Department of Project Management

Masters of Science in Project Management

Article Review Title: Sustainable Project Closure: Integrating Environmental and Social
Considerations in Project Management Implementation

Course: Project management implementation and closure

Reviewed by: - Fuad Kasim

Id.No: -

Summited To: -Mengistu D. (Ass. Professor)

February, 2024

Jimma, Ethiopia
1
Title: Sustainable Project Closure: Integrating Environmental and Social Considerations in Project
Management Implementation

Author: Jane Doe

Year of Publication: 2023

Publisher: Journal of Sustainable Project Management

Abstract

The present article explores the critical aspect of sustainable project closure, delving into the
integration of environmental and social considerations within project management implementation. It
discusses the growing significance of sustainable practices in project closure and the impact of
environmental and social factors on project outcomes. The review encompasses the analysis of
existing literature, case studies, and empirical evidence to provide insights into effective strategies for
incorporating environmental and social considerations into project management practices. The article
aims to shed light on the implications of sustainable project closure for organizations, stakeholders,
and the broader community, emphasizing the need for balanced, environmentally conscious, and
socially responsible project management practices.

Introduction

In recent years, the global emphasis on sustainability has spurred a paradigm shift in the project
management landscape, necessitating a holistic approach to project closure. This review endeavors to
dissect the multifaceted concept of sustainable project closure, focusing on the fusion of
environmental and social dimensions within project management frameworks. As organizations seek
to align their operations with sustainable development goals and environmental regulations, the
integration of environmental and social considerations in project closure has emerged as a critical
success factor. This introduction sets the stage for a thorough examination of the significance,
challenges, and best practices associated with sustainable project closure, priming the discussion for
an in-depth exploration of theoretical frameworks and methodologies underpinning the concept.

1
 Main Body

The main body of this review delineates the integral components of sustainable project closure,
articulating the interplay between environmental and social considerations and project management
implementation. It dissects the environmental impact assessment methodologies, stakeholder
engagement strategies, and regulatory compliance frameworks that underpin sustainable project
closure initiatives. Furthermore, the review analyzes the evolving role of environmental policies,
corporate social responsibility imperatives, and community-based approaches to project closure,
offering practical insights into the incorporation of sustainability principles throughout the project
lifecycle. Drawing from empirical evidence and industry best practices, the discussion encompasses
the challenges, opportunities, and potential trade-offs associated with sustainable project closure,
fostering a nuanced understanding of the complexities involved.

Objectives of the Article Review

The primary objective of this article review is to elucidate the pivotal role of sustainable project
closure and the integration of environmental and social considerations within project management.
This encompasses an in-depth analysis of the theoretical underpinnings, methodologies, and practical
implications associated with sustainable project closure, aiming to distill actionable recommendations
for project management professionals, organizational leaders, and policymakers.

Significance of the Article Review

This review holds notable significance in the realm of project management and sustainability,
offering a comprehensive exploration of the contemporary imperatives underpinning sustainable
project closure. By addressing the fusion of environmental and social considerations within project
management, the article review provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of project
closure practices, highlighting the imperative for organizations to embrace environmentally
responsible and socially conscious approaches to project implementation.

Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework of this review revolves around the convergence of environmental
sustainability, social responsibility, and project management theories. It encompasses the
incorporation of sustainable development paradigms, stakeholder theory, environmental impact
2
assessment models, and corporate sustainability frameworks within the project management domain.
The review delineates the theoretical underpinnings that inform the seamless integration of
environmental and social considerations in project closure, anchoring the discussion in established
theoretical constructs while exploring the emergent dimensions of sustainability within project
management.

Methodology Used in the Article Review

The methodology employed in this article review encompasses a comprehensive analysis of scholarly
literature, empirical case studies, and industry reports pertaining to sustainable project closure and the
integration of environmental and social considerations in project management. The review
synthesizes existing research findings, leveraging a qualitative approach to distill trends, best
practices, and critical insights while offering a panoramic view of sustainable project closure
paradigms.

Critique of the Article Review

While the article review offers a multifaceted exploration of sustainable project closure, it is essential
to acknowledge that certain limitations exist. These may encompass potential biases within the
selected literature, limitations in the generalizability of empirical findings, and the dynamic nature of
sustainability paradigms, which warrant continuous reassessment and refinement in light of evolving
environmental and social dynamics.

Contribution or Findings of the Article Review

The article review contributes to the existing body of knowledge by offering a nuanced understanding
of sustainable project closure and its relevance in contemporary project management landscapes. It
furnishes practical insights, navigable strategies, and actionable recommendations for integrating
environmental and social considerations within project closure practices, enjoining organizations to
adopt environmentally responsible and socially conscious project management approaches.

Strengths

The strength of this article review lies in its comprehensive coverage of the interplay between
environmental and social considerations within project management implementation. It effectively

3
synthesizes diverse perspectives, theoretical constructs, and empirical evidence, facilitating a holistic
comprehension of sustainable project closure imperatives and opportunities.

Weaknesses

The article review may be subject to potential limitations relating to the currency of certain empirical
studies, the scope of the selected literature, and the dynamic nature of sustainability frameworks.
Additionally, the review may grapple with challenges related to the generalizability of findings across
diverse industry sectors and geographic contexts.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the article review calls attention to the transformative potential of sustainable project
closure, emphasizing the imperative of integrating environmental and social considerations in project
management. It advocates for multifaceted strategies that align organizational objectives with
environmental stewardship and social responsibility, thereby fostering sustainable project outcomes.
As organizations navigate the complexities of project closure in contemporary landscapes, embracing
holistic and sustainable approaches will catalyze positive environmental and social impacts while
engendering long-term organizational resilience and stakeholder value.

4
 References

 Author1, A., & Author2, B. (Year). Title of the first reference. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.
 Author3, C., Author4, D., & Author5, E. (Year). Title of the second reference. Journal Name,
Volume(Issue), Pages.
 Author6, F., & Author7, G. (Year). Title of the third reference. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.
 Author8, H., Author9, I., & Author10, J. (Year). Title of the fourth reference. Journal Name,
Volume(Issue), Pages.
 Author11, K., Author12, L., & Author13, M. (Year). Title of the fifth reference. Journal Name,
Volume(Issue), Pages.
 Author14, N., & Author15, O. (Year). Title of the sixth reference. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.
 Author16, P., Author17, Q., & Author18, R. (Year). Title of the seventh reference. Journal Name,
Volume(Issue), Pages.
 Author19, S., & Author20, T. (Year). Title of the eighth reference. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.
 Author21, U., Author22, V., & Author23, W. (Year). Title of the ninth reference. Journal Name,
Volume(Issue), Pages.
 Author24, X., & Author25, Y. (Year). Title of the tenth reference. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.