Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BY AMANUEL TESHOME
JANUARY 2019
JIMMA,ETHIOPIA
JIMMA UNIVERSITY
BY AMANUEL TESHOME
JANUARY 2019
JIMMA,ETHIOPIA
i
ABSTRACT
Background:
Although pharmacotherapy in cardiovascular diseases can improve the well-being, its benefit can
be compromised by drug- therapy problems. A study conducted in Coimbatore showed that Drug
interactions (46.19%), drug over dosage (17.26%) and drug duplication (11.17%) were the most
frequently occurring drug therapy problems.
Study conducted in Felege hiwot referral hospital among cardiovascular patients a total of 105
numbers of DTPs were identified with the mean number of DTP was 1.38 + 0.8. Most of the
patients had drug therapy problem, of which indication related problems constituted the highest
part. The aim of this study will be characterize the prevalence of drug therapy problems among
hospitalized patients with cardiovascular diseases in Dembi Dollo Hospital.
Objective: The objective of the research will be to characterize the prevalence of drug therapy
problems among hospitalized patients with cardiovascular diseases in Dembi Dollo, West
Oromia, Ethiopia.
Methods and materials: Hospital based prospective cross sectional study design will be
used. A convenient sampling will be used. All admitted patients with cardiovascular disease/s,
in Dembi Dollo hospital fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be included. Four Pharmacy
interns will be involved in collecting the data. Interview guided semi-structured questionnaire,
data extraction formats for card review and drug therapy problem evaluating questionnaires will
be used for data collection. Finally data will be coded, edited and processed to meet the objective
of the study.
Work plan and Budget: The data will be collected from April 20 to may 05 2019 G.C and
the budget required will be 2000 Ethiopian birr.
Key words: Drug therapy problem, Dembi Dollo hospital, Drug related problems
i
Acknowledgment
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my adviser Mr. Fekede Bekele for his
constructive advice in the preparation of this proposal. My sincere gratitude also goes to my
lovely family and colleagues for their tireless support and encouragement throughout the years
of my study. Last but not least, I would like to acknowledge Jimma University, Institute of
Health Science, and Department of Pharmacy for providing me this golden chance to conduct
this study.
ii
Table of Contents
Acknowledgment.........................................................................................................................................4
CHAPTER ONE:.............................................................................................................................................1
Background..............................................................................................................................................1
Statement of the problem.......................................................................................................................2
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW.........................................................................................................3
Literature Review....................................................................................................................................3
Significance of the study..........................................................................................................................4
CHAPTER THREE..........................................................................................................................................5
3.1 General objective...............................................................................................................................5
3.2 Specific Objectives.............................................................................................................................5
CHAPTER FOUR: METHODS AND MATERIALS..............................................................................................6
4.1 STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................................................6
4.2 Study period......................................................................................................................................6
4.3 Study Design......................................................................................................................................6
4.4 POPULATION......................................................................................................................................6
4.4. 1 Source population......................................................................................................................6
4.4.2 The study Population :................................................................................................................6
4.5 Sample size and sampling technique.................................................................................................7
4.6 Sample size and Sampling technique.................................................................................................8
Variables..............................................................................................................................................8
Independent variable..........................................................................................................................8
Dependent variables............................................................................................................................8
4.7 Operational definition of terms.........................................................................................................8
4.8 Data collection procedure and Instrument........................................................................................9
4.9 Data processing & analysis................................................................................................................9
4.10 Data quality assurance.....................................................................................................................9
4.11 Ethical considerations......................................................................................................................9
4.12 Result dissemination plan..............................................................................................................10
4.13 Possible limitation of the study.....................................................................................................10
CHAPTER FIVE: WORK PLAN.....................................................................................................................11
iii
CHAPTER SIX: BUDGET...............................................................................................................................12
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................................13
ANNEX:......................................................................................................................................................14
TABLE 1. Socio demographic characteristics of the study population..................................................14
ANNEX II:QUESTIONARIES.........................................................................................................................17
iv
List of tables
Table 1.Socio demographic characteristics of the study population
Table 2. Type and number of DTPs among patients with CVD admitted in DDH
Table 3.
v
List of acronyms and abbreviations
DTP….drug therapy problem
DDH….Dembi Dollo hospital
ADR…Adverse drug reaction
CVD…Cardiovascular disease
DRP….Drug related problems
ME……Medication error
NGO…. Non governmental organization
vi
vii
CHAPTER ONE:
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The identification of drug therapy problems (DTP) is the focus of the assessment and the last
decision made in that step of the patient care process. Although drug therapy problem
identification is technically part of the assessment process, it represents the truly unique
contribution made by pharmaceutical care practitioners [5].
Drug therapy problem is an undesired patient experience that involves drug therapy and that
actually or potentially interferes with the desired Patient outcome. It is an event or
Circumstance involving drug therapy that actually or potentially interferes with desired health
outcomes. They are known to be the a major problem associated with pharmacotherapy[11,8].
According to Robert J. Cipolle text book of pharmaceutical care practice (third edition), there
are seven basic categories of DTPs. These are: Need for additional therapy, Unnecessary drug
therapy, Wrong drug, Dosage too low, Adverse drug reaction(ADR), Dosage too high and Non-
compliance[10]
Drug-related problems (DRP) include medication errors (ME) (involving an error in the process
of prescribing, dispensing, or administering a drug, whether there are adverse consequences or
not) and adverse drug reactions (any response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and
which occurs at doses normally used in humans for prophylaxis, diagnosis or therapy of disease,
or for the modification of physiological function). Medication error rates found in observational
studies are reported to vary between 1.7 and 59%, in which prescribing errors are reported to be
0.3-2.6%. Medication errors also frequent cause for adverse drug reaction. Incidences of ADR
reported in studies published since 1991 vary between 1.9 and 37.3% 2. Studies estimated that
adverse drug events (ADEs) account for approximately 5% of all hospital admissions, occur
during 10–20% of hospitalizations and are responsible for 7–9% of hospitalization days. Incident
ADEs cause by medication errors were observed in 1 out of 250 patients and accounted for
approximately 6% of ADEs and accounted for 30% of ADE-related hospital admissions[15]
Many studies have shown DRPs to be very common in primary care and in hospital settings.
Problems associated with drug use are many and includes inappropriate medication prescribing,
discrepancies between prescribed and actual regimens, poor adherence, drug interactions,
inappropriate use, patients monitoring and inadequate surveillance for adverse effects etc. Drug
related problems may leads to reduced quality of life, increase hospital stay, overall increase
health cost and even increase risk of morbidity and mortality 4-6. However, studies shows that
majority of Drug-related problems (50-80%) are often preventable, and pharmaceutical services
can reduce the number of ADRs, the length of hospital stays, and the cost of care (8,15).
1
1.2 Statement of the problem
Drug related problems are of a major concern in health care because of increased cost, morbidity
and mortality. DTP is associated with prolonged length of stay, increased economic burden, and
an almost 2-fold increased risk of death. Drug therapy problems are the dominant reasons for
admission. Cardiovascular diseases are the number one cause of death globally, more people die
annually from cardio vascular diseases (CVDs) than any other causes. Most developing countries
will experience the double burden of pre-transitional and post-transitional disease. The potential
costs of CVDs epidemic for African countries are staggering. It is estimated to cost (direct and
indirect) $300 billion annually in USA, equal to the entire gross domestic product of the African
continent. Of death in the sub Saharan region, CVD is the second leading killer over the age of
30 year. This shows appropriate management should be used to decreases such problem. On the
hand other researcher found, even single-disease management does not appear promising as a
strategy to care for patients [5]
2
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Literature Review
According to a study conducted in general midicine and cardiology department of 640 beded
multi disciplinary tertiary care hospital at coimbatore on 80 patients. The major diagnoses
included systemic hypertension (SHT) 47.5%, ischemic heart disease (IHD) 16.25%, congestive
cardiac failure (CCF) 10%, and cerebro vascular accident (CVA) 7.5%. A total of 1051 drugs
were prescribed during the study period. Patients with SHT were prescribed with 494 drugs.A
total of 112 DRPs (28.43%) were identified in these patients (4.77 ± 0.683). Among the IHD
patients who received a total of 217 drugs (9.86 ± 2.45), 71 DRPs (18.02%) were recognized
with a mean of 4.64 ± 0.71. About 129 drugs were prescribed in patients with CCF with a mean
of 9.21 ± 2.359 and a sum of 47 (11.93%) DRPs (4.21 ± 0.745) were observed. In patients with
CVA, 70 drugs (10 ± 3.16) were prescribed and 33 (8.38%) DRPs (4.69 ± 0.49) were identified.
In patients with SHT and IHD, the most frequently identified DRPs were drug interactions
(54.46% & 57.75%), drug over dosage (12.5% & 11.27%) and drug duplication (8.93% &
8.45%)[15].
According to an observational study involving 340 patients aged over 60 years using at least five
prescription drugs and discharged from hospital In total, 992 potential DRP were observed in the
340 patients (mean 2.9 ± 1.7). No drug prescribed but clear indication, an unnecessarily long
duration of treatment, dose too low, and incorrect drug selection were the DRP most commonly
observed. Ten percent of DRP occurring in 71 patients were drug–drug interactions. The number
of DRP was related to the number of drugs prescribed. Frequently occurring DRP found using
the patient interview were fear of side effects and inadequate knowledge of drug use.
Medication of patients discharged from the pulmonary department and of those with type 2
diabetes was particularly associated with occurrence of DRP [14]
According to a study conduted in india teriary care teaching hospital a total of 112 patient case
sheets were reviewed during the study period, out of which 53 drug related problems were
identified from 44 patients. The most common drug related problem was found to be drug
Interactions (49.05%) followed by Adverse Drug Reaction (18.86%), and failure to receive drugs
(9.43%). The most frequent suggestions provided by the intervening pharmacist were cessation
of drug (24.52%), followed by Change in frequency of administration (22.64%), change in drug
dose (20.75%). The majority of level of significance of drug related problems was seen to have
moderate significance in grade. The acceptance rate of recommendations and change in drug
therapy was found to be high (96.21%)[3].
According to Hospital based general cohort study conducted in Felegehiwot referal hospital
north east ethiopia on total of 76 cardiac patients The most common diseases encountered
during the data collection period were hypertensive heart diseases (26, 32.9%), rheumatic heart
diseases (24, 31.6%) and functional heart failure and corpulmonale (pulmonary heart disease)
(14, 18.4%). Heart failure (70, 78.9%) was the common syndrome that accompanied the
admission of greater number of patients. A total of 230 numbers of drugs were used. The mean
number of drug was 3 + 1.4 per patient. A maximum of seven numbers of drugs were
prescribed. Diuretics (58, 76.3%) and antibiotics (40, 52.6%) were the commonly used drug. A
total of 73 (96.1%) patients had one or more DTP/s. There was a total of 105 DTPs identified.
The mean number of DTP was 1.38 + 0.8 per patient. The maximum number of DTPs was four.
Most of the patients (35, 46.1%) had two DTPs[5].
4
CHAPTER THREE
3. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
5
CHAPTER FOUR: METHODS AND MATERIALS
4.1 Study area
This study will be conducted in Dembi dollo hospital, kellem wollega,,west oromia and Ethiopia.
Geographically, DD is located 639km away from Addis Abeba.
4.4 POPULATION
Inclusion criteria
Patients who are admitted with CVD.
Exclusion Criteria
Incomplete information on the patient card.
If patients discharched before cross checking the collected data
Unconscious and patients who have no care giver that facilitates communication with the
interviewer (Intensive care patients)
6
Those not willing to participate(interviewed)
Sample size
The following sample size determination formula will used
n= (Z∂/2)2 x P (1-p)
d2 where, n=required sample size
Z = the standard normal variables at 95% level of confidence
P-73.5% = (taken from the previous data research) [18]
d= margin of sampling error tolerated= 0.05
= 134
7
4.6 Sample size and Sampling technique
The sample size will be depending on the number of patients admitted during data collection
time. Convenient sampling technique was used as per the data collection period and inclusion
criteria. If the sample size is too small during the data collection period the data will be extended
for one week.
Variables
Independent variable
Socio demographic characteristics such as;
Age,
sex,
marital status
Educational level
religion
Length of hospital stay
number of drugs and co morbidities social drug use
medication history
organ function test
Dependent variables
Presence of DTP
The data collectors and the advisor will review all filled checklists.
Documented DTPs will be validated by the advisor
9
Privacy and confidentiality will be ensured during the pharmaceutical care services. Thus, name
and address of the patient will not be recorded in the DTP data collection checklist.
The results of the study will be disseminated to relevant bodies such as woreda health office, JU,
other concerning body etc.
This will be done through submission of reports and presenting findings at appropriate seminars,
workshops and conferences. Besides publication of the study findings on the reputable peer-
reviewed local/international journal will be considered.
10
CHAPTER FIVE: WORK PLAN
1. Title Pi $ advisor
selection
2. Proposal PI
Development
3. Finalize PI
proposal
4. Proposal PI
presentation
5. Pre test
Key: PI =
6. Data PI $DC Principal
collection
Investigator
7. Data PI or DC =
Data collector
analysis
8. Report PI
writing
9. Submission PI
of first,
second&
final draft
10. Report PI
presentation
and
submission
11
CHAPTER SIX: BUDGET
collectors training
Coffee/tea during data 4 4 40.00 640.00
collection for data collectors
Sub total _ _ _ 820.00
Contingency _ _ 10% 80.00
Quantity Unit cost(ET, Total cost
2 Stationary cost
birr)
Pen 4 5.00 20
Pencil 4 3.00 12
Eraser 4 2.00 8
Sharper 4 2.00 8
Proposal printing and laminating 2 40.00 80
Research report printing and laminating 2 50.00 100
Subtotal _ 228
Contingency 10% 23
Grand total _ _ 1299
12
REFERENCES
1. Rania Reedman Abraham. drug related problems and reactive pharmacist intervention for
patients receiving cardiovascular drugs. international journal of basic medical science and
pharmacy 2013December; 3(2):42-48
2. Palomar G, Shalom I, Jose E, Laura T, M.AntoniaM, Antoni B. Negative clinical outcomes
associated with DRPs in heart failure outpatients, impacts of pharmacist in a multi-
disciplinary heart failure clinic. journal of cardiac failure, 2011;17(32011): 217-233
3. Marten H, Vander W, Tiny J,Dirk JV.Noncompliance in patients with heart failure, how we
can manage it?.European journal of heart failure, 2005;7: 5-7
4. Salish, Assessment of clinical pharmacist intervention in tertiary care hospital of southern
India. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research ,2013; 6(2):0974-2441
5. Syed F.et al ,reasons for noncompliance in heart failure patients , Pakistan heart journal
july-december 2011, 43: 3-4
6. Gobezie T, Belay Y, Elias A, Belayed K, Masala D .Drug Therapy Problem among Patients
with Cardiovascular Diseases in felege hiwot Referral Hospital, North East, Ethiopia.
international journal of pharmacy teaching and practice2014;5(3):989-996
7. Mohammednur H, Jimi L, Minyahil A, Obese T, Guru T,Hun duma D, Belayed K. Clinical
Assessment of Drug Related Problems among Hypertensive Patients on follow up in Adam
Hospital Medical College, East Ethiopia. Bio pharm 2014; 3(2)
8. CjEng T, Bruce J, Debra J G, Alison R M, Emily J T. barriers to medication adherence in
chronic heart failure patients during home visit, journal of pharmacy practice and
research ,2010; 40(1 ):27-28
9. Saied FM Tariq M, Denial Khalid.personal and social factors regarding medical
noncompliance in cardiac failure patents. journal of the college of physicians and surgeons
Pakistan 2011;21(11):659-661
10. Richard S, Vicky C, Roger W.Adverse drug events and associated factors in heart failure
patients, among very elderly. Guadiana geriatrics journal, 2011December; 14( 4):79
13
11. Bereket MT, Daniel D, Belete H. Drug-related problems among medical ward patients in
Jimmia university specialized hospital, Southwest Ethiopia, journal of research in pharmacy
practice,2014 january-march;3(1):1-5
12. Jived S. teal, Assessment of DTP in patients with cardiovascular diseases in a tertiary care
hospital in India, journal of pharmaceutical care,2014; 2(2):70-76
13. Salish, Assessment of clinical pharmacist intervention in tertiary care hospital of southern
India. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research ,2013; 6(2):0974-2441
14. pro, Dr. Beer hard parlor D. pharmaceutical care practice, DRP and opportunities for new
services , April 2010.
Sex Male
Total
Age 15-35
36-65
≥65
Lives alone
14
Married
Widowed
Divorced
Education Illiterate
Primary school
Secondary school
Tobacco
Alcohol
Caffeine
Family history No
CVD
Diabetes
Morethan one
family history
Employed
Private
Post employed
TABLE 2. Type and number of DTPs among patients with CVD admitted in DDH
15
Table 2 showing the type and percentage of DTs
Duplicate therapy
Treating avoidable
ADR
Total
Untreated medical
2.Needs additional condition
drug therapy
Preventive or
prophylaxis
Synergistic or
potentiating
Total
5.ADR Frequency
inappropriate
Undesired effect
Drug interaction
Total
16
Total
Direction not
understood
7.compliance
Patient preferred not
to take
Total
ANNEX II:QUESTIONARIES
Data collection tool to identify drug therapy problems and associated factors among hospitalized
cardiovascular patients ……cont.d
17