Low Level Deliverables - Business Input (UHB Results) - NTT Ver 0.1

*** General – Recipients Have Full Control *** #_x000D_
Worksheet Index Status

DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure Complete
DL3 FI02 General Ledger Complete
DL3 FI03 Accounts Payable Complete
DL3 FI04 Accounts Receivable Complete
DL3 FI05 Asset Accounting Complete
DL3 FI06 Cash Management Complete
DL3 FI07 Charities Complete
DL3 FI08 VAT Complete
DL3 FI09 SAC Planning Complete
DL3 FI10 Vendor Invoice Management Complete
DL3 LW01 Logistics Enterprise Structure Complete
DL3 LW02 Inventory Management Complete
DL3 LW03 Extended Warehouse Management Complete
DL3 PR01 Procurement Complete
DL3 SD01 Sales and Distribution Complete
Requirements
Understood by Confirmed
Readiness Index by LLD Demonstrated Percent
NTT Addressed
Readiness Index - 6% Yes - 1 / 18 Yes - 1 / 18 Yes - 1 / 18 6
Readiness Index - 0% Yes - 4 / 16 Yes - 0 / 16 Yes - 0 / 16 0 Readin
Readiness Index
8%

DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure Complete
DL3 FI02 General Ledger Complete
DL3 FI03 Accounts Payable Complete
DL3 FI04 Accounts Receivable Complete
DL3 FI05 Asset Accounting Complete
DL3 FI06 Cash Management Complete
DL3 FI07 Charities Complete
DL3 FI08 VAT Complete
DL3 FI09 SAC Planning Complete
DL3 FI10 Vendor Invoice Management Complete
DL3 LW01 Logistics Enterprise Structure Complete
DL3 LW02 Inventory Management Complete
DL3 LW03 Extended Warehouse Management Complete
DL3 PR01 Procurement Complete
DL3 SD01 Sales and Distribution Complete
Data Entry -
There are links to each sheet from the index on this page.
Function/Area Worksheets
1 - Column E - List any interdependencies you are concerned about
2 - Column F - Any comments that need to be captured
3 - Column G - Drop-Down - Please select Yes, No or Unsure
4 - Column H - Drop-Down - Please select Yes or No
5 - Column I - Drop-Down - Please select Yes or No
6 - Column J - Please identify a contact person for that specific line item.
Please add any missing items at the bottom of table in the appropriate sheet.
Once work on a sheet has started please complete Column D on this worksheet.
Select In Progress or Complete from the drop-down in column D.
A link to the LLD behind each worksheet is in cell A1 on each page.
Please endeavour to complete the sheets by Friday 2nd February 2024.

out
ne item.
opriate sheet.
this worksheet.
D.
ge.
ry 2024.
Worksheet index - workstreams not noted on the index tab
Lease Accounting not started
PFI? to be defined?
Payroll - ESR to SAP interface (the target file and mapping table) payroll workstream?
Pharmacy - CMM pharmacy workstream?

Comments
Lease assets: the asset side of the accounting needs to follow the same logic as the purchased assets of DL3 FI05 Asset
Accounting (eg additions, depreciation, revaluation etc.) The liability side of the lease obligations also needs to be
defined within the leasing module.
Within Asset Accounting DL3 FI05 is the PFI asset (eg QEHB hospital) and its financial obligations, a form of borrowing like
leases: my assumption is that PFI remains a excel based calculation that is feed manually into the GL (both asset =
lifecycle and liability = finance obligation) - though the PFI asset itself will be an asset within FI05
Pay is 2/3rds of all expenditure - how the target file (ESR output) and associated CoA mapping table (to post everything
other than gross pay) is to be processed to SAP GL - ? This includes relevant questions about the format of the target file
(eg Heartlands versus QE allocate bank staff posting), detail versus summary postings, any other output requirement eg
occupational code etc. When the payrolls merge!
Drugs is largest non-pay expenditure and the dispensing system itself (currently CMM) is operationally critical in terms of
the provision of NHS healthcare and applicable regulations.
Interdependencies
Lease assets will have the same interdependencies as Purchased assets with
regards to Accounts Payable, Ordering etc.
Need to clarify how PFI will work - both as an asset and a liability, presumably
through manual GL postings as there is no specific cash transaction that is
capital, the lifecycle being a sub component of the unitary payment (it has no
dedicated purchase order), the same is true of the financial obligation.
The detail versus summary posting question is relevant to financial reporting.

Also the control account reconciliations and payovers (tax, NI pensions et al)
that arise from the mapping table and detailed postings. How / when is the
new CoA in terms of gross pay (cost centre and account code) to be entered
into ESR by employee? (ditto rest of the CoA regards the mapping table).
Financially - pharmacy issues / stock adjustments to be posted to GL - orders
and invoicing through Procurement / Accounts Payable. Also the high cost
prices - set by NHS nationally, how these processes will work?
Document
Functional Area Document Title
Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

VF
VF
VF
VF
Deliverable Interdependencies
Finance - Enterprise Structure
Finance Organisational Structure
Company
Company Code
Controlling Area Reporting
Segments/Division Reporting
Functional Area Reporting
Profit Centre and groups Reporting
Cost Centre Hierarchy Reporting
Cost Centre and groups Reporting
Cost Centre Reporting
All Multiple – probably all areas

Chart of Accounts - GL accounts ALL

Yes - 1 / 18
UHB Requirements
Comments Understood by NTT
No
No
Are we clear that this is purely UHB - from memory we were

discussing setting up companies for other entities within Not sure
BSOL but the doc only references UHB
No
Can't say if this is correct or not - assume the GL team have

confirmed that it is appropriate to use same CoA for all Not sure
companies including the charities?
Not clear if we've been asked to respond on

segments/divisions? Mentions we don't know yet but don't
recall being asked? Does this impact any of our decisions on Not sure
CC or PC? I thought we'd previously provided the new
structure which showed the various organisational layers etc.
As above, don't recall being asked? Not sure
Don't feel as though enough content here to comment on Not sure
Wouldn’t we need one CC hierarchy for each company within

the group? Apologies if I've misunderstood. Current Not sure
document not updated for Moorhouse review.
Don't feel as though enough content here to comment on,

Not sure
current document not updated for Moorhouse review.
Don't feel as though enough content here to comment on Not sure
The LLD document does not accurately reflect the discussions

and progress made over the past 6 months. The enterprise
structure down to company code is roughly what I would
expect but not well documented. Controlling areas No
downwards does not reflect the work undertaken so far or
the detail provided. Our main outstanding issue seems to be
when/where profit centres are required.
NTT have a draft chart of accounts - currently under

discussion and review
not sure - by this I mean we have supplied a draft of account
codes, in a reporting hierarchy. There appear to be more SAP No
requirements as yet not understood, implication for revenue
selection codes ('SD') or materials management ('MM') being
examples
Where are the reporting requirements captured, so we can

No
assess if this is fit for purpose as an enterprise structure?
I'm not clear we've been asked to feed into the User Stories? No
Assure Dialysis is in the process of being wound down

therefore question as to whether we need this as a Company No
Code - if needed for historical records keeping then ok
In S3 the document references that there are no role

implications and that this is config only. Can I just confirm
where the role implications are picked up? Some of the
decisions on what constitutes a cost centre are dependent No
upon how we can restrict role access across certain
combinations of PC/CC/GL etc so potentially would impact
the structure conversation?
Yes - 1 / 18 Yes - 1 / 18
Adequately Confirmed
Demonstrated Addressed Contact
No No
No No
No No Vicki Flindall
No No
No No Richard Baker
No No Michael Creaton and Louise Rudge
Readiness Index - 6%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
6%
Document

Finance DL3 FI02 General Ledger

Included within LLD
Included within LLD
Not included specifically in LLD
Not included specifically in LLD

Chart of Accounts, reporting. Team structure
Maintain accounting master data (P11).
including roles and responsibilities.
All sub ledgers, interfaces, manual (journal)

Record transactions (P16)
postings
MANUAL TRANSACTION (P17) Workflow approval process (to be confirmed)

Analyze & Reconcile accounts. (P31)
postings

Close books and consolidate financial results (P36) postings including consolidation
adjustments.

Financial Closing Cockpit (P37) postings including consolidation
adjustments.

Perform financial reporting (P43) postings including consolidation
adjustments. Closing Cockpit.

postings including consolidation
Perform regulatory reporting (P44)
adjustments. Closing Cockpit. Financial
reporting out of SAP/SAC.

Standard General Ledger Reports (P46)

Period End Activities (P47)
HLD Open Points (P49)
HLD GAP List (P54)
Inventory Accounting- Sumit Logistics
Accrual accounting / invoices without POs Logistics, VIM, AP

Comments
In order to understand GL postings a detailed

knowledge is required of all sub ledgers and their
outputs, all interfaces.
Some of the interdependencies were demonstrated
by NTT at the QE lecture theatre demo (from
AP/VIM, AR and Logistics).
We have has one 'show and tell' session when a

journal (less than 999 lines) was demonstrated.
This is an area that the Trust currently lacks a

detailed understanding of. It is understood that the
reconciliation process will be significantly different
from the 'as is' position. Sub ledgers will
automatically reconcile to GL. Particular emphasis in
SAP is placed on GR/IR reconciliation/clearing
account but this has not been demonstrated at all.
Once again this is an area where the Trust lacks an

understanding of the month end process. We need
to absolutely confirm that consolidation is in scope.
The Trust has already shared an 'as is' accounting and
reporting timetable for 2024/25 which assumes that
we continue to operate on two separate ledgers.
The Trust has never seen the closing cockpit. We

believe this is expected at the 'realisation phase'.
We need to absolutely confirm that consolidation is
in scope.
The Trust has already shared an 'as is' accounting and
reporting timetable for 2024/25 which assumes that
we continue to operate on two separate ledgers.
Nothing seen to date. Presumably report writing will

occur much later in the programme.
Input is required from all areas of the Finance team.
Out of scope per the LLD but we need to ensure that

the financial reporting provides all the information
required to perform regulatory reporting.
Confirm how we report cross modular activities. This

is vital for VAT reporting and for the provision of
relevant and reliable information for audit
inspection.
Input is required from all areas of the Finance team.
Is this separate to the closing cockpit?
There are a number of open points (GL006,GL010,

GL012, GL013, GL014, GL015, GL016, GL018, GL019).
Closed points eg document splitting have not been
demonstrated.
There are a number of open points (GLGAP001,
GLGAP002, GLGAP003, GLGAP004 (x2), GLGAP005
and GLGAP006)
It is still to be confirmed what inventory is to be
included as stockholding areas (ie included in the
balance sheet).
It is still to be confirmed how the Trust will replace its

long running accounting solutions to PO invoices
received without a receipt and purchase invoices
received without a purchase order.
Yes - 4 / 22 Yes - 0 / 22
UHB Requirements Understood by NTT Adequately Demonstrated

Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes - 0 / 22
Confirmed Addressed Contact

No Stephen Lewis / Marie Deeley

No
Stephen Lewis / Marie Deeley
No
No
No
45% 0% 0% 45% 45%
45% 0% 0% 45% 45%
45% 0% 0% 45% 45%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

Document

Finance DL3 FI03 Accounts Payable



Deliverable
BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS
MANAGE VENDOR MASTER DATA
VENDOR GROUPS (ACCOUNT GROUPS)

CREATION OF AN AP INVOICE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PROCESSES
AS IS PROCESS.
HIGH LEVEL TO BE PROCESS
INVOICE PROCESSING
PURCHASE ORDER BASED INVOICE PROCESSING
NON PURCHASE ORDER BASED INVOICE PROCESSING

INVOICE VERIFICATION
INVOICE PROCESSING WORKFLOW
DOWN PAYMENT
CLEARING PROCESS
VENDOR PAYMENT PROCESS
CORRESPONDENCE / REPORTING / PERIOD END ACTIVITIES
Interdependencies Comments
GL/ Cash Management/ all Trust departments
procuremnt/ AR Unclear of the process/ workflow . Who is responsible
procuremnt/ AR
???????? AP do not create invoices
GL/ Cash Management/ all Trust departments Vague Overview
GL/ Cash Management/ all Trust departments

GL/ Cash Management/ all Trust departments Not Demonstrated
GL / Financial Management/ all trust departments Not adequately Demonstrated
GL / Financial Management/ all trust departments +

Not adequately Demonstrated
Procurement
GL/ Financial Management Not adequately Demonstrated
Procurement Not Demonstrated
procurement/ all trust departmenst Not Demonstrated
not generaly used
not currently a process
GL/ Cash Managment Not Demonstrated
GL/ Financial Management Not Demonstrated
Yes - 4 / 16 Yes - 0 / 16

Unsure No
Yes No
No No
No No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes No
Unsure No
Yes No
Unsure No
Yes - 0 / 16

No Dawn Jeffries 25% 0%


0% 25% 25%
0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 25% 25%
0% 25% 25%
0% 25% 25%
0% 25% 25%
0% 45% 45%
0% 25% 25%
0% 25% 25%
0% 25% 25%
0% 45% 45%
0% 25% 25%
0% 45% 45%
0% 25% 25%
Document
Additional comments have been added to the LLD document

Finance DL3 FI04 Accounts Receivable




Additional Items
Dispute Management and

Advanced Collections
Cash Management / GL / Ops Finance /
Accounts Receivable Process
Income
Reconciliation Accounts GL
SAP Master Process Details Cash Management
Accounts Receivable To-Be Master Data Process Cash Management
Customer Master Data Cash Management
Company Code data Cash Management
Customer Groupings Cash Management
Customer Master Data fields Cash Management
Clearing between the Vendor and Customer AP
Blocking Customer Account Cash Management

SAP Transactions details
Accounts Receivable Transaction Data process

Invoice Processing
Income

Credit Memo in Accounts Receivable
Income

Invoice Forms
Income

Document Reversal
Income
Down Payments Cash Management / GL

Sales Ledger Journal Cash Management / GL
Overpayments Cash Management / GL
Doubtful Receivables GL
Bad Debt Write Off GL / Income / OPs Finance
Dunning Process
Dunning Block
Clearing Cash Management / GL
Manual Clearing Cash Management / GL

Post with Clearing Cash Management / GL
Automatic Account Clearing Cash Management / GL
Transfer Posting with Clearing Cash Management / GL
Period end process in Accounts receivable

To be Process in SAP
Enter Accruals and Deferrals
Close Account Receivable Periods
Correspondence
Ability to attach documents to a customer
Free text notes against customer account
Free text "diary" notes against line items (invoices)

Aged debt report
Reporting in General
Analysis1 Field in Sage (Debtor Type)
Analysis2 Field in Sage (Dir Code)
Dispute Management Income / Ops Finance
Advance Collections
Comments
Seems like a vague general overview
Driven by Customer Account Group
Unclear how info re new customers is received. There

has been a discussion around an electronic template
and a workflow to validate - though there has also
been references to this data being received outside
SAP. No workflow has been demonstrated - unclear if
this is in scope
There is still confusion around the various elements of

ther customer master data
Agreed would not be automatic. Only likely to be used
very occasionally (contra)
Unclear what transactions a "block" effects i.e. sales
invoices / credit memo's / cash
Not sure what is being referred to here
Not sure what is being referred to here
If this relates to the creation of sales invoices then it is
intended that these will be raised through OTC - no
demo has been provided for FI Invoices
It is intended that these will be raised through OTC -
no demo has been provided within FI
If this refers to invoice prints then info has been sent
to the SAP Cons though no print has been
demonstrated. In particular it is unclear how we deal
with PP's who have insurers
Unclear exactly what this refers to. The LLD doc advise
only available with FI only invoices. At present it is not
intended to have FI only invoices
No demo though the LLD doc seems to describe this
process well

process well
process well
process well - UHB to determin if required and set
rules
Seems to be the follow up process to above - do we
have to move a debt to the bad debt provison before
write off ? - no demo
This has been talked through and seems to be

understood (Dunning would run very similar to
commercial organisations) "Councils" needs to be
changed to "other gov" as per comment on LLD doc
and in line with customer account groups. Still need to
see a demo
Need clarification as to what happens when a Dunning

Block is removed as per comment within LLD doc.

process well from an AR perspective
process well from an AR perspective
Don't understand this - no demo
How is criteria set - no demo
Don't understand how this can be used to transfer an
invoice from one customer account to another - no
demo
Not sure what is being referred to here - no info given
in LLD doc - seems like just a heading
LLD document unclear - no demo
LLD document unclear - does this impact debtor
accounts (as per comment on LLD doc)
LLD document incomplete - no demo
Unclear what is intended to be including within this
section within LLD doc
I.e. a thid party consent form, address changes etc.
For general comments against a customer i.e. contact
details
Notes can be added to header or each line item within
invoice - unlcear if ths can be exported to excel for
credit controllers to work from
Not seen
Nothing has been demonstrated as to how we
retrieve general sales ledger / debtor related info
from SAP
Not clear if we will need this in SAP. Need

understanding of what can be included within aged
debt / o/s baalnce report
Not clear if we will need this in SAP. Need
understanding of what can be included within aged
debt / o/s baalnce report
A comprehensive dispute management module was

demonstrated by SAP Cons Tim Luckham and James
Willis (not NTT) it is unclear which NTT Cons will be
taking this forward
Demonstrated by SAP Cons Tim Luckham and James

Willis not NTT. Diary entry seemed better than
demonstrated through AR (line 39 above) Also
enabled facility to prioritise debtor chasing within SAP
and create broken payment promise reports (used for
installment plans and adhoc promises of payment)
Yes - 11 / 39 Yes - 1 / 39

Unsure No
Yes No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Unsure No
Yes No
Unsure No
Yes No
Yes No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes No
Yes Yes
Unsure No
Unsure no
no no
no no
no no
no not by NTT
no not by NTT
Yes - 1 / 39 13

No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 45%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 45%
No Simon Evans 25%

Simon Evans 0%
Simon Evans 0%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 45%

No Simon Evans 45%
No Simon Evans 45%
No Simon Evans 45%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 45%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 45%
No Simon Evans 45%

No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
0%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
no Simon Evans 45%
Yes Simon Evans 45%
No Simon Evans 25%
no Simon Evans 25%
no Simon Evans 0%
no Simon Evans 0%
no Simon Evans 0%
Not by NTT Simon Evans 0%
Not by NTT Simon Evans 0%

0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 45% 45%
45% 10% 100% 100%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
45% 10% 55% 55%
45% 10% 55% 55%

Document

Finance DL3 FI05 Asset Accounting
Deliverable
Asset purchase processes
Asset transfer
Global settings in SAP required for the entire Asset accounting process
VAT process for Assets
Acquisition with Purchase Order/ Additions - purchased (including capital lifecycle additions)
Asset Transfer
Intracompany Transfer/ Reclassifications
Intercompany Transfer
Asset Retirement
Asset Sale with Customer/ Disposals/derecognition
Asset Retirement without Customer
Scrapping (Retirement without Revenue)
Asset Impairment
Unplanned Depreciation
Write up of depreciation
Manual Depreciation
Period/Year end closing process in Asset Accounting
Leases - missing entirely from above - separate leasing workstream / module to follow?
Yes - 0 / 45 Yes - 0 / 45

No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
Yes - 0 / 45 0

No Michael Creaton / Steve Clarke 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
Document

Finance DL3 FI06 Cash Management

Bank Accounts Management
Cash Management
CM - Planning Process
Cash Management
Global Setting for Cash Management Organizational Structure
GL Document Types
Payment Terms
Payment Methods
Planning Groups
Planning Levels
SAP Bank Management
Bank Master Data
To be Process in SAP Bank Management
Bank & House Banks
Bank Account Master
General Ledger Account
Payment Media
SAP Bank Reconciliation Statement
To be Process in SAP Bank Reconciliation Statement
Import Bank Statement
Reprocess Bank Statement
Manual Statement
Bank Charges
Patient Credit Cards
Approval of Payments
Manage Petty Cash
Canteen and parking type revenue/cash
Pay advances
Clearing
Cash Management: Manage Cash flow

Cash Position
Process Memo Records
Check Cash Flow Items
Period/Year end process in Cash Management
Close CM Posting Periods
Year End Reconciliation with GL
Cash flow forecasting All finance modules

Comments
Discussions have started with NTT about building a

cash flow forecasting solution in SAC. It is not yet
clear when a robust solution can be designed within
the ERP. The objective must be to produce an
accurate and robust daily cash flow forecast over
various timespans.
Yes - 0 / 37 Yes - 0 / 37

No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
Unsure No
Yes - 0 / 37 0

No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No Alison Evans / Stephen Lewis

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

Document
Charities DL3 FI07 Charities












Missing Not listed

Not listed
Not Listed
Not listed
Not listed
Not Listed
Unlikely that the requirements are understood - Where is BWCHC in this

deliverable? The basic premis is the same for functionality but they are not
included in the YCOA document either appear to have been completely forgotten
about
Deliverable
Enterprise Structure for UHB Charities
General Ledger for UHB Charities
Global settings for General Ledger

Accounting Principles
Chart of Accounts
Account group
Retained Earnings account
Field status group

Posting Keys
Valuation and Ledgers
Standard Ledgers
Extension Ledgers
Fiscal year and posting periods
Document splitting
Document Types and Number Ranges
VAT Codes
Tolerance Groups for Employees
General Ledger master data process details
General Ledger transaction data process details
Financial Journals/document processing
Journal Templates
UHB Charities Journal Types
Period/Year end process in Charities General Ledger accounting process
General Ledger Clearing
Automatic clearing program
Manage Posting Periods

Regroup receivables/payables
Financial Closing cockpit
Accounts payable for UHB Charities

Global settings for Accounts payable
Accounts payable master data process

Accounts payable transaction data process
Period end process in Accounts payable
Accounts receivable for UHB Charities
Accounts receivable global settings

Accounts receivable master data process
Accounts receivable transaction data process
Period end process in Accounts receivable
Account Statement
Asset Accounting for UHB Charities
Fixed Assets global settings

Asset Accounting master data process
UHB Charities Asset Accounting transactions details
UHB Charities period/year end closing process in Asset Accounting
Fiscal Year Change
Cash Management for UHB Charities
Bank Accounts Management
Cash Management
UHB Charities SAP Global settings for Cash Management

SAP master process details (mapping to current process)
UHB Charities SAP Cash Management transactions

Period/Year end process in Cash Management
Data Migration Objects
Asset Accounting Master data
Cost Centre Master Data
Fund Centres
Fund balances
Asset Balances
Customer Master Data
Open Accounts Receivable Transactions

G/L Account Master data
Cost Centre Master Data
General Ledger Balances
Reconciliation Account Balances
Fund Statements productions

Financial Accounts reporting
Fund Balance roll over at year end and how open balances will be visible
How Transfers between funds can be effected without impacting I&E but affecting
the fund balance
How the MT 940 file will be transmitted to the charities for coding of donated
income and subsequent clearing as charity not finance hold the details for
allocation of funds
How the SAP system will be made available to the charity staff on a different
platform IE BWCHC are not on UHB Platform
Unlikely that the requirements are understood - Where is BWCHC in this deliverable? The basic premis is the same for functio
General observation is - We are not aware of how we will report. The requirement is by:- Site (4 hospitals and one all sites) , F
and fundraising) essential for compliance to FRS102 . We have not been shown fund statements generation by fund, we have
have not been able to obtain comfort that the requirements are unerstood. Where domos have been scheduled we have not
income or expenditure requirement it was not apparent in the posting if the fund was a Profit centre or segment therefore the
General observation is - We are not aware of how we

will report. The requirement is by:- Site (4 hospitals
and one all sites) , Fund type (Endowment, Restricted,
Designated, General) , Grants type (research, non
research) Category of income and expenditure,
(charitable. management and fundraising) essential
for compliance to FRS102 . We have not been shown
fund statements generation by fund, we have not
been shown the roll forward of fund balances and told
thay to do this the year end process must be done
which is not possible in the test system. so we have
not been able to obtain comfort that the
requirements are unerstood. Where domos have
been scheduled we have not been comfortable that
the method will work, IE fund transfer between GL
codes, where each fund is a GL code - whilst it may
satisfy the no inflation of income or expenditure
requirement it was not apparent in the posting if the
fund was a Profit centre or segment therefore the
question raised was how will thet appear in the fund
itself - this was not answered.
If this relates to the coding structure it is being looked

at now, but BWCH Charity is not mentioned in either
this document or the COA document so appears to
have been overlooked as the the coding requirements
do differ
Have not understood the fund structure or the

Needs to be able to report by expense splits between charitable,fundraising &
fund, type of fund and hospital management costs also split between Endowment,
site restricted & unrestricted reporting requirements
apparent form the YCOA document
Assume this is in GL discussed at trust level, no

Charity specific conversations had
No NTT do not understand the FRS102 and SORP

requirements evidenced in creating GL codes for
Transfers between funds. and statement that all
general funds are balance sheet
Have not understood the fund structure or the

expense splits between charitable,fundraising &
management costs also split between Endowment,
restricted & unrestricted reporting requirements
apparent form the YCOA document
Not been explained
Not understood that the funds can not zero into one
Needs to be retained each year by
retained earnings file apparent from needing to send
fund as this is legal requirement
a simple I&E and Balance sheet for two years for only
of charities
3 funds to demonstrate again - THINK BANK ACCOUNT
Not got this far on charity specific discussions

Dont understand how they ledgers need to report

dispite providing Management and Annual Accounts
formats
No see CoA comment they do not understand the

groupings in the expenses
Do not think this is necessary as all adjustments

should go through the real ledgers
Standard trust periods but the different close down

times has not been addressed as a decision to use
single controlling area? Unless this is done by user
access but this has not been explained
Not decided yet if we need this as our hospital sites

are currently identifyable within the coding structure -
not yet aware of how this will be replcated in SAP
I think htis is goverened by the trust
The charity is not registered for VAT the cost of the

VAT should go to the purchase cost of the goods or
services this has not been discussed
Employee costs to coding structureNot sure what this means
Not yet demonstrated an understanding of the I&E

catergorisation splits from the YCOA document
Not seen a demo yet - last one was suspended when

the question was asked how if the fund is a GL code
will the transfer appear in the fund statement .
Instead we were then taken through super user
access reuirements. Not recieved any user guides
No demonstration recieved just granted super user

access
one demonstration recieved on a transfer but raised

more questions that could not be answered was then
granted super user access to test, but without
understanding the system it is impissible to test it.
Not discussed as yet
We have given them year end timetable but they

fundamentally do not get the fund must retain its
balance
Not got this far on charity specific discussions, NTT

probably understand but i dont know what this means
if this relates to Banking awaiting the cost approval

from Sarah
Heard of it neing mentioed in GL

group but am not part of that Not got this far on charity specific discussions
group
Needs to be accessible by Fund as

well as category of expense Have seen the AP order to payment but not claims as
(charitable, management or of yet
fundraising)
Not sure what this is, but if this relates to payment

terms accross the controlling area this it is unlikely the
trust 30 days will work for charities
Assume this is in AP not discussed at trust level

Discussed requirements not demonstrated how

immediate claims will be paid
Assume this is in AR not discussed at trust level

Discussed requirements and fixed asset listing

provided not seen a demo of how revaluation gains
and losses are processed according to realised and
unrealised as of yet on fixed asset holdings of equity
shares
Assume covered under Fixed Asset at trust level

Asset listings provided nothing further discussed
Not got this far on charity specific discussions assume

as per trust level
Provided bank account requirements many times but

repeatedly being asked to provide, assume this is
covered by the trust level discussions
Not seen for charities, assume it will work as per the

trust, only difference will be that there may be 100
donations of £5 on our sttements and the charity
currently code this has not been discussed how the
automation could work for us.
I don't understand what this means

Not seen any document maps since our blueprints

were provided, several screen shots of the system
have been shared but only one live system which was
unsuitable and we raised that profit centre or
segment needed to be our funds we thought???????
Not seen this for charity

Not seen for charity
No, looking at the CoA provided there is no evidence

it will work. Profit centers for funds has been
mentioned but as we have not seen fund statement
generation unable to confirm requirements are
understood
We have provided the listings and categories of

assets, Buildings, Vehicles, artifacts, Short and Long
term investment holdings and IT but have not
discussed how the depreciating / none depreciating
and revaluations will work
The latest conversation we were told that the cost

centre is a department of the hospital, this is not the
case for charities as the structure is different (by fund)
so unsure they understand
I have not heard the term fund centre used so i can

not comment
Not understood as transfers between funds need to

equal zero accross all funds in the I&E but not inflate
Each income and expenditure or deflate Income and expenditure, this was
type needs to be identifyable by attempted to be demonstrated by having set up GL
fund as well as group of fund codes for two funds and posting a transfer BUT we
types and charoty as a whole raised the question how will the transfer appear in the
actual fund if no profit centre was selected which we
were led to beieve was or fund reporting methods
Have given the list of tangible assets to NTT no further

Assume this is addressed within AP. we pay many

claims for staff as well as external speakers etc. not
aware how the AP team will deal with this

Interdependent relationship
Was shown something up to two years ago but
between site/fund type/fund and
nothing has been said since on how this works with GL
the GL income and expenditure
code
(by fund being required)
Trying to mapp the charity chart of accounts to the

Mapped to funds balances
SAP standard
funds balances derived from

income and expenditure for each
fund Repeatedly advised it can be done but not shown
Repeatedly told it can be done but the demo used GL

codes for each fund. We would therefore be unable
to check the transfer between funds codes = zero
easily and obtain transfers for the accounts disclosure
s deliverable? The basic premis is the same for functionality but they are not included in the YCOA document either appear to have been
equirement is by:- Site (4 hospitals and one all sites) , Fund type (Endowment, Restricted, Designated, General) , Grants type (research, no
n shown fund statements generation by fund, we have not been shown the roll forward of fund balances and told thay to do this the year
ood. Where domos have been scheduled we have not been comfortable that the method will work, IE fund transfer between GL codes, w
f the fund was a Profit centre or segment therefore the question raised was how will thet appear in the fund itself - this was not answered
Yes - 0 / 70 Yes - 0 / 70
No No
No No
Unsure No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
No No
Unsure No
No No
Unsure No
No No
Unsure No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
No No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
e YCOA document either appear to have been completely forgotten about
esignated, General) , Grants type (research, non research) Category of income and expenditure, (charitable. management
und balances and told thay to do this the year end process must be done which is not possible in the test system. so we
ill work, IE fund transfer between GL codes, where each fund is a GL code - whilst it may satisfy the no inflation of
ppear in the fund itself - this was not answered.
Yes - 0 / 70 0
No Karen Cutler / Sophie Spencer 0%













0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
Document
Finance DL3 FI08 VAT
2.1

2.2

2.2.1
2.2.2
2.3
3 Finance DL3 FI08 VAT

3.1
3.2 Finance DL3 FI08 VAT

3.2.1
3.3 Finance DL3 FI08 VAT

3.3.1
3.4
3.4.1

3.5
3.5.1 Finance DL3 FI08 VAT
3.5.2
Concern 1
Concern 2
Concern 3
Concern 4
Further general comment

AP/AR/Procurement/GL
Require cross module reporting in

Value Added Tax (VAT) - High level UHB process in SAP order to review VAT return - this
is not available in SAP therefore
existing practices will need to
remain
SAP configuration settings
Tax Procedure
VAT Code Setup
VAT applicability to UHB company codes
SAP VAT Solution Process scope

VAT master data creation process
SAP VAT Master data configuration
Tax Codes set at Business Partner level
SAP VAT Transactional data configuration
Setting Default Tax Codes in Purchasing and Sales Documents
SAP VAT Transactional processes
VAT Transaction Types
Period end process in VAT
To be Process in SAP
Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases
Cross module reporting for order

line details, supplier/customer
details and general ledger
Roles & Authorisations
postings to full posting code
(including cost centre/profit
centre)
Cross module reporting for order

line details, supplier/customer
details and general ledger
VAT Reporting
postings to full posting code
(including cost centre/profit
centre)
Journal processing
Capital schemes and VAT apportionment
Control account
External reporting
Comments
Very basic standard SAP report shown for just input
and output (not EU reverse charge) - does not include
all information required to produce VAT return due to
cross module confilcts. The report itself is insufficient
to provide a full VAT return - we will need to adopt
the same process as we currently undertake in order
to submit a VAT return.
Whilst they understand that UK VAT is 20%, there is

also restricted VAT on some supplies (5%) and
apportioned VAT for Capital Schemes which they
have not yet created and assigned in SAP
Decision trees given to NTT to aid their understanding,

just when i think they understand, they ask me a
question which demonstrates their lack of
understanding.
Not all VAT codes have been added to SAP - No capital
VAT codes
Still incomplete - COS and Business Activity shown as
INPUT only. No Capital % added into SAP
Heading only - see below
Not all tax rates are set up in SAP - Capital schemes

This has not been discussed with me - i am unfamiliar
with what "business partner" means in the SAP world
and how this fits in with VAT.
As long as the decision trees are adhered to in SAP -

customer/supplier and what we are selling/buying
then the default VAT position should, theroetically, be
correct.
I've been advised that for Non recoverable VAT (which

SAP ensures me they won't appear on the VAT return)
we won't be able to see the cost centre and further
work is required to find out where to post the VAT
back to. This is a huge step back from the currect
reports we have in Sage with full posting code.
Also refer to further comments below this table on

VAT transactions not specificed in this deliverable.
The deliverable shows that they understand what we

have discussed. I've yet to see this in practice.
UHB = monthly, NTT aware of this per the deliverable

however there is no mention of the roll up journal to a
control code which has been discussed with them.
I don't want unposted parked documents being part

of the VAT return process - this hasn't been
demonstrated to me - not discussed
SAP standard VAT reports are insufficient to produce

the VAT return - cross module reports required to
complete return in excel - SAP alone cannot determin
the VAT status and therefore work is required in excel
and viewing invoices as is currently undertaken.
I've advised NTT of the roles and authorisation once

the data is downloaded into excel - this area is not a
SAP function as it's who completes the VAT return and
authorises it - this wouldn't apply as a workflow in SAP
because SAP doesn't provide adequate reports alone.
As noted in the first point above, i have been shown a

very basic SAP standard VAT report. I've advised this
is insufficient to produce the VAT return alone. Cross
module reports are required to complete the return in
excel - SAP alone cannot determin the VAT status and
therefore work is required in excel and viewing
invoices as is currently undertaken.
I would not want an auto function to fill out a return.
I am concerned that all journals will have a VAT tick

box and automatically post a transaction to the VAT
balance sheet codes. This means that multiple
finance members will be posting to the VAT codes
which will make reconciling that much harder and
more time consuming.
This has not yet been discussed or demonstrated
I am unsure if there will be a control account, similar

to the Sage process, which rolls up input and output
to a final control which balances back to the amount
received from HMRC. I have asked the question but
am unsure whether SAP will work in the same way?
I've also yet to see any other reports required for

KPMG - NTT have had sight of these external
requirements and i've been told it's possible to
produce the reports but yet to actually see anything
I've been advised that NTT understand the NHS VAT

process and UAT will demonstrate this. As there is no
adequat environment in the SAP system yet it is
difficult to test their understanding
Yes - 6 / 18 Yes - 1 / 18
Yes Yes
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
No No
Unsure No
No No
Unsure No
No No
Yes No
Unsure No
Yes No
Yes No
No No
Unsure No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes - 1 / 18 8
Yes Louise Rudge / Michael Creaton 45%
No Louise Rudge / Michael Creaton 25%


45% 10% 100% 100%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 45% 45%
Document
Finance DL3 FI09 SAC Planning





Questions / Points of note

As the document was last updated in May-
23 this doesn’t reflect current
requirements / decsions. FM colleagues
have had engagement with NTT and meet
Sam Long / Ben Parton on a weekly basis
Planning requirement will be heavily

dependent on the level of granularity of
data/information. I.E. ESR Details, Activity
Sam Long / Ben Parton Details etc
3.1 Finance
3.1.1 Overview Chart of Accounts / Hierarchy
3.1.2 Key design considerations
3.1.3 Data Integration Integration with S4HANA / Data fro
3.1.4 Dimensions Chart of Accounts / Hierarchy
3.1.5 Data Received from Sub-Models Chart of Accounts / Hierarchy / S
3.1.6 Sample Process flow TBC
3.1.7 Step by Step Process TBC
3.2 Cashflow
3.2.1 Overview
3.2.3 Data Integration
3.2.4 Dimensions
3.2.5 Sample Process flow
3.2.6 Step by Step Process
3.3 Capital Expenditure
3.3.1 Overview
3.3.4 Dimensions
3.4 Activity
3.4.1 Overview SLAM / Income Team
3.4.2 Key design considerations SLAM / Income Team
3.4.3 Data Integration SLAM / Income Team
3.4.4 Dimensions SLAM / Income Team
3.4.5 Sample Process flow SLAM / Income Team
3.4.6 Step by Step Process SLAM / Income Team
3.5 CIP
3.5.1 Overview
3.5.4 Dimensions
3.6 Workforce
3.6.1 Overview
3.6.3 Data Integration ESR / S4HANA
3.6.4 Dimensions TBC

3.6.5 Sample Process flow TBC
3.6.6 Step by Step Process TBC
4 Model Structure
4.1 Dimensions
4.1.1 Model Dimensionality Matrix
4.1.2 Date
4.1.3 Version TBC
4.1.4 Account Chart of Accounts / Hierarchy
4.1.5 Cost Centre Chart of Accounts / Hierarchy
4.1.6 Profit Centre Chart of Accounts / Hierarchy
4.1.7 Budget type

4.1.8 Division Chart of Accounts / Hierarchy
4.1.9 Site Chart of Accounts / Hierarchy
4.1.10 HRG Code
4.1.11 Company code Chart of Accounts / Hierarchy
4.1.12 Flow
4.1.13 Project
Comments
Is this covering I&E and SOCIE
Further demonstrations will be required for "actuals"

analytics within SAC
Needs to be updated to account for further discussions.
The current design is that there will be a workforce and a
GBP story, the workforce story will feed the GBP story.
Roles and Responsibilites will need to added.
Needs to go down to GL level, but can also be presented at

other hierachy levels as required.
Multi-year plan story to be added
Not completed
Divisions will need to changed to current Site / CDG
structure. However the physical site dimension will still be
needed for responsible hospital models. I.E. GHH
Gynaecology Assessment unit phyically sits at Good Hope
but comes under BHH for management purposes.
Audit trail needs demonstration
Measure - WTE to be added

Just GL to be added
Needs to be updated to most recent conversations
Not completed
Not demonstrated yet


Not demonstrated yet - current proposal is for an upload

only - needs further discussions






To be updated in line with current proposal - Unlikely to be

included in SAC build





Needs to be refined - It doesn't state the requirement.

Plan will need to be stated by GBP and WTE/FTE
"The transactions are driven by ESR data that holds the

payroll costs" this is incorrect.
No decision has been made whether Cost Centre Owners

(Budget Holders) will have ownership of plans within SAC
Needs more details - Intergrations with ESR / S4HANA /

SLAM
Open Item - ESR Data Elements will need to included in

here, included Occupational Code
Update needs to be provided
Open Item
Definition of "Finance" needs to be split into "I&E" and

"SOFP"
Model Configs to be discussed with NTT Colleague
GBP and WTE Dimensions need to be added to this matrix
Technical specs only
Technical specs only
Needs more information


Yes - 6 / 58 Yes - 1 / 58
Unsure No
Yes No
Yes No
No No
Yes No
Yes No
No No
No No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
No No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
No No
No No
Yes No
No No
Unsure No
No No
Unsure No
No No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes Yes
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes - 1 / 58 8
No Sam Long / Ben Parton 25%
no Sam Long / Ben Parton 45%




Yes Sam Long / Ben Parton 45%


0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 45% 45%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
45% 10% 100% 100%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
Document

Finance / VIM DL3 FI10 Vendor Invoice Management
Deliverable
Open Text Vendor Invoice Management - Overview
Business Requirements
Channel of Communication of VIM
Invoice Processing
Standard Vendor Invoice Management roles
Process Details
Invoice Matching
Define Workflow
Overview of UHB workflow requirements
Suggested revised process in Open Text VIM
Define Exceptional Reasons
Workflow Approvals
Define Chart of Authority for approval.
Period End Activity
Workflow Monitoring in VIM
Open items
Data Migration Objects
Roles & Authorizations
WRICEF (Workflows, Reports, Interface, Conversion, Enhancements and Forms) & Interfaces
Reporting in Vendor Invoice Management
VIM Analytics
VIM Workplace
Exception Analysis Report
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Not Demonstrated
Yes - 0 / 23 Yes - 0 / 23

Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes - 0 / 23 0

No Dawn jeffries 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
Document

Logistics & Warehouse DL3 LW01 Logistics Enterprise Structure
Client
Company Codes
Plant
Storage Location
Warehouse
Purchasing Organisation
Purchasing Group
Shipping/Receiving Point
Sales Org
Distribution Channel
Divisions
Sales Office
Sales Group
Org Structure Assignment for Deliveries
Comments
Do not have Plants

Coverd by TCT Pre-Built solution
Covered by TCT Pre-Built solution
Coverd by TCT Pre-Built solution

Yes - 3 / 14 Yes - 3 / 14

No No
No No
No No
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
No No
No No
Yes Yes
No No
No No
No No
No No
No No
Unsure No
Yes - 3 / 14 9

No 0%
No 0%
No 0%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
No 0%
No 0%
Yes 45%
No 0%
No 0%
No 0%
No 0%
No 0%
No 25%

0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
45% 10% 100% 100%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
Document

Logistics & Warehouse DL3 LW02 Inventory Management


Deliverable
Batch Management
Consumable Purchasing
Core Inventory Process
Cross-Plant Transfer Posting
Direct Procurement with Inbound Delivery
Intra-Company Returns Stock Transfers

Material Requirements Planning
Physical Inventory - Inventory Count and Adjustment
Return to Supplier
SAP Fiori Analytical Apps for Inventory and Warehouse Management
Stock Transfer with Delivery
Subcontracting
Covered by TCT in the Pre-Built solution
Not seen this yet on how the product flows from

Procurement SAP Process
purchasing to delivery at the Warehouse or Hospital

Using Pre-Built solution so not sure if this will still
apply
Unsure what you mean by this need more of an

explanation
Yes - 10 / 12 Yes - 10 / 12
UHB Requirements
Adequately Demonstrated
Understood by NTT
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Unsure No
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Unsure No
Yes - 10 / 12 30

Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
No 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
No 45%

45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
0% 0% 45% 45%
45% 10% 100% 100%

45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
0% 0% 45% 45%
Document

Logistics & Warehouse DL3 LW03 Extended Warehouse Management
Deliverable
Adhoc movements in warehouse
Customer Returns
Inbound Processing from Supplier with Batch Management
Physical Inventory in Warehouse
Real-Time Reporting and Monitoring
Replenishment in Warehouse
Return to Supplier
Scrapping (Disposal) in Warehouse
Warehouse Inbound Processing from Supplier
Warehouse Outbound Processing to Customer
Warehouse Outbound Processing to Customer with Batch Management
Adhoc movements in warehouse
Customer Returns
Physical Inventory in Warehouse
Yes - 14 / 14 Yes - 14 / 14

Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes - 14 / 14 42

Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Yes 45%
Readiness Index -
100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
45% 10% 100% 100%
Document

Procurement DL3 PR01 Procurement

Other points
We need clarifcation on how High Cost

Tariff Excluded Devices (HCTED) will fit into
the above process as per recent
conversations. It was discussed at the most
Ben Bastable recent Technical Design Authority (TDA).
We will need clarity on whether orders will

be going via S4HANA or NHSSC in relation
to HCTED. If it is via S4HANA there will
need to be clarity from both NHSE and
NHSSC that this will not impact
reimbursment for implants and other
Ben Bastable devices.
Analytics – Purchase Order Visibility and Procurement Spend AdviseInc/ NHSE/I
Consumable Purchasing Atamis
Direct Procurement with Inbound Delivery Logistics
Integration of Procurement with External Suppliers Atamis/ GHX NEXUS
Procurement of Direct Materials Atamis
Procurement of Services Atamis
Purchase Contract Atamis
Real-Time Reporting and Monitoring for Procurement AdviseInc/ NHSE/I
Request for Price (RFQ) Atamis
GHX NEXUS/ NHSSC online/

Requisitioning
HCTED impact
Supplier Classification and Segmentation SAP
Supplier Consignment ESIMS

Supplier Evaluation and Performance Monitoring Atamis
HCTED Processing as per comments below

Sumit's Comments Comments

No further action- reports shown. This needs to be discussed further as we have not
Can be done if need be explored this yet in detail or agreed anything.
Just terminlogy. Does not refer to
UHB process list from the LLD.
Due to best practice process used Is this not general purchasing and similar to
here Requistioning?- need more info pls.
Due to best practice process used Should this fall under Logistics area? We need more
here information please.
Dependent on interface GHX Not fully discussed we need more information. Have
discussed NHSSC online
Due to best practice process used Is this not general contracting that we do within
here Atamis?- need more info pls.
No further action- reports shown. This needs to be discussed further as we have not
Can be done if need be explored this yet in detail or agreed anything.
Open item and beign discussed- We have requested to keep this functionality for our
awaiting BDA presentation. This is Buyers to obtain single and low value quotes and
with Wakas to have another prices. This functionality has not been fully tested or
working group to finalise reqm agreed yet.
UHB process list from the LLD. Is this not general purchasing and similar to
Due to best practice process used Requistioning? There are still outstanding
here clarifications.- need more info pls.
Added another scope item. This
will help with better reporting. This has not been fully discussed yet and will need AP
This can be demoed input as they also deal with supplier set ups.
Open item and beign discussed-
awaiting BDA presentation. This is Has been discussed but not fully agreed. Cat mgrs and
with Wakas to have another some key suppliers have been engaged but still need
working group to finalise reqm finalising.
Has been discussed but not agreed fully as this would

be general all supplier monitoring and allow end users
Open item and beign discussed- to record their experiences. Paramenters of what we
awaiting BDA presentation. This is would like feedback on would need to be agreed if we
with Wakas to have another use this functionality and what we could use the data
working group to finalise reqm for i.e. improve supplier performance, reduce the use
of poor performing suppliers etc. Elements of this are
also covered within Atamis for higher value procured
Contracts through Procurement team. From an FM
perspective we need to understand what functionality
Atamis has to support with the financial risk
assessment within the tendering process, and what
will need to be built into S4-HANA i.e Quick Ratio,
Payable Days, Credit Rating, Turnover etc
Discussed with the team- linked to a BDA approval. Wakas to progres.
Yes - 0 / 14 Yes - 0 / 14

Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
No No
Yes - 0 / 14 0

No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%
No Simon Clarke 25%

No Simon Clarke / Ben Bastable 25%
No 0%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 0% 0%
Document
In general it is very difficult to relate the LLD Document back to what I have seen. This may be due to the do

Finance DL3 SD01 Sales and Distribution
Additional Question: can sales orders to be routed to the credit controller that is assigned to the customer being billed ?
hat I have seen. This may be due to the document being produced by the previous NTT Consultant. Additional comments added to LLD
Credit Memo Processing Income / Ops Finance / GL
Customer Returns Income / Ops Finance / GL
Debit Memo Processing Income / Ops Finance / GL
Intercompany Sales Order Procession Income / Ops Finance / GL
Invoice Correction Process with Credit Memo Income / Ops Finance / GL
Invoice Correction Process with Debit Memo Income / Ops Finance / GL
Sales of Services Income / Ops Finance / GL
Sell from Stock Income / Ops Finance / GL / Warehouse
igned to the customer being billed ?

Additional comments added to LLD
Comments
Principle of SAP process understood though not
demonstrated
demonstrated
demonstrated
demonstrated
demonstrated
demonstrated
A basic demonstration has been seen, though this did

not include: how attachments are sent; invoices
printed / emailed; recurrent billing; billing between
sites i.e. QE to BHH (as requested by Vicki F) It is not
understood how GL account and Profit/Cost Centre
are impacted
No demo - it is not clear whether the sale of stock will

follow the same process as seen re sale of services
above (from a billing perspective)
Yes - 0 / 8 Yes - 0 / 8

Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Unsure No
Yes - 0 / 8 0

No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%
No Simon Evans 25%

0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%
0% 0% 25% 25%

Low Level Deliverables - Business Input (UHB Results) - NTT Ver 0.1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Low Level Deliverables - Business Input (UHB Results) - NTT Ver 0.1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

*** General – Recipients Have Full Control *** #_x000D_

Worksheet Index Status

Worksheet Index Status

Please endeavour to complete the sheets by Friday 2nd February 2024.

Worksheet index - workstreams not noted on the index tab

Worksheet Index Status

Lease Accounting not started

Pharmacy - CMM pharmacy workstream?

The detail versus summary posting question is relevant to financial reporting.

Functional Area Document Title

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance DL3 FI01 Finance Enterprise Structure

Finance - Enterprise Structure

Finance Organisational Structure

Controlling Area Reporting

Functional Area Reporting

Profit Centre and groups Reporting

Cost Centre Hierarchy Reporting

Cost Centre and groups Reporting

Cost Centre Reporting

All Multiple – probably all areas

Chart of Accounts - GL accounts ALL

Are we clear that this is purely UHB - from memory we were

Can't say if this is correct or not - assume the GL team have

Not clear if we've been asked to respond on

As above, don't recall being asked? Not sure

Don't feel as though enough content here to comment on Not sure

Wouldn’t we need one CC hierarchy for each company within

Don't feel as though enough content here to comment on,

Don't feel as though enough content here to comment on Not sure

The LLD document does not accurately reflect the discussions

NTT have a draft chart of accounts - currently under

Where are the reporting requirements captured, so we can

Assure Dialysis is in the process of being wound down

In S3 the document references that there are no role

No No Michael Creaton and Louise Rudge

25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

25% 0% 0% 25% 25%

Functional Area Document Title

Finance DL3 FI02 General Ledger

Finance DL3 FI02 General Ledger

Finance DL3 FI02 General Ledger

Finance DL3 FI02 General Ledger

Finance DL3 FI02 General Ledger

Finance DL3 FI02 General Ledger

Finance DL3 FI02 General Ledger

Finance DL3 FI02 General Ledger

* General – Recipients Have Full Control * #_x000D_