Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formants Guide To Robotics As A Service
Formants Guide To Robotics As A Service
as a Service?
A Practical Guide to RaaS
Going to Market 18
Solving labor shortages vs. replacing humans
Touting the full spectrum of benefits
Positioning pilots for success
Looking at the to-do list above and the hefty price tag, most
businesses have put off or merely dabbled in the world of robotic
automation, scared off not by the technology itself but by the related
costs, labor, training, and risk of failure. This does not set the stage
for mass rollouts, but rather a smattering of pilots and trials poorly
positioned for long-term success and subsequent mass adoptions.
RaaS solution providers also remove much of the financial risk from
the equation for their customers. Instead of large capital expenditure
(CapEx) outlays, customers can fund their RaaS deployments out of
operating expenses (OpEx).
Plus those robots won’t run forever, so end-of-life for the machines
and their replacement costs must factor into the equation. Other
factors include operations and support personnel, maintenance
costs, setup, and deployment costs.
At the end of the day, these robots are competing with staffing
people to perform those same tasks. If the price point for the
customer isn’t competitive, then the model is broken from the start.
Relatedly, initial RaaS robot deployments may also not have as long
of a working life as learnings and iteration over time should yield
more cost-efficient robots with longer working lives, rendering earlier
generations obsolete. Patience is most certainly a virtue in this space.
Finally, since it’s still the early days for robotic automation, not
every investor may be up for the “Wild West” atmosphere of the
industry where lots of RaaS outfits are attempting land grabs with
competing solutions. There’s no established playbook for long-term
RaaS success, and the lack of benchmarks and comparables may
scare off potential backers that aren’t completely sold on the market
opportunity and potential.
For pre-seed investments, Hermann says “you need a strong idea and a
first technical MVP (which can be hacked together) just to show there’s
a path for a very specific solution which already can bring quick time
to value. You also need a founding team with technical expertise,
including someone with a Ph.D., post-doc or any other academic
relevant background. Most importantly, you need a big vision, although
you don’t need product-market fit yet.”
“Map out the investor market based on who else has invested
in similar robotics/tech companies at that stage,” he said,
recommending TechCrunch, Crunchbase and personal networks to
research this topic.
“Understand the goal, why I’m taking money, who’s the partner, and
what do I need from this partner” Hermann continued. “Create a first
wishlist, get warm introductions, and be bold. Ask other founders that
you don’t compete with directly for their guidance.”
“Many founders are great at talking tech, but only a few of them leave
the room/chat with an investor with clearly stating why their venture
it’s a massive opportunity for the investor & themselves,” Hermann
said. “All investors follow their theses on markets and a founder
should know them and pitch in a way that convinces the investor on
why their company fits into that vision.”
One winning ingredient is pitching more than just the hardware. RaaS
businesses should see margins at scale more comparable with SaaS
businesses than pure hardware plays, making them more attractive
to investors looking to get in on the automation and robotics wave
without adding a major outlier to their portfolio.
On the software side of the house, they’re looking for a really strong
offering with a large enough market opportunity. Too often, Hermann
says, the value proposition for software alone is slim, and there are
far fewer barriers to entry.
Customers may also find ways to pay for their RaaS deployments
using similar government funds. Additionally, there may be regulatory
and legislative pressure creating urgency for a RaaS solution, such as
California banning the sale of gas-powered lawn mowers by 2024. It’s
wise to keep tabs on how local regulations and laws make a particular
market segment even more open to RaaS.
That’s not to say that RaaS teams can’t have a vision for how their
offering will expand and evolve. Those aspirations should be taken
into consideration when mapping out their technology roadmaps,
pitching their business to the investment community, or even
attracting top talent. But a narrow initial focus free from distraction is
essential to make sure the business does one thing really well before
branching out into new territory.
Logistics
Logistics mobility solutions were some of the first RaaS offerings
to make a splash, helping to automate warehouses and shipping
facilities. These were a perfect environment for robotic automation
since items are stored in an organized manner and the entire facility is
a controlled environment dedicated to the task.
Property management
Real estate maintenance applications such as automated cleaning and
lawnmowing solutions are also picking up steam.
Robotic lawnmowers from the likes of Hire Henry and Mowfleet, and
will soon be trimming the grass in parks and along highways around
the world.
Other services
Personal services and healthcare applications are also prime targets
for RaaS solutions as entrepreneurs design and build offerings for
everything from delivering pizzas to disposing of hazardous biowaste.
Regulatory requirements can make the healthcare industry in
particular more challenging for a RaaS offering to break into, however.
It’s also a helpful reminder that machines already perform many tasks
formerly handled by manual labor. From washing dishes to harvesting
corn to opening garage doors, we now take it for granted that there
are better things for people to do when a machine can perform a task
easier and cheaper than a person can.
Reiterating the fact that these robots aren’t taking away jobs should
be fully ingrained in how RaaS companies research and approach
prospects and get reflected in the business case and ROI calculations
being marketed as part of the pitch.
And since robots are best suited for repetitive tasks, in many cases
their error rate is far superior to that of their human counterparts. For
example, installing drywall is a laborious task requiring lots of sanding
and finishing, but multiple firms have introduced robotic solutions for
this purpose.
For nearly any task, the robots don’t mind completing the job by
meeting the precise specifications and level of detail a human worker
might struggle to achieve in the same period of time. Unlike their Unlike their human
human counterparts, robots thrive when things are really boring and counterparts,
monotonous, with daydreaming and fatigue replaced by rigorous robots thrive
quality control and measurement. when things are
really boring and
Environmental wins monotonous
Many corporations and government entities have sustainability
reporting requirements and specific targets they’re either legally
obligated to meet or shooting for as part of their overall sustainability
strategy. RaaS solutions have plenty to offer in this department.
But the real wins in this department come when robotic applications
happen outdoors and near the general public. For example, while a
weekly visit from landscapers is usually accompanied by a cacophony
of gas-powered lawnmowers and leaf blowers, battery-powered
robots hum along at a much lower decibel level.
Also, these types of pilot customers are usually much more accepting
of the tweaks and modifications to be made based on some of the
early rough patches and unforeseen obstacles the pilot encounters.
When a robot gets stuck in a ditch or its sensors get covered in mud
Hermann says that ideal pilot customers are usually businesses run
by younger leaders open to new ideas or relatively new industries still
figuring things out themselves, such as cannabis farmers trying to
optimize their yields or the next generation of a family farm interested
in modernizing their operations. They’re also likely to be far more
comfortable sharing important data the RaaS business needs to
optimize and enhance their offering.
“Whitepapers are gold,” Dr Holmes said of their utility during the sales
cycle and for fundraising. “They see the hard data and calculations,
and the final number is really impressive with how much they’re
saving and how much productivity they’re increasing.”
A limited scope
Early pilots should try to do one thing well on a relatively small scale.
No unproven RaaS firm should approach a prospect and, for example,
offer to automate an entire farm. Instead, start with a single field and
solely focus on harvesting or yield optimization.
And by only trying to perform one task with RaaS, it’s much easier to
assess and prove the superiority of the RaaS solution. When robots
are doing too many things at once it’s less clear to evaluate the net
benefits of each function.
Hire Henry also makes a point of engaging with the technology and
innovation parts of customer organizations so they can plug their
solution into the broader technology roadmap. These departments
RaaS firms can set the stage for this conversation by assessing the
current operations expenses, required labor, environmental impact,
and efficiency. These are the numbers the pilot must equal if not
better to qualify as a success.
From that starting point, the RaaS business can calculate the
expected savings and productivity gains from their solution. With a
little bit of padding, these can serve as a starting point for an ROI
calculation and target for the pilot.
Real-time visibility
Both RaaS businesses and their pilot customers derive real benefits
from a steady stream of data coming out of these early deployments.
Creating a dashboard that aggregates and provides easy access to
these insights keeps everyone engaged and informed, leading to
faster actions and expedited expansion.
For many founders, building robots from scratch is the fun part,
but that thinking runs counter to a successful RaaS model, which is
bringing solutions to market at scale as cheaply as possible. Rolling
your own is seldom competitive at scale.
If there really is no other choice, the company can still develop its own
hardware, but they should really limit those efforts only to those parts
that no one else offers at an attractive price point, otherwise relying
on a platform built with third-party parts. This will keep the cost of the
overall robots down—which makes it easier to turn a profit and sell the
service at a lower price to improve the ROI for customers.
These solutions eliminate the need for RaaS companies to build their
own software solutions for sending robots commands (even when
they’re offline), managing data uploads from the robots, aggregating
Do one thing really
that data, and turning it into a useful management console and
well while having a
reporting dashboard. Issues are identified faster and remote
vision for what else
corrections and fixes can be performed to minimize any disruption.
robotic automation
could offer those
The RaaS model depends on those businesses managing greater customers
and greater numbers of robots per employee, so it makes sense to
leverage the ready-built tools designed to make that a reality and
reduce the need for expensive on-site visits. These tools also don’t
require PhD-level familiarity with robotics so operations teams can
find talent more easily.
Since the RaaS business model usually takes years to pay off the
hardware for each deployment, companies need a way to front the
cash for more robots to service these additional customers and
The last thing anyone wants to stifle growth are easily preventable
cashflow issues. And don’t forget that all those extra robots will
probably require increased headcount as well to maintain a high level
of service and deal velocity.