Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Received 23 November 1998; received in revised form 8 January 1999; accepted 12 January 1999
Abstract
SiC powders were pressureless sintered to about 98% of the theoretical density by using 10 wt.% (Al2O3 Y2O3) as sintering additives.
The densi®cation mechanism was attributed to liquid-phase sintering due to the formation of a eutectic liquid between Al2O3 and Y2O3 at
sintering temperatures. SEM observation revealed that SiC exhibited a uniformly distributed ®ne-grained microstructure and a highly
intergranular fracture behavior. The maximum values of strength and toughness were up to 625 MPa and 7.5 MPa m1/2, respectively. The
improved toughness is considered to be mainly associated with the de¯ection of cracks along interphase boundaries due to a weak interface
as well as with the introduction of microcracks at the interface between SiC grains and the secondary phases due to a residual tensile stress
from thermal expansion mismatch. # 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Silicon carbide; Pressureless sintering; Mechanical properties; Residual stress; Interface; Microcrack
0254-0584/99/$ ± see front matter # 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 2 5 4 - 0 5 8 4 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 3 9 - 5
140 J.H. She, K. Ueno / Materials Chemistry and Physics 59 (1999) 139±142
Fig. 1. Relative density as a function of Y2O3 content for SiC-10 wt.% Fig. 2. Linear shrinkage as a function of Y2O3 content for SiC-10 wt.%
(Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics sintered at 18508C (triangles), 19008C (circles), (Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics sintered at 18508C (triangles), 19008C (circles),
19508C (diamonds) and 20008C (squares). 19508C (diamonds) and 20008C (squares).
J.H. She, K. Ueno / Materials Chemistry and Physics 59 (1999) 139±142 141
Fig. 3. Weight loss as a function of Y2O3 content for SiC-10 wt.% Fig. 5. Flexural strength as a function of Y2O3 content for SiC-10 wt.%
(Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics sintered at 18508C (triangles), 19008C (circles), (Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics sintered at 19008C (circles), 19508C (dia-
19508C (diamonds) and 20008C (squares). monds) and 20008C (squares).
peratures may enhance the evaporation of liquid phases and droplets can be seen on the surface of SiC grains due to a
the reactions between SiC and additives, maximum densi- relatively high amount of Al2O3, which is easy to volatilize
ties were not obtained at 20008C, where the sintering at high temperatures. In contrast, SiC-10 wt.%
shrinkage reached highest values. (Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramic with 62.5 wt.% Y2O3 in the addi-
During sintering, the volatilization of liquid phases as tives exhibited a `clean' surface. This phenomenon suggests
well as the reactions between SiC and additives may also that an excessive addition of Al2O3 is needed to suppress the
cause the loss of weight. As shown in Fig. 3, the weight loss evaporation of Al2O3 and therefore obtain high sintered
of SiC-10 wt.% (Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics increases with densities. As shown in Fig. 1, the sintered densities
increasing temperature. In addition, it can be seen in Fig. 3 increased with increasing Al2O3 addition.
that the weight loss is higher at lower Y2O3 contents, i.e., The ¯exural strength of SiC-10 wt.% (Al2O3Y2O3)
Al2O3-rich compositions have higher weight loss than ceramics is illustrated in Fig. 5 as a function of Y2O3
Y2O3-rich compositions. content. Over the whole range of Y2O3 contents, the
Fig. 4 shows the fracture surfaces of SiC-10 wt.% strengths were in excess of 500 MPa, which is at the upper
(Al2O3Y2O3) ceramics with different Y2O3 contents. limit of boron- and carbon-doped SiC. Especially at a
For the specimen with 25 wt.% Y2O3 in the additives, many sintering temperature of 19508C, a high strength up to
625 MPa was achieved for SiC-10 wt.% (Al2O3 Y2O3)
ceramics with 25 wt.% Y2O3 in the additives. This should be
attributed to a relatively homogeneous microstructure with-
out large abnormal grains, which may act as ¯aw origins. In
addition, the strength of SiC-10 wt.% (Al2O3 Y2O3) cera-
mics decreased with increasing Y2O3 content. The decrease
in strength is estimated to result from the increase in residual
pores, i.e., the decrease in sintered density. As can be seen in
Fig. 1, the sintered density decreased with increasing Y2O3
content.
It has been reported [10] that the fracture mode in boron-
and carbon-doped SiC is predominantly transgranular. How-
ever, it is interesting to note in Fig. 6 that SiC-10 wt.%
(Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics exhibited a highly intergranular
fracture behavior. This phenomenon is considered to be
related to the characteristics of secondary phases. As shown
in Fig. 6, the secondary phase is primarily located as a
continuous ®lm at the grain boundaries. Since the major part
of the intergranular phase was YAG, which has a larger
thermal expansion coef®cient than SiC, a residual tensile
stress would be generated at the interface between SiC and
YAG upon cooling down from sintering temperatures. The
existence of such a stress may weaken the interphase
boundaries, leading to intergranular fracture.
Fig. 4. Fracture surfaces of SiC-10 wt.% (Al2O3Y2O3) ceramics with Fig. 7 shows the fracture toughness of SiC-10 wt.%
(A) 25 wt.% and (B) 62.5 wt.% Y2O3 in the additives. (Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics as a function of Y2O3 content.
142 J.H. She, K. Ueno / Materials Chemistry and Physics 59 (1999) 139±142
Fig. 6. SEM micrograph of a fracture surface for SiC-10 wt.% Fig. 8. SEM micrograph of Vickers indentation cracks in SiC-10 wt.%
(Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics sintered at 19508C with 37.5 wt.% Y2O3 in (Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics sintered at 19508C with 37.5 wt.% Y2O3 in the
the additives. additives.
[1] Prochazka, S., in: J.J. Burke, A.E. Gorum, R.M. Katz (Eds.),
Proceedings of the Conference on Ceramics for High-Performance
Applications, Brook Hill Publishing Co., Chestnut Hill, 1975, p. 239.
[2] M. Omori, H. Takei, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 3744.
[3] R.A. Cutler, T.B. Jackson, in: V.J. Tenny (Ed.), Proceedings of the
Third International Symposium on Ceramic Materials and Compo-
nents for Engine, American Ceramic Society, Westerville, 1989,
p. 309.
[4] M.A. Mulla, V.D. Krstic, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 70 (1991) 439.
[5] L.S. Sigl, H.J. Kleebe, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 (1993) 773.
[6] N.P. Padture, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (1994) 519.
[7] S.K. Lee, C.H. Kim, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (1994) 1655.
[8] E.M. Levin, C.R. Robbins, H.F. McMurtie, in: M.K. Reser (Ed.),
Phase Diagram for Ceramists, American Ceramic Society, Colum-
Fig. 7. Fracture toughness as a function of Y2O3 content for SiC-10 wt.% bus, 1969, fig. 2344.
(Al2O3 Y2O3) ceramics sintered at 19008C (circles), 19508C (dia- [9] Y.W. Kim, M. Mitomo, J.G. Lee, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 104 (1996) 816.
monds) and 20008C (squares). [10] S.K. Lee, Y.C. Kim, C.H. Kim, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 5321.