Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indian Standard
GEARS-CYLINDRICA~L GEARS-ACCURACIES-
MBTHODSOFINSPECTION
( First Revision )
Q BIS 1995
FOREWORD
This Indian Standard ( First Revision ) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after -the
draft finalized by the Gears Sectional Committee had been approved by the Light Mechanical Engineer-
ing Division Council.
This standard was originally published in 1974. The present revision incorporates the latest internation-
ally accepted techniques for inspection of cylindrical gears which includes inspection of gear blanks of
meshing gears, inspection of teeth forms of gears pairs and the inspection of gear pairs in assembled
conditions. The gears are classified into 12 grades based on their accuracies. The revision also incor-
porates the methods for determining individual errors,_schematic for electronic pitch testing equipment,
schematic circuit for single flank testing and measurement of double flank total composite error
Assistance has been derived from the following standards while revising the standard:
i) DIN 3960 : 1987 ‘Definitions parameters and equations for involute cylindrical gears and gear
pairs’, issued by DIN. Dxutsches Institut fiir Normung, Germanv.
ii) DIN 3961 : 1978 ‘Tolerances for cylindrical gear teeth’, issued by DIN. Deutsches Institut ftir
Normung, Germany.
iii) DIN 3967 : 1978 ‘System of gear fits, backiash tooth thickness allowances, tooth thickness
tolerances, principles’, issued by DIN. Deutsches Institut fiir Normung, Germany.
IS 3681 : 1994 ‘Gears -- Cylindrical gears - Accuracies (Jivsi revision )’ may be referred for definitions
and notations.
In reporting the result of a test or analysis made in accordance with this standard, if the final value,
observed or calculated, is to be rounded off, it shall be done in accordance with IS 2 : 1960 ‘Rules for
rounding off numerical values ( revised )‘.
IS 7504 : 1995
Indian Standard
GEARS - CYLINDRICAL GEARS -ACCURACIES
METHODS OF INSPECTION
( First Revision )
1 SCOPE SMax - Maximum tooth thickness
1.1 This standard covers the general plan for Win - Minimum tooth thickness
cylindrical gears of involute, modified involute flank
forms, comprising of gears with straight or inclined sb - Tooth thickness on base cylinder
teeth for connecting parallel shafts. Fn - Chordal tooth thickness
I.2 This standard covers the inspection methods for SC - Constant chordal tooth thickness
gear teeth oncylindrical gears of module 1 to 70 and
Y - Addendum modification co-efficient
with reference circle diameter up to 10 000 mm graded
in 12 gear tooth qualities. z - Number of teeth
2 REFERENCES zv - Virtual number of teeth
A - Factor (Table 7)
IS 3681 : 1994 ‘Gears - Cylindrical gears - Ac-
curacies (first revision)‘may be referred for definitions Cl - Factor (Table 8)
and notations. Factor (Table 9)
c2 -
3 SYMBOLS
OM - Measuring pin or ball diameter
a” _ Radial pitch distance (double flank pitch
distance) Ff - Total profile error
6 - Face width Fi’ - Single flank total composite error
d’ - Reference circle diameter F; - Double flank total composite error
4 - Top diameter, Blank diameter FP - Total cumulative pitch error
db - Base circle diameter Fpk - Cumulative pitch error over k pitches.
dM - Measuring circle diameter Fpz/a- Cumulative pitch error over 1/8%ofperiphery
ff - Profile form error Fs - Total alignment error
4’ - Single flank tooth to tooth composite error Fr - Radial run-out error
fi” _ Double flank tooth to tooth composite error IT - Tolerance grade
1
IS 7504 : 1995
In the case of pinions or wheels with bores, the axis of 6.1 Circular Pitch Errurs
the bore is adopted as the reference axis. Circular pitch errors called as pitch errors in short, ilre
In the case of pinions on shafts, the reference axis shall measured on thereference circle or any other circle as
be the bearing axis of the bearings. close to it as possible and concentric with respect to the
In order to facilitate the operations of machining, gear axis. The difference between the measuring circle
inspection and assembly of toothed wheels, it is diameter & and the reference circle diameter d in-
recommended that radial and axial auxiliary reference fluences the measurement of the error by the factor
surfaces should be indicated clearly on the working d&d and these errors aregenerally negligible.
drawings ( see Fig. 1). The measured values are also affected by eccentricity
of the teeth with respect to reference axis and also by
profile error.
Inspection of the pitch by measuring the deviation from
the design value is normally performed only on high
precision gears where exact angular transmission is
indispensable, A tooth flank is butted against a fixed
anvil in the region of the reference circle while a
movable measuring feeler senses the corresponding
flank of the adjacent tooth. The differences between the
adjacent pitches csn be read from a dial indicator
( see Fig. -2 ).
Eccentricity of the teeth with reference to the gear axis
gives rise to an error curve of overall sinusoidal form.
FIG.1 REFERENCE
SURFACES
\\ When pitch measurement is carried out using a hand
operated comparator, the computation of the individual
5.2 Tip Cylinder pitch error, tooth to tooth pitch and total cumulative
pitch error is carried out as given in Table 2 and the
5.2.1 Tip Dimne~er
graph of the errors can be drawn from the values thus
The value of the tip diameter is not of essential impor- computed.
tance. In cases where the apparatus for inspecting the The difference between the consecutive measured
tooth thickness rests on the tip cylinder, allowance values gives tooth to tooth pitch error, fU. Then the
should be made for the tip diameter error. algebraic mean value is calculated from all the
measured values. The difference between the measured
5.2.2 Radial Run-Out values and the mean valuegives individual ptich error,
ft The algebraic addition of individual pitch error fp
This is the total range of movement of an indicator gives the cumulative pitch error. The total cumulative
stylus which is in contact with the tip cylinder during a pitch error Fp is given by the difference between
complete revolution of the gear (seeFig. 1). This check maximum and minimum values of cumulative pitch error.
is important only in the case where certain tooth inspec-
tion instruments rest on the cylinder. The circular pitch errors can also be measured by using
electronic pitch testers. Individual pitch errors are
2
Table 1 Tolerances on Gear Blanks (pm)
( Clause 5.4 )
I Quality 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
T
Bore ITl In IT3 IT4 IT4 IT6 IT6 IT6 IT7 ITa
error of form
Shaft In In IT3 IT4 IT4 IT5 ITS IT5 IT6 In IT8 IT8
error of form
Xp diameter IT6 IT6 IT7 IT7 IT7 IT7 IT7 IT8 Il?3 n-9 IT11 IT11
F
‘) Radial b-out of
Xp cylinder
Radial run-out of the 2.5 0.014 + 5 0.0&f, + 10 Usd, + 15 O.O4d, + 25
reference surface
Axial run-out of the
reference surface
w
NOTE-& - Blank diameter, mm.
‘) When the tip cylinder is used as a datum surface for a checking instrument.
i
G SUPPORT
FIG.2 INS~YXX~ON
OFGEARTmm POR
INDMDUAL
ERRORS
measured Lvith an attachment for involute and helix actual value of a single transverse pitch and nominal
testers, which operates on the comparison pitch transverse pitch.
measuring principle and at the same time defines a
mean value. Figure 3 shows a schematic of an In a gear with z teeth there are z individual pitch errors
electronic pitch testing equipment. The attachment of the right flank and as many of the left flanks. The
compares the initial comparison pitch value ‘0’ of any errors, fP are obtained as the difference between the
one pitch of the gear with all subsequent pitches. This individual measured value and the mean of all z’
is achieved with the electric tracer ‘K’ which, with its measured values.
pair of styli ‘M’ switched to difference measurements, 6.12 Cumulative Pitch Error, Fpk
measures values in relation to the initial datum value
‘0’. When the last measured value has been recorded, This is the deviation of the actual dimension of a pitch
electronic unit ‘R’ automatically evaluates the mean interval over k individual pitches from the correspond-
value which k then drawn automatically as a straight ing nominal value. The cumulative pitch error is
line through the previously recorded pitch diagram. The obtained as the algebraic sum of the k individual pitch
actually recorded individual pitch errors are then read errors contained in the interval, provided the error of
Hoffalong the line. measurement is sufficiently small.
6.1.1 Individual Pitch Error, fp k
Fpk-Zf
Individual pitch error,fpis the difference between the OP
4
Base or guide- body for H and J
Ckria side for eleck tracer K
Gvrier side for electric tracer L
I!kctric tracer for pitch tests, etc
F%ztric tracer for true nmning tests
Pair of tracer styli of K switched to
different measurements.
N Selector switch for separate tracer pressure
direction setting for M
0 Fine setting screw for adjusting the
distance betwken tracer styli of M
P Supporting ball pin or ball/type stylus of
L for true running teats
Q Measuring head adjustment swivelling and
locking members
2 Counting mechanism
R Computer for mean value evaluation
S Measured Glue store
T Stroke mechanism
iJ Stroke restriction
V Indicator instrument
W Ekctric tracer for involute tests, etc
FIG.3 ELECRCNW
PITQI
TEWNG E~JIPMENT
If the errors of all the pitch intervals are measured from Tooth to-tooth pitch errors are directly obtained from
a particular reference tooth profile or calculated from ciradar pitch measurements as the difference of
the individual errors& according to the above equation measurements offleighbouring pitches.
and then plotted against the corresponding teeth num- 65.7 Base Pitch Error, fp
bers, then the cumulative pitch errors are obtained as
per Fig. 4. Base pitch erroris the difference between the ac-1 and
nominal values of the base pitch. Deviations measured
6.13 Cumulative Pitch Ermr Over 118 of Periphery, in the transverse plane are denoted by fpt and in the
Fpzf8 normal plane by fpea.
This is the Amulative pitch error over-aniuterval of l/8 Insped~on is performed by means of a base pitch
circumference of the gear (k = z/8). measuting instrument which is pie-adjusted to setting
i.lA T&al Cumulative Pdch Errs, Fp gauges. Either portable or bench instruments can be
The maximum cumulative pitch errorin agear is called . employed. In both cases, measurement is independent
the total cumulative pitch error. It is indicatedwithout of the gear axis with no influence of radial run-out on
sign and is obtained from the cumulative pitch ermrs as the base pitch. -Se2Fii. 5.
the difference belweeu the algebraic maximum value The absolute value of the base pitch on the line of action
and the algebraic minimum value. ksn idicative of the pressure angle. Error in the base
piti Implies an error ln the pressure angle.
6.1.5 RangeofPitch Errors, Rp
For spur gears, error in the pressure angle can be -
This is the difference between maximum and minimum determined by means of the equation:
actual values of the transverse pitches of the right or left
flanks of a gear.
6.I.6 Tooth to Tooth P&h Errol fi For helical gears, the measured error of the base pitch
may be due to an error in the pressure angle or in the
The tooth to tooth pitch error is the difference between
helix angle or both. Measurement of the base pitch on
the actual values of two successive right or left the line of action is particularly important for the gears
tmnsverse pitches.
produced by si@e tooth cutters.
5
Is 7504 : 1995
’1 r-fu
FLANK F(O. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101-l 12131415161718192021
a- Individual pitch em+ marked as vertical blocks between the flnak numbers.
R, - Range of pitch exror, fU - Tooth to tooth pitch error
b-Total cumulative pitch error referred to flank 21.
Fp - Total cumulative pitch error.
c -Cumulative pitch error over intervals of every three teeth,&3 (k = 3) shown a5 vertical blocks in the middle of the flanks.
FIG.4 DEIERMNKIION
OFPrm ERROR(Eg : 21)
MEASURING F
ER SUPPORT
BASE
l
Is 7504 : 1995
d,=z.m=
cos&
By plotting the flank deviations with the help of a flank FE. 6 IXSPECXON
OFTCIOIXPROFILE
7
IS 7504 : 1995
8
FIG. 9 MFASJREMENTOF
RADLAL
RUN-OUTERROR
cl
of an imaginary gear concentric with the axis,
which encloses all the errors of the gear.
The theoretical tooth thickness measured on the
AL
h\/\
REFERENCE CIRCLE
-J)--
4 = %,- &I
Ii-m+;m(l-c0s~)fx.m
6.4.1 Measurement tif the Tooth Thickness by Means of
Gear Tooth Calipers
in -which y) = $ t F (in radians)
a) Meizsurement on the reference cylinder ”
Refer Fig. 10. Measurement on the reference
cylinder is given b-y: -$ -$ for ~gears without addendum
<-mqsin11, modifications.
9
IS 7504 : 1995
1
tmw
1
EC-m 1 - Ic sina cosa f x . cos2a k_f
4 --2Etanan- inv at + 0.5 .....(2)
[ I II cos2Bb
For module = 1 and a - 20°, & - 1.387 05
k must always be rounded off to a whole number.
and & = 0.747 58. The transversti working pressure angle awt on the
cylinder with the diameter (d + 2x.mn) can be
calculated from:
Z
cosawt-cosat .....(3)
z+2r.cosp
The helix angle on the base cylinder is computed
from:
tanfib - tar+ cosat .....(4)
The transverse pressure angle is calculated from:
tana,
tanat = - ....
cosS
BASE ClRCLf
6.4.2.2 Gears wtihoutprofile correction
a) Spur gears
The odoth width ‘M’ in case of a spur gear is
calculated from:
M - m cosa [(k - 0,0.5) n + z&v a]
.. ...(a)
The number of teeth measured is computed
from the formula:
10
Is 7504 : 19YJ
Tabk3 Tooth Width of Gears Without Profile Correction, Module = 1, PressureAngle = 14.F’
( Clause6.4.2.2 )
z = number of teeth in gear blank, k = number of teetb measured, MI = tooth width for module 1
p, - m.n cos14.5” = 3.041527. m
a = 14.50
IS 7504 : 1995
Table 4 Tooth Width of Gears Without Profile Correction, Module = 1, Pmssure Angle = 15”
( Chse 6.4.2.2 )
z = ,number of teeth in gear blank, R = number of teeth measured, Ml = tooth width for module 1
pe = m.3c.cosW = 3.034 546.m
a = 15O
t i i
/ 42 1 4 1 10.8704 IL
73931
150 1 9 1 25.4534 \\100\ 17 1 49.5465 Ill50126 1 76.3602 j1200) 34 \ 100.4533 1[12itjy .2 1 124.5464 1
14
I!3 7504: 1995
kOOT CIRCLE
15
Table 7 FactorA
( Clause 6.4.2.2 )
M - mcosa[ (k - 0,5) x + zinva] + 2xmsina The effective pressure angle aw on the diameter
. ......(12) (d + 2xm) is computed from:
Number of teeth measured, k is computed from: z
cosaw =eosa- .....(15)
I
2+2X
tana,,,-2Ztsna-inva +OS .....(13) b) Helical gears
The nominal dimension M~of the tooth width of a
By introducing constant C2, the formula 12 can be helical gear with profile correction over k teeth
simplified as: according to formula 1 is:
M-m.(Mt +C2) .....(14) M = mn cosa” [(k~- 0,s) x + z.inv at]
Value of C2 can be obtained from Table 9.
+ 2xmn sin an .....(16)
Value of Ml can be obtained from Tables 3 to 6.
FIG. 14 DLMENSION
OVERBAUDORPINSFORE-AL GEARS
16
IS 7504 : 1995
Table 8 Factor C,
( Chse 6.4.2.2 )
,
B a, - 14.50 an - 1.5’
0” 0.0053 68 0.005 940
2” 0.005 378 0.005 950 24O 0.006 988 0.007 723 0.018 113
3O 0.005 390 0.005 967 25O 0.007 153 0.007 914 0.018526
4” 0.005 407 0.005 982 0.014 103 1 1 25O56’40” 1 0.007 317 1 0.008092 1 0.018 942
5O 0.005 428 0.006 007 26’ 0.007 327 0.008 102 0.018 968
6’ 0.005 455 0.006 036 27” 0.007 515 0.008 310 0.019 440
14028’40” 0.005 899 0.006 527 0.015 355 11 38O 1 0.010721 1 0.011849 0.027 431
z
k the number of teeth measured, computed horn cosa, = cosa, .. . ..(18)
formula 2 is: z+2xcos~
17
Table 9 Factor C,
( Clause 6.4.2.3)
” In the case of negative profile correction a minus sign (-) must be placed before the values c’z.
18
IS 7504 : 1995
To ensure that two parallel planes touch the flanks, 7 INSPECTION OF GEAB TEETH IN
the face width must be: ASSEMBLY CONDITIONS
b 2 iti sin& + b co@, ... ..(20)
7.1 Single Flank Total Composite Error Testing
tat& = tang. cosar
where !q,.t = Constant line overlap or width of the In this test two gears are meshed and rotated at the
measuring surface in tooth width measurement. prescribed centre distance with either the right or left
flanks in constant contact. See Fig. 16. The single flank
For gears without chamfering composite errors of the right flank are generally
&f z 1.2 + 0.018M different from those of left flank of the same gear. The
bkj > 2.0 + 0.03M deviations of the’ rotating positions of the gear with
respect to nominal positions given by the positions of
Summary of the important formulae~for the tooth width the mating gear and by the ratio of the number of teeth
measurement with the aid of M-test dimension for spur are measured starting lrorn a start position. For this, a
and helical gears are furnished in Table IO.
comparative measuring device is required where the
6.4.3 Tolerance on M-Test Dimension error free rotating angle positions are obtained. The
The upper allowance and tolerance on M-test dimension errors are generally indicated as paths along with
can be obtained by multiplying the upper tooth thickness circumference of a measuring circle, for example, the
allowance (A,,) and tooth thickness tolerance (7’,, values reference circle or base circle. The errors can also be
from Tables 7and 8 of IS 3681 : 1995, respectively by given in angles.
cosa,.
6.4.4 Tooth ThicknessMeasurement Over Pins or Balls 7.1.1 Single Flank Total Composite Errol; Fi’
Tooth thickness can be determined by taking the meas- In a circular test graph as shown in Fig. 17, the single
urement over pins or balls placed in diametrically flank total composite error, Fi’ is the difference between
opposite tooth spaces as shownin Fig. 14 and Fig. 15. the maximum and minimum distance of the recorded
This method is suitable for both external and internal
test graph from the axis of rotation of the test chart,
spur and helical gears. The size of the balls or pins should
namely, F,’ is the difference between the maximum
be selected in such a way that they touch the tooth flanks
on or approximately near the reference circle. and minimum Y-axis of the test graph.
The theoretical dimension,Mu over the pins or balls can 7.12 Single Flank Tooth to Tooth Composite Error, fi’
be calculated from Table 11. The selection of pin orball The single flank tooth to tooth composite error,j’ is the
diameter and the calculation procedure for other maximum difference that occurs in the rotating posi-
parameters are given in Table 12. tions deviations within a rotating angle corresponding
The tolerance on dimension, MR over pins or balls can to the period of a tooth contact.
be obtained by multiplying the upper tooth thickness
allowance (A,,) and tooth thickness tolerance. (Ta 7.2 Double Flank Total Composite Error Testing
values loom Tables 7 and 8 of IS 3@31 : 1995, respec-
In this test two gears are meshed with each other and
tively by a factor given by --- * rotated with a left and right flank of thegears always in
sinaRt . wsf3 contact at the same time (two Sank contact) under the
6.5 Blue Bearing Test (TR4) inlIuence of a force acting in the direction of the centre
Due to various gear errors and inIluence of working distance. See Fig. 18. In this process, the changes of the
conditions..a near flank will not have full bearinn on the centre distance arc measured. The centre distance found
mating flank & a gear mesh. The blue bearing t&t indi- in the double flankcomposite error testing is designated
cates the bearing zone of one flank with its mating flank. as a”.
FIG. 15 DIMENSION
OVERBALLSORPINSFOR INERNALGEARS
19
Table 10 Summary of Important Formulae for the Tbotb Width Measurement
(Clause 6.4.2.3)
Ml = according to Tables 3 to 6
A = according to Table 7
Cl = according to Table 8
C2 = according to Table 9
‘) check whether the value of k read from Tables 3 to 6 and also from Fig. 13 are tbe same. If the value is not same, use
the fomitiae 12 and 13 of 642.3 to evaluate M and k.
73.1 Double Flank To& Composite Errq fi” the distance between the highest and lowest points of
an averaging line.
Refer Fig. 19. The double flank total composite error,
Fi” is the diEerence between the maximum and mini- 7.2.3 Double Flank Tooth to Tmth Composite
mum working centre distance within one test rotation. Err04 X”
7.22 Radial Run-Ou Fr
The double flank tooth to tooth composite error, fi”
The radial run-& error& is the longwave component is the difference between the maximum and mini-
of the test diagram. This component can be obtained by mum working centre distance that occurs within a
drawing zm averaging line thereby suppressing the turning angle corresponding to the period of a tooth
short-wave components. The radial run-out error, Fr is contact.
23 = f,(-12) puuu/s
22 -
FIG.16 BLOCKDIAGRAM
OFCIR~JKFDXSINGLE
FLANKTFS~ING
Table 11 Calculation of Theoretical Dimension Over Pins or Balis, MR
( Clause 6.4.4 )
With
even COSci, a=%
MR-ms =+DM Mtt-q.z- MR-mzz-DM bfR’m$-- hi
No.of +DM
a=R co% R *=Rt
teeth
Dimension
over pins With
or balls odd No.
of teeth
MR-ms -D, MR'T.Z
MR-mz +44 MR-m,s +DM wsaR
axaRt
-DM
CosuR waRt
Table 12 Calculation of dR,aR, aRt and q~
( Chzuse 6.4.4 )
w aR+a-3
%-a,+* “Rt’%-q .
spur gears
DM=nm.cbsa
invaR=inta*+”
Pin or ball touching the tooth
flanks below the reference circle
Helical gears
DM
2r tAna, 1)
inva& = inva, f -
Z
‘) Use + sign for positive correction and - sign for negative correction. Substitute the apolute value of x in the equations.
IS 7504 : 1995
40
so
20
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 llIllIllllllllIllll111111
125242322212019181716151413121110 9 6 7 6 5 4 3 2 125
I I
FIG.18 TIWINGONDOUBLE
FLANKTOTALCOMFYBITE
ERROL
23
IS 7504: 1995
U)
) fl” fr
b)
FIG.19 DOUBLJZ
FLANKTOTAL
COMWSITE
ERROR
DIAGRAM
T
b
FIG.20 INSPECXJON
OFTOOTH
THKKNFSS
24
Bureao of lndias Standards
BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau ofIndian StandardsAct, 1986 to prom-ote
harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods
and attending to connected matters in the country.
Copyright
BIS has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these pubhcations may be reproduced in any
form without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course
of implementing the standard, of necessary details, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade
designations. Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director ( Publications ), BIS.
Amendments are Issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also
reviewed periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that
no changes are needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision.
Users of Indian Standards should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or
edition.
This Indian Standard has been developed from Dot: No. LM 13 (4280).
Headquarters:
Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002 Telegrams : Manaksanstha
Telephones : 331 01 31, 331 13 75 ( Common to all offices )