Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The internal business process perspective in a Balanced Scorecard (BSC) shines a light on the internal
workings of your organization. It helps identify the critical processes that need to function effectively to
achieve your customer and financial goals.
Here's a breakdown of this key BSC perspective:
What it Focuses On:
Efficiency: This measures how well your organization uses its resources (people, equipment, materials)
to produce outputs. Metrics like cycle time, cost per unit, and rework rates can be used.
Effectiveness: This measures how well your processes deliver the desired results and meet customer
requirements. You might track on-time delivery rates, defect rates, or process compliance.
Innovation: This assesses your organization's ability to develop and implement new processes and
technologies to improve performance. The number of new product launches, patent applications, or
employee suggestions can be indicators.
Why it's Important:
Strong internal business processes are the backbone of delivering value to customers. By ensuring your
processes are efficient, effective, and innovative, you can:
Reduce costs and improve profitability.
Increase customer satisfaction by delivering high-quality products and services on time.
Gain a competitive advantage by continuously improving your processes.
What Processes to Consider:
Core Processes: These are the essential processes directly tied to delivering your product or service to
the customer. (e.g., manufacturing, order fulfillment)
Support Processes: These processes indirectly support core processes. (e.g., human resources,
accounting)
Examples of Internal Process Objectives:
Reduce production cycle time by 15%.
Achieve a 99% on-time delivery rate.
Develop and implement two new process improvements each quarter.
Increase employee suggestion rate by 20%.
Developing Strong Internal Process Objectives:
Align with Customer and Financial Goals: Ensure your internal process objectives directly contribute
to achieving your customer and financial objectives.
Identify Bottlenecks: Pinpoint areas in your processes that are causing delays, inefficiencies, or errors.
Focus improvement efforts on these areas.
Invest in Technology: Consider how technology can automate tasks, improve communication, and
streamline processes.
By effectively utilizing the internal business process perspective in your BSC, you can identify areas for
improvement and optimize your operations to drive customer satisfaction and financial success.
The Learning & Growth perspective in a Balanced Scorecard (BSC) focuses on the capabilities and
resources your organization needs to achieve its long-term goals. It's essentially an investment in the
future by ensuring your workforce and systems are equipped to adapt and thrive.
Why is it Important?
In today's dynamic business environment, continuous learning and improvement are crucial for
sustainable success. The Learning & Growth perspective helps you assess your organization's ability to:
Develop and retain skilled employees who can effectively implement your strategy.
Foster a culture of innovation that drives new ideas and process improvements.
Adapt to changing technologies and market conditions.
What Does it Look At?
The Learning & Growth perspective typically examines three key areas:
Employee Capabilities: This assesses the skills, knowledge, and experience of your workforce. You
might track training completion rates, employee certifications, or skills gaps.
Information Technology: This evaluates the effectiveness of your technology infrastructure and its
ability to support learning and innovation. Consider metrics like system uptime, user satisfaction with
technology, or investment in R&D.
Organizational Culture: This assesses the work environment and its support for learning and
continuous improvement. Track employee engagement surveys, innovation awards, or knowledge-
sharing initiatives.
Examples of Learning & Growth Objectives:
Increase employee training hours by 10% annually.
Reduce employee turnover rate by 5%.
Develop a knowledge-sharing platform to facilitate collaboration and learning.
Implement a new technology system to improve data analysis capabilities.
Developing Strong Learning & Growth Objectives:
Align with Strategic Goals: Ensure your Learning & Growth objectives support your overall strategy
and the capabilities needed to achieve them.
Focus on Continuous Improvement: Develop a culture of learning where employees are encouraged
to develop new skills and share knowledge.
Invest in Training & Development: Provide opportunities for employees to acquire the skills and
knowledge they need to excel in their roles.
Embrace Innovation: Encourage experimentation and new ideas to drive process improvements and
growth.
By prioritizing the Learning & Growth perspective in your BSC, you can ensure your organization has
the talent, culture, and resources needed to adapt, innovate, and achieve long-term success.
share
more_vert
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIve
The Financial Perspective in a Balanced Scorecard (BSC) serves as the foundation, translating your
overall strategy into concrete financial goals. It essentially measures the financial health and
profitability of your organization as a result of implementing your strategic plan.
Why is it Important?
Financial performance is a vital indicator of an organization's success. The Financial Perspective helps
you assess the financial implications of your strategic initiatives and ensure they're driving sustainable
financial growth.
What Does it Look At?
The Financial Perspective typically focuses on a few key financial metrics:
Profitability: This measures your organization's ability to generate profit. Common metrics include net
income, return on investment (ROI), and profit margin.
Revenue Growth: This measures the increase in your organization's sales over time. You might track
sales growth rate or market share.
Liquidity: This measures your organization's ability to meet its short-term financial obligations. Metrics
like current ratio and quick ratio can be used.
Efficiency: This measures how well your organization uses its resources to generate revenue. Look at
cost-to-income ratio or expense ratios.
Examples of Financial Perspective Objectives:
Increase net income by 10% within the next year.
Achieve a return on investment (ROI) of 15% on new product development initiatives.
Maintain a current ratio of 2:1 to ensure adequate liquidity.
Reduce operating expenses by 5% through cost-saving measures.
Developing Strong Financial Objectives:
Align with Strategy: Ensure your financial objectives directly support your overall strategic goals.
Consider Industry Benchmarks: Compare your financial metrics to industry averages to identify areas
for improvement.
Maintain Long-Term Focus: While short-term profitability is important, consider setting objectives that
drive sustainable growth in the long run.
Balance Multiple Objectives: Strive for a healthy balance between profitability, growth, and liquidity.
By effectively utilizing the Financial Perspective in your BSC, you can establish clear financial targets,
track progress towards those targets, and ensure your strategic plan is driving financial success for your
organization.
There are many measures of financial performance, each offering a unique perspective on a company's
health. Here's a breakdown of some key metrics used to assess financial performance:
Profitability Ratios:
Net Profit Margin: This ratio indicates the percentage of revenue remaining after all expenses,
including taxes, are subtracted. It shows how much profit a company generates from each dollar of
revenue.
Return on Equity (ROE): This ratio measures how effectively a company uses shareholder equity
(investment) to generate profits. It shows how much profit is earned for each dollar of shareholder
investment.
Return on Assets (ROA): This ratio shows how much profit a company generates from its total assets.
It indicates how efficiently a company uses its assets to create profits.
Liquidity Ratios:
Current Ratio: This ratio measures a company's ability to meet its short-term obligations (due within a
year) using its current assets (cash, inventory, receivables). A higher ratio indicates better short-term
liquidity.
Quick Ratio: Similar to the current ratio, but excludes inventory (which can be less liquid) from current
assets for a more conservative assessment of short-term solvency.
Efficiency Ratios:
Gross Profit Margin: This ratio shows the percentage of revenue remaining after subtracting the cost
of goods sold. It reflects the company's efficiency in managing its production costs.
Operating Expense Ratio: This ratio measures the percentage of revenue used to cover operating
expenses (excluding cost of goods sold and interest). A lower ratio indicates better control over
operating expenses.
Other Important Measures:
Earnings Per Share (EPS): This metric shows a company's profit allocated to each outstanding share
of common stock. It's a key measure for shareholders to assess a company's profitability relative to its
size (number of shares outstanding).
Revenue Growth: This metric tracks the increase in a company's sales over time. It indicates the
company's ability to grow its market share and expand its business.
Choosing the Right Metrics:
The most relevant financial performance measures will depend on the specific company, industry, and
the goals you're trying to assess. It's often beneficial to consider a combination of these metrics to get a
well-rounded view of a company's financial health.
By analyzing these financial performance measures, investors, creditors, analysts, and managers can
gain valuable insights into a company's profitability, solvency, efficiency, and growth potential.
share
Strategic planning and control are like looking at a map and steering a ship, but what about the nuts and
bolts of navigating the journey? That's where tactical planning and control come in.
Tactical Planning focuses on translating the broad strokes of strategic planning into actionable steps.
It's about creating clear, short-term plans (usually weeks, months, or quarters) that guide day-to-day
activities and ensure progress towards strategic goals. Here are some key aspects of tactical planning:
Breaking Down Objectives: Strategic goals are typically high-level and long-term. Tactical planning
involves breaking these goals into smaller, more manageable objectives for specific departments or
teams.
Actionable Steps: Each objective should have a clear set of action steps outlining what needs to be
done, who is responsible, and by when. This provides a roadmap for daily operations.
Resource Allocation: Tactical plans identify the resources (people, equipment, budget) required to
achieve each objective. This ensures everyone has the tools they need to succeed.
Alignment with Strategy: Tactical plans should be closely aligned with the overall strategic goals.
Every action step should contribute to achieving the broader strategic vision.
Benefits of Tactical Planning:
Clarity and Focus: Provides a clear roadmap for daily activities and keeps everyone focused on
achieving short-term objectives.
Increased Efficiency: By allocating resources effectively, tactical planning helps teams work more
efficiently towards their goals.
Improved Communication: The planning process fosters communication between departments and
ensures everyone is on the same page.
Measurable Progress: By setting milestones and deadlines, tactical plans allow for tracking progress
and identifying any roadblocks early on.
Tactical Control ensures that the tactical plans are being executed effectively and adjustments are
made as needed. It's the monitoring and evaluation aspect of short-term planning. Here's what tactical
control involves:
Tracking Progress: Monitoring performance against the established milestones and deadlines set in
the tactical plan.
Performance Measurement: Using relevant metrics to measure progress towards objectives. This
might involve data analysis, reports, or performance reviews.
Identifying Deviations: Pinpointing areas where the plan is not being followed or objectives are not
being met.
Corrective Action: Taking necessary steps to address deviations from the plan. This could involve
adjusting resource allocation, modifying action steps, or revising objectives.
Benefits of Tactical Control:
Improved Performance: By identifying and addressing issues early on, tactical control helps ensure
that the team stays on track and achieves its objectives.
Adaptability: Provides the flexibility to adjust plans based on changing circumstances or unforeseen
obstacles.
Enhanced Communication: Regular monitoring and evaluation necessitate communication between
team members and management to address any concerns or roadblocks.
Accountability: Helps hold individuals and teams accountable for achieving their assigned tasks and
objectives.
In essence, tactical planning and control are like the engine and steering wheel of your ship.
Tactical planning defines the course, while tactical control ensures you're navigating effectively and
making adjustments as needed to reach your destination. They work together to bridge the gap between
strategic goals and daily operations, ultimately driving successful execution of your overall strategy.
share
more_vert
Programming and budgeting can be powerful instruments for tactical planning and control by providing a
roadmap and guardrails for resource allocation and project execution. Here's how they fit into the
tactical planning and control framework:
Tactical Planning:
Programming: Programming involves defining the specific tasks, activities, and projects that need to be
undertaken within a particular timeframe (typically a quarter or year) to achieve tactical objectives. Think
of it as creating a detailed itinerary for your short-term journey.
Budgeting: Budgeting assigns financial resources (budget) to each programmed activity. This ensures
there are sufficient funds to complete the planned tasks and achieve the objectives. It's like allocating
your travel budget for gas, meals, and accommodation on your trip.
How Programming & Budgeting Facilitate Tactical Planning:
Clarity and Prioritization: By explicitly defining activities and allocating resources, programming and
budgeting provide clarity on what needs to be done and in what order. This helps prioritize tasks and
ensure focus on activities that contribute most to achieving objectives.
Resource Optimization: Budgeting ensures resources are allocated efficiently and there are no
shortfalls that could derail projects. It allows you to identify potential resource constraints early on and
make adjustments to the program or budget as needed.
Alignment with Strategy: Programming and budgeting should be aligned with the broader strategic
goals. The programmed activities and allocated resources should all contribute to achieving the tactical
objectives that support the overall strategy.
Tactical Control:
Monitoring Progress: Once the program and budget are established, monitoring progress against the
plan is crucial. This involves tracking how well activities are being completed within budget and
timeframe.
Performance Measurement: Relevant metrics should be defined to measure progress towards
programmed activities and budget expenditure. This allows for early identification of any deviations from
the plan.
Corrective Action: If there are deviations from the program or budget, corrective actions need to be
taken. This could involve adjusting timelines, reallocating resources, or revising the budget if necessary.
How Programming & Budgeting Facilitate Tactical Control:
Early Warning System: By tracking progress against the program and budget, programming and
budgeting act as an early warning system. Deviations can be identified and addressed before they
snowball into major problems.
Accountability: A well-defined program and budget hold teams accountable for delivering on planned
activities and managing resources effectively. This fosters a culture of ownership and performance.
Flexibility: Programming and budgeting should be flexible enough to adapt to changing circumstances.
Adjustments can be made to the program or budget as needed to ensure continued progress towards
objectives.
In essence, programming and budgeting provide the nuts and bolts for translating tactical plans
into action. By clearly defining activities, allocating resources, and monitoring progress, they
ensure efficient execution of short-term plans and ultimately contribute to the success of your
overall strategy.
share
more_vert
A budgetary control system is a crucial process for organizations to monitor and manage their financial
resources effectively. It ensures that spending stays aligned with the budget created during the strategic
planning phase. Here's a breakdown of the key steps involved:
Budget Preparation:
1. Align with Strategy: The first step is to ensure the budget reflects the organization's overall strategic
goals and priorities. Strategic objectives should be translated into financial terms, outlining how much
funding is needed for various initiatives.
2. Departmental Inputs: Involve different departments in the budgeting process. They can provide
insights into their specific needs and expected expenses for the upcoming period.
3. Top-Down & Bottom-Up Approach: A well-balanced approach combines top-down targets set by
management with bottom-up estimates from departments. This ensures a realistic and achievable
budget.
4. Approval Process: Once the budget is drafted, it goes through a formal approval process. This
typically involves department heads, senior management, and potentially the board of directors.
Budget Implementation & Monitoring:
1. Communication & Awareness: The approved budget should be communicated clearly to all
departments and relevant personnel. Everyone should understand spending limitations and their role in
adhering to the budget.
2. Tracking & Reporting: Establish systems to track actual expenditures against budgeted amounts.
Regular reports should be generated to analyze spending patterns and identify any variances.
3. Variance Analysis: Deviations from the budget (variances) need to be investigated. Analyze the
reasons for these variances – were there unexpected expenses, cost overruns, or shortfalls in revenue?
Control & Corrective Action:
1. Taking Action: Based on the variance analysis, corrective actions may be necessary. This could
involve reducing discretionary spending, exploring cost-saving measures, or revenue-generating
initiatives.
2. Adapting the Budget: In some cases, significant unforeseen circumstances might necessitate revising
the budget itself. However, this should be done with caution and only after careful evaluation.
Benefits of a Budgetary Control System:
Financial Discipline: Encourages responsible financial management by setting spending limits and
promoting adherence to the budget.
Improved Decision Making: Provides data-driven insights to support informed financial decisions
throughout the year.
Performance Measurement: Helps track progress towards financial goals and identify areas where
adjustments might be needed.
Early Warning System: Highlights potential financial problems early on, allowing for timely corrective
action.
Overall, a well-designed budgetary control system acts as a safeguard for an organization's
financial health. It ensures resources are used efficiently and effectively, ultimately contributing
to the achievement of strategic objectives.
share
more_vert
FLEXIBLE BUDGETING
volume_up
drive_spreadsheetExport to Sheets
Using the Flexible Budget:
Monitor Performance: Track actual activity levels and compare actual costs to the corresponding
budgeted amounts in the flexible budget. Analyze variances to identify areas of efficiency or cost
overruns.
Decision Making: Use the flexible budget to inform decisions about resource allocation, pricing
strategies, and production planning in response to changing market conditions.
Remember: A flexible budget is a tool, not a prediction. Regularly review and update your flexible
budget as your understanding of the business and its cost behavior evolves.
By incorporating flexible budgeting into your financial planning process, you can gain greater
adaptability and make more informed decisions in a dynamic business environment.
share
Both performance budgeting and zero-based budgeting (ZBB) are methods for creating budgets that
focus on efficiency and achieving organizational goals. However, they take different approaches:
Performance Budgeting:
Focus: Performance budgeting emphasizes aligning budgets with organizational goals and objectives.
It links resource allocation to desired outcomes and measures performance based on achieving those
goals.
Process:
1. Strategic Objectives: Start by defining the organization's strategic goals and objectives for the budget
period.
2. Performance Measures: Identify key performance indicators (KPIs) to track progress towards
achieving those objectives. These KPIs could be financial (profitability), operational (efficiency), or
customer-centric (satisfaction).
3. Budget Allocation: Allocate resources (budget) to departments or programs based on their expected
contribution to achieving the strategic goals and objectives. This may involve using historical data, cost-
benefit analysis, or activity-based costing to justify budget requests.
4. Performance Monitoring: Track progress throughout the budget period and compare actual results to
the KPIs and budgeted amounts. Analyze variances and take corrective actions as needed.
Benefits:
o Strategic Alignment: Ensures budgets are aligned with the organization's overall strategy and
priorities.
o Performance-Driven: Focuses on achieving results and value for money.
o Improved Decision Making: Provides data-driven insights to support resource allocation decisions.
Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB)
Focus: ZBB takes a more fundamental approach. It requires justifying all expenses, even recurring
ones, from scratch each budget period. This forces a critical evaluation of whether each expense is still
necessary and contributes to achieving organizational goals.
Process:
1. Decision Packages: All expenditures are grouped into decision packages that outline the activity, its
purpose, expected benefits, and resource requirements (cost).
2. Justification & Ranking: Each decision package is rigorously evaluated and ranked based on its
contribution to organizational goals. Managers must justify why each expense is necessary and how it
aligns with the strategy.
3. Budget Allocation: Resources are allocated based on the ranking of the decision packages. Highest-
ranked packages are funded first, followed by others based on available resources.
Benefits:
o Cost Control: Encourages a culture of cost-consciousness and eliminates unnecessary expenses.
o Improved Efficiency: Forces managers to critically evaluate the necessity of each expense.
o Focus on Value: Prioritizes expenditures based on their contribution to achieving goals.
Choosing Between Performance Budgeting & ZBB:
Performance budgeting is a good choice for organizations that already have a well-defined strategic
plan and established performance measurement systems.
ZBB can be beneficial for organizations undergoing significant changes, facing resource constraints, or
looking to streamline operations. It can be a more time-consuming process compared to performance
budgeting.
In Conclusion:
Both performance budgeting and ZBB offer valuable tools for creating effective and efficient budgets.
The best choice for your organization depends on your specific needs, priorities, and existing financial
management practices. You can even consider a hybrid approach that combines elements of both
methods.
share
BAHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF BUDGETING
volume_up
Traditional budgeting often assumes rationality, where people make well-informed decisions based on
perfect information. However, behavioral science tells us that people's financial decisions can be
influenced by various psychological factors. Here's a closer look at the behavioral aspects of budgeting:
Common Biases and How They Affect Budgeting:
Anchoring Bias: People tend to rely too heavily on the first piece of information they receive. This can
be problematic when setting budget targets. For example, if a department historically received a certain
amount of budget, they might anchor their request on that number, even if it's no longer justified.
Confirmation Bias: People favor information that confirms their existing beliefs. This can lead to
overlooking areas where budget adjustments might be necessary.
Overconfidence Bias: People tend to overestimate their ability to predict future events and
underestimate risks. This can lead to overly optimistic budget forecasts.
Present Bias: People tend to give more weight to immediate rewards or punishments than future
consequences. This can lead to prioritizing short-term spending over long-term financial goals.
Loss Aversion: People feel the pain of loss more intensely than the pleasure of gain. This can lead to a
reluctance to cut expenses, even when necessary.
Strategies to Address Behavioral Biases in Budgeting:
Participative Budgeting: Involve employees in the budgeting process. This can foster a sense of
ownership and encourage more realistic budget estimates.
Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB): ZBB forces a justification for every expense, even recurring ones. This
can help overcome anchoring bias and ensure expenses are truly necessary.
Scenario Planning: Develop budgets for different potential scenarios (optimistic, pessimistic, most
likely). This can help address overconfidence bias and prepare for unexpected circumstances.
Regular Reviews and Feedback: Monitor progress against the budget and provide regular feedback to
teams. This helps address present bias and keeps long-term goals in mind.
Incentives: Consider using incentives that reward responsible budgeting practices and achieving
budget goals.
Additional Considerations:
Transparency and Communication: Clearly communicate the organization's financial goals and the
purpose behind budget targets. This can help employees understand the bigger picture and feel more
invested in achieving those goals.
Focus on Value: Shift the focus from simply meeting budget numbers to demonstrating the value
delivered for the allocated resources. This can help address loss aversion by highlighting the positive
outcomes of responsible spending.
By understanding and addressing these behavioral aspects of budgeting, organizations can create a
more realistic budgeting process, improve financial discipline, and achieve their strategic objectives.
share
more_vert
RESPONSIBILTY ACCOUNTIONG
volume_up
Identifying the right responsibility centers is a crucial first step in implementing an effective responsibility
accounting system. Here's a breakdown of the key factors to consider:
Organizational Structure:
Departments: Existing departments within your organization can often serve as a natural starting point
for responsibility centers. For example, a manufacturing company might have separate responsibility
centers for production, marketing, and human resources.
Functions: Responsibility centers can also be defined based on specific functions within the
organization. This could be relevant for large or complex organizations. For instance, within a marketing
department, there could be separate responsibility centers for brand management, market research,
and advertising.
Products or Services: If your organization offers a variety of products or services, consider creating
responsibility centers for each product line or service offering. This allows for focused performance
measurement and cost control for each product or service.
Decision-Making Authority:
A key aspect of responsibility accounting is holding individuals and departments accountable for their
performance. Therefore, responsibility centers should be aligned with areas where managers have clear
decision-making authority over costs and activities.
Level of Autonomy:
The level of autonomy granted to different departments or functions can also influence how you define
responsibility centers. For instance, if a sales department has significant autonomy over pricing
decisions and marketing strategies, it might be designated as a profit center.
Common Types of Responsibility Centers:
Cost Centers: These centers are primarily responsible for controlling costs associated with their
activities. Examples include production departments, human resources, and research & development.
Performance is measured by comparing actual costs to budgeted costs.
Revenue Centers: These centers focus on generating revenue for the organization. The sales
department is a typical example. Their performance is measured by the amount of revenue generated
and their contribution to profitability.
Profit Centers: These centers have responsibility for both generating revenue and controlling costs. A
branch office or a product line might be considered a profit center. Their performance is measured by
overall profit generated.
Investment Centers: These centers manage investments on behalf of the organization and are held
accountable for generating a return on those investments. Subsidiary companies are a common
example. Their performance is measured by return on investment (ROI) metrics.
Here are some additional tips for identifying responsibility centers:
Focus on manageability: The number of responsibility centers should be manageable to avoid
creating an overly complex system.
Clearly defined boundaries: Ensure clear boundaries between responsibility centers to avoid
confusion about ownership of costs and activities.
Alignment with strategy: Align the responsibility centers with your overall organizational strategy and
objectives.
By carefully considering these factors and tailoring them to your specific organization, you can establish
a well-defined structure of responsibility centers that forms the foundation for a successful responsibility
accounting system.
share
more_vert
Under responsibility accounting, reports are designed to provide clear and concise information about the
performance of each designated responsibility center. These reports should be tailored to the specific
needs of each center and its manager, but here are some general elements you'll likely find:
Content of Responsibility Accounting Reports:
Financial Performance: This is a core element. Reports should compare actual results (revenues,
costs, expenses) to the budgeted amounts for the responsibility center. This allows for quick
identification of variances and areas requiring further analysis.
Performance Metrics (KPIs): Reports should include relevant KPIs specific to the center's objectives.
For a cost center, it might be variances in material costs or labor costs. For a revenue center, it could be
sales generated, customer acquisition costs, or market share.
Explanations for Variances: Reports should not just show the variances but also provide explanations
for any significant deviations from the budget or KPIs. This could involve factors beyond the manager's
control (e.g., unexpected price fluctuations) or areas for improvement within the center's control (e.g.,
inefficiencies).
Types of Responsibility Accounting Reports:
Monthly Performance Reports: These are regular reports typically provided monthly, summarizing the
center's performance for that period. They allow for ongoing monitoring and timely course correction if
needed.
Quarterly or Annual Performance Reports: These reports offer a more comprehensive overview of
performance over a longer period. They can be used for more in-depth analysis and performance
evaluation of the responsibility center manager.
Special Reports: These are customized reports generated on an ad-hoc basis to investigate specific
issues or areas identified during regular reporting. They might focus on a particular cost overrun or a
deviation from a key performance metric.
Benefits of Effective Reporting:
Improved Decision Making: Responsibility accounting reports provide managers with valuable insights
to make informed decisions regarding resource allocation, cost control, and operational strategies within
their area of responsibility.
Enhanced Accountability: Regular reporting holds managers accountable for achieving their budgets
and performance targets, promoting a culture of ownership and responsibility.
Performance Evaluation: These reports form the basis for performance evaluation of responsibility
center managers. By comparing actual results to targets and analyzing variances, management can
assess the effectiveness of each manager.
Early Warning System: Deviations from budgets or KPIs identified through reports can serve as early
warnings of potential problems within a responsibility center, allowing for timely intervention and
corrective action.
Additional Considerations:
Clarity and Conciseness: Reports should be clear, concise, and easy to understand for the designated
recipient, whether it's a department head or senior management.
Frequency and Timing: The frequency of reporting (monthly, quarterly) should be determined based
on the needs of the organization and the level of detail required.
Integration with Other Systems: Ideally, responsibility accounting reports should integrate with other
financial management systems for seamless data flow and analysis.
By implementing a well-designed reporting system within the framework of responsibility accounting,
organizations can empower managers, improve performance measurement, and ultimately achieve their
strategic objectives.
share
more_vert
Operational planning and control (OP&C) is the process of ensuring an organization's day-to-day
operations run smoothly and efficiently to achieve its strategic goals. It involves a series of
interconnected activities focused on:
Planning: Defining what needs to be done, how it will be done, and by whom.
Scheduling: Allocating resources (people, equipment, materials) and setting timelines for tasks and
processes.
Monitoring: Tracking progress against the plan and identifying any deviations.
Controlling: Taking corrective actions to address deviations and ensure the plan is on track.
Benefits of Effective OP&C:
Improved Efficiency: Reduced waste, streamlined processes, and optimal resource utilization lead to
increased efficiency and productivity.
Enhanced Quality: Consistent monitoring and control measures help ensure products and services
meet quality standards.
Cost Control: Effective OP&C helps identify and eliminate unnecessary costs, leading to improved
profitability.
Increased Customer Satisfaction: By ensuring consistent quality and timely delivery, OP&C
contributes to higher customer satisfaction.
Improved Strategic Alignment: Effective OP&C translates strategic goals into actionable plans and
ensures day-to-day operations are aligned with the overall strategy.
Key Elements of Operational Planning:
Demand Forecasting: Predicting future customer demand for products or services. This forms the
basis for production planning, resource allocation, and staffing needs.
Process Design: Defining the steps involved in producing goods or delivering services. This includes
identifying bottlenecks, opportunities for improvement, and ensuring quality control measures are in
place.
Capacity Planning: Aligning production capacity with expected demand to avoid stockouts or
overproduction.
Resource Allocation: Assigning personnel, equipment, materials, and other resources necessary to
complete tasks and achieve operational goals.
Key Elements of Operational Control:
Performance Measurement: Establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) to track progress in areas
like production output, quality control, delivery timelines, and costs.
Variance Analysis: Investigating deviations from the plan to identify root causes and implement
corrective actions.
Inventory Management: Maintaining optimal inventory levels to avoid stockouts or excessive carrying
costs.
Scheduling and Dispatching: Creating and managing work schedules for personnel and equipment to
ensure smooth production flow.
OP&C Tools and Techniques:
Gantt Charts: Visualize project timelines and task dependencies.
Critical Path Method (CPM): Identify the critical path of tasks in a project to optimize scheduling and
resource allocation.
Statistical Process Control (SPC): Monitor and control production processes to minimize defects and
improve quality.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems: Integrate various operational functions (planning,
inventory, scheduling, etc.) into a central software system.
Effective OP&C is an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring, adaptation, and
improvement. By implementing a robust OP&C system, organizations can achieve their
operational goals, optimize resource utilization, and gain a competitive edge.
share
more_vert
Standards for operations, when used as instruments of planning and control, play a crucial role in
ensuring operational efficiency and effectiveness within an organization. These standards serve as
benchmarks for various aspects of your operations, guiding planning efforts and enabling control
mechanisms to identify and address deviations. Here's a breakdown of their key functions:
Planning:
Setting Goals and Objectives: Operational standards translate broad organizational goals into
specific, measurable targets for each process or activity. This provides a clear roadmap for operational
planning and resource allocation.
Developing Work Instructions: Standards can be used to define clear and consistent work instructions
that outline the expected procedures, methods, and best practices for completing tasks. This ensures
quality and consistency across operations.
Capacity Planning: Standards related to factors like production times, cycle times, and machine
capabilities aid in accurate capacity planning. This helps organizations determine their ability to meet
customer demand and avoid bottlenecks.
Control:
Performance Measurement: Operational standards serve as a baseline against which actual
performance can be measured. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are often derived from these
standards to track metrics like production output, quality control, lead times, and costs.
Variance Analysis: Deviations from operational standards can be identified through performance
measurement. Variance analysis helps pinpoint the root causes of these deviations, whether it's
equipment malfunction, inefficient processes, or supplier issues.
Corrective Action: Once the root causes of deviations are identified, corrective actions can be
implemented to bring performance back in line with the standards. This promotes continuous
improvement and ensures operational effectiveness.
Types of Operational Standards:
Quality Standards: These define the acceptable level of quality for products or services. Examples
include defect rates, specifications, and conformance to industry regulations.
Performance Standards: These focus on measuring efficiency and effectiveness. Examples include
production output per unit time, cycle times, and delivery lead times.
Cost Standards: These establish benchmarks for allowable costs associated with operations.
Examples include material usage rates, labor costs per unit, and overhead expenses.
Safety Standards: These define safe work practices and procedures to minimize accidents and
injuries.
Benefits of Using Standards:
Improved Efficiency: Standardized processes minimize variability and lead to smoother operations,
reducing waste and rework.
Enhanced Quality: Consistent adherence to quality standards ensures consistent product or service
quality.
Cost Control: Identifying deviations from cost standards helps pinpoint areas for cost optimization.
Increased Productivity: Clear work instructions and efficient processes contribute to higher
productivity levels.
Improved Communication and Training: Standards provide a common language for communication
across departments and facilitate the development of effective training programs.
Popular Standards for Operational Planning and Control:
ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems: A widely adopted standard that provides a framework for
establishing a quality management system. It emphasizes continuous improvement and customer
satisfaction.
Six Sigma: A data-driven methodology for minimizing defects and process variations. It uses statistical
analysis to identify and eliminate sources of error.
Lean Manufacturing: A philosophy focused on eliminating waste and maximizing value in
manufacturing processes. It emphasizes continuous flow, pull production, and employee empowerment.
Implementing Effective Standards:
Involvement of Stakeholders: Involve relevant stakeholders (employees, managers, customers) in the
development and implementation of operational standards to ensure buy-in and ownership.
Documentation and Communication: Clearly document standards and communicate them effectively
to all personnel involved in the operations.
Training and Development: Provide necessary training to ensure employees understand the
standards and have the skills to adhere to them.
Regular Review and Updates: Standards should be reviewed and updated periodically to reflect
changes in technology, customer requirements, or best practices.
By establishing and effectively utilizing operational standards as instruments of planning and control,
organizations can achieve greater efficiency, improve quality, and gain a competitive edge in the
marketplace.
share
more_vert
INVESTIGATION OF VARIANCES
volume_up
Investigating Variances: Diving Deeper into the "Why" Behind the
Numbers
Variance analysis is a crucial tool, but it's just the first step. The real power lies in investigating the
reasons behind significant variances. Here's a roadmap to guide you through a thorough variance
investigation:
1. Prioritize Variances:
Materiality: Focus on variances that have a significant financial impact. Small variances might not
warrant a deep dive.
Frequency: Investigate variances that occur repeatedly, as they might indicate systemic issues.
Trend Analysis: Look for trends in variances over time. A consistently unfavorable variance suggests a
persistent problem.
2. Gather Information:
Production Records: Review production records to analyze material usage, labor hours, and machine
downtime.
Purchasing Documents: Examine purchase orders, invoices, and contracts to understand material
prices and purchase quantities.
Employee Timecards: Analyze employee timecards to assess labor efficiency and identify potential
issues like absenteeism.
Quality Control Reports: Review quality control reports to determine if scrap rates or rework contribute
to material quantity variances.
Market Research: If material price variances are suspected, research market trends and supplier
pricing to understand external factors.
3. Conduct Root Cause Analysis:
Brainstorming: Gather relevant personnel (production, purchasing, quality control) to brainstorm
potential causes for the variance.
5 Whys Technique: Ask "why" five times to delve deeper into the root cause. For example, if the
variance is high material usage, ask why more material was used, why there was waste, and so on.
Isolating Variances: If multiple variances are interrelated, isolate the impact of each to pinpoint the root
cause. For instance, high labor hours and high material usage might indicate an issue with production
process design, not necessarily inefficiency with individual workers.
4. Evaluate Potential Causes:
Material Variances:
o Inefficient material usage due to improper cutting, overproduction, or design flaws.
o Price fluctuations due to changes in market conditions, supplier negotiations, or unexpected
transportation costs.
o Receiving errors or inaccurate inventory records.
Labor Variances:
o Inefficiencies in production processes leading to wasted time or rework.
o Employee absenteeism or lack of proper training.
o Inaccurate timekeeping or reporting.
Overhead Variances:
o Changes in production volume not reflected in the budget.
o Inefficiencies in utility usage or maintenance practices.
o Unexpected costs not accounted for in the budget.
5. Develop and Implement Corrective Actions:
Once the root cause is identified, develop corrective actions to address the issue.
This could involve:
o Revising production processes to minimize waste.
o Renegotiating supplier contracts for better pricing.
o Implementing stricter quality control measures.
o Investing in employee training to improve efficiency.
o Updating budgets to reflect changes in overhead costs.
6. Monitor and Follow Up:
After implementing corrective actions, monitor the impact on future variances.
Track if the variances are trending favorably or if further adjustments are needed.
Regularly review variance reports to ensure the implemented solutions are effective in the long run.
Additional Tips:
Use Variance Investigation Tools: Utilize statistical techniques or visual aids like Pareto charts to
identify and prioritize variances.
Document the Investigation Process: Maintain clear documentation of the investigation process,
including the identified causes, implemented actions, and their effectiveness.
Communication and Collaboration: Ensure clear communication between departments involved in the
investigation and implementation of corrective actions.
By following these steps and conducting thorough variance investigations, organizations can move
beyond simply identifying deviations to implementing solutions that drive continuous improvement in
operational efficiency and financial performance.
share
more_vert
REVISION OF STANDARDS
volume_up
All three terms - internal audit, operational audit, and management audit - are interrelated within the
realm of organizational evaluation. But each has a distinct focus and purpose:
Internal Audit:
Broad Scope: Internal audit is a broad-based, independent review activity designed to assess the
organization's overall governance, risk management, and internal control systems.
Focus: Internal auditors evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls, identify areas for improvement,
and ensure compliance with regulations and policies. They may examine various aspects like financial
reporting, operational processes, IT systems, and adherence to ethical codes.
Role: Internal auditors act as independent advisors to management, providing objective insights and
recommendations for improving organizational efficiency and effectiveness.
Operational Audit:
Specific Focus: Operational audits delve deeper into specific operational areas or processes within an
organization. They assess the efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of these operations.
Objectives: The goal of an operational audit is to identify opportunities for improvement in areas like
production processes, service delivery, resource utilization, and cost control.
Focus Areas: Operational audits can target specific departments, functions, or projects. Examples
include procurement practices, inventory management, marketing campaigns, or IT infrastructure.
Management Audit:
Management Practices: Management audits evaluate the effectiveness of management practices and
decision-making processes within an organization.
Focus: This type of audit assesses how well management is planning, organizing, directing, and
controlling the organization's resources to achieve its strategic objectives. It may examine areas like
leadership effectiveness, risk management strategies, communication practices, and talent
management.
Relationship to Others: Management audits can be considered a subset of internal audits, with a
specific focus on management practices.
Here's a table summarizing the key differences:
Feature Internal Audit Operational Audit Management Audit
Governance,
Efficiency,
risk Effectiveness
effectiveness,
Focus management, of management
and economy
internal practices
of operations
controls
Identify
Improve Assess
opportunities
overall management's
for
Objectives organizational ability to
improvement
efficiency and achieve
in specific
effectiveness strategic goals
operations
drive_spreadsheetExport to Sheets
Choosing the Right Audit:
The type of audit conducted depends on the specific needs of the organization. Here are some general
guidelines:
Internal audits are typically conducted regularly to provide ongoing assurance about the organization's
internal control environment.
Operational audits are often performed in response to specific concerns about operational efficiency,
cost control, or process effectiveness.
Management audits might be undertaken periodically to assess the overall effectiveness of leadership
and management practices.
Synergy and Collaboration:
While each audit type has a distinct focus, they can be complementary. Findings from one type of audit
can often trigger the need for another. For instance, an internal audit might identify weaknesses in
procurement controls, prompting a more in-depth operational audit of the procurement process.
Effective communication and collaboration between internal auditors, operational audit teams, and
management are crucial for a comprehensive organizational evaluation process.
AS AN INSTRUMENT OF CONTROL
volume_up
Internal audits, operational audits, and management audits can all be valuable instruments of control
within an organization. Here's how each contributes to organizational control:
Internal Audit as an Instrument of Control:
Risk Management: Internal audits assess the adequacy of risk management practices, ensuring the
organization proactively identifies and mitigates potential risks that could impact its operations or
financial performance.
Control Environment: By evaluating internal controls, internal audits identify weaknesses that could
lead to errors, fraud, or waste. This helps strengthen the organization's control environment and deter
non-compliance.
Governance: Internal audits assess adherence to policies, procedures, and regulations. This promotes
good governance and ensures the organization operates within legal and ethical frameworks.
Continuous Improvement: Internal audit recommendations often identify opportunities to improve
processes, controls, and resource allocation. Implementing these recommendations strengthens the
organization's overall control posture.
Operational Audit as an Instrument of Control:
Efficiency and Effectiveness: Operational audits assess how well operations are performing in terms
of efficiency (doing things right) and effectiveness (doing the right things). By identifying areas for
improvement, operational audits help optimize resource utilization and achieve desired outcomes.
Cost Control: Operational audits can pinpoint areas of excessive waste or unnecessary spending. This
helps management identify opportunities to tighten controls and reduce costs.
Performance Monitoring: Operational audits provide a snapshot of how well operational processes are
performing against established standards. This allows management to identify deviations and take
corrective actions to maintain control.
Compliance: Operational audits can assess adherence to operational standards, safety protocols, or
industry regulations. This helps ensure operational activities are conducted within a controlled
environment.
Management Audit as an Instrument of Control:
Strategic Alignment: Management audits assess how well management practices are aligned with the
organization's overall strategy. This ensures resources are directed towards achieving strategic
objectives and maintaining control over the organization's direction.
Decision-Making: Management audits evaluate the effectiveness of management's decision-making
processes. This helps identify areas where decision-making could be improved to achieve better control
over outcomes.
Performance Management: Management audits assess the effectiveness of performance
management practices within the organization. Strong performance management systems ensure
employees are working towards achieving organizational goals, contributing to overall control.
Risk Management: Management audits can evaluate how well management is identifying and
managing risks associated with the organization's operations. This helps mitigate potential disruptions
and maintain control over the business environment.
Overall, a comprehensive internal audit program that incorporates elements of operational and
management audits can be a powerful tool for organizational control. By regularly evaluating
various aspects of the organization, identifying areas for improvement, and implementing
corrective actions, organizations can achieve greater efficiency, effectiveness, and overall
control over their operations.
TYPES OF VARIANCES
volume_up
Variances are the differences between budgeted and actual costs or sales within an organization. They
are essential for understanding how well an organization is performing compared to its plans. There are
several main types of variances, categorized by what aspect of the business they relate to:
Cost Variances:
Material Variances:
o Material Price Variance (MPV): This measures the difference between the actual price paid for
materials and the standard price per unit budgeted. It can be favorable (if the actual price is lower) or
unfavorable (if the actual price is higher).
o Material Quantity Variance (MQV): This measures the difference between the actual quantity of
materials used and the standard quantity allowed for production. It can be favorable (if less material is
used) or unfavorable (if more material is used). This variance could be caused by inefficiencies in
cutting materials, overproduction, or design flaws.
Labor Variances:
o Labor Rate Variance (LRV): This measures the difference between the actual hourly wage rate paid to
workers and the standard wage rate budgeted. It can be favorable (if the actual rate is lower) or
unfavorable (if the actual rate is higher). This could be due to unexpected overtime or changes in pay
agreements.
o Labor Efficiency Variance (LEV): This measures the difference between the actual labor hours used
for production and the standard labor hours allowed. It can be favorable (if less labor is used) or
unfavorable (if more labor is used). This could be caused by inefficiencies in production processes,
inadequate training, or unexpected equipment downtime.
Overhead Variances:
o Overhead Spending Variance (OSV): This measures the difference between the actual total overhead
costs incurred and the budgeted overhead costs. It can be favorable (if actual costs are lower) or
unfavorable (if actual costs are higher). This could be caused by changes in utility rates, maintenance
costs, or other unforeseen expenses.
o Overhead Volume Variance (OVV): This measures the difference between the budgeted variable
overhead costs for the actual production volume and the variable overhead costs incurred based on the
standard volume. It can be favorable (if actual volume is lower than expected) or unfavorable (if actual
volume is higher than expected). This variance is caused by fluctuations in production volume relative to
the budget.
Sales Variances:
Sales Price Variance (SPV): This measures the difference between the actual selling price of a good or
service and the standard selling price budgeted. It can be favorable (if the actual price is higher) or
unfavorable (if the actual price is lower). This could be caused by changes in market demand,
competitor pricing strategies, or offering discounts.
Sales Volume Variance (SVV): This measures the difference between the actual number of units of a
good or service sold and the standard sales volume budgeted. It can be favorable (if more units are sold
than expected) or unfavorable (if fewer units are sold than expected). This could be caused by
marketing campaign effectiveness, economic factors, or changes in customer preferences.
Sales Mix Variance (SMV): This measures the difference between the budgeted profitability of the
sales mix and the actual profitability of the sales mix. It occurs when the proportion of different products
or services sold deviates from the budgeted mix. It can be favorable or unfavorable depending on the
profitability of the products sold.
Understanding these different types of variances allows managers to pinpoint areas where they can
improve efficiency, control costs, and ultimately boost profitability.
USAGE VARIANCES
volume_up
Usage variance, also known as quantity variance, is a specific type of cost variance that focuses on the
difference between the actual quantity of resources (materials or labor) used in production and the
standard quantity that was budgeted or expected. It applies to both direct materials and direct labor.
Here's a breakdown of usage variances:
Types of Usage Variances:
Material Usage Variance (MUV): This measures the difference between the actual quantity of materials
used and the standard quantity allowed for production, valued at the standard price per unit. It can be
favorable or unfavorable:
o Favorable MUV: Occurs when less material is used than expected (actual quantity < standard
quantity). This could be due to efficient material usage practices, improved cutting techniques, or
reduced waste.
o Unfavorable MUV: Occurs when more material is used than expected (actual quantity > standard
quantity). This could be caused by inefficiencies in production processes, poor quality control leading to
rework, or inaccurate estimates during budgeting.
Labor Usage Variance (LUV): This measures the difference between the actual number of labor hours
used for production and the standard number of labor hours allowed, valued at the standard wage rate
per hour. Similar to MUV, it can be favorable or unfavorable:
o Favorable LUV: Occurs when less labor time is used than expected (actual hours < standard hours).
This could be due to improved worker efficiency, automation of tasks, or streamlined production
processes.
o Unfavorable LUV: Occurs when more labor time is used than expected (actual hours > standard
hours). This could be caused by inadequate worker training, unexpected equipment breakdowns, or
inefficiencies in production scheduling.
Importance of Usage Variances:
Usage variances are crucial for organizations to understand how efficiently they are utilizing resources.
By analyzing these variances, managers can identify areas for improvement in:
Production processes: Streamlining processes to minimize material waste and rework.
Inventory management: Maintaining optimal inventory levels to avoid stockouts or excessive carrying
costs.
Employee training: Investing in programs to improve worker skills and efficiency.
Production planning: Refining production schedules to minimize idle time and optimize resource
allocation.
Computation of Usage Variances:
Material Usage Variance (MUV): (Standard Price per Unit) * (Actual Quantity Used - Standard Quantity
Allowed)
Labor Usage Variance (LUV): (Standard Wage Rate per Hour) * (Standard Hours Allowed - Actual
Hours Used)
Investigating Usage Variances:
Once a significant usage variance is identified, a deeper investigation is required to pinpoint the root
cause. This might involve:
Reviewing production records to analyze material usage and labor hours.
Examining quality control reports to assess if scrap rates or rework contribute to MUV.
Evaluating employee time cards to understand potential causes behind LUV.
By effectively analyzing and investigating usage variances, organizations can take corrective actions to
improve resource utilization, reduce costs, and ultimately enhance their profitability.
DEFINE TOTAL PROFIT RETURN ON INVESTMENT RESIDUAL INCOME
ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED
volume_up
All the terms you mentioned are financial metrics used to assess a company's performance and
profitability, but they each have distinct nuances:
Total Profit:
This is the most basic measure of a company's financial performance. It's simply the difference between
total revenue and total expenses over a specific period.
Formula: Total Profit = Total Revenue - Total Expenses
Limitation: Total profit doesn't consider the investment required to generate that profit. A company with
high total profit might not necessarily be using its resources efficiently.
Return on Investment (ROI):
This metric goes beyond total profit by considering the investment made to achieve that profit. It
expresses profitability as a percentage of the cost of the investment. ROI helps assess how efficiently a
company is using its resources to generate returns.
Formula: ROI = (Total Profit / Investment) x 100%
Variations: There are different variations of ROI depending on the specific investment being evaluated.
For example, Return on Assets (ROA) measures profitability relative to total assets, while Return on
Equity (ROE) focuses on profitability relative to shareholders' equity.
Residual Income (RI):
This metric builds upon ROI by considering the opportunity cost of capital. It reflects the amount of profit
earned in excess of what investors expect based on the risk associated with the investment.
Formula: RI = Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) - (Cost of Capital x Total Capital)
Interpretation: A positive residual income indicates the company is generating returns above the
minimum expected return required by investors. A negative residual income suggests the company
might not be using its capital effectively.
Economic Value Added (EVA):
Similar to residual income, EVA is a performance measure that considers the cost of capital. It reflects
the economic profit generated by a company, taking into account all costs, including the opportunity cost
of capital.
Formula: EVA = NOPAT - (Cost of Capital x Total Capital Employed)
Interpretation: A positive EVA indicates the company is creating economic value for its shareholders,
while a negative EVA suggests the company is destroying value.
Here's a table summarizing the key differences:
Metric Description
drive_spreadsheetExport to Sheets
Choosing the right metric depends on the specific context and what aspect of performance you're trying
to assess. However, ROI, Residual Income, and EVA provide more nuanced insights into profitability
compared to just looking at total profit, as they consider the investment required to generate that profit
Here are the formulas for some common variance types:
Cost Variances:
Material Price Variance (MPV): (Actual Price per Unit - Standard Price per Unit) * Actual Quantity Used
Material Quantity Variance (MQV): (Standard Price per Unit) * (Actual Quantity Used - Standard
Quantity Allowed)
Labor Rate Variance (LRV): (Actual Wage Rate per Hour - Standard Wage Rate per Hour) * Actual
Hours Used
Labor Efficiency Variance (LEV): (Standard Wage Rate per Hour) * (Standard Hours Allowed - Actual
Hours Used)
Overhead Spending Variance (OSV): Total Actual Overhead Costs - Total Budgeted Overhead Costs
Overhead Volume Variance (OVV): (Budgeted Variable Overhead Rate per Unit) * (Actual Production
Volume - Standard Production Volume)
Sales Variances:
Sales Price Variance (SPV): (Actual Selling Price per Unit - Standard Selling Price per Unit) * Actual
Units Sold
Sales Volume Variance (SVV): (Standard Selling Price per Unit) * (Actual Units Sold - Standard Sales
Volume)
Sales Mix Variance (SMV): (Contribution Margin per Unit for Actual Sales Mix) - (Contribution Margin
per Unit for Budgeted Sales Mix) * Actual Units Sold
Note:
These formulas assume you have already established standard prices, quantities, rates, and other
relevant data for budgeting purposes.
Some variations of these formulas might exist depending on specific accounting practices.
Additional Formulas:
Usage Variance (applicable to both materials and labor): (Standard Price/Rate per Unit) * (Actual
Quantity/Hours Used - Standard Quantity/Hours Allowed)
This formula combines Material Usage Variance (MUV) and Labor Usage Variance (LUV) into a single
concept.
By understanding these formulas and applying them to your data, you can calculate variances and
analyze the reasons behind them. This helps organizations identify areas for improvement in cost
control, efficiency, and overall profitability.
Here are the specific formulas for price variance and cost variance:
Price Variance:
Material Price Variance (MPV): (Actual Price per Unit - Standard Price per Unit) * Actual Quantity Used
This formula calculates the difference between the actual price paid for a material and the budgeted
(standard) price per unit. It's multiplied by the actual quantity used to determine the total price variance.
A positive variance indicates the material was purchased at a higher price than expected (unfavorable),
while a negative variance indicates a lower price than expected (favorable).
Cost Variance:
There isn't a single universal formula for cost variance because it's an umbrella term encompassing
various types of variances related to production costs. The specific cost variance formula depends on
the type of cost you're analyzing. Here are some common examples:
Material Quantity Variance (MQV): (Standard Price per Unit) * (Actual Quantity Used - Standard
Quantity Allowed)
This formula calculates the variance arising from the difference between the actual quantity of material
used and the standard quantity allowed for production. A positive variance indicates more material was
used than expected (unfavorable), while a negative variance indicates less material was used
(favorable).
Labor Rate Variance (LRV): (Actual Wage Rate per Hour - Standard Wage Rate per Hour) * Actual
Hours Used
This formula calculates the variance arising from the difference between the actual wage rate paid to
workers and the standard wage rate budgeted. A positive variance indicates a higher wage rate than
expected (unfavorable), while a negative variance indicates a lower wage rate (favorable).
Labor Efficiency Variance (LEV): (Standard Wage Rate per Hour) * (Standard Hours Allowed - Actual
Hours Used)
This formula calculates the variance arising from the difference between the standard number of labor
hours allowed for production and the actual number of hours used. A positive variance indicates more
labor hours were used than expected (unfavorable), while a negative variance indicates less labor time
was used (favorable).
Overhead Spending Variance (OSV): Total Actual Overhead Costs - Total Budgeted Overhead Costs
This formula calculates the variance between the actual total overhead costs incurred and the budgeted
overhead costs. A positive variance indicates higher overhead costs than expected (unfavorable), while
a negative variance indicates lower overhead costs (favorable).
Understanding the Distinction:
Price variance focuses solely on the difference between the actual price paid and the budgeted price
for a resource (material, labor).
Cost variance encompasses a broader range of variances that can arise from both price differences
and usage inefficiencies (quantity variances) related to materials, labor, and overhead costs.
By calculating and analyzing both price variances and cost variances, organizations can gain deeper
insights into their cost control effectiveness and identify areas for improvement in procurement
practices, production processes, and overall operational efficiency.