Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Team Development Model outlines stages of how a group goes through a journey of
becoming a team. Team Development Models helps us understand the nuances and
stages of the groups journey towards coming together to achieve a common goal.
Team Development Models can also help leaders shorten the experimentation journey to
create great and high performing teams that last.
organizations these days are constantly faced with rapid change, disruption, complex
problems and are increasingly turning to its people to provide breakthrough solutions
and innovative ideas.
Whether you’re a new leader or a member of the team responsible for oversight of an
organization, developing a high-performing team is crucial to you.
To build high-performing teams, there are a few common requirements such as:
Dysfunction #1: Absence of Trust. The fear of being vulnerable with team
members prevents the building of trust within the team.
Dysfunction #2: Fear of Conflict. The desire to preserve artificial harmony stifles
the occurrence of productive ideological conflict.
Dysfunction #3: Lack of Commitment. The lack of clarity or buy-in prevents team
members from making decisions they will stick to.
This model also includes a team assessment to determine team scores on the 5
dysfunctions and provide your team with a sense of its strengths and areas for
improvement.
Forming stage is a situation that members of a group don’t truly understand about their
duty, regulations and rules. The members cannot finish their job without leader or
manager because they lack of confidence. They have to be encouraged and motivate
them that it can help them to feel as a significant part of a team.
Storming stage is a situation that it often starts when team members prefer to use
conflicting work styles. People may work in different ways for all sorts of reasons, but if
differing working styles cause unforeseen problems, they may become
frustrated. Moving from this stage requires that the leader of team should strong ability
to help all members accept each other and respect in each individual task.
Norming stage is a period that team members know one-another better, they may
socialize together, and they are able to ask each other for help and provide constructive
feedback. At this point a group need to provide a delegate for making agreement and
consensus.
Performing stage is that all members can achieve the duty without any problems, but
they want to develop the term in regard to interpersonal development. A leader should
concentrate on developing performance of the team.
Adjourning stage is the final task when especially a group is successful. The leader of
the team must be appreciated with the achievement and show all member that their
accomplishment is so proud. This stage help increase motivation to members to move
on next thinks or another task.
It was created in response to questions and requests from actual managers working in
organizations all over the world – managers struggling to transform their people into
effective teams.
This model also includes a team assessment to determine team scores on the Rocket
Model Stages and provides your team with a sense of its strengths and areas for
improvement.
Rocket Team Performance Model
1. CONTEXT: WHAT ARE OUR CRITICAL ASSUMPTIONS?
Team formation gets off to a good start when team members share a common view of
the context in which they’re operating.
All too often, it turns out that team members are operating from different assumptions.
That fundamental disconnects leads to well-intended but misaligned actions that hurt
team morale and reduce effectiveness.
When team members agree on what success looks like, they set the stage for
effectiveness. What will it mean to win? What are the goals, when do they need to be
accomplished, what strategies will the team use, and how will progress be measured?
Answering these questions leads to goal clarity, which strengthens mission clarity and is
essential to boosting teamwork.
It seems like it should be easy to get the right number of people with the right talents on
a team. In fact, we find it can be one of the toughest aspects of building teamwork.
That’s because most organizations assign staff members to a team based more on
availability or politics than talent. The team leader may believe that the skills, experience,
and abilities of individual team members are all that matters, but there are other talent
considerations.
It’s human nature for any group to develop norms for greeting, meeting, seating,
communicating, deciding, and executing. These unwritten rules usually solidify fast,
without any formal discussion.
However, teams that take the time to talk through and consciously establish norms
leverage a powerful tool for achieving team cohesiveness and performance.
Buy-in happens when team members have a team-first, not a me-first, attitude. High-
performance teams are committed to team goals, roles, and rules, and they’re motivated
to get necessary, day-to-day tasks done.
They understand how their work contributes to the greater good, and they’re optimistic
about their chances of success.
6. RESOURCES: DO WE HAVE THE RESOURCES NEEDED?
Early on, teams need to figure out what resources are necessary for meeting their goals,
and leaders may have to lobby key stakeholders to get those needs met.
Tangible resources may include a realistic budget, office space, hardware and software
systems, specialized equipment, and tech support. Intangibles may include political
support and authority to make decisions.
The best teams understand that managing conflict is not the same as minimizing conflict.
The team members cultivate the necessary courage to raise difficult issues, while
developing effective ways to work through disagreements and find solutions.
They know that too little conflict, with problems swept under the rug, leads to artificial
harmony and groupthink. Too much conflict leads to chaos and backstabbing.
High-Performing teams keep their eye on the prize. They measure results against
mission, regularly track progress, learn from successes and failures, and devise ways to
continue improving delivery. They understand it’s critical to align goals with important
organizational outcomes and benchmark progress in a way that leads to superior
performance.
Achieving results depends on how well the team handles the previous seven steps in the
framework. In other words, members must share assumptions about context, agree on
mission and work towards goals, have clearly defined roles and skills, ensure buy-in,
adhere to norms, access necessary resources, and manage conflict effectively. When the
team falters at one of these steps, outcomes are affected. By practicing what works, the
team continues to strengthen morale and succeed.
Drexler Sibbit Team Performance model
The Drexler/Sibbet Team Performance® Model illustrates team development as seven
stages, four to create the team and three to describe increasing levels of sustained
performance.
This model also includes a team assessment to determine team scores on the
Drexler/Sibbet 7 stages and provide your team with a sense of its strengths and areas for
improvement.
1. Orientation– What is our mission and picture of success, and why am I here?
2. Trust Building– Who is with me here and what are the skill sets and competencies we
bring to this team?
3. Goal Clarification– What are our targets and roles? What’s yours, mine and ours?
4. Commitment-How will we work together? Let’s get all in!
As we progress through the four stages of team creation we then reach the three stages
of performance. In these stages we begin to implement and master our process
becoming heavily invested in the task at hand:
6. High Performance– This is the time when we are literally reading the minds of our
teammates, anticipating their needs and moves and becoming a seamless supportive
unit. It makes us want to stay in this zone forever. This stage is what we call the “WOW”
that results from having a high-performance team.
7. Renewal– Just when you have it all figured out, things change. It’s time to re-orient
and begin the cycle again right back to stage 1.