You are on page 1of 115

Agricultural Meteorology

0
1-6
.53
Prof. Dr. Paulo C Sentelhas

16
2.7
03
nio
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

1
Class Summary
1. Agricultural productivity and its interaction with the
environment

2. Concepts and definitions of weather and climate


- Climate Variability

0
- Climate Trend

1-6
- Climatic anomaly

3. Agrometeorology as an agricultural management tool

.53
4. Importance of agrometeorological information for the
sustainability of agriculture

16
- Strategic purposes
- Tactical purposes
- Achieving resilience
2.7
4. Other climate effects on agriculture 2
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

2
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 3
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Agricultural productivity and its interaction with the environment


ge

Agricultural productivity (clockwise)


- Harvest
Eu

- Climate Conditions
- Production environment (Soil)
- Grow Crops/Cycle
tos

- Spacing
- Seed quality
n

- Soil Preparation
Sa

- Correction and Fertilization


- Planting Season
ik

- Weeds
Er

- Pests/Diseases
- Irrigation

3
The image
will be HERE

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 4
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Agricultural productivity and its interaction with the environment


Agricultural productivity factors
ge

Climate – 50%
Eu

Soil – 23%
Genotype – 13%
Management – 14%
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

4
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 5
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Agricultural productivity and its interaction with the environment


Agricultural productivity factors
ge

Climate - ?
Eu

Soil
Genotype Man has action on these factors
Management
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

5
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 6
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Conceptualization of weather and climate


ge

Current Condition Average condition


Eu

For a given location, the state of the The state of the atmosphere can be
atmosphere can be described both in described by variables that characterize
instantaneous terms, defining the current your physical condition. These variables
tos

condition, which is extremely dynamic, as are what we call meteorological elements:


well as in statistical terms, defining the air temperature, relative humidity, wind
n

average condition, which in turn is a static speed and direction, precipitation,


Sa

description. atmospheric pressure, solar radiation, etc


...
ik
Er

6
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 7
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

The current condition or a specific period is called WEATHER


ge

The average condition of time is called CLIMATE


Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

7
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 8
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Weather and climate determinants


Factors are causal agents that condition meteorological / climatic elements, that is,
ge

solar radiation, air temperature, rain, wind speed and direction, atmospheric
pressure, relative air humidity, etc ... The performance of the various factors causes
Eu

the meteorological elements to vary in time and space.


tos

Some meteorological elements can also act as factors, which is the case of solar
n

radiation, which can be taken both as an element, as it is a variable that quantifies


Sa

the availability of solar energy on the Earth's surface, but can also be considered a
factor, for example. condition temperature, pressure and indirectly other elements.
ik
Er

8
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 9
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

MACROCLIMATE FACTORS
They are those who operate on a regional or geographic scale. They are classified as
ge

permanent (latitude, altitude/relief, oceanity/continentality, etc.)


Eu

Latitude
This factor is linked to Earth-Sun relationships, which involve the apparent movement
of the Sun in the N-S direction throughout the year, which is a consequence of the
tos

translation movement and the inclination of the terrestrial axis (23 ° 27 ') in relation
to the perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic. Thus, there is spatial and temporal
n

variation in the angle of incidence of the sun's rays on the surface (zenith angle) and
Sa

the photoperiod, which in turn generate daily values of solar irradiance that vary
according to latitude and the day of the year, resulting in differences in thermal
ik

conditions.
Er

> Latitude
< Annual average temperature

9
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 10
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Translation and formation of the seasons


The Earth's translation movement around the Sun causes a seasonal variation in solar
ge

irradiance on the Earth's surface, generating the seasons. This seasonal variation is
due to the inclination of the terrestrial axis at 23 ° 27 'in relation to the normal to the
Eu

plane of the ecliptic. This makes it possible for an observer on the Earth's surface to
feel that the Sun is moving in the N-S direction throughout the year.
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

10
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 11
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Distribution of solar radiation on the Earth's surface in the months of January and July
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

11
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 12
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Space-time variation of photoperiod and solar radiation at different times of the year
ge

and latitudes
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

12
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 13
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Latutude vs. Annual average temperature


Sea level locations
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

13
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 14
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Altitude
The increase in altitude causes a decrease in temperature. This is as a result of air
ge

thinness and decreased atmospheric pressure


Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

14
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 15
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

In addition, the association of altitude with relief can affect the rainfall regime of a
region. Orographic rains are an example of this:
ge

1- Hot and humid air 2 - Cooling the air as it rises 3 - Moisture condensation and rain
Eu

formation 4 - Dry air heating 5 - Hot and dry climate

This effect also occurs at the Serra do Mar region in the State of São Paulo, where the
tos

total annual rainfall is 2,150mm/year in Santos, 3,800mm/year in the top of the


Mountain and 1,300mm/year in the city of São Paulo .
n
Sa
ik
Er

15
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 16
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Oceanity/Continentality
ge

These terms refer, respectively, to the proximity or distance to the ocean or large
portions of water. Oceanity refers to the effect of the ocean on the climate of a
Eu

coastal region. Ocean water acts as a thermal moderator, that is, it does not allow
large temperature variations to occur. This is due to the fact that water has a higher
specific heat than air. Cooling and heating more slowly. The mass of water when
tos

exchanging heat with the air causes an attenuation of both the heating of the air and
its cooling, thus reducing the thermal amplitude (Tmax - Tmin). Continentality occurs
n

in places located inside the continents, therefore without being affected by the
Sa

oceans. In this condition, the thermal amplitudes are greater, both in daily and annual
terms.
ik
Er

Cuiabá - Monthly thermal amplitude between 8 ans 17°C


Salvador - Monthly thermal amplitude between 3 and 6°C

On a larger geographic scale, the moderating power of the oceans also explains why
the thermal amplitudes (summer - winter) are higher in NH and lower in HS. See the
figure below and prove it ..

16
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 17
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Oceanity/Continentality - Difference between hemispheres


ge

Annual thermal amplitude (difference between the Tmed of the warmest month and
Eu

the coldest month) due to the effects of continentality/oceanity.

HN Continent > Ocean > thermal amplitude


tos

HS Continent < Ocean < thermal amplitude


n
Sa
ik
Er

17
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 18
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Ocean currents
The continuous movement of ocean waters due to differences in density (caused by
ge

differences in temperature and salinity and by the rotation of the Earth) generates
currents that move in an organized manner, maintaining their physical characteristics,
Eu

which differ from adjacent waters. The currents that circulate from the Poles to the
Equator are COLD and those that circulate from the Equator to the Poles are HOT.
tos

The atmosphere in contact with these portions of water comes into thermal
equilibrium with the surface. Therefore, the currents have a great effect on the
n

thermal and water regime (rains) on the coast of the continents.


Sa
ik

Cold currents condition a mild and dry climate


Er

Hot currents condition hot and humid climate

18
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 19
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

19
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 20
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

General circulation of the atmosphere and other types of circulation


The GCA generates the prevailing winds, which in turn are responsible for the
ge

formation of the intertropical (ITCZ) and extratropical (ETCZ) convergence zones, and
also of the semi-permanent anticyclones in the horse latitudes.
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

20
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 21
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

The following figures show the average posi on of ITCZ in the months of January and
ge

July. It is possible to note that during the summer in HS the ITCZ moves to the south,
which contributes to the increase in rainfall in the N, Midwest and SE regions of
Eu

Brazil.
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

21
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 22
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

In July (winter in the SH), on the other hand, ITCZ moves to the north, which
contributes to the decrease in rainfall in the SE, midwest and even part of the
ge

northern region of Brazil.


Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

22
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 23
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Atmospheric circulation in South America


ge

The general circulation of the atmosphere is modified by a series of factors


throughout the year, with great temporal and spatial variation. In South America, in
Eu

addition to cyclones and anticyclones, a well-known phenomenon is the variation in


circulation in the zonal (east-west) direction, known as El Niño Southern Oscillation
(ENSO) which causes changes in the general circulation pattern of the atmosphere,
tos

causing changes in the weather patterns normally observed. Simply put, this
phenomenon is known as El-Niño/La-Niña.
n
Sa

The figure shows the circulation observed in the Equatorial Pacific Ocean in normal
ik

years. The circulation cell with Central/Western movements and downward


Er

movements in the west of South America and with winds from East to West close to
the surface (trade winds, white arrows) and from West to East at high levels of the
troposphere is the so-called Walker cell. This circulation cell contributes to the
increase of rain on the Australian coast and the decrease of it on the west coast of
South America.

23
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 24
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

El Niño is an atmospheric-oceanic phenomenon characterized by anomalous warming


of surface waters in the Tropical Pacific Ocean, which can affect the regional and
ge

global climate, changing wind patterns on a global scale, and thus affecting rain
regimes in tropical regions. and mid-latitudes.
Eu

It is noted that the surface winds, in some cases, even change direction, that is, they
tos

are from west to east. There is a shift in the region with greater cloud formation and
the Walker cell is split.
n
Sa
ik
Er

24
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 25
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

El Niño Impacts
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

25
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 26
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

El Niño Impacts
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

26
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 27
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

El Niño Impacts
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

27
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 28
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

La Niña represents an oceanic-atmospheric phenomenon with characteristics


ge

opposite to El Niño, and which is characterized by an abnormal cooling in the surface


waters of the Tropical Pacific Ocean.
Eu
tos

Anomaly of sea surface temperature in December 1988. Only negative anomalies


below -1°C are plotted.
n
Sa
ik
Er

28
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 29
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

La Niña Impacts
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

29
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 30
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

La Niña Impacts
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

30
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 31
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

La Niña Impacts
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

31
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 32
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Modoki El Niño vs. Canonical El Niño


ge

These differences clearly show that an El Niño event does not always generate
Eu

impacts exactly the same as others that have occurred in the past. Although there is a
certain pattern, variations are expected.
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

32
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 33
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Air masses
Air masses are large volumes that, when moving slowly or parking, over a region
ge

acquire its thermal and humidity characteristics. The air masses are named according
to their region of origin and the type of surface they were in contact with. The main
Eu

masses operating in South America are:


Continental equatorial (hot and humid)
Continental tropical (hot and dry)
tos

Polar maritime (cold and dry)


Equatorial maritime (hot and humid)
n

Tropical maritime (mild and conditioning of stability and little precipitation)


Sa
ik
Er

33
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 34
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Distribution of the main air masses operating in Brazil and their relationship with
monthly rainfall
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

34
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 35
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Front systems
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

35
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 36
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

The climate and its variability are conditioned by several factors, which can be
classified as FIXED and DYNAMIC
ge

FIXED Factors
Associated with the geographic location of the place: Latitude - Seasons, Altitude,
Eu

Continentality and Predominant Systems (air masses, fronts, etc.)


DYNAMIC Factors
Associated with the variability of the circulation of the atmosphere at different spatial
tos

scales (global, zonal and local), causing meteorological conditions to vary in time
(interannual variation) and in space (space variation)
n
Sa
ik
Er

36
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 37
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Climatic variability: Anomalies vs. Trends vs. Changes


Climate Variability: caused by the combination of several factors that condition the
ge

climate of a place. This combination is extremely dynamic and variable in time and
space. Climatic variability is an intrinsic aspect of a climate of a place and should
Eu

always be assessed in agricultural projects.


ntos

Defines the degree of risk of agricultural activity


Sa
ik
Er

37
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 38
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Climate Trend refers to a continuous period, with more than 5 years, with an increase
or decrease in the analyzed meteorological variable. If this occurs sporadically, only in
ge

a few years, it indicates a situation compatible with variability. On the other hand, if
this occurs continuously over a long sequence of years, this trend passes and is
Eu

characterized as a climate change.


ntos
Sa
ik
Er

38
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 39
03
Agricultural Meteorology
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Climatic anomalies are meteorological events with deviations much higher than the
normally observed variability pattern. Anomalies are associated with ocean-
ge

atmospheric phenomena that cause consequences in weather conditions. The most


common example are the events of El Niño and La Niña. In addition to these we have:
Eu

SACZ, Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and Atlantic Dipole.


ntos
Sa
ik
Er

39
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 40
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Climate Variability: Main Causes


ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

40
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 41
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Climate changes
Climate changes are changes in average weather conditions for successive periods of
ge

30 years, showing continuous trends, which can be positive, neutral or negative.


Therefore, for the identification of climate changes there is a need for at least two
Eu

periods of 60 years. Climate change can have different causes.


n tos
Sa
ik
Er

41
Agricultural
Meteorology
Er
ik
Sa
ntos
Eu
ge
nio
03
2.7
16
.53
1-6
0
42

42
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 43
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Climate Variability vs. Climate Change


ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

43
Agricultural
Meteorology
Er
ik
Sa
ntos
Eu
ge
nio
03
2.7
16
.53
1-6
0
44

44
Agricultural
Meteorology
Er
ik
Sa
ntos
Eu
ge
nio
03
2.7
16
.53
1-6
0
45

45
Agricultural
Meteorology
Er
ik
Sa
ntos
Eu
ge
nio
03
2.7
16
.53
1-6
0
46

46
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 47
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Possible causes of climate change


The factors that can cause climate change are:
ge

- Extraterrestrial: variation of energy emission by the sun


Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

47
Agricultural
Meteorology
Er
ik
Sa
ntos
Eu
ge
nio
03
2.7
16
.53
1-6
0
48

48
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 49
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Possible causes of climate change


The factors that can cause climate change are:
ge

- Extraterrestrial: variation of energy emission by the sun


- Astronomical: precession and obliquity - variation of inclination and position and
Eu

variation in the eccentricity of the orbit


n tos
Sa
ik
Er

49
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 50
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Precession - The time required to describe a full turn is 25,800 years


ge

Obliquity - It is the variation of the inclination of the terrestrial rotation axis. 41,000
year period
Eu

Orbit eccentricity - The elliptical movement that the Earth performs around the Sun
has its scentricity varying over time. 100 thousand year period.
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

50
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 51
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Possible causes of climate change


The factors that can cause climate change are:
ge

- Extraterrestrial: variation of energy emission by the sun


- Astronomical: precession and obliquity - variation of inclination and position and
Eu

variation in the eccentricity of the orbit


- Terrestrial: distribution of oceans and continents, volcanism, size of polar ice caps
and changes in the composition of the atmosphere
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

51
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 52
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Distribution of oceans and continents


ge
Eu

There have been no significant changes since 1850


n tos
Sa
ik
Er

52
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 53
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Volcanism
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

53
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 54
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Polar cap size


ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

54
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 55
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Changes in the composition of the atmosphere


ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

55
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 56
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Possible causes of climate change


Among the factors that have been promoting changes in the Earth's climate pattern,
ge

the change in the chemical composition of the atmosphere is the most likely, as it
alters the Earth's radiation balance, intensifying the GREENHOUSE EFFECT, thus
Eu

promoting what is called GLOBAL WARMING.


n tos
Sa
ik
Er

56
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 57
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Balance of Radiation, Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming


ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

57
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 58
03
Agricultural
Meteorology
nio

Air Temperature Projections vs. Uncertainties


ge

RCP = Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) are GHG concentration


trajectories adopted by the IPCC to predict future climate change scenarios
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

58
Agricultural
Meteorology
Er
ik
Sa
ntos
Eu
ge
nio
03
2.7
16
.53
1-6
0
59

59
Projection Gross Primary Productivity

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 60
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

60
Overall Impacts of Global Warming in Agriculture

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 61
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

61
Importance of Agrometereological Information for
the Sustenaibility of Agriculture

0
Strategic

1-6
Purposes

.53
Tactical Resilience

16
Purposes Obtention

2.7 62
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

62
Strategic Purposes
Mapping of the capability of production,
layout of cultures in properties and the
choice of venture based in the
Strategic

0
interpretation of the local climate

1-6
Relating to Agricultural Planning

.53
Agro Climatic Zoning
Climatic Risk Zoning

16
Zoning of the best periods for sowing
Zoning of the risk of plague and disease occurences
2.7
Climatic Planning of the Property
63
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

63
Agro Climatic Zoning
Strategic

0
1-6
.53
16
Source:

2.7 64
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

64
Climatic Risk Zoning
Strategic

Climatic Risk Zoning of the Culture from Caupi in the State of Piauí

0
1-6
.53
16
Low 2.7
Medium High
Source:

65
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

65
Zoning of the Beans Cuture in Rainy Season

Agro Climatic Zoning and Planting


Periods for Beans in PR
Zoning of the Beans Cuture in Drought

0
1-6
Source: Zoning of the Beans Cuture in Fall/Winter

.53
16
Strategic

2.7 66
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

66
0
Climatic Risk Zoning

1-6
for Soy in
Mato Grosso

.53
16
Favorable
2.7
Intermediate Unfavorable 67
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

67
Strategic
Sowing Period for Soy Culture

Culture Cycle Soil AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
Favorable (green) and Unfavorable (grey) periods for sowing by every 10 days

0
CLAYEY
GROUP I
MEDIUM TEXTURE

1-6
SOY CLAYEY
GROUP II MEDIUM TEXTURE
CLAYEY
GROUP III
MEDIUM TEXTURE

.53
Culture Cycle Soil AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
Favorable (green) and Unfavorable (grey) periods for sowing by every 10 days
SANDY
GROUP I CLAYEY

16
MEDIUM TEXTURE
SANDY
SOY GROUP II CLAYEY

2.7
MEDIUM TEXTURE
SANDY
GROUP III CLAYEY
MEDIUM TEXTURE
68
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

68
Zoning of the risk of
plague and disease occurences
Strategic

0
1-6
.53
16
Source:
2.7 69
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

69
Climatic Planning
Strategic In places where there’s a propability of occurence of frost,
producers must choose the best climatic conditions for the
culture of perennial crops, in order to minimize damage risks.

0
1-6
LOCATION CHOICE

.53
16
Avoid facing
South and Image provided by
South west

2.7
Do not plant
70
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

70
Microclimatic Planning
In places where there’s a propability of occurence of intense
Strategic wind, frost or hail, the alteration of the microclimate is a
viable action to reduce damage risks in the crop and
increase productivity.

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 71
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

71
Tactical Purposes
Tactital Create flexibility in the procution system,
due to the follow up on the weather
conditions, hydrological availability of the

0
soil and forecast of weather/climate

1-6
Relating to Decision Making

.53
Decide on the most appropriate moments for the agricultural
management practices through agrometereological monitoring.

16
Tillage, Sowing, Side Dressing, Pesticide Application (fungicide,
2.7
insecticide, herbicide), Irrigation (when and how much to
irrigate), Harvest etc. 72
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

72
Tactital Agrometereological Monitoring and Favorability Conditions
Monitoring for the implementation of agricultural practices

Planting

0
1-6
Tillage Aerial Pulverization

.53
Irrigation Harvest

16
Pulverization
2.7 73
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

73
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 74
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

74
Jataí, GO - Relative Storage of Water in Soil – CAD= 50mm

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 75
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

75
Tactital
In this context, weather and climate forecasts are
still extremelly importante for decision making

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 76
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

76
Tactital
In this context, weather and climate forecasts are
still extremelly importante for decision making

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 77
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

77
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 78
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

78
Resilience Obtention
Strengthening of agricultural systems
Resilience by means of diversification and
Obtention strategies of risk management

0
(Strategic Actions + Technical Actions)

1-6
Resilience

.53
Refers to the capability and hability of the agricultural
system to face adverse severe and unexpected

16
metereological conditions, such as prolongued drought,
frost, intense winds, hail, among others adverse
2.7
metereological events.
79
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

79
Utilizing minimum tillage or direct planting
reduces evaporation of water in the soil, resulting in
Resilience
Obtention a better use of water by the cultures and giving
more flexibility for the staggering of plantings

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 80
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

80
Productivity, bushel/ha Coverage and Organic Matter in the Soil

0
GAINS (bsh/ha)

1-6
MOS = +12
Straw = +22

.53
MOS + Straw = + 34

16
Average
Straw
2.7 Adapted from
by

81
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

81
Integrated Plague and Disease Control
Resilience Improves cultures’ vigor, allowing more tolerance to
Obtention
the adverse metereological conditions

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 82
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
tos
n
Sa
ik
Er

82
Irrigation – guarantees the necessary hydrological supply do plants
endure prolongued drought, being specially importante in the
reproductive phase of cultures

0
1-6
.53
16
Resilience
Obtention

2.7 83
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

83
Resilience
Deepening of roots
Obtention
Physical, chemical and biological management of soil

Physical
Water storage
Chemical

0
CTC and Organic Matter
Texture
CTC
Porosity

1-6
Ca
Structure
Compaction Water Al

Roots

.53
Biological
Cultural

16
Plagues
Diseases
Nematoides

2.7
Weeds

Image 2. Interrelation among chemical, physical and biological factors with the
development of roots and the water reservoir availble for plants. 84
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

84
Resilience
Obtention

Soil Profile

0
X

1-6
Productivity

.53
16
2.7 85
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

85
Resilience
Obtention

0
1-6
Photos:

.53
16
Source:
2.7 86
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
tos
n
Sa
ik
Er

86
Resilience
Obtention
Use of Microorganisms and Biostimulants

Improvement of soil microbiota


Biostimulants adjust and

0
favors the development os the
favor physiological processes
radicular system for acting in

1-6
in cultures, contributing to
the availability of nutrientes
growth and productivity
and repellency to nematoids.

.53
16
Image provided by

2.7

Photo by
87
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
tos
n
Sa
ik
Er

87
Resilience
Use of
Obtention
antiperspirants
Trasnpiration
water evaporation to air

0
dimishes the hydrological
potencial in the leaf

1-6
Cohesion
water column in the xylem is Triadimefon (fungicide) reduces
maintained by cohesion of transpiration from 19 to 40%, resulting

.53
the molecules of water in in an increase in productivity.
the elements of the vases

Tension

16
Low hydrological potencial in
the roots causes the
Amino polysaccharide reduces
transpiration from 26 to 43%, without
2.7
entrance of water in the soil,
which dislocates by osmosis affecting productivity.
untill the medulla
88
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

88
0
1-6
Other climate effects on agriculture

.53
16
2.7 89
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

89
Cultivation System
Dryland X Irrigated
Conventional X Direct Planting
Use of wind breakers
Integrated System Field-Forest-Cattle,

0
among others

1-6
.53
16
2.7 90
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

90
Cultivation and
Plant Population

0
1-6
.53
16
Tolerant to drought
2.7
Susceptible to drought
91
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

91
Culture Phenology

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 92
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
ntos
Sa
ik
Er

92
Agricultural Productivity

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 93
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

93
Agricultural Productivity - An Open Air Factory
Energy Atm Raw Material
Solar Water and CO2
radiation Work shift
Photoperiod

0
Proc Regulator.

1-6
Air Temperature

Factory - Plants

.53
Factory
Process - Photosynthesis maintenance
Expenses: Breath Management

16
(Air Temperature)

Final product: Grains 2.7


Soil raw material
Water and Nutrients 94
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

94
Definitions of Agricultural Productivity and Efficiency
Determinant
Productivity types

factors RS, T, N,
Potential Productivity Genotype,
Plant
Real productivity with Irrigation (AT) Population

0
Crop and
Limiting and Reducing

1-6
Determining Factors
Irrigation
Real productivity with Irrigation Management
(BT)
Determining and Limiting
Achievable Productivity Water Deficit

.53
Factors

Real Dry Farming Production


(AT) Determining, Limiting and Crop

16
Reducing Factors Management
Real Dry Farming Production
(BT)

2.7
Productivity Levels
95
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

95
Productivity Breakdown Definitions
(Yield Gap)
Productivity types

Potential Productivity

Real productivity with Irrigation (AT)

0
Yield Gap by

1-6
Real productivity with Irrigation Water Deficit
(BT) Total
Achievable Productivity Yield Gap

.53
Real Dry Farming Production Yield Gap by
(AT) Management

16
Deficit
Real Dry Farming Production
(BT)

2.7
Productivity Levels
96
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

96
Productivity types

Potential Productivity

Real productivity with Irrigation (AT)

0
Climatic Efficiency (EC)

1-6
EC = (PA/PP)*100
Real productivity with Irrigation
(BT)
Achievable Productivity

.53
Real Dry Farming Production Agricultural Efficiency (EA)
(AT) EA = (PR/PA)*100

16
Real Dry Farming Production
(BT)

2.7
Productivity Levels
97
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

97
Variability of Soy Productivity x Climate Variability

Soy Productivity

0
Productivity (bsh/ha)

1-6
.53
16
2.7
Source: IBGE (2019) 98
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

98
Soy Productivity in Brazil

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 99
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

99
Soy Productivity in Brazil

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 100
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

100
Soy Productivity in Brazil

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 101
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

101
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
Meteorologia Agrícola
Er
ik
Sa
ntos
Eu
ge
nio
03
2.7
PP, PA and PR of Soy Culture

16
.53
1-6
0
Battisti, Sentelhas, Pascoalino et al. (IJPO 2018)
102

102
Climate Efficiencies x Management Efficiency

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7
Battisti, Sentelhas, Pascoalino et al. (IJPO 2018) 103
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

103
PP, PA and PR of Soy Culture
Soy Productivity Champions – CESB 2017/18

0
Productivity (bsh/ha)

1-6
.53
16
NORTH EAST CENTER-WEST SOUTH EAST SOUTH IRRIGATED

2.7
Crop Champions 2017/18
104
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
tos
n
Sa
ik
Er

104
Climatic Efficiency x Agricultural Efficiency

Soy Productivity Champions – CESB 2017/18

0
1-6
.53
16
NORTH EAST CENTER-WEST SOUTH EAST SOUTH IRRIGATED

2.7
Crop Champions 2017/18
105
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

105
Productivity Gains
Opportunity for Improvement in Soy Productivity
Season 2017/18
water Manage
ment

0
1-6
Productivity (bsh/ha)

.53
16
2.7
NORTH EAST CENTER-WEST SOUTH EAST SOUTH IRRIGATED
Crop Champions 2017/18
106
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
tos
n
Sa
ik
Er

106
Productivity Gains
Opportunity for Improvement in Soy Productivity
Season 2017/18
water Manage
ment

0
1-6
Productivity (bsh/ha)

.53
16
2.7
NORTH EAST CENTER-WEST SOUTH EAST SOUTH IRRIGATED
National Average CONAB
107
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
tos
n
Sa
ik
Er

107
Soy Productivity Loss
Hydrological deficit X Agricultural Management
Real Prod. Mgt. Loss Hydro. Loss

0
1-6
Productivity (bsh/ha)

Reducing the
YGma in 30% (+27,6 bsh)

.53
YGdef in 20% (+8,8 bsh)
Would result in an average
national PR of 87,4 bsh/ha

16
CESB Average 2.7 Brazil Average
108
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

108
Quality of Agricultural Products

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 109
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

109
Quality of Grains in Harvest

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 110
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Table 7 – Average percentage of molded grains found in soy, submited in three


periods of rain simulation, from the experimente installed at UNIVAG, Várzea Grande,
ge

MT, in october 2007.


Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

110
Quality of Grains in Harvest

Weather X Quality of Grains


Excess of humidity

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 111
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

111
Quality of Grains in Harvest
Weather X Physiological Disorders
Effects oh high temperatures and
hydrological stress

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 112
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

112
0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 113
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio

Final Considerations
Agriculture is highly dependente of weather and climate conditions. Seen that there’s
ge

no way to predict the metereological conditions with great advance, agriculturists


need to adopt planning measures, that allow to minimize the risks derived from
Eu

climate variability, and agriculturists have no control over them, except for the choice
os location ou time of sowing;
The impact of climate variability in agriculture is not just related to growth,
tos

productivity and quality of cultures, but also related to agriculture practices, like
tillage, sowing, irrigation, phitossanitary control, harvest etc. Therefore, the
n

agrometereological control is the best solution for more assertive decision making.
Sa
ik
Er

113
Recomended Bibliography

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 114
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

114
Thank you for the attention!

0
1-6
.53
16
2.7 115
03
Meteorologia Agrícola
Prof. Paulo C. Sentelhas
nio
ge
Eu
n tos
Sa
ik
Er

115

You might also like