You are on page 1of 1

Fall Prevention

Lydia Burgess, Ellie Sullivan, Riley Mackay, Julia Curtin, Michael Dew
Bon Secours Memorial College of Nursing

Abstract Data and Analysis of the Issue Proposed


AIM Solution
- Proposed Solution Conclusion

CVSU: Cardiovascular Services Unit Hypothesis: If all three fall preventative measures are in place and a fall
Description of Issue: Hospital falls increase the risk of inpatient injuries and
Patient Population: all patients on this unit have a cardiac safety champion is present for each shift, then fall prevalence will decrease. The Issue: The Cardiovascular Services Unit at St Mary’s Hospital wants to
length of stay for patients. Saint Mary’s Hospital wishes to reduce the fall
issues/diagnoses (heart failure, surgical, NSTEMI/STEMI, blood pressure, decrease their fall rates due to the result of increased injuries and prolonged
rates on the Cardiovascular Services Unit. The purpose of this project is to see
EKG abnormalities) We want to increase the utilization of fall preventative measures and hospital admissions.
how implementing a fall safety champion on the unit can reduce the number
Beds on unit: 20 beds total propose the implementation of a fall safety champion on St. Mary’s
of falls.
Cardiovascular Services Unit to therefore decrease fall percentages by Data Analysis: We collected data by using the unit falls census for 2023 and
Patients that are deemed a high fall risk are >50 on the Predictive Assessment 50% by August 1st, 2024. 2024 year to date, one site visit February 14th 2024, and a online survey that
Data Analysis: The data was collected through nursing staff surveys, review
(PA) Fall Risk Score. had unit staff participants.
of fall audits, and on the unit observations.
PA Fall Risk Score takes into account patient diagnoses, medications,
history, vitals, anything that would put the patient at risk for falling and Root Cause: The identified root cause of increased falls on CVSU is that all
Root Cause: Fall preventatives (signage, bed/chair alarms,etc.) were not
automatically generates a score 0-100. fall preventative measures were not consistently in place and that there is not
implemented to all patients on the unit.
Logistics: a safety champion assigned for either day or night shift.
Proposed solution: We propose to identify a nurse (on each shift - day and ● Delegation of fall champion to personnel per shift
night) to be the fall safety champion, who will be responsible for ensuring all ● having and completing fall prevention checklist every shift to Proposed Solution: We think that utilizing all fall preventative measures for
fall preventatives are in place and appropriately documented. Also, we ensure measures are in place all patients and implementing a fall safety champion will decrease fall
propose to use all fall preventative measures on all 20 patients on the unit. percentages by 50% on the unit of CVSU.

Conclusion: Fall safety champions and use of fall preventative measures on


all patients will reduce the total rate of falls.
“Fall prevention is important in any health care setting as a means of
Stakeholders: improving patient safety” (Szumlas, S., Groszek, J., Kitt, S., Payson, C.,
● Patients & Stack, K., 2004).
Site visit: 2/14/24 ● Nurses
The unit’s main fall preventative measures are: yellow “fall risk” identifiable ● Assistive Personnel
armband, in room Schmid board being up to date, functioning bed/chair alarm ● Hospital Administration
(3 measurable preventions). CVSU staff implements a “Stay with Me” ● Health Systems
protocol for every patient that is a high fall risk to avoid falls going to and
from the bathroom, bed to chair, etc.

Introduction and Description of ➔ 12 patients were >50 on the PA Fall Risk Score = 60% of unit high fall
risk
References
➔ 25% of patients were missing 1 of 3 measurable fall preventions
the Issue ➔ 8% of patients were missing 2 of 3 measurable fall preventions
Potential costs:
● We suggest incentivising the duty of safety champion by placing a LeLaurin, Jennifer H., and Ronald I. Shorr. “Preventing Falls in Hospitalized
➔ 33% of patients were missing 3 of 3 measurable fall preventions $1-$2 hourly incentive for whoever takes the responsibility per
➔ 8% of patients had a live video monitor which is the highest level of fall shift ($12-$24 per 12 hour shift) Patients.” Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, vol. 35, no. 2, 1 Mar. 2019, pp.
Macro Level: “Each year, roughly 700,000 to 1 million patient falls occur in prevention ● Buying adequate plug in bed alarms for beds that are not equipped
U.S. hospitals resulting in around 250,000 injuries and up to 11,000 deaths.6 from factory. These are reusable so they would be an infrequent
➔ Only 25% of patients had all 3 measurable fall preventions in place cost. ($30-$50 per alarm, without wholesale pricing) 273–283, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6446937/,
About 2% of hospitalized patients fall at least once during their stay.7,8
● Paper and ink costs associated with extra checklists and fall signs
Approximately one in four falls result in injury, with about 10% resulting in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2019.01.00
posted (4-9 cents per printed checklist)
serious injury.9” (LeLaurin and Shorr).
Survey Data: Preventing and Managing Falls in Adults with Cardiovascular Disease. (n.d.).
➔ Easier to comply to fall prevention measures if staff put a bed/chair alarm
Micro Level: In 2023, the unit incurred 10 falls with no two consecutive on all 20 patients in the unit at all times. Timeline: American Heart Association.
months of more than 2 falls. In 2024, there have been 4 falls (2 in Jan, 2 in ➔ Patient ambulation time or “chair time” is sacrificed because of a high fall ● implement a way for safety champion to be chosen for every shift
Feb). These falls are an ongoing issue because falls can lead to an increase risk score. (whether it be rotating or the same few people each time etc.) by https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/consumer-healthcare/what-is-cardi
risk of injury and prolong patient’s length of stay. All participants stated that a fall safety champion for each shift (day and night May 1st 2024
shift) would be helpful to hold accountability for each patient and that it does ● Start the program by May 15th 2024 ovascular-disease/preventing-and-managing-falls#:~:text=Cardiovascular
not fall on one individual staff member. ● Evaluate efficacy on August 1st, 2024 (giving 2.5 months of trial)
to see if falls have decreased
%20conditions

Szumlas, S., Groszek, J., Kitt, S., Payson, C., & Stack, K. (2004). Take a

Root Cause Data Collection:


● Compare fall rates monthly (with each other and
second glance: A novel approach to inpatient fall prevention. The Joint

pre-implementation months for the last year) Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, 30(6), 295-302.
Root Cause: All fall preventative measures were not consistently in place,
● make an online survey for floor nurses to take that gives feedback
additionally there is not a safety champion for either shift. in order to potentially revise program to better suit needs and
improve efficacy

Rationale: Patients lack an understanding of their higher risk for falls due to
their diagnoses that symptoms can include weakness, shortness of breath,
orthostatic hypotension, and fatigue (Preventing and Managing Falls in
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease, n.d.). Patients’ lack of education lead to
patient refusal or newer staff not implementing all fall preventative measures
for high fall risk patients.

You might also like