Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. The text is based on the phrase that I received in Jakarta through a short message
(sms) from my dear friend, an Acehnese, moslem woman on the evening of May
17, 2003. After another long message, I recomposed the words that we shared as a
way of strengthening her in her struggle along with the people in Aceh in the midst
of violence against the people of Aceh. The violence was especially noticeable
since the government of Indonesia set up military action in the Aceh area in May
after peace negotiations with the Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (the Acehnese Independ-
ence Movement that demanded Aceh's independence from Indonesia) in Aceh
failed. The original message she sent me was as followed (in Indonesian): 'Aku
berharap angin kan menemaniku dengan syaimya. Sungguh malam ini hatiku ga-
lau,hasratku patah, gairahku kalah setelah mendengar tabuhan perang. Aku ber-
harap angin kan menemaniku dengan syaimya.' Aceh is a region in western Indo-
nesia where the population is predominantly Moslem. Regarding the composition
of religion Islamic claims, Aceh is the first place in terms of the number of Mos-
lems. In fact, it is still considerably true that the biggest Moslem population in the
world is in Indonesia. Indonesia has been well known as a multi-faith and multi-
cultural society. Unfortunately until now, the state only recognized six religions
formally or legally: Islam, Christian (meaning: Protestant), Roman Catholic, Hin-
duism, Buddhism and Confucianism. While other faiths, including local beliefs, are
considered as non-religions and, therefore, have no legal rights before the law. In-
donesia is also known as a land of thousands of islands with more than 200 lan-
guages and dialects.
2. A much shorter version of this presentation was presented before the Joint Interna-
tional Seminar on 'Women in Mission,' Bossey, Switzerland, June 2003.
3. He is the second president of Indonesia who came to power in the late 1960s and
ruled the country for 30 years until his (so called) 'resignation' in 1998.
4. This identification is based on the data of the results of the 4 years of research of
social conflict and violence in Indonesia (after the violent acts in May 1998 in Ja-
karta) by the research team of Trisakti University coordinated by Dadan U.D. It
was presented at the One Day Consultation on 'Building a Community to Over-
come Violence' coordinated jointly by the Center of Research and Service to Soci-
of the regime. However, it is not totally wrong ifit is said that the year
1998 marks the kairos moment in the life of this nation. It is the kairos
moment because the people- the powerless - began to reclaim their
place as subjects in the history of the nation. There the single narrative
of Indonesia was broken into pieces and into the thousands of stories
and definitions of the 'new' Indonesia. The subject of the history has
changed (that is-the people oflndonesia), therefore, this new subject is
trying to change the subject of the narrative/story into the story of
democracy.
Many have realized that to change the subject of the story into
democracy is not just a 'blink of an eye' process. According to a deep
and comprehensive research of Indonesia5, there have been new fac-
tors in the social, economic and political lives of Indonesia since 1998
that have opened another layer oflndonesian's face. Those factors are:
1. The lost of the authentic and relevant leadership that caused dis-
trust of the institutions, especially the state and the central gov-
ernment;
2. The emergence of interdependency (as a character of globaliza-
tion) versus independency in the context of the autonomous region
that is a way of struggling to define one's own identity;
3. The unmanaged, pluralistic character oflndonesian society;
4. The low quality of human resources in many areas due to the lim-
ited educational access for many people as well as the policy of
school curricula that, in the past, had to be designed by the gov-
ernment without adapting to the characteristics of the cultural and
religious diversity in many parts of Indonesia. This fact highlights
the failure of the progressive paradigm and result-oriented educa-
tional system in the past. (Moreover, the recent political approach
to the educational system has not yet been able to work outside
such closed paradigm [in terms of faith, economic and social)).
These factors are clearly the intertwining factors with other un-
derlying causes of conflict and violence such as the power struggle
over the ownership of natural resources, the political struggle of
the elites (both the military and the non military groups) to hold on
to the power. It is also the struggle of other parts of the society
(students, women's activists, human rights activists, the laborers
5. See note 4.
and the migrant workers) who have been trying to dismantle the
unjust policy and praxis of the state and the government.
By pulling together these factors, it is understandable if one then asks
'how did the society which had been known as tolerant suddenly
change to be a racist and brutal society?' 'How can we explain such
social discontinuity?' 6
My struggle, even now, is whether or not a social discontinuity is
happening in Indonesia. Still the main question is how Indonesian
people, after reclaiming the place of themselves as subjects of history
and changing the subject of the political discourse into democratic and
now being in the transition of it, can build a new self-understanding
without holding onto the policy and practices of violence against each
other. Here, to my understanding, religions can still play a construc-
tive and transformative role. Religion can play a significant role in
managing the pluralistic character of Indonesia as well as transform-
ing the tendency and practices of ritualism in religious institutions.
Moreover, the positive characters of this nation, such as family based
values as togetherness, friendliness and some more, need to be elabo-
rated. 7 In the midst of such radical change in the life of the Indonesian
nation, I have seen the need to shift the subject of mission that must be
started from looking at as well as reclaiming Indonesia as an authentic
context and text for the engagement in God's mission. This step must
be taken by Indonesian churches in order for us as a church and a
nation to not live under the repeated history which is violent in its
very nature. Therefore, remembering such history needs to be seen as
a first constructive theological as well as political step in bringing
healing and reconciliation in the life of the Indonesian people as, to
use Rita Nakashima Brock's illustration, a 'broken-hearted' nation.
To remember these stories then it must be through the encounter
with the victims of violence, whereas in this presentation it is pre-
sumably women. Through such encounters the stories of female vic-
tims should be seen as the authentic source for finding the legitimate
language of victimization. It is the language that will challenge our
history as a nation. It is the language that cannot be denied because
powerful in its very nature, and will tum the face of history to look
into the eyes and listen to the voice of the victims. And, when the
6. See note 4.
7. The analysis that is presented on pages 2-3 is taken directly from my paper that was
presented at 'The Executive Meeting of the World Alliance of Reformed Churches'
in Tondano, North Sulawesi Indonesia, July 2002.
1. She will lose her connection with her own community from which
she has drawn the meaning of being somebody. It is the beginning of
the dismembering process that is started when the victim is uprooted
from her root community. Such process can be identified when the
effort to forget or to develop false memory is taking place in the life of
a victim. Such reality does represent a picture of a community of for-
getting. Therefore, in such community, a victim of violence will still
remain as an alien who becomes homeless, has no root, and becomes
nobody.
This direction shows the character of our history in Indonesia
under the years of Soeharto's power. Narratives of Indonesia were
selected by the powerful for the people to remember. They passed on
the single narrative of Indonesia as a big, tolerant, just and peaceful
nation. They selected the supported stories for such a narrative. They
created one single enemy of the nation and that was a communist
party of Indonesia. Media was used as a legitimate and powerful tool
for such selection. Through the state owned Television station, we saw
the dichotomy of hero and enemy, of good and bad, of right and
wrong. Through such selected stories, we were taught about an ethic
of enemy that is hatred over against our fellow sister and brother who
were stigmatized as 'communists.'
The first time that I remember seeing such indoctrination through
media was when I was in junior high school. Because of this, I grew
up as a teen with a feeling of ambiguity between hatred and anxiety.
The process at school was almost all the same. There was no other
alternative where I, as my many other friends, could relate to this
specific part of our history without using hatred as an entry point.
Anxiety came as a counter part of hatred. When I refused to use hatred
as a lens to read such history, then anxiety emerged as a result. 'What
would happen to my family if I befriend a so-called communist
child?' 'What would happen to my parents who (at that time) worked
in the Department of Education and Culture if a member of my rela-
tives was accused as connected to a communist organization?'
The process of such selection has politically used the lens of the
(previous) government as the ultimate lens to see, to read and, finally,
to define the women in the history of the nation according to the needs
of the powerful to hold on to their power that continued to marginalize
women as well. Such marginalization takes form in the state definition
of the ideal women that, of course, excluded many dissident women. 9
I grew up with such selected memory in my life that did not allow
any sense of solidarity toward my own stigmatized people. The sense
of solidarity occurred after this memory was broken into pieces
through different encounters with the real victims of the years of stig-
matization under Soeharto's regime.
An older woman, a victim of the stigmatization of communism,
shared her story one night in June of 1998. We spent hours and hours
together as I listened to the painful, yet powerful, story of struggle and
survival. From her I learned about how to develop a kind of subver-
sive memory under the powerful memory that had been selected for
her. She said 'no' to every accusation made by the powerful people.
Her way of developing such subversive memory was started in the
middle of the 1990s by collecting her stories of being violated against
by the powerful people in order to tell her children, grandchildren, and
younger generation about 'another stories' of our history as a nation.
This is her way of bringing out small narratives together with other
narratives of women victims in order for them to be able to live and to
reclaim their place in the life and the future of this nation.
2. She can enter the re-membering process that is the process when a
victim is reaccepted into the community where she can find again her
own root. Such a process is a long journey, but in that process the
questions of 'Who am I?' "Why it happened to me?' and so on and so
forth are seen and responded to differently by the victim as well as the
community. Therefore the community is enabled to become a com-
munity of remembrance because it has become a witnessing commu-
nity that is a witness to the violence against its member. It is therefore
the re-membering process '... involves developing a different narra-
tive of life; it entails a type of reconstruction of self in relation with
family and society.' 10
local lenses is mainly the process in which both religions claim their
own places in Indonesia. This way of reading can also be seen as a
response to an identification of the flow of Christianity in more global
levels when it is said that, '[w]hile Christianity has remained the larg-
est religion in the world, with one-third of the world's population, its
continued decline among ethnic Europeans, and growth among others,
means that the face of faith in the twenty first century belongs to the
Southern Hemisphere.' 14 Localities, therefore, will and have painted
the face of Christianity in many places in the South including Indone-
sia. But how contextual Christianity responds to such colorful painting
is another story that I am going to share with you.
Since the 1970s, the terms 'contextualization,' and 'inculturation'
have been dominating our theological discourses in Asia, especially
for Protestants. I prefer to use the term 'contextualization' (as in Ro-
man Catholic theological discourse the term 'inculturation' is prefera-
bly used), and in this presentation the term is going to be read and
understood through a feminist perspective.
'Contextualizing theology in feminist terms means that
women's shared experience in their historical, socioeconomic,
geopolitical, cultural, ethnic, and religious contexts is the
starting point of the theologizing process. It also serves to cri-
tique a narrow and distorted framing of feminist theological
agenda. In sum, feminist theological method is contextual. Its
theological significance is based on how well it unmasks the
historical dynamics of oppression (global and local, internal
and external) and offers a vision of abundant life for all, espe-
cially for the most oppressed women in that context.' 15
As in many places in Asia, Christianity was brought to Indonesia
together with colonialism. It is true that Islam and Christianity have
been the major counter partners in the modem history of Indonesia.
From the perspective of the history of church in Indonesia, it is almost
impossible, even unrealistic, if we talk about it without considering
Islam as the main factor for the church in giving response to the con-
textual reality as well as to develop her contextual ecclesiological
identity. However, in the year 1998 and early 1999 (the beginning of
14. D.L. Robert, 'The Mission Education Movement and the Rise of World Christian-
ity, 1902-2002' in: Focus (Spring 2003), 21.
15. M.J. Legge, 'Contextualization' in: L.M. Russell and J.S. Clarkson (eds.), Diction-
ary of Feminist Theologies, Louisville 1996, 56.
the communal conflict in Ambon and its surroundings) there has been
an immediate need for both religions to re-encounter each other.
The shift of the social context of Indonesia within the last four
years needs the re-interpretation from both religions in understanding
themselves and those who are identified as the others. In this re-
encounter there are at least three major issues that are not only based
on the religious teachings of Islam but also are closely related to the
role that Christianity and other religions can develop some construc-
tive roles:
16. In his presentation at the One Day Workshop on 'Building a Community to Over-
come Violence' held by the Center for Research and Service to Society of Jakarta
Theological Seminary, March 2002.
17. Again, the identifications are mostly based on my presentation at WARC Executive
Committee meeting, July 2002.
18. A. Baso, Plesetan Lokalitas. Politik Pribumisasi Islam, Depok 2002.
19. A. Baso, Plesetan Lokalitas, 7.
them while they were working abroad. Nasiroh had had her liberation!
But what about Hagar?
'But Abram said to Sarai, "Your slave-girl is in your power; do
to her as you please." Then Sarai dealt harshly with her, and
she ran away from her. The angel of the Lord found her by a
spring of water in the wilderness, the spring on the way to
Shur. And he said, "Hagar, slave-girl of Sarai, where have you
come from and where are you going?" She said, "I am running
away fro my mistress Sarai." The angel of the Lord said to her,
"Return to your mistress, and submit to her." I will so greatly
multiply your offspring that they cannot be counted for multi-
tude So she named the Lord who spoke to her, "You are El-
roi"; for she said, "Have I really seen God and remained alive
after seeing hirn?' 24
Why did the Lord send Hagar back to the place of violence? What is
the meaning of violence in terms of the story of a slave-girl like Ha-
gar? Should she go through suffering in order for her to regain a vic-
tory? What is the meaning of God's presence in the midst of the suf-
fering of a woman? Does the obedience to God mean suffering? Hagar
named the Lord as a God who sees. What does the seeing of God
mean for her then?
The above questions ponder the double aspects of reading the text
in a multi-faith society such as Indonesia. First, it opens the possibility
for a real encounter with women from different faith backgrounds
because the story of Hagar is so familiar for many women. Although,
second, it cannot be discussed immediately by using inter-religious
lens because it points toward the crucial question of suffering which is
still ambiguous in Christian theology.
It is during the rethinking of suffering that women, along with
those who struggle for justice, peace and liberation, have played the
role in changing the subject of many theological conversations. The
woman to women encounter has played a significant and crucial role
in bringing out the voice of the locals. In this case, when the localities
speak the voice of women is calling us to listen to different stories,
different voices about the Bible, about the traditions, and even about
life itself.
24. Gen. 16:6-13 (quoted from the New Revised Standard Version).
25. For a careful reading the book of G. Aulen, Christus Victor. A Historical Study of
the Three Main Types of the Idea of the Atonement, New York 1969 good to be
read in comparison with J.D. Weaver, The Nonviolent Atonement, Grand Rapids
2001.
26. D. Solle, The Silent Cry. Mysticism and Resistance, Minneapolis 2001, 139.
27. D. Solle, The Silent Cry, 139.
with the fear-near God and that fits into God's incomprehensi-
ble love. The way of suffering that is not just tolerated but
freely accepted, the way of passion, becomes therefore part of
the disciple's way of life Suffering does not necessarily
separate us from God. It may actually put us in touch with the
mystery of reality. To follow Christ means to take part in his
life. In Christianity suffering is viewed positively for the
sake of Christ. At times it even transfigure, as the place of en-
counter with God where we make a gift (sacrifice) and God in-
vites us to her/himself by bearing the suffering with us. ' 28
It is, therefore, the concept of the suffering God that needs to be re-
considered in the dialectical connection between dolorousness and
compassion. Here the concept of kenosis becomes an important ele-
ment in trying to deconstruct the meaning of suffering which still uses
the experience of women as victims of violence as the starting point.
Elizabeth A. Johnson in her book, She Who Is, uses the metaphor
of womb as a theological symbol to give meaning to the kenosis of
God when she says:
'What is striking about all discussion of the kenotic, self-
limiting God is the continuous, almost exclusive use of male
imagery and pronouns for God Such exclusive use of male
metaphors is a blatant anomaly because to be so structured that
you have room inside yourself for another too dwell is quintes-
sentially a female experience. To have another actually living
and moving and having being in yourself is likewise the prov-
ince of women. So too is the experience of contraction as a
condition for bringing others to life in their own Integrity
This reality is the paradigm without equal for the panentheistic
notion of the co-inherence of God and the world. To see the
world dwelling in God is to play variations on the theme of
women's bodliness and experience of pregnancy, labor and
giving birth. Correlatively, this symbol lifts up precisely those
aspects of women's reality so abhorred in classical Christian
anthropology and affirms them as suitable metaphor for the
divine. ' 29
30. As it is told by Elizabeth A. Johnson. In her book, She Who Is, 264.
31. As she quoted from Rosemary Radford Ruether, 'Feminism and Jewish-Christian
Dialogue' in J. Hick and P. Knitter (eds.) The Myth of Christian Uniqueness,
Maryknoll, 1988, 147.
32. E.A. Johnson, 'Redeeming the Name of Jesus Christ' in: C.M. La Cugna (ed.),
Freeing Theology. The Essentials of Theology in Feminist Perspective, San Fran-
cisco, 1993, 124-125.
33. W. Wink, Engaging the Powers. Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domi-
nance, Minneapolis, 1992, 141.
and death, but his life, his vision of justice and right relation re-
stored in communities of celebration and abundant life. ' 34
The views of these theologians are in parallel when they both, even
though through different ways, agree that the cross is a symbol of evil
and violence that is forced upon Christ and therefore should not be
understood as having atoning power. Moreover, an Asian feminist
theologian, Chung Hyun Kyung, says that the cross of Christ does not
have any atoning meaning. Instead the cross should become a power-
ful symbol that will always remind us of the time when Christ says
'no' to crime and violence against humanity. When Christ says 'no' to
violence we see the compassion of God. And when Christ is resur-
rected we see the life that God has chosen.
To start the conversation with a Moslem by using the metaphor of
life will enable us to experience the life-giving power of the compas-
sionate God who is at work and is having contractions to bring a just
and peaceful life in the world of violence and terror. To weave our
stories with our fellow Moslems sisters and brothers' stories of life
and struggle will enable us to come together to create a possible com-
munity whose task is to overcome violence. It is in such encounter
that the subjects of mission is not about salvation anymore but is about
life. Life comes first.
The risen Christ came to meet his disciples and greeted them with the
Easter greetings: 'Peace be with you.' Easter is a very personal and
intimate experience that is shown through two intimate actions of the
nsen one.
First, Jesus encountered his disbelieving disciples and asked them
to touch him. The risen one opens himself to be touched. The disciples
are allowed to touch the marks of violence that have been restored.
After allowing himself to be touched, Jesus asked for something to
eat. The risen Christ is hungry. What a familiar experience. It is so
humane, so personal. The Lord is hungry and therefore the disciples
were asked to share their meals. And it is in the moment of eating in
the presence of his disciples that the communal aspect of Easter is
shown. Sharing a meal is a shalom event in the Old Testament and by
looking at the event in a room in Jerusalem, we may say that the
marks of violence have been brought into the life of the community
vis-a-vis the moment of peace.
The God who is touchable and hungry is the God who chose life
amidst death and violence. It is God who carries out God's mission of
life and dignity for all in each place. To touch the risen one means to
recognize and to identify the violence among us that is even commit-
ted by our very own communities. To touch the risen one also means
to see the possibility of carrying out the work for justice and peace for
all. To touch Christ means to experience the life and dignity in its
fullness. Therefore, to be in God's mission is to opt for life and dig-
nity for all. This is the option that many Christian and Muslim women
in Indonesia have taken in our efforts to create a nonviolent commu-
nity together. This struggle is the locus that has designated the possi-
bility of developing a life-centered mission where human life and
dignity stand as the common ground for the inter-religious communi-
ties to build the new and humane Indonesia. However, to return to the
beginning of this vision is to ask ourselves one important question: Do
we believe in nonviolence?