Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction : Article 12 OF the constitution defines the term State, It lays down, In this part, unless
the context otherwise requires, the state includes the Government and Parliament of India and the
government and the legislature of each of the states and all local or other authorities within the
territory of India or under the control of the government of India.”
Cases: 1.In University of Madras vs. Santa Bai, the Madras high court held that the ‘other
authorities’ could only indicate authorities of a like nature i.e., ejusdum generis. So construed, it
could be only mean authorities exercising governmental or sovereign functions. It cannot include
persons, natural or juristic, such as, a University unless it is maintained by the State.
2. In Airport Authority’s Case, it has been held that if a body is an agency or instrumentality of
government it may be an ‘authority’ within the meaning of Article 12 whether it is a statutory
corporation, a government company or even registered society. Accordingly it was held that the
International Airport Authority which had created by an Act of Parliament was the ‘State’ within the
meaning of Article 12.
3. In Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib, it has been held that a Society registered under the Societies
Registration Act, 1898, is an agency or ‘instrumentality of the state’ and hence ‘state’ within the
meaning of article 12.
Q5. Discuss the principles of equality as laid under Article 14 of the India
Constitution. (Right to equality)
Introduction: Part- III of the constitution deals with fundamental rights from Articles 14 to 35. The
fundamental rights are conferred to every citizen against the Government. If any of the fundamental
rights are violated, the citizen of India can sue the state.
The right to equality under article 14: Equality is one of the basic elements of democracy. Right to
equality means equality in all its forms i.e. legal,civil and social. The object of right to equality is to
secure to the citizens equality in all its form. An article 14 to 18 of the constitution guarantees the right to
equality to every citizen of India. Article 14 embodies the general principles of equality before law and
prohibits unreasonable discrimination between persons.
Principles laid under Article 14: Article 14 declares that the state shall not deny to any person equality
before the law or equal protections of the laws within the territory of India. Thus Article 14 uses two
expressions “equality before law” and “equal protection of law”. Article 14 is based upon the
principles of natural justice.
1. Equality Before Law:- Equality before law in Article 14 is based on the principles of Rule of law. No
man is above the law of the land. There is no distinction before the law. The concept of equality before
law does not mean absolute equality among human beings which is physically not possible to achieve.
Equality before the law means that among equals the laws should be equal. The right to sue and
be sued, to prosecute and be prosecuted for the same kind of action should be same for all citizen of full
age without distinctions of race, religion, wealth, social status or political influence.
2.Equal Protection of Laws:- Equal protection of law is a positive concept, implying equality of
treatment under equal or similar circumstances. No one can be favoured more and no one can be
unfavoured more. Equal law should be applied to all persons in the same situation. There should not be
any discrimination between one person to another. Equal law should be applied to all in same situation,
and there should be no discrimination between one person and another.
Article 14 permits classification but prohibits class legislation:-
The equal protection of laws guaranteed by Article 14 does not mean all laws must be general in
character. It does not mean that same law should apply to all persons. It does not mean that every law
must have universal application for. Thus Article 14 forbids is class- legislation but it does not forbid
reasonable classification. The classification, however, must not be “arbitrary, artificial, or evasive” but
must be based on some real substantial distinction bearing a just and reasonable relation to the object
sought to be achieved by the legislation.
Cases: 1. Ramakrishna Dalmia v/s Justice Tedndolkar [ AIR1958 SC 538], In this case the Supreme
Court held that Article 14 protects all persons from discrimination by the legislative as well as the
executive organ of the state. Article 14 forbids class legislation it does not forbid reasonable classification
for the purpose of legislation.
2. State of Madras V/S Champakam Dorairajan, The Madras Government had reserved seats in state
medical and engineering colleges for different communities in certain proportions on the basis of
religion, race and caste. The state defended the aw on the social justice for all sections of the people. But
the Supreme Court held the view that the law is void because it classified students on the basis of caste
and religion.
Q6. Discuss the Freedom of Speech and Expression with the help of deiced Cases.
Introduction: Personal liberty is the most important of all fundamental rights. Articles 19 to 22 deals
with the different aspects of basic rights. Taken together these four Articles from a chapter of personal
liberties which provides the backbone of the fundamental rights. The foremost amongst these are the six
fundamental rights in the nature of freedoms which are guaranteed to the Citizens by Article-19 of the
Constitution.
Provisions under Article 19of the Constitution:
Among all the six fundamental rights Article-19 is the most important one. This Article contains 6
freedoms. Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.—
(1) All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression; (b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations or unions (d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;
(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India; and
(f) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
from the executive action but from the legislative action also. A person can be deprived of his life and
personal liberty if two conditions are complied with, 1) there must be a law and 2), there must be a
procedure prescribed by that law.
PERSONAL LIBERTY MEANING AND SCOPE:
Prior to Maneka Gandhi Case Decision: The meaning of the term personal liberty came up for
consideration of the Supreme Court for the first time, In Maneka Gandhi v/s Union of India, Case Article
21 guaranteed the right to life and personal liberty to citizens only against the arbitrary action of the
Executive and not from Legislative action. The state could interfere with the liberty of citizens.
CONDITIONS UNDER ARTICLE 21:
Art.21 requires the following conditions to be fulfilled before a person is deprived of the property:-
There must be a valid Law // The Law must provide a Procedure.// The procedure must be just, fair
and reasonable// The law must satisfy the requirements of Arts. 14 and 17 i.e., it must be reasonable
THE RIGHTS ARE HELD TO BE COVERED UNDER ARTICLE 21 OF THE
CONSTITUTION:
1.RIGHT TO LIVE WITH HUMAN DIGNITY:
People Union for Democratic Rights v/s Union of India: In this Case it was held that non-payment of
minimum wages to the workers employed in various, A siad Projects in Delhi was a denial to them of
their right to live with basic human dignity and violative Article 21 of the Constitution.
2. RIGHT TO LIVELIHOOD (securing the necessity of life): In Olga Tellis v/s Bombay Municipal
Corporation: This case is popularly known as the ‘Pavement Dwellers case’. It was held in this case that
the word ‘life’ in Article 21 includes the ‘right to livelihood’ also.
3. RIGHT TO SHELTER: It includes adequate living peace, safe and decent, structure, clean and
decent surroundings, sufficient light, pure air and water, electricity, sanitation and other civic amentias
like roads etc. The right to shelter therefore, does not mean a mere right to roof over one’s head but right
to all the infrastructure necessary to enable them to live and develop as a human being.
4.RIGHT TO PRIVACY : A citizen has a right to safeguard the privacy of his own, his family,
marriage, procreation, motherhood, child-bearing and education among other matters.
Cases: In Auto Shankar Case: The Supreme Court held that the “right to privacy” or the right to be
let alone is guaranteed by Art.21 of the Constitution.
5. RIGHT TO HEALTH AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE : In a historic judgment in Consular
Education and Research Centre v/s Union of India: The Supreme Court held that right to medical care
is a fundamental right.
6. RIGHT TO DIE: State of Maharashtra v/s Maruty Sripati Dubal. The Court listed several
circumstances in which people may wish to end their lives, including disease, cruel or unbearable
condition of life, a sense of shame etc. The right to life under Article 21 also includes the “right not to
live”, i.e., right to die or terminate one’s life
7. RIGHT TO FREE LEGAL AID: Article 39-A provides equal justice and free legal aid. It means
justice according to law
8. RIGHT TO EDUCATION A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT UNDER ARTICLE 21-A:
The Constitution 86th Amendment Act, 2002 has added a new Article 21- A after Article 21 and has made
education for all children of the age of 6 to 14 a fundamental right.
Case : In Unni Krishna v/s State of A.P. : Where the Court specifically held that the right to education
for the children of age of 6 to 14 is a fundamental right. Article 21-A makes it obligatory for the
Government to enact a Central Legislation to give effects to the Constitutional amendments. The
Legislation will create a mechanism by which a citizen who is aggrieved that the right to education has
not been fulfilled should be able to get relief by filing writ petitions in the High Courts and the Supreme
Court.
Q8. Explain the Safeguards available against the arbitrary arrest and detention
under Article-22 of the Indian Constitution.
Introduction : Article-22 provides safeguards against arrest and preventive detention. Article 22
prescribes the minimum procedural requirements that must be included in any law enacted by the
Legislature in accordance with which a person may be deprived of his life and personal liberty.
*Preventive Detention Laws U/A 22: Sometimes the Country is faced with the certain dangers. To
safeguard the interest of the country the Central Government is entitled to declare certain areas and
certain persons to detain them under prevention of the breach of peace.
Ex: 1. Preventive Detention Act, 1950 2.Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987.
1. Review by Advisory Board: the 44th amendment Act, 1978 has substituted a new clause for clause
(4) which reduces the maximum period for which a person may be detained without obtaining the
opinion of the advisory board from 3 months to 2 months. The detention of a person for a longer
period than two months can only be made after obtaining the opinion of the advisory board. The
advisory board shall now be constituted in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief Justice
of the appropriate high court. If the advisory board reports that the detention is not justified, the
detained person must be released.
2. Communication of Grounds of Detention to Detenue: the authority making the detention must as
soon as possible be communicated to the person detained the grounds of his arrest, that is, the
grounds which led to be subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority and to give the detenue the
earliest opportunity of making a representatives against the order of detention that is, to be furnished
with sufficient particulars to enable him to make a representation.
3. Detenue’s Right of Representation: the other right given to the detenue is that he should be given
the earliest opportunity of making a representation against detention order. It means that the detenue
must be furnished with sufficient particular of ground of his detention to enable him to make a
representation which on being considered may give him relief.
Q9. Discuss the Right to Constitutional Remedies under Article 32 and 226 of the
Constitution.
Part III of our Constitution provides for legal remedies for the protection of these rights against
their violation by the State or other institutions/individuals. It entitles the citizens of India to move the
Supreme Court or High Courts for the enforcement of these rights.
Article 32 is the heart and soul of our Constitution.Let us now understand the five
types of Writs:
1. Writ of Habeas Corpus: One of the valuable writs for personal liberty is “Habeas Corpus” which
means “You may have the body”. If any person is detained in prison or a private custody without legal
justification; this writ is issued to the authority confining such person, to produce him/her before the
Court. The Court intervenes here and asks the authority to provide the reasons for such detention and if
there is no justification, the person detained is set free.
2. Writ of Certiorari: The meaning of Certiorari is to be certified. This writ is issued when any lower
court or a tribunal exercises a wrongful jurisdiction and decides the case. The party affected can move
this writ to higher courts like the High Court or the Supreme Court. Writ of Certiorari can be issued to
the quasi judicial or subordinate courts when they act:
In excess or without any jurisdiction
In contravention to the principles of Natural justice
In violation of the prescribed procedure as established by law
Resulting in an error of judgment apparent on the face of it.
3. Writ of Mandamus: The term “Mandamus” in Latin means “We command”. This writ is issued to a
public official who refrains from performing his public duties which he is obliged to do. This writ can
also be issued to any public authority (including the government, corporation and Court) commits an act
which is detrimental to the welfare of the general public. This writ however cannot be issued against the
President and the Governor.
4. Writ of Quo-Warranto: “By what warrants?” is the literal meaning of the term Quo-Warranto. The
issuance of this writ takes place to restrain a person from acting in public office to which he is not
entitled. In simple words, if a person occupies a public office without being qualified for the office, then
this writ is issued to restrain the concerned authority from discharging his duties. The High Court of that
particular state has the authority to issue this writ and direct the person to vacate the office in question.