Professional Documents
Culture Documents
28 languages
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sorry to interrupt, but our fundraiser won’t last longThis Monday, we ask you
to join the 2% of readers who give. If everyone reading this right now gave just R$10, we'd
hit our goal in a couple of hours. R$10 is all we ask.
Marshall Sahlins
Sahlins in 2003
Citizenship American
Scientific career
students
Part of a series on
Anthropology
Outline
History
show
Types
show
Archaeological
show
Biological
show
Social
Cultural
show
Linguistic
show
Research framework
show
Key concepts
show
Key theories
show
Lists
v
t
e
Part of a series on
show
Basic concepts
show
Provisioning systems
show
Case studies
show
Related articles
show
Major theorists
v
t
e
Early work[edit]
Sahlins's training under Leslie White, a proponent of materialist and
evolutionary anthropology at the University of Michigan, is reflected in his early
work. His 1958 book Social Stratification in Polynesia offered a materialist
account of Polynesian cultures.[19] In his Evolution and Culture (1960), he
touched on the areas of cultural evolution and neoevolutionism. He divided
the evolution of societies into "general" and "specific". General evolution is the
tendency of cultural and social systems to increase in complexity, organization
and adaptiveness to environment. However, as the various cultures are not
isolated, there is interaction and a diffusion of their qualities (like
technological inventions). This leads cultures to develop in different ways
(specific evolution), as various elements are introduced to them in different
combinations and on different stages of evolution.[3] Moala, Sahlins's first major
monograph, exemplifies this approach.
Stone Age Economics (1972) collects some of Sahlins's key essays
in substantivist economic anthropology. As opposed to "formalists,"
substantivists insist that economic life is produced through cultural rules that
govern the production and distribution of goods, and therefore any
understanding of economic life has to start from cultural principles, and not from
the assumption that the economy is made up of independently acting,
"economically rational" individuals. Perhaps Sahlins's most famous essay from
the collection, "The Original Affluent Society," elaborates on this theme through
an extended meditation on "hunter-gatherer" societies. Stone Age
Economics inaugurated Sahlins's persistent critique of the discipline
of economics, particularly in its Neoclassical form.
Contributions to historical anthropology[edit]
After the publication of Culture and Practical Reason in 1976, his focus shifted
to the relation between history and anthropology, and the way different cultures
understand and make history. Of central concern in this work is the problem of
historical transformation, which structuralist approaches could not adequately
account for. Sahlins developed the concept of the "structure of the conjuncture"
to grapple with the problem of structure and agency, in other words that
societies were shaped by the complex conjuncture of a variety of forces, or
structures. Earlier evolutionary models, by contrast, claimed that culture arose
as an adaptation to the natural environment. Crucially, in Sahlins's formulation,
individuals have the agency to make history. Sometimes their position gives
them power by placing them at the top of a political hierarchy. At other times,
the structure of the conjuncture, a potent or fortuitous mixture of forces, enables
people to transform history. This element of chance and contingency makes a
science of these conjunctures impossible, though comparative study can enable
some generalizations.[20] Historical Metaphors and Mythical
Realities (1981), Islands of History (1985), Anahulu (1992), and Apologies to
Thucydides (2004) contain his main contributions to historical anthropology.
Islands of History sparked a notable debate with Gananath Obeyesekere over
the details of Captain James Cook's death in the Hawaiian Islands in 1779. At
the heart of the debate was how to understand the rationality of indigenous
people. Obeyesekere insisted that indigenous people thought in essentially the
same way as Westerners and was concerned that any argument otherwise
would paint them as "irrational" and "uncivilized". In contrast Sahlins argued that
each culture may have different types of rationality that make sense of the world
by focusing on different patterns and explain them within specific cultural
narratives, and that assuming that all cultures lead to a single rational view is a
form of eurocentrism.[3]