Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structural Behaviour
Summary
Unit 2 deals with the behaviour of structures in buildings. An understanding of
the types of loads and forces, and how they are handled by materials and
components is a necessary prerequisite for selecting the correct material for the
purpose used. Unit 2 uses two sources of reference. Chapter 1 of Reid (1984) is
presented as Appendix B. It is a descriptive introduction to the types and
functions of structural systems used in buildings. As you study this material
work through the ITQs. Chapter 1 of Beckmann and Bowles (2004) is
presented as Appendix C and explains the principles of structures very
concisely, with more emphasis on quantitative understanding. If you are
already familiar with this kind of material you will find the ITQs in this unit
straightforward so just use them to refresh your understanding. However, if the
material is new to you it will be necessary to work quite hard at the ITQs and
perhaps supplement your reading.
In the In-Text Questions the chapter, page and figure references are to the
chapter, page and figure numbers in the relevant Appendices (B and C).
Considering Fig. 1.9, draw a triangle of forces to scale to estimate the largest
horizontal force that the 3kg brick can resist without overturning.
Fig. 2.1 The resultant of two perpendicular forces acting at the same
point has the size and direction of the hypotenuse of the triangle.
The inverse process is also helpful in understanding forces: any force can be
resolved into a vertical and horizontal component (Fig. 2.2), the size of which
can be calculated using trigonometry or estimated by a scale drawing.
Fig. 2.2 The downward vertical component of the force P is Psinθ and
the horizontal leftward component is Pcosθ.
2.3 Moments
When the applied forces are not in line (for example as in the shear situation
sketched in Fig. 4.3) the result is a turning moment. This is the same action as a
lever and the example of a children’s seesaw (Fig. 2.4) shows the principle. A
35 kg child sitting 1.4 m from the fulcrum generates a moment of 49 kgf-m or
480.7 Nm.
Fig. 2.4 Each child on the seesaw exerts a moment given by the force
multiplied by the distance from the fulcrum.
Likewise the forces must be in equilibrium. Neglecting the weight of the beam
itself, the total downward forces on the fulcrum are 75 kgf-m or 735.75 N.
These must be balanced by the upward reaction force exerted by the fulcrum on
the beam. If the downward forces increase as more children climb aboard, so
does the reaction force increase to maintain equilibrium. Finally, both vertical
and horizontal components of every force must also be balanced to ensure
equilibrium, so when analysing forces and checking for equilibrium, it is best
to resolve all forces into their vertical and horizontal components first.
For the situation in Fig. 1.8, the steel beam is 6 m long supporting a brickwork
wall 3 m high and 225 mm thick. By how much does the bending moment at
the mid-point from this uniformly distributed load change if the wall increases
to 4 m high? Or to 450 mm thick?
The deflection depends on load, span, material stiffness (i.e. the modulus of
elasticity) and the geometry of the beam section. The higher the load the larger
the deflection will be and the greater the span the larger the deflection will be.
On the other hand, the higher the modulus of elasticity (stiffer material) the
smaller the deflection. The effect of section geometry is more subtle and is
alluded to by Reid (Appendix B), p.10-11. In the same way as a deeper beam
has a larger moment of resistance because the compression and tension zones
are spaced further apart so a deeper beam is stiffer and deflects less. In a beam
with a solid rectangular cross-section the deflection under a load is inversely
proportional to the beam’s depth cubed, so doubling the depth of a beam
reduces the deflection 8-fold. Likewise the deflection is inversely proportional
to the beam’s width, so doubling the width of the beam halves the deflection.
Structural engineers define the cross-section of the beam in terms of the second
moment of area or moment of inertia and handbooks provide formulae to
calculate the second moment of area of all kinds of solid or hollow section
beams. For the solid section beam it is (width × depth-cubed ÷ 12). The
important point is that the second moment of area takes the shape of the beam
section into account and doubling the second moment of area halves the
deflection: the two are inversely proportional.
ITQ 2.52.
If everything else remains unchanged is the deflection of a beam increased or
decreased when its depth, width or span is increased?
ITQ 2.53.
To lighten a structure a beam is changed from steel to aluminium of the same
cross-section. How will the deflection change?
ITQ 2.54.
To lighten a structure a solid beam is changed to a hollow one of the same
second moment of area. How will the deflection change?
The strength of a short column is based only on its cross-sectional area and the
material strength, but Reid (Appendix B) points out that a slender column fails
by sideways buckling. The buckling results in a tensile failure on the outer
surface of the curved column and common-sense indicates that the length of
ITQ 2.55.
Confirm that the slenderness ratio of the masonry column of a cathedral nave
which is 750 mm in diameter and 18 m high, restrained top and bottom
(effective length = height / 2), is 12. Compare this to the values mentioned in
the text.
ITQ 2.56.
Using table 2.1, by how much would the load-carrying capacity of the column
in ITQ 2.55 change if the load became eccentric, with eccentricity changing
from 0.05 to 0.3.
ITQ 2.57.
Look again at ITQ 4.19 in the light of buckling resistance. Recognising that
the compression force in the web is proportional to the distance from the
neutral axis, what is the best shape for the cut-outs in the web of a
castellated beam?
joints may be pinned, where all of the members are free to rotate relative to
each other, or fixed, where they are not. The simplest pin jointed structure is a
triangle – three members, three joints – and in fact this is the only truly stable
one. A four- or more-jointed structure like this is completely floppy and
useless. The principle of triangulation – to make a series of three membered
units – is key to the satisfactory performance of most structural frames. The
difficulty of making sufficiently reliable fixed joints in timber buildings forced
carpenters throughout history to reinforce joints with triangular bracing, which
can typically be concealed within the wall panelling. Thus the simple floppy
frame building in Fig. 2.7 is stabilised by the triangulating braces around each
joint. Of course, with the passage of time these braces may have been cut
through during alterations to the building and this may have compromised the
stability of the structure.
Fig. 2.7 Without bracing (a) the simple frame can distort (‘racking’) in
response to horizontal forces. Bracing to create a series of triangles (b)
stiffens the frame.
By analogy with the forces in a beam, the top horizontal members (AC, CE,
EG, etc) are in compression and the bottom members (BD, DF, etc) are in
tension. Identifying which vertical and diagonal members are in tension and
which are in compression can be done by thinking about what happens to the
truss if the members are cut through. The sequence in Fig. 2.10 explains this.
Since the truss is symmetrical, the thought process can stop at this stage and
the complete analysis of members is shown in Fig. 2.11.
The size of the forces in each member, and hence the size of the members
themselves needed to resist those forces, can be estimated by resolving them at
each joint using the triangle of forces (or a polygon where more than 3
members meet). In Fig. 2.12 lengths of the arrows show the size of the force in
the members and the angles are the same as those in the truss.
Fig. 2.12 Using the triangle or polygon of forces for the truss. For
equilibrium the triangle/polygon must close. Notice the relatively large
compression force in member GF.
ITQ 2.58.
Referring to Fig. 4.7, is it also necessary to brace the corners in the horizontal
plane?
ITQ 2.59.
In what way are the effects of wind loads and seismic ground forces
analogous?
ITQ 2.60.
Use the process sketched in Fig. 4.10 to identify which members are in tension
and compression in the truss shown below, which is a through-truss typical of
many railway and road bridges, where the traffic load is on the bottom
members as the vehicles pass through the middle.
2.8 Conclusion
This unit has presented the basic principles of structural behaviour in a
qualitative, descriptive way.
2.9 References
Beckmann P, Bowles R (2004) Structural aspects of building conservation,
Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Reid E (1984) Understanding buildings, Construction Press