Professional Documents
Culture Documents
If our genes are so similar, what really makes a eukaryote di!erent from a prokaryote, or a human from E.
coli? The answer lies in the di!erence in gene expression and regulation used.
Aa Aa Aa
It is estimated that the human genome encodes approximately 25,000 genes, about the same number as that for corn and nearly twice as many as that for the common fruit fly.
Even more interesting is the fact that those 25,000 genes are encoded in about 1.5% of the genome. So, what exactly does the other 98.5% of our DNA do? While many mysteries
remain about what all of that extra sequence is for, we know that it does contain complex instructions that direct the intricate turning on and o! of gene transcription.
Multicellular eukaryotes have a much larger genome than prokaryotes, which is organized into multiple chromosomes with greater sequence complexity. Many eukaryotic
species carry genes with the same sequences as other plants and animals. In addition, the same DNA sequences (though not the same proteins) are found within all of an
organism's diploid, nucleated cells, even though these cells form tissues with drastically di!erent appearances, properties, and functions. Why then, is there such great variation
among and within such organisms? Quite simply, the way in which di!erent genes are turned on and o! in specific cells generates the variety we observe in nature. In other
words, specific functions of di!erent cell types are generated through di!erential gene regulation.
Of course, higher eukaryotes still respond to environmental signals by regulating their genes. But there is an additional layer of regulation that results from cell-to-cell
interactions within the organism that orchestrate development. Specifically, gene expression is controlled on two levels. First, transcription is controlled by limiting the amount
of mRNA that is produced from a particular gene. The second level of control is through post-transcriptional events that regulate the translation of mRNA into proteins. Even
after a protein is made, post-translational modifications can a!ect its activity.
Table 1: Overview of Di!erences Between Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Gene Expression and Regulation
Prokaryotes Eukaryotes
Default state of On O!
transcription
DNA structure Highly supercoiled DNA Highly supercoiled
with some associated chromatin associated with
proteins histones in nucleosomes
Sequence-specific transcription factors are considered the most important and diverse mechanisms of gene
regulation in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (Pulverer, 2005). In eukaryotes, regulation of gene
expression by transcription factors is said to be combinatorial, in that it requires the coordinated interactions
of multiple proteins (in contrast to prokaryotes, in which a single protein is usually all that is required).
Many genes, known as housekeeping genes, are needed by almost every type of cell and appear to be
unregulated or constitutive. But at the core of cellular di!erentiation, manifested in the variety of cell types
observed in di!erent organisms, is the regulation of gene expression in a tissue-specific manner. The same Figure 1: DNA footprinting reveals transcription
genome is responsible for making the entire cadre of cell types, each of which has its own function—for factor specificity in di!erent cell types
example, red blood cells exchange oxygen, muscle cells expand and contract, and cells in the immune In vivo footprinting analysis of the human beta globin
system recognize pathogens. Genes that regulate cell identity are turned on under very specific temporal, promoter shows that adult erythroblasts (E, lane 4) have
spatial, and environmental conditions to ensure that a cell is able to perform its designated function. footprints on important regulatory motifs (note lighter
regions, especially at CACC) as compared to the other
Take the example of the gene for beta globin, a protein used in red blood cells for oxygen exchange. Every
samples. Here, lane N is control DNA, lane H is HeLa cells,
cell in the human body contains the beta globin gene and the corresponding upstream regulatory sequences
lane K is K562 cells, lane R is Raji cells, and lane J is Jurkat
that regulate expression, but no cell type other than red blood cells expresses beta globin. Scientists can use
cells. Of these cells lines, none is part of the lineage
a technique called DNA footprinting to map where transcription factors bind to specific regulatory sequences.
leading to red blood cells.
When Reddy et al. examined the beta globin promoter in di!erent cell types, they found that the transcription
© 1994 American Society for Biochemistry and
factors that could bind to the promoter sequences required for beta globin expression were expressed only in
Molecular Biology Reddy, P. M. et al. Genomic
erythroblasts (immature adult red blood cells). (See Figure 1). The two consensus sequences in the beta
footprinting and sequencing of human beta-globin locus:
globin promoter known for binding transcription factors, CCAAT and CACC, were protected in the erythroid
tissue specificity and cell line artifact. Journal of Biological
cells (E), but not the other cell types (Reddy et al., 1994).
Chemistry 269, 8287–8295 (1994). All rights reserved.
As in prokaryotes, eukaryotic repressor molecules can sometimes bind to silencer elements in the vicinity of a gene and inhibit the binding, assembly, or activity of the
transcription complex, thus turning o! expression of a gene. Positive regulation by TFs that are activators is common in eukaryotes. Considering the restrictive transcriptional
ground state, it is logical that positive regulation is the predominant form of control in all systems characterized to date. Many activating TFs are generally bound to DNA until
removed by a signal molecule, while others might only bind to DNA once influenced by a signal molecule. The binding of one type of TF can influence the binding of others, as
well. Thus, gene expression in eukaryotes is highly variable, depending on the type of activators involved and what signals are present to control binding.
Chromatin structure contributes to the varying levels of complexity in gene regulation. It allows simultaneous regulation of functionally or structurally related genes that tend to
be present in widely spaced clusters or domains on eukaryotic DNA (Sproul et al., 2005). Interactions of chromatin with activators and repressors can result in domains of
chromatin that are open, closed, or poised for activation. Chromatin domains have various sizes and di!erent extents of stability. These variations allow for phenomena found
solely in eukaryotes, such as transcription at various stages of development and epigenetic memory throughout cell division cycles. They also allow for the maintenance of
di!erentiated cellular states, which is crucial to the survival of multicellular organisms (Struhl, 1999).
Reddy, P. M., Stamatoyannopoulos, G., Papayannopoulou, T., & Shen, C. K. Genomic footprinting and sequencing of human beta-globin locus: Tissue specificity and cell line
artifact. Journal of Biological Chemistry 269, 8287–8295 (1994)
Remenyi, A., Scholer, H., & Wilmanns, M. Combinatorial control of gene expression. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 11, 812–815 (2004) doi:10.1038/nsmb820 (link
to article)
Struhl, K. Fundamentally di!erent logic of gene regulation in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Cell 98, 1–4 (1999)
Sproul, D., Gilbert, N., & Bickmore, W. The role of chromatin structure in regulating the expression of clustered genes. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, 775–781 (2005)