Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION OF
RENEWABLE ENERGY
INTEGRATION SCENARIOS
Analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of various configurations of
renewable energy sources and energy storage systems, as identified through
an extensive literature survey, in meeting energy demands and mitigating
dependence on conventional power sources.
table of
contents.
02 OBJECTIVE OF THE
LITERATURE REVIEW 05 BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Efficiency Improvement:
1. Wind Power Curtailment: Wind
Utilizing multiple energy
power abandonment due to
sources, particularly in
the lack of demand during 1. Two-Step Optimization
conjunction with wind
peak load regulation periods Model: The coordinated
energy, significantly
leads to wastage of wind dispatching model is
improves system
energy resources and poses formulated as a two-step
efficiency.
challenges for grid stability. optimization problem.
2. Maximized Wind Power
2. Contradiction in CHP Units: 2. Step 1: Focuses on
Consumption: The High Initial Capital
The contradiction between optimizing extra wind
coordinated dispatching Investment: The initial
heat and electric power power consumption by
method aims to maximize capital investment
outputs from Combined Heat adjusting energy sources at
MULTIPLE the consumption of extra required for establishing
and Power (CHP) units during the system level to achieve
ENERGY wind power, thereby multiple energy source
off-peak hours exacerbates predefined goals.
SOURCES + reducing wind power plants is relatively high
wind power abandonment, 3. Step 2: Maximizes fuel
WIND ENERGY abandonment and compared to single-
necessitating the maintenance savings and economic
optimizing resource source systems, posing a
of high heat output levels even benefits by considering the
utilization. financial barrier to
when electric demand is low. operation of energy sources
3. Economic Benefits: By implementation.
3. Need for Optimization: Existing in different working
targeting the maximum
dispatching methods primarily conditions, utilizing a
extra wind power
focus on extra wind power dynamic programming
consumption and highest
consumption alone, lacking a algorithm to ensure the
economic benefit, the
comprehensive strategy to most economical unit
strategy enhances fuel
maximize economic benefits utilization.
savings and overall
and fuel savings while
economic efficiency of
maintaining grid stability.
the hybrid energy system
INTEGRATED
PROBLEM SOLVED METHODOLOGY ADVANTAGE LIMITATION
SYSTEM
1. Integration of Solar-Powered
1. Bi-Level Market Equilibrium
Heat Pumps (SPHPs): The
Model: The framework is 1. Operational Cost
research addresses the
formulated as a bi-level Reduction: By investing in 1. Fair Heating Pricing
integration of SPHPs into
market equilibrium model. SPHPs, operational costs Mechanism: Designing
Combined Heat and Power
2. Upper Level: Consumers of CHP systems are a fair heating pricing
(CHP) systems to enhance
strategically invest in SPHPs effectively reduced in mechanism is crucial to
system benefits.
based on LMPs and DHPs, both electric and heating reflect the actual use of
2. Economic Evaluation: The
affecting net electric and sectors. central heat resources
focus is on evaluating the
heating loads. 2. Electricity and Heating and heating networks
economic benefits of
3. Lower Level: LMPs are Cost Reduction: by various consumers.
integrating SPHPs into CHP
updated using Direct Consumers can 2. Optimal Placement of
systems, emphasizing
SOLAR POWER + Current Optimal Power substantially reduce their SPHPs: Determining the
reduction of operational costs
CHP Flow (DCOPF), while DHPs electricity and heating optimal placement of
and efficient provision of heat
are updated using a cost- charges by utilizing SPHPs across the CHP
energy.
plus pricing method. energy from SPHPs. system under a budget
3. Market Equilibrium Model: A
4. Algorithm: Due to the 3. Generation Flexibility: limit is important.
bi-level market equilibrium
nonlinearity of the market Increased use of SPHPs Investigating the
model is developed to assess
equilibrium problem, an benefits both electric and marginal benefits of
the economic benefits. This
algorithm is proposed to heating sectors with SPHPs at different
model considers locational
iteratively solve the bi-level lower operational costs locations is essential for
marginal prices (LMPs) and
model. A criterion is and higher generation optimization.
district heating prices (DHPs)
designed to achieve a flexibility.
to guide consumer investment
desired solution.
decisions in SPHPs.
INTEGRATED
PROBLEM SOLVED METHODOLOGY ADVANTAGE LIMITATION
SYSTEM
1. Integration of Solar-Powered
1. Bi-Level Market Equilibrium
Heat Pumps (SPHPs): The
Model: The framework is 1. Operational Cost
research addresses the
formulated as a bi-level Reduction: By investing in 1. Fair Heating Pricing
integration of SPHPs into
market equilibrium model. SPHPs, operational costs Mechanism: Designing
Combined Heat and Power
2. Upper Level: Consumers of CHP systems are a fair heating pricing
(CHP) systems to enhance
strategically invest in SPHPs effectively reduced in mechanism is crucial to
system benefits.
based on LMPs and DHPs, both electric and heating reflect the actual use of
2. Economic Evaluation: The
affecting net electric and sectors. central heat resources
focus is on evaluating the
heating loads. 2. Electricity and Heating and heating networks
economic benefits of
3. Lower Level: LMPs are Cost Reduction: by various consumers.
integrating SPHPs into CHP
updated using Direct Consumers can 2. Optimal Placement of
systems, emphasizing
SOLAR POWER + Current Optimal Power substantially reduce their SPHPs: Determining the
reduction of operational costs
CHP Flow (DCOPF), while DHPs electricity and heating optimal placement of
and efficient provision of heat
are updated using a cost- charges by utilizing SPHPs across the CHP
energy.
plus pricing method. energy from SPHPs. system under a budget
3. Market Equilibrium Model: A
4. Algorithm: Due to the 3. Generation Flexibility: limit is important.
bi-level market equilibrium
nonlinearity of the market Increased use of SPHPs Investigating the
model is developed to assess
equilibrium problem, an benefits both electric and marginal benefits of
the economic benefits. This
algorithm is proposed to heating sectors with SPHPs at different
model considers locational
iteratively solve the bi-level lower operational costs locations is essential for
marginal prices (LMPs) and
model. A criterion is and higher generation optimization.
district heating prices (DHPs)
designed to achieve a flexibility.
to guide consumer investment
desired solution.
decisions in SPHPs.
INTEGRATED
PROBLEM SOLVED METHODOLOGY ADVANTAGE LIMITATION
SYSTEM
1. Integration of Solar-Powered
1. Bi-Level Market Equilibrium
Heat Pumps (SPHPs): The
Model: The framework is 1. Operational Cost
research addresses the
formulated as a bi-level Reduction: By investing in 1. Fair Heating Pricing
integration of SPHPs into
market equilibrium model. SPHPs, operational costs Mechanism: Designing
Combined Heat and Power
2. Upper Level: Consumers of CHP systems are a fair heating pricing
(CHP) systems to enhance
strategically invest in SPHPs effectively reduced in mechanism is crucial to
system benefits.
based on LMPs and DHPs, both electric and heating reflect the actual use of
2. Economic Evaluation: The
affecting net electric and sectors. central heat resources
focus is on evaluating the
heating loads. 2. Electricity and Heating and heating networks
economic benefits of
3. Lower Level: LMPs are Cost Reduction: by various consumers.
integrating SPHPs into CHP
updated using Direct Consumers can 2. Optimal Placement of
systems, emphasizing
SOLAR POWER + Current Optimal Power substantially reduce their SPHPs: Determining the
reduction of operational costs
CHP Flow (DCOPF), while DHPs electricity and heating optimal placement of
and efficient provision of heat
are updated using a cost- charges by utilizing SPHPs across the CHP
energy.
plus pricing method. energy from SPHPs. system under a budget
3. Market Equilibrium Model: A
4. Algorithm: Due to the 3. Generation Flexibility: limit is important.
bi-level market equilibrium
nonlinearity of the market Increased use of SPHPs Investigating the
model is developed to assess
equilibrium problem, an benefits both electric and marginal benefits of
the economic benefits. This
algorithm is proposed to heating sectors with SPHPs at different
model considers locational
iteratively solve the bi-level lower operational costs locations is essential for
marginal prices (LMPs) and
model. A criterion is and higher generation optimization.
district heating prices (DHPs)
designed to achieve a flexibility.
to guide consumer investment
desired solution.
decisions in SPHPs.
Research Insights
Common Challenges Identified: Key Focus Areas for Research:
Maximizing renewable energy Developing micro-level integration
utilization at the micro-level. strategies for renewable energy
Ensuring safety and reliability of sources like wind, solar, CHP etc.
home energy systems. Implementing safety protocols and
Achieving cost-effectiveness in standards for home energy systems.
renewable energy integration for Designing cost-effective solutions
household use. for renewable energy deployment in
households.
Research Insights
Potential Solutions and Objectives: Conclusion:
Creating modular and scalable renewable The insights from the research highlight
energy systems tailored for home integration. the importance of addressing safety,
Incorporating smart technologies for effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness in
monitoring, control, and optimization of home home integration of renewable energy.
energy usage. By focusing on micro-level integration,
Integrating backup and storage solutions to safety standards, and cost-effective
enhance reliability and resilience of home solutions, the aim is to make renewable
energy systems. energy accessible and practical for
Exploring innovative financing options and households, contributing towards
incentives to make renewable energy adoption sustainable and energy-efficient homes.
affordable for homeowners.
01
MULTIPLE ENERGY SOURCES + WIND ENERGY
BIBLIOGRAPHY Rong, S., Chen, X., Guan, W., et al. (2019). Coordinated dispatching strategy for
wind power consumption. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, 7, 1461–1471.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-019-0540-7
02
SOLAR POWER + HYDRO
Szmytkowski, J., Niringiyimana, E., WanQuan, S., & Dushimimana, G. (2022).
Feasibility Study of a Hybrid PV/Hydro System for Remote Area Electrification
in Rwanda. Journal of Renewable Energy, 2022, 4030369.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4030369
03
SOLAR POWER+ CHP
Wang, J., et al. (2018). Economic Benefits of Integrating Solar-Powered Heat
Pumps Into a CHP System. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 9(4),
1702-1712. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2018.2810137
04
MULTIPLE ENERGY SOURCES + WIND ENERGY
Rong, S., Chen, X., Guan, W., et al. (2019). Coordinated dispatching strategy for
wind power consumption. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, 7, 1461–1471.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-019-0540-7
05
MULTIPLE ENERGY SOURCES + WIND ENERGY
Rong, S., Chen, X., Guan, W., et al. (2019). Coordinated dispatching strategy for
wind power consumption. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, 7, 1461–1471.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-019-0540-7
CONCLUSION