Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Constitution of India
The Constitution of India (1950), while not explicitly providing for gender
neutrality, covers many such provisions that promote equality while
attempting to eliminate any discrimination based on religion, race, caste,
place of birth, sex, or any of them. However, there are also provisions under
the Indian Constitution that allow gender-specific policies to be framed for
the uplifting of the marginalised genders.
Fundamental Rights
Article 14 of the Indian Constitution lays down the provision for equality
before the law, which is based on the doctrine of the Rule of Law. According
to this Article, every person is equal in the eyes of the law and shall have
equal protection under such law within the territory of India. This
fundamental right can be invoked by any person within Indian territory,
regardless of whether they are a citizen or not. However, reasonable
classification based on rational nexus and intelligible differentia is permitted.
In simpler terms, any differentiation based on fair and reasonable grounds
with a rational explanation behind such classifications shall be held legal and
constitutional.
Furthermore, since the Article talks about equality before the law and equal
protection under such laws, it can be interpreted to advocate for the right to
equal treatment in similar situations regardless of the gender or sexual
orientation of the individual. This shall be imposed for both the rights and
duties conferred.
The Court held that the exclusion of transgenders from Indian policies and
legal provisions denies them equality before the law and the equal protection
of the law as conferred on the other genders. Such exclusion results in
widespread discrimination against the transgender community, which could
only be resolved by proper accommodation in the law through gender-
inclusive language.
This question was answered through many judicial precedents, the most
recent of which is Paramjit Singh v. State of Punjab (2009), in which it was
held that the policies for the upliftment and protection of a certain gender or
oppressed section of society are not discriminatory against the rest of
society. They simply protect the interests of those who have been
discriminated against and oppressed for far too long.
However, as held by the Supreme Court in the case of M.R. Balaji v. State of
Mysore (1963), the interests of the weaker and marginalised sections of
society should also be adjusted alongside the rest of society. Protective
discrimination should not extend to preferential treatment.
While not directly dealing with gender neutrality, Article 16 still ensures that
there is no discrimination regarding employment in the public sector only due
to one’s gender identity or sexual orientation. This makes the provision
gender inclusive in nature.
Beyond this, any situations or circumstances that are not covered by the
above-mentioned Articles will be examined in light of Article 14.