You are on page 1of 3

1772 RESEARCH NOTES

21.1°C. for the first four weeks in respec- eighteen to thirty-two days of age. J. Nutri-
tive order. The relative humidity may be tion, 4 1 : 25-30.
Siegel, P. B., and R. H. Coles, 1958. The effects of
either 30 or 60% without harmful effects.
early humidities on broiler production. Proc.
REFERENCES Assoc. Southern Agricultural Workers, 55:
Barrott, H. G., and E. M. Pringle, 1947. Effect of 240-241.
environment on growth and feed and water Sturkie, P. D., 1965. Avian Physiology, Second
consumption of chickens. I. The effect of tem- Edition, pp. 221 and 246.
perature of environment during the first nine Wekstein, D. R., and J. F. Zolman, 1967. Hom-
days after hatch. J. Nutrition, 34: 53-58. eothermic developments of the young chick.
Barrott, H. G., and E. M. Pringle, 1948. Effect of Proc. Soc. Exper. Biology Med. 125: 294-297.
environment on growth and feed and water Wekstein, D. R., and J. F. Zolman, 1966. Personal
consumption of chickens. II. The effect of tem- communication.
perature and humidity of environment during Wilson, W. O., U. K. Abbott and H. Abplanalp,
the first eighteen days after hatch. J. Nutrition, 1961. Evaluation of coturnix (Japanese quail)
37: 153-161. as pilot animal for poultry. Poultry Sci. 40:
Barrott, H. G., and E. M. Pringle, 1950. Effect of 6S1-6S7.
environment on growth and feed and water Wilson, W. O., H. Ota and T. D. Siopes, 1969.
consumption of chickens. III. The effect of tem- Avian bioclimate chambers for research. Poultry
perature of environment during the period from Sci. 48: 1085-1090.

COMPARISON OF SPROUTED VERSUS NORMAL WHEAT WHEN FED


TO WHITE LEGHORN COCKEREL CHICKS
L. F. FALEN AND C. F. PETERSEN
Department of Poultry Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83843

(Received for publication August 22, 1969)

Current U. S. grade standards discount TABLE 1.—Composition of basal diet*


wheat in a lot showing more than two per-
Ingredients Percent
cent sprouting. The grade is lowered with
increased sprouting until, at IS percent, the Normal wheat 61.0
Dehyd. alfalfa meal 2.5
grain is classified sample grade. Recent Soybean meal (48% protein) 22.0
data (Murray and Huber, 1968) indicate Herring fish meal 5.0
Meat and bone scraps 5.0
that the chemical composition of sprouted
wheat may not be different from normal * Balance of the diet composed of mineral and
vitamin supplements with chromic oxide added at
grains. In this experiment sprouted wheat 0.2 percent for use in M.E. determinations.
was compared to normal wheat using meta-
bolizable energy determinations and gain in
body weight of White Leghorn cockerel pared to normal wheat. Sprouted wheat
chicks as the basis of comparison. was evaluated at 25, SO, 75 and 100 per-
cent replacement of normal wheat in a
EXPERIMENTAL
high-energy starter ration. The composition
Gaines wheat which contained approxi- of the basal diet is shown in Table 1.
mately 60% sprouted kernels was corn- Two hundred day-old White Leghorn
Published with the approval of the Director of cockerel chicks were housed in a Jamesway
the Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station as Re- Universal battery and fed the control
search Paper No. 801. wheat diet for two days. All chicks were
RESEARCH NOTES 1773

then individually weighed and ISO assigned TABLE 2.—Chemical composition of sprouted and
non-sprouted Gaines soft white winter wheat
to the experimental lots so that each lot
contained 15 chicks of similar weights. Du- Component Sprouted* Non-sprouted**
plicate lots were fed the experimental ra-
Moisture 7.99% 7.01%
tions for a 28-day period with body Ash 1.93 2.19
weights being recorded at 7, 14, 21 and 28 Fat 0.88 0.79
Crude fiber 3.57 3.22
days. Feed consumption for each lot was Protein 13.16 12.32
determined for the 28-day period. Feed and N.F.E. 72.47 74.47
Ca 1.56 1.88
water were supplied ad libitum. Chromic P 1.24 1.16
oxide was added to the diets 10 days before
* Test weight sprouted wheat 55.9 pounds per
a 3-day fecal collection period. Metaboliz- bushel.
able energy was determined employing the ** Test weight normal wheat 60.4 pounds per
bushel.
procedures of Hill and Anderson (1958).
Chemical analysis of the sprouted and
non-sprouted Gaines wheat (Table 2) indi- able energy was found between the two
cated only minor differences in protein, wheats when each comprised 100 percent of
fat, fiber, ash and moisture. the grain portion of the ration. However,
metabolizable energy was significantly
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION higher for combinations of sprouted and
The evaluation of normal vs. sprouted normal wheat than for either wheat when
wheat is summarized in Table 3. Substitu- fed alone. There was a tendency for the
tion of 25 to 100 percent sprouted wheat chicks to metabolize more energy with the
for normal wheat resulted in no difference 1:1 ratio of the two grains; however, there
in average weight gain or efficiency of feed was no statistical difference in M.E. when
utilization. Thus, in terms of weight gain the ratios of normal to sprouted wheat
or feed efficiency, no deleterious effect of were 1:3, 1:1, or 3:1 respectively.
feeding sprouted wheat to young birds was Sprouted wheat can be successfully used
found. in rations for poultry as based upon early
No significant difference in metaboliz- chick growth data.

TABLE 3.—Summary of evaluation of normal vs. sprouted Gaines wheat in the diet of
White Leghorn cockerel chicks to 4 weeks of age

Percent wheat in diet: Body wt. gain in g. g. feed/g. gain Metabolizable


Normal Sprouted Repl. Av. Repl. Av. Kcal./g.
61.00 — 405 2.06
405 405a* 2.08 2.07 2.5998a*

45.75 15.25 420 1.95


415 417a 1.96 1.95 2.7207b

30.50 30.50 404 2.09


406 405a 2.03 2.06 2.7443b
15.25 45.75 398 2.10
419 409a 2.00 2.05 2.7035b

— 61.00 398 1.92


397 397a 2.03 1.97 2.6155a

* Data followed by unlike letters are significantly different at the .05 level of probability.
1774 RESEARCH NOTES

Murray, G. A., and D. M. Huber, 1968. Sprouted


REFERENCES
and moldy wheat. Idaho Agr. Exp. Sta. Current
Hill, F. W., and D. L. Anderson, 1958. Compari- Information Series No. 95.
son of metabolizable energy and productive en- Steel, R. G. P., and J. H. Torrie, 1960. Principles
ergy determinations with growing chicks. J. and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Co.,
Nutrition, 64: 587-603. New York.

EVIDENCE FOR A RHYTHMICITY OF WITHIN-GROUP VARIABILITY OF


BIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN THE CHICK
ROBERT L. SQUIBB
Laboratories of Disease and Environmental Stress, Rutgers—The State University,
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

(Received for publication September 2, 1969)

A detailed study of data collected fromi in which all animals were given the same
periodicity experiments conducted in ourr reference diet ad libitum and were reared
laboratories over the last six years has3 under the same laboratory conditions. Sam-
shown that variability within groups, as3 pling procedures and chemical analyses
measured by standard deviations of means, were also standardized and have been pre-
may have diurnal rhythms that are inde- viously described (Squibb, 1964a).
pendent of and equally as organized as cir- The first graph (1-a), covering a 72-
cadian rhythms or diurnal oscillations off hour period, shows that peaks and troughs
group means. Further, the variabilityf of diurnal oscillations of the standard de-
rhythms, like those of group means, can be5 viations of mean serum free amino acid
affected by exogenous and endogenous3 values were inverted when chicks were
agents. A working hypothesis was devel- reared under two different lighting regi-
oped by plotting and statistically testingy mens. Graph 1-b illustrates how the pat-
diurnal changes in the standard deviationss tern of standard deviation oscillations in
of group means of several avian tissue con- noninfected animals was altered by a New-
stituents. castle disease virus infection.
The phenomenon of rhythmicity in with- Under constant lighting (1-c) curves of
in-group variability is illustrated in Fig. 1L the within-group variability of hepatic
showing highly significant changes in sev- DNA, RNA and protein showed similar
eral different parameters. The graphs also3 patterns. However, in the hearts of the
demonstrate how the rhythms can be al- same chicks (1-d), the curves of these
tered by exogenous and endogenous agents.i. three parameters did not coincide.
In order to have a common denominatorr Graph 1-e illustrates that the rhythm for
for comparing the various parameters, diur- within-group variability may be indepen-
nal changes of the standard deviations aree dent of mean patterns; here the former has
presented in terms of percentage change.:. a definite rhythm while the latter is almost
Each point on a curve represents at least 88 a straight line function. That the rhythmi-
animals sacrificed at that particular time.:. city of within-group variability may not be
All data are for 4 week old cockerel chickss species related is shown in 1-f wherein the
from periodicity standardized experimentss curves of RNA in the heart of the growing

You might also like