Unraveling the Strengths and Limitations of Bacoco Rope: A Critical Examination of a

Sustainable Fiber Alternative

The purpose of this critique paper is to assess the idea of making ropes out of banana peels,
cornstarch, and coconut husk coir fiber as a waste-reduction measure. It emphasizes the
environmental impact of banana peel disposal while praising the innovative solution of turning
them into ropes. Bacoco rope is an alternative rope made from banana peel, cornstarch, and
coconut husk coir fiber. These raw materials used to make bacoco rope are environmentally
friendly and readily available in the Philippines due to their abundance in the tropical region. The
study focuses on the possibility of using natural raw materials as an alternative to traditional
ropes that we are all familiar with and use. The researchers highlighted the characteristics of
each stated material above, which, once merged, will be a suitable and innovative solution
addressing the environmental concerns associated with improper waste management and also
promoting sustainability and eco-friendliness.
The paper discusses the possibilities and benefits of using banana peels, cornstarch, and
coconut husk fiber to make an alternative rope; however, there is little information to support the
proposed rope's real strength or performance. The researchers were simply basing these
concepts on previous related experimental investigations, but the suggested product rope
lacked consistent testing and varied situations, making it impossible to judge its practical value
and dependability. As a result, the suggested alternative rope may not be appropriate for all
situations in which traditional ropes are used due to potential limits in strength, flexibility, and
resistance to environmental conditions such as moisture and UV exposure. It will be limited by
the materials accessible in nature and time constraints, resulting in home-based studies. Access
to specialized equipment or materials required for comprehensive testing will be limited,
potentially reducing the depth of the study.
The performance of the suggested substitute rope may be challenging to validate for the
researchers due to a lack of scientific equipment, difficulties simulating realistic environmental
circumstances, and trouble obtaining a variety of samples. The quality and availability of raw
materials are examples of external issues that might make the evaluation process more difficult.
Furthermore, the concept lacks credibility due to flaws, including technological complexity and a
lack of scientific support. The efficacy and practicality of the study's conclusions can be
increased by addressing these constraints and working with experts in this area.
Overall, the study may benefit from a more thorough examination of the feasibility and
sustainability of using these materials on a broad scale. Therefore, a more thorough
examination of the potential disadvantages or limitations of various alternatives, such as
durability, cost-effectiveness, and availability, would provide a more balanced perspective.
Furthermore, the research's paper might be strengthened by providing comparative studies with
existing traditional ropes, which would provide greater insights into the proposed materials'
benefits and negative aspects. By addressing these issues, the study could provide a more solid
foundation for its findings and contribute more effectively to the discussion on sustainable
materials and waste management.
Recommendations include integrating scientific support, exploring alternative materials, and
providing more detailed insights into the rope-making process. In conclusion, while the concept
is innovative, further research and refinement are imperative to assess its feasibility and
practicality effectively.