Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANALYSIS
F(t)
𝑐𝜔
With 𝜙 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛−1
𝑘−𝑚𝜔2
𝐹0
Introducing 𝛿𝑆𝑇 = , one can write
𝑘
𝑋 1
=
𝛿𝑆𝑇 2 2 2
𝜔 𝜔
1− + 2𝜉
𝜔0 𝜔0
Random process
Sample function
Random Variable
Ensemble
Solution can be done using
1. Time domain analysis
2. Developing Response Spectrum
3. Spectral domain analysis
Ensemble averages
1. Mean value
2. Auto-correlation Function
If the ensemble averages are independent of choice of time, t such a Random Process is
called a STATIONARY RANDOM PROCESS
1) Temporal mean
2) Temporal autocorrelation
If it is found that the statistical averages of each one of the sample is constant such a
process is called an ergodic process
An Ergodic process must be necessarily Stationary but the opposite is not necessarily
true
𝑇
𝑥 𝑡 = 𝑥0 0 < 𝑡 <
2
𝑇
=0 <𝑡<𝑇
2
𝑇
1 2 𝑥0
Mean Value 𝑥ҧ = 𝑥 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 =
𝑇 0 2
𝑥02
Mean square value 𝑥2 = 2
𝑇
1 𝑇 1 2−𝜏 2
𝑅 𝜏 = න 𝑥 𝑡 𝑥 𝑡 + 𝜏 𝑑𝑡 = න 𝑥0 𝑑𝑡
𝑇 0 𝑇 0
1 𝜏 𝑇
= 𝑥02 2
− 𝑇 𝑓𝑜𝑟 0 < 𝜏 < 2
𝑅 𝜏
𝑇
1 2 1 𝜏 𝑇
= න 𝑥02 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑥02 − + 𝑓𝑜𝑟 < 𝜏 < 𝑇
𝑇 𝑇−𝜏 2 𝑇 2
∞
Special cases – Expected value of x or mean value of x -> 𝐸 𝑥 = 𝑥ҧ = −∞ 𝑥𝑝 𝑥 𝑑𝑥
∞
- Mean square value of x -> 𝐸 𝑥 2 = 𝑥 2 = −∞ 𝑥 2 𝑝 𝑥 𝑑𝑥
Let
Assuming f(t) describe the voltage, then mean square value of f(t) gives the energy
dissipated across a 1-ohm resistor
Integral of over ranging over - to + gives the total mean power of f(t)
Hence the name Power Density Spectrum or Power Spectral Density (PSD)
Now, the power dissipated in a 1-ohm resistor by the frequency component of voltage
f(t) lying in an infinitesimal band between and +d is proportional to
𝑑𝑃(𝑥) 1
𝑝 𝑥 = =
𝑑𝑥 𝜋 1 − 𝑎2
We have already seen that for any arbitrary excitation f(t), the response can be
written as,
Now we take the Fourier Transform of both the LHS and the RHS
Where,
This is true for any arbitrary excitation. Our interest is when the excitation is random and
stationary.
However, it can be shown that for a stationary random process E[f(t-)] = E[f(t)] that yields
More often than not, the excitation random process is expressed in terms of Power
Spectral Density rather than in terms of autocorrelation. It is in such cases expedient to
obtain the PSD of the response as well. The PSD of the response can be expressed as,
Gust response, Turbulent Boundary Layer Excitation, Wave dynamics, Jet noise,
Automobile response etc. are obtained using this methodology
𝑚𝑥ሷ + 𝑐 𝑥ሶ − 𝑦ሶ + 𝑘 𝑥 − 𝑦 = 0
𝑥ሷ + 2𝜁𝜔𝑛 𝑥ሶ − 𝑦ሶ + 𝜔𝑛2 𝑥 − 𝑦 = 0
Let f(t) be random ergodic process. Hence x(t) will also be random and ergodic
Without any loss of generality one can assume E[f(t)] = 0 that leads to E[x(t)] = 0
And
On substitution
On rearranging
Finally expressing the force in terms only from force and wind speed can be written as,
This equation is quite satisfactory for gusts which completely envelope the structure, i.e.
for the small point-like object considered in this analysis so far. However, now consider
the situation where the object grows in size to become large, larger than some of the
gusts. In such a situation, the equation as shown above would obviously overestimate
the force for small gusts which are not completely correlated over the entire surface of
the large object. It can be argued that this “lack of correlation” is related to the size of a
gust with respect to the size of the structure. This thinking leads to the concept of the
“aerodynamic admittance”.
If A represents the area of the object, then a characteristic dimension for the structure
is
How much gust force is transferred to a structure should be dependent on the ratio
Once the wind spectrum is defined one has to obtain the structural response for the
same. It depends upon the wind excitation frequencies in relation to the natural
frequency of the structure. Hence the dynamic behavior of the structure needs to be
considered. The dynamic magnification factor is earlier defined as,
𝐹0
𝑥(𝑓) = 𝐻(𝑓)
𝑘
or,
with,
The peak response can be expressed as, 𝑥ො = 𝑥ҧ + 𝑔𝜎𝑥 . The value of ‘g’ can be estimated as,
1ൗ
2
𝑔 ≅ 2𝑙𝑛 3600𝑓0
A slightly modified value is prescribed in the BIS code as per Vickery (1972)
1. An introduction to the basic structural dynamics with a focus into Civil Engineering
structures is presented
2. Analysis technique to be adopted for both deterministic and non-deterministic load is
discussed
3. Power spectral density technique is discussed with a special focus in wind
engineering application
4. The users are encouraged to explore the use of numerical techniques and FE
modeling technique for large structures.
References: