"Change of Voting Age in India" and how it impacts an

election process.

Change of Voting Age in India

The 61st Amendment to the Indian Constitution in 1988 lowered the voting age from 21 to 18 years,
granting young adults the right to vote in elections. This constitutional change reflects the recognition
of young people’s voices and their role in democratic processes.

The impact of voting in elections:

1. Representation and Accountability:
o Voting allows citizens to choose representatives who will voice their concerns in
government.
o Elected officials are accountable to voters for their actions and policies.
2. Electoral Results:
o Your vote may not directly elect the president, but when combined with others, it matters.
o Most states follow a “winner take all” system, where the popular vote winner receives the
state’s electoral votes.
3. Change and Participation:
o Voting is a powerful medium for effecting change.
o Rising voter participation reflects citizens’ desire to be “change makers.”
o From age 18, individuals can choose their country’s leader.
4. NOTA (None of The Above):
o If none of the candidates meet your criteria, you can use the NOTA option.
o NOTA allows you to voice your opinion even when no candidate aligns with your views.
5. Impact on Daily Life:
o Voting decisions touch every facet of government, including safety, housing, education, and
health3.
o Participating in elections ensures progressive values and policies are highlighted.

In summary, voting is not just a right; it’s a responsibility that shapes our democracy and influences our
well-being.

Positive Impacts
1. Broader Representation: Lowering the voting age has expanded the electorate, allowing a more
representative democracy that includes the views of the younger population.
2. Early Civic Engagement: Young adults are encouraged to engage in civic duties earlier, which can foster
a lifelong habit of participation in the democratic process.
3. Reflective Policy Making:With more young voters, politicians may be more inclined to address issues
pertinent to the youth, leading to policies that cater to a broader spectrum of the population.
4. Enhanced Voter Turnout:Studies suggest that the youth vote has increased over time, which can lead to
more decisive electoral outcomes.

Negative Impacts:
1. Political Naivety:Critics argue that younger voters might not have the necessary experience or
knowledge to make informed choices, potentially leading to less rational electoral outcomes.
1|HARSH KOTHARI
2. Vulnerability to Influence:Young voters may be more impressionable and susceptible to populist
rhetoric or misleading information, which can be exploited by political entities.
3. Inconsistent Participation: While youth are empowered to vote, their turnout rates can be inconsistent,
possibly due to mobility, educational commitments, or lack of interest.

The amendment aimed to make the voting age of 18 a reality in the true sense, allowing immediate
participation of young adults in elections and potentially reducing the nearly year-long wait for new voters
to exercise their franchise. This reform is seen as a step towards enhancing the vibrancy and inclusiveness of
Indian democracy.

HOW IT WILL IMPACT ELECTION PROCESS

Lowering the voting age is a topic that has garnered significant attention and debate in various countries.
Let’s explore how such a change might impact the election process:

1. Increased Youth Participation:

o Lowering the voting age could encourage more young people to participate in elections. By
allowing 16- and 17-year-olds to vote, we expand the pool of eligible voters.
o Prospective voters who start voting at a younger age are more likely to develop lifelong
voting habits. This could lead to increased voter turnout in the long term.
2. Political Engagement and Attitudes:
o Empirical research from countries that have already implemented lower voting ages provides
insights.
o Overall, the impact appears to be positive in terms of political engagement and civic
attitudes among young voters.
o However, the comprehensiveness of effects varies, and some differences exist across
countries.
3. Challenges and Considerations:
o Critics argue that younger voters may lack sufficient political knowledge and maturity.
o Advocates emphasize that young people are affected by political decisions and should have a
say in shaping their future.
o The impact depends on factors such as education, awareness campaigns, and voter
education programs.
4. Historical Context:
o Younger voters can significantly influence election outcomes. Their political preferences
often persist over time.
o The generation that comes of age during a successful or popular administration tends to
support that party for decades.
5. Global Trends:
o Several countries in Europe and South America allow 16- and 17-year-olds to vote in some or
all elections.
o Research indicates that the impact is generally positive, but systematic comparisons are
needed.
6. India’s Context:
o Recently, there have been discussions about reducing the minimum age for contesting
elections from 25 years to 18 years in India.
o Such reforms could enhance youth participation and shape the political landscape.

In summary, lowering the voting age can have both benefits and challenges. It’s essential to consider the
context, educate young voters, and foster informed civic participation. Ultimately, the impact on the election
process depends on various factors and the specific implementation in each country.
2|HARSH KOTHARI
3|HARSH KOTHARI