You are on page 1of 7

FAKE JOB DETECTION SYSTEM

INTRODUCTION

In today's dynamic and technology-driven job market, the rise of online job platforms has
provided unprecedented convenience for job seekers and employers alike. However, this
evolution has also given way to a concerning surge in fraudulent activities related to fake job
postings. Job seekers are increasingly falling victim to scams, where malicious actors exploit the
anonymity and accessibility of online platforms to deceive individuals with false employment
opportunities.

To counteract this growing threat, the Fake Job Detection System emerges as a crucial solution.
This system leverages advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence, machine learning,
and natural language processing, to meticulously analyze and assess job postings for authenticity.
By combining these cutting-edge technologies, the Fake Job Detection System aims to provide a
robust and proactive defense against the proliferation of fake job advertisements. delves into the
pressing need for such a system, outlining the prevalence of fake job scams and their detrimental
impact on job seekers. It emphasizes the role of technology in creating a secure job-seeking
environment, showcasing how the Fake Job Detection System stands as a shield against
deceptive practices. As we delve deeper into the intricacies of this innovative solution, it
becomes evident that it represents a crucial step forward in ensuring a trustworthy and reliable
job market for all stakeholders involved.
TITLE AUTHORS Aim of Drawback METHODOLOGY Overcomes
Research
1.Fake Job Pablo Compare 1.Lack of Logistic There's a need for
Detection with Cesar different research on Regression, more research in
Machine Learning: Quihui machine utilizing Multi-layer using location
(2022)
A Comparison learning contextual Perceptron, data to make fake
models for the information Random job detection
detection of like Forest, Support better. Also, we
fake job geographical Vector should look more
postings on location for Machine, and into the language
online job improving others to train used in job
boards. model models on the postings to tell
accuracy Employment apart real ones
Scam Aegean from the fake
2.Need for
Dataset. ones.
further
Natural
investigation
Language
into
Processing
linguistic
(NLP)
features to
techniques
distinguish
were also
between
employed to
genuine and
analyze textual
fake job
data from job
postings
postings.

TITLE AUTHORS Aim of Drawback METHODOLOGY Overcomes


Research

2. Detection of Fake Aashir The goal of The study Data from The need to check
Job Postings by Amaar, the study is to lacked Kaggle, if their method
Wajdi thorough
Utilizing Machine use machine exploration of cleaned it up, works for different
Aljedaani, types of fake
Learning and learning and the proposed and used
Furqan method's
Natural Language natural methods TF- content, see how
adaptability
Rustam,
Processing language to diverse IDF (Term well it works in
fraudulent
Approaches Frequency- real life, and find
processing to content, real-
world Inverse ways to handle
identify fake
applicability, Document unbalanced and
jobads, and
consideration Frequency) and biased training
aiming to of challenges
Bag-of-Words data for the
safeguard related to
unbalanced for feature classifiers.
people from and biased
engineering
getting training data
for the
tricked by classifiers.
deceitful job
postings.

3. Machine Learning Shawni The goal of the the study is The study uses Testing how well
that it didn't a dataset from
Approach for Dutta and research is to the computer
talk much Kaggle about
Detecting Fake Job Prof. create a about how job posts and system works with
well the cleans it up by
Recruitment Samir computer more job
method fixing missing
Kumar system that works on a info, removing information or a
larger scale unnecessary
Bandyop can find fake lot of job posts
and in real- words, and
adhyay, job postings, time choosing will help us see
situations. important
(2020) making it how it handles
features.Models
easier for job- like Decision bigger amounts of
Tree and Naïve
seekers to spot data.
Bayes to figure
real out which one
is best at
opportunities..
finding fake job
ads.

TITLE AUTHORS Aim of Drawback METHODOLOGY Overcomes


Research

4. A Supervised Aravind Develop a Limited Supervised Adaptive systems


Learning Approach Sasidhara model for focus on learning with that continuously
for Fake Job Posting n Pillai accurate fake dealing with Gradient learn from new
Detection job detection evolving Boosting data and adjust to
using scammer classifier on changing patterns
supervised tactics. labelled data. in fake job
learning. postings.

5. A Hybrid Deep Wang et Combine Requires Hybrid deep Creating more


large
Learning Approach al. (2021) Bidirectional learning training data and
amounts of
for Detecting Long Short- data for approach with using "practice"
training the
Deceptive Job Term Memory Bi-LSTM and data to train fake
complex
Postings deep attention job detectors
learning
mechanism on without needing
model.
labelled data massive amounts
of information.

6. Detecting Tian et al Analyze Lacks Rule-based Developing


consideration
Deceptive Job (2011) textual classification systems that can
of structural
Advertisements: A content of job features and system learn from new
external data
Content-Based postings to analysing data and adjust to
sources.
Approach identify keywords, new patterns.
fraudulent phrases and
patterns inconsistencies

TITLE AUTHORS Aim of Drawback METHODOLOGY Overcomes


Research

7.Leveraging Li et al. Utilize Data Ensemble Using "practice"


Multiple Features (2023) various collection learning with data to train their
and Ensemble features and and labeling Random Forest systems without
Learning for Fake ensemble can be time- and needing as much
Job Detection learning to consuming XGBoost(extre real information.
improve and me Gradients
detection expensive. Boosting) on
accuracy. data with
textual,
structural, and
external
features

You might also like