You are on page 1of 15

Analyzing Impact of Affiliate Marketing on Consumer Behavior with

M-Commerce Perspective
SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation
3 (2) 55-69
https://doi.org/10.21844/smsjei.v3i02.9733
Ritesh Dwivedi*

Abstract

The research paper examines the impact of Affiliate marketing on consumer behavior with respect to m-
commerce in Delhi NCR.The research proves that trust, attitude, indignity and price perception are
dependent on the gender of the consumer. The research also shows that there is a positive, high and
statistically significant relation between indignity and advertisement utility and a positive, medium and
statistically significant relation between Attitude and Advertisement utility, price perception and
advertisement utility as well as Attitude and Price perception.

Keywords
Affiliate Marketing, CPA, M-Commerce, Consumer behavior, Chi Squared Test, Correlation,

1. Introduction displayed on publisher's content. Ad agency helps


generate and place the ad copy. Ad server helps
Internet marketing or online marketing is a type of deliver the ad and track statistics.
marketing that utilizes Internet to deliver
promotional marketing message to prospective Affiliate marketing is a form of online business in
customers. It includes email marketing, social which a third party i.e. the affiliateis awarded for
media marketing, Search engine marketing, every visitor it provides with the help of hyperlinks
display advertising as well as mobile advertising. It on the website. It is very similar to paying a finder's
consists of a number of parties: publisher, fee for the introduction of new client or multiple
advertiser, advertising agencies, ad server and clients to a business. There are various ways in
advertising affiliate. Publisher integrates which an affiliate can be compensated. They are
advertisement into the online world and advertiser CPC or Cost per click, CPL or Cost per Lead, CPM
is the one that provides advertisement that be or cost per thousand, CPO or Cost per order.

Assistant Professor, Amity Business School, Amity University UP, NOIDA Email: ritesh_hariom@rediffmail.com

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


56 [ ISSN 2349-7920 ] SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation

Source: Prabhu and Sathpathy (2015)

Figure 1: Pictorial Representation of affiliate marketing concept



CPC or cost per click is the price paid by the Affiliate: Affiliate is a term used for an individual
advertiser per ad click. CPL or cost per lead is the or a firm promoting products of the advertiser with
cost paid by the advertiser per valid lead provided the help of a website or an application.
by the publisher. CPM or cost per thousand is the
price paid by the advertiser per thousand ad Customer: Customer is a term used for an
impressions. CPA or Cost per affiliation or Cost per individual or a firm that visits the affiliate website
order or cost per purchase is the price paid by the or the application and if he or she likes the
advertiser per orders. It is used to make comparison advertisement clicks on it. The customer is then
across advertising media and vehicles and can also directed to the merchant's website.
be used to measure the profitability of a firm's
Internet marketing. Cost Per Affiliation

Affiliate marketing is a form of online business in CPA or Cost per affiliation or Cost per order or cost
which a third part i.e. the affiliate is awarded for per purchase is the price paid by the advertiser per
every visitor it provides with the help of hyperlinks orders.
on the website.
It is used to make comparison across advertising
It consists of 3 main parties: media and vehicles and can also be used to
measure the profitability of a firm's Internet
Advertiser: Advertiser is a term used for an marketing.
individual or a firm selling any product via online
websites and applications. It consists of following activities:

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


Analyzing Impact of Affiliate Marketing on Consumer Behavior with M-Commerce Perspective 57

· Filling the form · Online retailing companies like Flipkart,


· Taking the estimate of the cost of the product SnapDeal, Amazon, Tradus and yepme etc.
· Signing up for the application or the website · Matrimonial websites like Bharatmatrimonial,
· Buying the product. shaadi, jeevansathi etc.
· Tour and travel industries like Yatra,
Companies like Flipkart, Amazon etc. have started makemytrip, Expedia, tripadviser, Ixigo etc.
their own affiliate program where affiliate · Online job sites like careerbuilder, monster,
companies are paid a predefined rate of indeed, GulfNaukri etc.
commission for bringing in customers to their · Some other affiliate marketers are apple,
website. Companies that uses affiliate program raddison, quickheal, Indiamart, godaddy etc.
are:

How CPA Marketing Works

User clicks
on an
Affiliated Link

User sent to
Landing Page

User visits
web site
User fills
out offer
Affiliated Gets Paid
Source: http://backlinko.com/
(and possibly rocks out)

Figure 2:Working of CPA system

1. Literature Review of growth in the affiliate network as it increases the


search engine ranking of the website as well as
Janssen et al. (2007) studied the impact of affiliate ultimate viewership.
marketing on search engine ranking and found out
how the seven different affiliate marketing Bread and Barnes (2009) analyzed the effect of
network affects the search engine ranking. He affiliate marketing on UK financial service
found that increase in the affiliate network is industry. The 3 main topic of research were
influenced by the increase in the number of mortgage, credit card and motor insurance. The
potential affiliate, active in the advertising web research showed that most consumers do not know
page. The research also highlights the importance how to research in an efficient manner. Their

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


58 [ ISSN 2349-7920 ] SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation

research also showed that affiliate marketers were customers. Study showed that even for a startup or
able to take advantage of credit card section more a local business, there is a way to market their
than others. product via Internet.

Fox et al. (2007) explained the essential Prabhu and Satpathy (2015) analyzed the
guidelines, which needs to be followed in many adaptability of the affiliate marketing in Indian
affiliate programs while explaining how online scenario and to measure the future potential it
retailers control the business model and holds. The study explained the entire process of
promotional tools, which can be used by their affiliate in detail with the concept of Affiliate
affiliate. Marketing and also threw light on the affiliate
program followed by various e-commerce
Li et al. (2011) analysedthe experimental aspects websites. The research was divided into four
of m-commerce regardless of the type of different parts: top affiliate program followed by
consumption. The study showed that emotion plays online retail companies, by matrimonial websites,
a very important role in consumer experience and by tour and travel industry and by online job site.
concluded that utilitarian factor had a negative The research showed that affiliate marketing
effect on the consumption experience of consumer. would continue to grow.

Gupta and Vyas (2014) identified factors Sharma (2015) explained the importance of
affecting the use of m-commerce in India. Study Internet Marketing in e-commerce and gives a brief
establishes m-commerce as user friendly, secure introduction of Internet marketing. Advantages of
and easy to access even in low connection area. The Internet advertising have been explained while
authors have also explained the drawbacks of m- explaining the various e-commerce revenue
commerce i.e. lack of internet connectivity, models like CPA, CPL, CPM and CPI. The
language barrier, lack of awareness and less research examined various e-commerce website
number of mobile phone users can have an adverse like Flipkart, Snapdeal, Shopclues, Homeshop18,
effect on the business. Fashionandyou and Dealsandyou. He concludes
that Internet Marketing is an essential tool for any
According to Edelman and Brandi (2014) some company that wants to improve their revenue.
of the common frauds that affiliate may indulge in
are adware, cookie stuffing, typo-squatting and 2. ResearchMethodology
loyalty software. Study discussed the various
affiliate management structures i.e. in-house This paper is based on complete survey work
affiliates, specialist affiliate and the affiliate which aims at extracting knowledge and
network, which provides required technical information regarding customer satisfaction from
infrastructure. The research shows that affiliate service quality.Survey was conducted to show the
marketing allow sellers to advertise more impact of affiliate marketing on customer behavior
efficiently via Internet. with respect to m-commerce in India and covered
the respondents of Delhi NCR regions only.
Yasin et al. (2015) tried to analyze the importance Conclusive research design and Convenience
of digital marketing for marketers as well as sampling technique was used while conducting

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


Analyzing Impact of Affiliate Marketing on Consumer Behavior with M-Commerce Perspective 59

this research. The questionnaire consisted of 21 Ha: There is no significant difference between the
items, which is divided into 6 parts: demographics, trust of male and female.
Trust, attitude, indignity, Price perception and
advertisement utility. By using questionnaire To measure the difference in the Attitude of
method (on a 5-point Likert scale)152 responses male and female.
were collected out of which 35 responses were
rejected as they didn't fit the target population or Ho: There is significant difference between the
the data was incomplete. Thus, a sample size of 119 attitude of male and female.
was taken. Ha: There is no significant difference between the
attitude of male and female.
The research analysis uses Chi Squared test to
check the relationship between trust and gender, To measure the difference in the Price
attitude and gender, indignity and gender, price perception of male and female.
perception and gender as well as advertisement
utility and gender of the consumer. Correlation is Ho: There is significant difference between the
used to measure the relation between trust, attitude, price perception of male and female.
indignity, advertisement utility and price Ha: There is no significant difference between the
perception of the consumer. price perception of male and female.

Objectives of the study are listed below: To measure the difference in the Perceived
· To study about affiliate marketing and it's indignity of male and female.
working with respect to M-commerce.
· To study about various compensation models. Ho: There is significant difference between the
· To study the impact of affiliate marketing on perceived indignity of male and female.
consumer behavior with respect to M-commerce. Ha: There is no significant difference between the
· To study the impact of factors affecting affiliate perceived indignity of male and female.
marketing on gender.
To measure the difference in the advertisement
3. Hypothesis Formulation utility of male and female.

Hypothesis formulation constitutes the null and Ho: There is significant difference between the
alternate hypothesis with respect to each test used advertisement utility of male and female.
in the research. Ha: There is no significant difference between the
advertisement utility of male and female.
4.1 Independent T-Test
4.2 Chi-Squared Test
To measure the difference in the trust of male
and female. To measure the relationship between trust and
gender.
Ho: There is significant difference between the
trust of male and female. Ho: There is no relationship between trust and

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


60 [ ISSN 2349-7920 ] SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation

gender. between trust and attitude.


Ha: There is relationship between trust and gender. Ha: There is no relation between trust and attitude.

To measure the relationship between attitude To measure the correlation between trust and
and gender. indignity.

Ho: There is no relationship between attitude and Ho: There is statistically significant relation
gender. between trust and indignity.
Ha: There is relationship between attitude and Ha: There is statistically significant relation
gender. between trust and indignity.

To measure the relationship between indignity To measure the correlation between trust and
and gender. price perception.

Ho: There is no relationship between indignity and Ho: There is no statistically significant relation
gender. between trust and price perception.
Ha: There is relationship between indignity and Ha: There is statistically significant relation
gender. between trust and price perception.

To measure the relationship between price To measure the correlation between trust and
perception and gender. advertisement utility.

Ho: There is no relationship between price Ho: There is no statistically significant relation
perception and gender. between trust and advertisement utility.
Ha: There is relationship between price perception Ha: There is statistically significant relation
and gender. between trust and advertisement utility.

To m e a s u re t h e re l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n To measure the correlation between attitude


advertisement utility and gender. and indignity.

Ho: There is no relationship between Ho: There is no statistically significant relation


advertisement utility and gender. between attitude and indignity.
Ha: There is relationship between advertisement Ha: There is statistically significant relation
utility and gender. between attitude and indignity.

4.3 Correlation To measure the correlation between attitude


and price perception.
To measure the correlation between trust and
attitude. Ho: There is no statistically significant relation
between attitude and price perception.
Ho: There is no statistically significant relation Ha: There is statistically significant relation

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


Analyzing Impact of Affiliate Marketing on Consumer Behavior with M-Commerce Perspective 61

between attitude and price perception. 5. Detailed Analysis and Interpretation

To measure the correlation between attitude 5.1 Qualitative Analysis


and advertisement utility.
Less than 18
50 and above Age 2%
5%
Ho: There is no statistically significant relation
between attitude and advertisement utility. 35-50
3%
Ha: There is statistically significant relation
between attitude and advertisement utility.

25-35
To measure the correlation between indignity 14%
and price perception.

Ho: There is no statistically significant relation


between indignity and price perception.
Ha: There is statistically significant relation 18-25
between indignity and price perception. 76%
To measure the correlation between indignity
and advertisement utility.
Figure 3:Age
Ho: There is no statistically significant relation
between indignity and advertisement utility..
Ha: There is statistically significant relation Key Findings
between indignity and advertisement utility. · 76% of the respondents are from age group 18-
25.
To measure the correlation between price · 14% of them are from age group 25-35.
perception and advertisement utility. · 3% of the respondents are from age group 35-
50.
Ho: There is no statistically significant relation · 5% of the respondents are of age group 50 and
between price perception and advertisement utility. above.
Ha: There is statistically significant relation
between price perception and advertisement utility.

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


62 [ ISSN 2349-7920 ] SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation

Gender Key Finding:

· 54% of the respondents have an annual income


of less than Rs 50,000.
Female · 30% of them have an annual income of more
32% than Rs 2,50,000.
· 7% of the respondents have an annual income
between Rs 1,00,000 and Rs 2,50,000.
Male · 9% of the respondents have an annual income
68%
between Rs 50,000 and Rs 1,00,000.

Highest Education Qualification


Figure 4:Gender 10th
2%

Key Findings:
Post
· 68% of the respondents are male Graduate 12th
· 32% of them are female. 20% 19%

Income

Less Than Rs. 50,000 Graduate


Rs. 50,000-Rs 1,00,000 59%
Rs. 1,00,000-Rs 2,50,000
More Than 2,50,000

Figure 6:Highest Education Level

Key Finding:
30%
· 59% of the respondents are graduates.
54% · 20% of them are post graduates.
· 19% are fresh out of high school.
7% · 2% of the respondents have the highest
th
education qualification of 10 .
9%

Figure 5:Income

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


Analyzing Impact of Affiliate Marketing on Consumer Behavior with M-Commerce Perspective 63

Online E-commerce User Key Findings:


Yes No
· 30% of the respondents access mobile
1% application only to access e-commerce portals.
· 13% of the respondents uses website only for the
same.
· The survey shows that 57% of the respondents
uses both website and mobile application to
access e-commerce portals like amazon, flipkart
etc.
Trust Level
80
70
99% 60

Axis Title
50
40
30
20
Figure 7:Number of online respondents
10
0
Strongly Strongly
Disagree Neutral Agree
Disagree Agree
Key Findings: Trust Level 1.7 8.33 12.43 68.9 8.6

Figure 9:Trust Level of User on Advertisement shown


· The survey shows that 99% of the respondents on M-commerce
are active users of e-commerce portals.
Key Findings:
User Preference
· 68.93% of the respondents agree to the fact that
Mobile Application Only they can trust advertisement that are shown on
Website Only m-commerce website or applications.
Both · 12.43% of the respondents have a neutral view to
the fact that they can trust advertisement that are
shown on m-commerce website or applications.
· 8.6% of the respondents strongly agree to the fact
30% that they can trust advertisement that are shown
on m-commerce website or applications.
· 8.33% of the respondents disagree on the fact
57% that they can trust advertisement that are shown
on the m-commerce websites and applications.
· Only 1.7% of the respondents strongly disagree
13%
to the fact that they can trust mobile
advertisement.

Figure 8: User Preference

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


64 [ ISSN 2349-7920 ] SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation

Attitude Key Findings:


70
60
· 55.2% of the respondents agree that the
Axis Title

50
40
30
advertisements that are shown on mobile
20 application insult their intelligence.
10
0
· 3.9% of the respondents strongly agree that the
Strongly Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Neutral Agree
Agree advertisements that are shown on mobile
Attitude 3.4 7.7 14.1 65.5 9.2 application insult their intelligence.
Figure 10: Attitude of Consumers towards affiliate · 12.1% of the respondents are neutral to the fact
marketing that the advertisements that are shown on mobile
application insult their intelligence.
Key Findings: · 21.55% of the respondents disagree that the
advertisements that are shown on mobile
· 65.5% of the respondents agree to the fact that application insult their intelligence.
advertisement gets their attention and have a
positive attitude towards advertisement. · 7.35% of the respondents strongly disagree that
· 9.2% of the respondents strongly agree to the fact the advertisements that are shown on mobile
that advertisements get their attention and have a application insult their intelligence.
positive attitude towards advertisement.
· 14.1% of the respondents are neutral to the fact Price Perception
that advertisement get their attention and have a 60
positive attitude towards advertisement.
Axis Title

50
· 7.7% of the respondents disagree to the fact that 40
30
advertisement get their attention and have a 20
positive attitude towards advertisement. 10
0
· 3.4% of the respondents strongly disagree to the Strongly
Disagree Neutral Agree
Strongly
Disagree Agree
fact that advertisement get their attention and
Price Perception 1.43 25.26 16.93 53.13 3.16
have a positive attitude towards advertisement.
Figure 12:Impact of advertisement on price
Indignity
60 Key Findings:
Axis Title

50
40
· 53.13% of the respondents agree to the fact that
30 advertisement leads to an increase in the price of
20
10
the goods.
0
Strongly
Disagree Agree
Strongly · 3.16% of the respondents strongly agree to the
Disagree Neutral Agree
fact that advertisement leads to an increase in the
Indignity 7.35 21.55 12.1 55.2 3.9
price of the goods.
Figure 11: Attitude of consumers towards content · 16.93% of the respondents are neutral to the fact
shown in advertisement
that advertisement leads to an increase in the
price of the goods.
· 25.26% of the respondents disagree to the fact

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


Analyzing Impact of Affiliate Marketing on Consumer Behavior with M-Commerce Perspective 65

that advertisement leads to an increase in the 5.2 Quantitative Analysis


price of the goods.
· 1.43% of the respondents strongly disagree to the 5.2.1 Independent T-test
fact that advertisement leads to an increase in the
price of the goods. Table 1: p-value for independent t-test

Advertisement Utility Variables p-value


80
Trust and age .384
70
60 Attitude and age .005
Axis Title

50 Indignity and age .003


40
Price perception and age .202
30
20 Advertisement utility and age .000
10
0
Strongly Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Neutral Agree
Agree Key Finding:
Advertisement Utility 0.3 6.9 19 70.13 3.73

· P-value for Trust and age is .384. Thus,


Figure13: Advertisement utility alternate hypothesis is accepted while performing
independent t-test between trust and age. This
Key Findings: shows that there is no significant difference
between trust levels of various age groups.
· 70.13% of the respondents agree to the fact that
advertisements are helpful in taking consumer- · P-value forAttitude and age is .005. Thus, null
buying decision. hypothesis is accepted while performing
independent t-test between attitude and age. This
· 3.73% of the respondents strongly agree to the
shows that there is significant difference between
fact that advertisements are helpful in taking attitudes of various age groups.
consumer-buying decision.
· 19% of the respondents are neutral to the fact that · P-value for Indignity and ageis .003. Thus, null
advertisements are helpful in taking consumer- hypothesis is accepted while performing
buying decision. independent t-test between indignity and age. This
shows that there is significant difference between
· 6.9% of the respondents disagree to the fact that
perceived indignity levels of various age groups.
advertisements are helpful in taking consumer-
buying decision. · P-value for Price perception and ageis .202.
· .3% of the respondents strongly disagree to the Thus, alternate hypothesis is accepted while
fact that advertisements are helpful in taking performing independent t-test between price
consumer-buying decision. perception and age. This shows that there is no
significant difference between price perceptions of
various age groups.

· P-value for Advertisement utility and ageis


.000. Thus, null hypothesis is accepted while
performing independent t-test between
advertisement utility and age. This shows that there
is significant difference between perceived
advertisement utility of various age groups.

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


66 [ ISSN 2349-7920 ] SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation

· P-value between Advertisement utility and


5.2.2 Chi Square Test gender is .037. Thus, null hypothesis is accepted
 while performing independent t-test between
Table 2: p-value for Chi square test advertisement utility and gender. Thus, null
hypothesis is accepted and that shows that there is
no relationship between advertisement utility and
Variables p-value
gender.
Trust and gender 0.367
Attitude and gender 0.258 5.2.3 Coefficient of correlation
Indignity and gender 0.169
Price perception and gender 0.062 Table 3: Pearson Coefficient and p-value for
Key Finding: utility and gender
Advertisement 0.037 correlation

· P-value between Trust and gender is .367.


Thus, alternate hypothesis is accepted while
performing independent t-test between trust and
Variables Pearson coefficient p-value
gender. Thus, alternate hypothesis is accepted and Trust and Attitude 0.387 0.000
that shows that there is a relationship between trust Trust and Indignity 0.091 0.324
and gender. Trust and Price perception 0.138 0.133
Trust and Advertisement Utility 0.268 0.003
Attitude and Indignity 0.257 0.005
· P-value between Attitude and gender is .258. Attitude and Price perception 0.459 0.000
Thus, alternate hypothesis is accepted while Attitude and Advertisement utility 0.733 0.000
performing independent t-test between attitude and Indignity and price perception 0.087 0.346
Indignity
Key and Advertisement Utility
Findings: 0.809 0.000
gender. Thus, alternate hypothesis is accepted and
Price Perception and Advertisement 0.514 0.000
that shows that there is a relationship between
attitude and gender. · The Pearson Coefficient value between trust and
attitude is 0.387 and p-value is 0.000. This shows
· P-value between Indignity and gender is .169. there is a positive, low and statistically significant
Thus, alternate hypothesis is accepted while relation between trust and attitude.
performing independent t-test between indignity
and gender. Thus, alternate hypothesis is accepted · The Pearson Coefficient value between trust and
and that shows that there is a relationship between indignity is 0.091 and p-value is 0.34. This shows
indignity and gender. there is a positive, low and statistically
insignificant relation between trust and indignity.
· P-value between Price perception and gender
is .062. Thus, alternate hypothesis is accepted · The Pearson Coefficient value between trust and
while performing independent t-test between price price perception is 0.138 and p-value is 0.133. This
perception and gender. Thus, alternate hypothesis shows there is a positive, low and statistically
is accepted and that shows that there is a insignificant relations between trust and price
relationship between price perception and gender. perception.

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


Analyzing Impact of Affiliate Marketing on Consumer Behavior with M-Commerce Perspective 67

· The Pearson Coefficient value between trust and 5.3Summary Interpretation


advertisement utility is 0.268 and p-value is 0.003.
This shows there is a positive, low and statistically The main purpose of the research is to study the
significant relation between trust and impact of affiliate marketing on consumer
advertisement utility. behavior with respect to m-commerce.
Independent t-test was used to measure the
· The Pearson Coefficient value between attitude reliability of the study.
and indignity is 0.257 and p-value is 0.005. This
shows there is a positive, low and statistically By conducting chi squared test in our study, it was
significant relation between attitude and indignity. seen that:

· The Pearson Coefficient value between attitude · Trust is an important factor and varies with
and price perception is 0.459 and p-value is 0.000. respect to gender.
This shows there is a positive, low and statistically · Attitude, indignity and price perception also
significant relation between attitude and price varies with respect to gender.
perception.
· The Pearson Coefficient value between attitude
and advertisement utility is 0.733 and p-value is With the help of Pearson Correlation Analysis, it is
0.000. This shows there is a positive, medium and seen that:
statistically significant relation between attitude
and advertisement utility. · Indignity and Advertisement utility has a
positive, high and statistically significant relation.
· The Pearson Coefficient value between · Price perception and advertisement utility as
indignity and price perception is 0.087 and p-value well as attitude and advertisement utility has a
is 0.346. This shows there is a positive, low and positive, medium and statistically significant
statistically significant relation between indignity relation.
and price perception. · Trust and attitude, trust and price perception,
trust and advertisement utility, attitude and
· The Pearson Coefficient value between indignity as well as attitude and price perception
indignity and advertisement utility is 0.809 and p- has a positive, low and statistically significant
value is 0.000. This shows there is a positive, high relation.
and statistically significant relation between · Trust and indignity, trust and price perception as
indignity and advertisement utility. well as indignity and price perception have a
statistically insignificant relation.
· The Pearson Coefficient value between trust and
attitude is 0.514 and p-value is 0.000. This shows Thus, the above study shows that there has been a
there is a positive, medium and statistically positive impact of affiliate marketing on consumer
significant relation between price perception and behavior with respect to m-commerce.
advertisement utility.

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


68 [ ISSN 2349-7920 ] SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation

6. Conclusion education level, age, gender as well as income of


the consumers.
Affiliate marketing is a form of online business in
which a third party i.e. the affiliate is awarded for Majority of male population are of the belief that
every visitor it provides with the help of hyperlinks there is a need for improvement in the content of
on a website or a mobile application. It is very the advertisement. However, that is not the case for
similar to paying a finder's fee for the introduction female population and they are happy with the
of new client or multiple clients to a business. The content of the advertisement, which are shown to
various companies that offer affiliate programs in them. The utility of the advertisement is also
India are Flipkart, Amazon, Snapdeal etc. different for different gender. Each gender has a
d i ff e r e n t v i e w a b o u t t h e u t i l i t y o f t h e
Companies like Flipkart, Amazon, Snapdealetc. advertisement.
uses CPA or Cost per Affiliation compensation
method to reward their affiliate partners. CPA or 6.1Suggestions
Cost per affiliation or Cost per order or cost per The various methods, which can be used to further
purchase is the price paid by the advertiser per improve the acceptance of users towards
orders. It is used to make comparison across advertisements, are:
advertising media and vehicles and can also be
used to measure the profitability of a firm's Internet · Use native advertisement as the acceptance
marketing. These affiliate have a pre-defined level of native advertisement is higher as compared
Commission rates, which are different for different to normal advertisement. The chances of a user
product category. The commission rate of the clicking on native ad is greater as they are does not
companies also varies according to the customer. break the flow of the website or an app.
The affiliate partners are paid more in case of a new · Take user permission before taking users to a
customer as compared to a repeated different website or to a different application
customer.Different affiliates offer different download link.
commission rates. Commission rates offered by · Introduce an advertisement free edition to the
Flipkart and Amazon are higher as compared to users. For example, only show ads to users who do
companies like Snapdeal, Infibean etc. not avail the in-app purchase in the application.

Affiliate marketing has had a positive impact on


consumer behavior with respect to m-commerce. Note: The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees
of the journal for their suggestions to improve the overall
Even though, a majority of customers do not like quality of the paper. Usual disclaimers are applicable.
watching advertisement in their mobile
applications, their acceptance towards
advertisements is increasing. The various factors Reference
like trust, attitude and advertisement utility are
interdependent on each other and plays an · Brear, D.A.V.I.D & Barnes, S.T.U.A.R.T. (2008).
important part in influencing customer behavior Assessing the value of online affiliate marketing in the UK
towards affiliate marketing. Consumer behavior financial services industry. International Journal of
Electronic Finance, 2(1), 1-17.
towards affiliate marketing is also dependent upon

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017


Analyzing Impact of Affiliate Marketing on Consumer Behavior with M-Commerce Perspective 69

· Bar-ilan, J, Hasan, M &Levene, M. (2006). Methods for Linktrackrcom. (2016). Linktrackrcom. Retrieved 10 July,
comparing rankings of search engine results. Computer 2 0 1 6 , f r o m h t t p : / / w w w. l i n k t r a c k r. c o m / a c c o u n t /
Networks, 50, 1448-1463. knowledgebase.php?action=displayarticle

Chawla, D &Sondhi, N. (2011). Research Methodology: Min, L, Dong, Z.Y & Chen, X. (2012). Factors influencing
Concept and Cases. : In-text citation: (Chawla&Sondhi, consumption experience of mobile commerce. Internet
2011) Research, 22(2), 120-141.

Fox, P & Wareham, J. (2007). Controlling your brand: Nair, H.I.M.A & Barnes, S.T.U.A.R.T. (2008). Digital
Contractual restrictions placed by Internet retailers on marketing: a phenomenon that rules the modern world.
affiliate marketing activities in Spain. 20th Bled Reflections Journal of Management, 6(2016), 1-8.
eConference, 50, 125-141.
Prabhu, S &Satpathy, T (2015). Digital marketing: a
Haq, Z.U. (2012). Affiliate marketing programs: A study of phenomenon that rules the modern world. Reflections
consumer attitude towards affiliate marketing programs Journal of Management, 8(S4), 278-282.
among Indian users. International Journal of Research
Studies in Management, 1(1), 127-137 Sharma, S. (2015). Internet Marketing: The Backbone of
Ecommerce.International Journal of Emerging Research in
Https://secure2sfdcstaticcom/assets/pdf/datasheets/sc- Management & Technology, 4(12), 200-202.
socialcom-advertising-benchmarkpdf. (2016).
Wo r d s t r e a m c o m . R e t r i e v e d 1 0 J u l y, 2 0 1 6 , f r o m Smartinsightscom. (2016). Smart Insights. Retrieved 10
http://www.wordstream.com/average-ctrSfdcstaticcom. July, 2016, from http://www.smartinsights.com/internet-
(2016). Sfdcstaticcom. Retrieved 10 July, 2016, from advertising/internet-advertising-analytics/display-
https://secure2.sfdcstatic.com/assets/pdf/datasheets/sc- advertising-clickthrough-rates/
socialcom-advertising-benchmark.pdf
Wordstreamcom. (2016). Wordstreamcom. Retrieved 10
July, 2016, from http://www.wordstream.com/average-ctr

Vol. III No.2 ; June-2017

You might also like