Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.According to the Supreme Court, is the 'Rule of Law' as embodied in Article 14 a 'basic feature' of
the Indian Constitution?
2.Which aspect of the 'Rule of Law' concept, as propounded by A.V. Dicey, is NOT applicable to the
Indian system?
4. Consider the following statements about the powers and functions of the President and the
Governor of India:
1. The President appoints the attorney general of India, while the Governor has no role in this
appointment.
2. Both the President and the Governor appoint the vice-chancellors of universities in states.
3. The President acts as the chancellor of central universities, whereas the Governor does not have a
similar role in state universities.
5. With reference to the President and the Governor in India, consider the following statements:
1. During a President's rule in a state, the Governor enjoys extensive executive powers as an agent of
the President.
2. The Governor, like the President, can seek information relating to the administration of affairs
from the Chief Minister.
3. Both the President and the Governor can appoint the chief election commissioner and election
commissioners of states
a) Only one
6. Regarding the financial powers of the Governor and the President in India, consider the following
statements
1. The Governor is responsible for ensuring that the state budget is presented before the state
legislature, a role similar to that of the President at the central level.
2.The Governor has the authority to constitute a finance commission for the state, similar to the
President's power for the Centre.
3. No demand for a grant in the state legislature can be made without the Governor's
recommendation, a power that is not mirrored by the President at the central level.
7. Regarding the appointment powers in the judiciary of India, consider the following statements
1. The Governor makes appointments to the judicial service, Including district judges in consultation
with the state High Court and the State Public Service Commission.
2. The Governor appoints district judges in consultation with the president.
3. The President is involved in the appointment of district judges but not session and civil judges.
8. Regarding the assent to bills by the President and Governor, consider the following statements
1. The Governor has the option to reserve a money bill for the consideration of the President.
2. Once a money bill is reserved by the Governor for the President's consideration, the Governor's
role in its enactment ends.
3. The President is bound to give his assent to a money bill reserved by the Governor.
9. With reference to the ordinance-making power in India, consider the following statements:
1. An ordinance issued by the President has the same force and effect as an act of Parliament,
similar to the Governor's ordinance which has the same effect as an act of the state legislature.
2. The President can promulgate ordinances on subjects within the Union List only, while the
Governor can do so for subjects within the State List.
3. Ordinances issued by both the President and the Governor cease to operate after six weeks from
the reassembly of the respective legislatures.
12. Members of Parliament and State Legislatures are not liable for court proceedings in respect of:
(2) Speeches delivered and votes cast within Parliament or its committees.
a) 1 & 3
b) 2 & 4
c) 3 & 4
d) 1, 2 & 4
(1) Article 31-C overrides Article 14 when it comes to laws implementing Directive Principles in
Article 39(b) and (c).
(3) The Supreme Court held that Article 14 is subordinate to Article 31-C.
Which of the following statements correctly describe the relationship between Article 31-C and
Article 14 of the Indian Constitution?
a) 1 & 3
b) 2 & 4
c) 3 & 4
d) 1 & 4
(2) Foreign sovereigns and diplomats from criminal and civil proceedings.
a) 1 & 2
b) 2 & 4
c) 1 & 4
d) 3 & 4
15. Which of the following types of laws cannot be subjected to judicial review under Article 13 for
being inconsistent with the fundamental rights?
a) 1 only
b) 2 only
c) 3 only
16. Under which Articles do the Supreme Court and High Courts have the power to declare laws
unconstitutional for violating fundamental rights?
(A) Article 32 for the Supreme Court and Article 226 for the High Courts.
(B) Article 32 for both the Supreme Court and High Courts.
(C) Article 226 for the Supreme Court and Article 32 for the High Courts.
(D) Article 36 for the Supreme Court and Article 42 for the High Courts.
17. As per Article 13, which of the following cannot be challenged for violating fundamental rights?
18. According to the Kesavananda Bharati case, under what condition can a constitutional
amendment be declared void?
(B) If it violates a fundamental right forming part of the Constitution's 'basic structure'.
(1) They can be enforced against both State and private actions.
(2) They are only enforceable against the arbitrary action of the State.
(3) They include both rights that restrict State power and those that confer privileges on individuals.
(4) They are absolute and cannot be curtailed under any circumstances.
20. Which of the Above statements are true regarding the fundamental rights in the Indian
Constitution?
a) 1, 3
b) 1, 2
c) 2, 4
d) 3, 4
21. Regarding the enforcement of fundamental rights, which of the following is/are true?
(A) Individuals can approach the Supreme Court directly for their enforcement.
(C) The Supreme Court defends and guarantees fundamental rights but does not enforce them.
(D) Violations of fundamental rights can be challenged in any lower court.
22. The Parliament's power to amend fundamental rights is characterized by which of the following?
(B) Any amendment to fundamental rights must preserve the 'basic structure' of the Constitution.
(2) Some fundamental rights are negative, placing limitations on the State's authority.
(3) All fundamental rights are positive, providing certain privileges to individuals.
Which of the above mentioned statements correctly describe the nature of fundamental rights in
India?
a) 1 & 4
b) 2 & 3
c) 1 & 3
d) 2 & 4
24. Under what circumstances can an aggrieved person directly approach the Supreme Court for a
violation of fundamental rights?
25. What are the key characteristics of fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution?
(i) They are available against the arbitrary action of the state.
(iii) They are primarily negative in character, limiting the authority of the State.
(iv) They are non-justiciable, preventing individuals from seeking legal remedies.
(vi) Aggrieved persons must always go through the High Courts before approaching the Supreme
Court.
(viii) Parliament can curtail or repeal them through an ordinary legislative act.
(ix) Amending fundamental rights does not impact the 'basic structure' of the Constitution.