Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Khushbu Sapra
Author Note
This paper was prepared for Applied Research and Business Analytics MGMT580,
Cohort A, taught by Deb Linehan and Nidal Mousa. Word count- 1484.
THE DECISION BY TATA MOTORS- LAUNCH OF NANO 2
Contents
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................3
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................8
References ........................................................................................................................................9
Introduction
This paper would focus on analysing the decision taken by Tata Motors Limited (TML),
the launch of Nano. The paper begins with the describing the business of TML and a glimpse of
automotive industry. The history behind the decision and its relevance is then discussed along
with the study of the decision tools used. The paper additionally describes the consequences of
the decision and it is further concluded with the overall analysis of the case.
2018). Its known for its gentle skills of mergers and acquisitions, that enhance its global presence
and improve its own capabilities (Manjeet & Moon, 2008). Its broad automotive portfolio
includes passenger cars, vans, sports cars, coaches, trucks, buses, construction equipment and
military vehicles (MarketLine, 2018). Its premium and luxury utility vehicles are sold under
brand names Land Rover and Jaguar across borders (MarketLine, 2018).
vehicles. China, Japan, Germany and the United States are the biggest manufacturers of
passenger cars and commercial vehicles (Wagner, 2020). China’s alone market share accounts
for 30% of the worldwide auto production (Wagner, 2019). Investment in intangible resources
like flexibility, customization and personalized experience for customers are the driving factors
in the automotive industry as customers buy and consume experiences (Pitts, 2015). TML also
took a significant decision in 2008 to launch an innovative and differentiated product ‘Nano’,
THE DECISION BY TATA MOTORS- LAUNCH OF NANO 4
known as ‘the car for people’, serving the differentiated needs of middle-class families (Paul,
2009). “With 31 patents in design and 37 in technology, and the lowest emission levels among
petrol cars in India, the Tata Nano was heralded as the start of an era” (Deepika & Rajann, 2011,
para. 3).
In 2003, Tata Sons’ chairman Ratan Tata witnessed a family in the rainy night on a
scooter (two-wheeler). The father in that family was driving the scooter, a young kid was
standing in front of father, behind the handlebar, the wife was sitting with another baby in her
lap. Ratan Tata was so moved by this situation that he decided to come up with an idea of safe,
affordable and weather friendly vehicle for a family of four, this gave birth to a magnificent
decision in the history of automotive industry- the project of Tata Nano, a budget friendly car for
The project announced a price of one lakh rupees (US$ 2500) for a car and it was
primarily targeting the scooter market, motorcycle and middle-class people (Ahuja, 2017). Soon
after the announcement of the car, it gained considerable public attention. Ratan Tata’s decision
raised the hopes in the lives of those Indian people for whom having a car is no less than a
dream. According to Bennett (as cited in Hansen and Nielsen, 2016), it was like a freedom
machine for the status conscious Indian customers who were excited to migrate from two-
wheeler or three-wheeler to a four wheeled vehicle. In January 2008, when first Nano was
unveiled to the public, the battling crowd in the Pragati Maidan (stadium in New Delhi) was
surprised to spectate the Nano package of beautiful interior, the affordable asking price and all
Soon after the launch of Nano, the sales of used cars in India fell considerably. People
were not ready to spend money on used cars as they knew that they could buy Nano for much
less price if they wait till year end (Paul, 2009). Moreover, the price of a used Maruti 800,
arguably the Nano’s closest competitor, fell by 30% (Paul, 2009). Thus, the Tata Nano project
became the highlight of the world’s news in the year 2008 and gift to the exploding middle-class
population in India.
According to Barends and Rousseau (2018), the managers should make their decisions
based on evidences and those evidences should be sourced from the scientific literature,
professional experience, the organizational data and must consider stakeholders’ concerns.
Nano was a brainchild of Ratan Tata, and the entire company trusting his vision and
professional experience agreed to work for this Project. According to Ahuja (2017), the company
analyzed the statistics and data associated with various car designs and conducted appropriate
research before finalizing the Nano project. However, not all the stakeholders’ views were
considered. The interest of customers was prioritized as Ratan Tata believed in fulfilling his
promise of providing the cheapest car to public. Employees of Tata group revolted against the
price of US$ 2500, but the CEO denied and for him the cost of the car was concrete (Breuer &
Upadrasta, 2017).
The decision taken by Tata group can also be aligned with the Powell and Baker’s (2016)
six-stage problem solving model to a great extent. However, their failure in ‘evaluating the
solution’ reflects how the small mistakes can impact the most planned, researched and well
aimed decisions.
THE DECISION BY TATA MOTORS- LAUNCH OF NANO 6
The struggling situation in the rainy night for a middle-class family on scooter made the
chairman to explore the possible challenges that middle-class people faces (Hansen & Nielsen,
2016).
The company did research and the chairman used his professional experience to identify
the actual problem. They tried knowing more about the taste and preferences of customers as
Identifying a problem
After analysis, the company identified the problem of improving the transportation need
of middle-class family who have limited income and who want to avoid rain, wind and dust
(Paul, 2009).
The company came up with various designs of two-wheelers and four-wheelers to solve
the problem. After rejecting many propositions, they finally decide to pursue Nano’s production
(Ahuja, 2017).
This is the step which TML failed to execute effectively. According to them, Nano is the
safe, affordable and all-weather form of transportation (Sharma, 2017). However, it was later
proved that the cheapest car was not meeting the safety and emission standards (Paul, 2009)
TML implemented its solution and launched the first Nano in January 2008 (Hansen &
Nielsen, 2016).
THE DECISION BY TATA MOTORS- LAUNCH OF NANO 7
From the beginning, Nano faced a lot of challenges. It was proposed by the company to
start its project from West Bengal, India but because of land acquisition protests by farmers and
political reasons, Nano plant had to shift to Gujrat, India (Paul, 2009). Additionally, soon after
the sale of Nano started, there were complaints of cars catching fire and usage of poor materials
in the car (Hansen & Nielsen, 2016). Appendix B shows in detail, the drawbacks of Nano when
It was proved that Nano in its original form is not compliant with the safety regulations
and BS-VI emission norms (“Tata Nano ends”, 2020). Furthermore, inflation, political and other
macro factors were not accounted for while making the decision, causing the difficulty for the
company in the times of increase in input prices (Sharma, 2017). After several cases of Nano
catching fire, the company had to offer extended warranty and recall for updation to correct their
mistake (Deepika & Rajann, 2011). Tata kept his promise (of selling the cheapest car), but Nano
could not. As a result, the sales of the car declined year after year and now the Nano project is at
Research Problem- How can the company better serve the transportation need of the
middle-class families (with average income and who want protection against harsh weather
Key variables – Cost of plant and equipment, cost of resources (material and human),
marketing cost, quantities sold, unit price of Nano. Consumer needs: budget friendly car, safe,
accommodate four people and protection against extreme weather conditions. Appendix C
THE DECISION BY TATA MOTORS- LAUNCH OF NANO 8
explains these variables in detail through influence chart. The chart also depicts the areas where
TML lagged.
Conclusion
Thus, the decision which was made to positively influence the lives of Indian masses and
was supposed to provide optimal transportation solution to the world, failed to meet its
expectations because of insufficient analysis and relying primarily on the intuition of the
chairman while making the decision. Moreover, because of chairman’s emotional attachment to
the project, it was not tested on risk and return parameters as well as cost-benefit analysis. The
case therefore necessitates the significance of decision-making process in each business. The
efficiency in decision making help in attaining the organizational goals as well as builds on the
trust and credibility of the company. It is therefore essential to critically assess all the alternatives
References
Ahuja, A. (2017). Case study on Tata Nano. Amity University. Retrieved from
https://www.slideshare.net/amanahuja3766/case-study-on-tata-nano
Barends, E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2018). Evidence-based management: How to use evidence to
Breuer, H., & Upadrasta, V. (2017). Values-based product innovation – The case of Tata
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317369548_Values-
Based_Product_Innovation_-_The_Case_of_Tata_Nano
Deepika, & Rajann, S. (2011). Case study on Tata Nano. Amrita Vishwa Vidhyapeetham School
nano
Hansen, A., & Nielsen, K. B. (2016). The rise and fall of the people's car: middle-class
aspirations, status and mobile symbolism in New Delhi. In Cars, automobility and
Inzamam. (2019). Tata nano failure case study. Bking.in. Retrieved from https://bking.in/tata-
nano-failure-case-study/
Manjeet, K., & Moon, I. (2008). Tata: master of the gentle approach. Business Week. Retrieved
from
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.royalroads.ca/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&si
d=5fb0df03-6547-487a-b6b6-d938139b2f65%40pdc-v-sessmgr05
THE DECISION BY TATA MOTORS- LAUNCH OF NANO 10
MarketLine. (2018). Company profile: Tata Motors Limited. MarketLine. Retrieved from
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.royalroads.ca/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&si
d=a0eb9d77-ebec-44a8-b097-48cafcaa8ffa%40pdc-v-sessmgr04
Paul, P. (2009). The Tata Nano: The people's car. University of Virginia, 1-9. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228143324_The_Tata_Nano_The_People's_Ca
r/link/55af80fc08ae7cdc32e2bed4/download
Pitts, F. H. (2015). Creativity and the commodity in the automobile industry. University of
information.bris.ac.uk/files/122526462/Pitts_FH_2015_Creativity_and_the_Commodity
_in_the_Automobile_Industry.pdf
Powell, & Baker, K. R. (2016). Business analytics: The art of modeling with spreadsheets, 5th
Sharma, S. (2017). How a scooter on a rainy day turned into Ratan Tata's dream project
politics/how-a-scooter-on-a-rainy-day-turned-into-ratan-tatas-dream-project-
nano/story/239035.html
Tata Nano ends 2019 with zero production, sales of 1 unit. (2020). The Economic Times.
ends-2019-with-zero-production-sales-of-1-unit/articleshow/73120259.cms
Wagner, I. (2019, December 19). Motor vehicle production- Statistics & facts. In Statista.
production/
THE DECISION BY TATA MOTORS- LAUNCH OF NANO 11
automobile-production-since-2000/
THE DECISION BY TATA MOTORS- LAUNCH OF NANO 12
2017- Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
2018 2017 2017 2017 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018
Tata Nano
(Sales in 57 121 94 62 52 29 42 20 3
Units)
Adapted from Inzamam (2019)
THE DECISION BY TATA MOTORS- LAUNCH OF NANO 13
The variables that are displayed in red reflect the areas where TML made the mistakes.
TML did not pay enough attention to safety features in the car, several casualties were later
experienced because of that. Moreover, their biggest mistake was to ignore the macro economic
forces of inflation and politics. Without considering these factors, they declared the fixed product
price of one lakh rupees. As a result, the company’s product failed to serve its purpose and its
sales stalled.