1. What, according to source #1, were the main differences between
Austria and Prussia towards the idea of a unified Germany? When unifying a region, sharing things are crucial to complete the unification. These could be religion, language, traditions… Austria Prussia had lots of differences and that’s why they couldn’t unify. On the one hand, Prussia had a manly German population who shared the same ethnic, language, traditions, culture... On the other hand, in Austria there were different ethnics groups which tore the empire apart. The approach on the economic growth.
2. Why, according to source #2, was it necessary for Bismarck to follow
Realpolitik to unify Germany? Realpolitik was a type of politic which consisted of acting and not just saying that things will be done (pragmatism). It was necessary for Bismarck to follow Realpolitik to unify Germany because acting is the way get things done, this includes the unification of Germany, in which it is necessary to take actions to unify it and not just saying that they will do one thing or the other thing.
3. Compare and contrast sources #2 & #3 to explain how Realpolitik and
the Unification Wars are connected. Realpolitik and the Unification Wars were connected because it was the first time that, as realpolitik describes, action was taken to perform and achieve the great issues, which in this case was the unification of Germany. 4. According to source #4; To what extent could the Franco-Prussian war be considered the last step in the unification of Germany? The Franco-Prussian war was a strategy from Bismarck to take control of the southern German states by having a face from the outside. This would unite the kingdoms. On the one hand, even before annexing the southern states, Prussia had already unified most of Germany, and, as the German unification ended without the unification with Austria, which was part of the Ger. Confed, the German unification could have also ended without the unification the southern states as they orbited around Austria. On the other hand, even though the southern states orbited around Austria, they were independent, and it did not mean that they could unify. Therefore, without the annexation of those southern states the unification would have not been complete. To conclude, I strongly believe that the Franco-Prussian war could be considered the last step on the unification of Germany, as after unifying with those states, the only one left was Austria which they couldn’t unite with due to political reasons. Minimum extent -> No possibilities Medium extent -> Medium possibilities Large extent -> A lot of possibilities Those who were not under the control of Prussia before the Franco-Prussian war got under it after the war.
5. Using sources 1- 5, Assess the importance of Otto von Bismarck in the
Unification of Germany. Otto von Bismarck was crucial and indispensable for the unification of Germany. Without Otto von Bismarck the German unification probably wouldn’t have happened and, it wouldn’t have happened in that way and that early. Otto von Bismarck was the one to start taking action with the unification with the Unification Wars. He also was the mastermind behind the plans to unify the states without properly conquering the, like the annexation of Holstein, in which Holstein was annexed as well as the north of Germany without declaring the war to Austria. Or the Franco-Prussian war, in which they annexed the southern states not by conquering them but creating a war which will create in them a nationalist feeling, and in this way, they will unify with Germany happily without being forced to. Without such a mastermind helping with the unification, this unification couldn’t have occurred or would’ve been temporal, as the states wouldn’t have unified, or would have been forced to unify and they wouldn’t have finally separated.
HISOTRY 2"the Wars of Unification Were The Most Significant Factor in The Establishment of The German Empire." To What Extent Do You Agree With This Statement