THE WAR IN UKRAINE

FROM THE POINT OF VIEW

OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
(BUDAPEST
MEMORANDUM)
 BUDAPEST
MEMORANDUM
The Budapest Memorandum on Security
Assurances is a diplomatic document
signed on December 5, 1994, in
Budapest, Hungary. The memorandum
was signed by the United States, the
United Kingdom, Russia, and Ukraine. Its
primary focus was to address security
assurances for Ukraine in the aftermath
of the dissolution of the Soviet Union
and Ukraine's decision to give up its
nuclear weapons.
 OBJECTIVES

R2P Territorial integrity International law Geopolitical

considerations
 VIOLATION OF TERRITORIAL
INTEGRITY
The 2014 annexation of Crimea by
Russia marked a blatant violation of
Ukraine's territorial integrity, contrary to
the Budapest Memorandum's core
principles. This event ignited a
protracted conflict in Eastern Ukraine,
challenging the effectiveness of
international law in preventing such
breaches and maintaining stability.

INTERNATIONAL LAW AND
SOVEREIGNTY:
The crisis raises fundamental
questions about the sanctity of state
sovereignty in international law. The
Budapest Memorandum aimed to
safeguard Ukraine's sovereignty, yet
the subsequent events underscore
the challenges in enforcercing these
commitments, revealing a gap
between legal ideals and real-world
power dynamics.
GEOPOLITICAL
CONSIDERATIONS
The conflict exposed the
influence of geopolitical
interests on international law.
Russia's strategic concerns in
the region and its historical
ties with Crimea played a
significant role, highlighting
the complex interplay between
legal commitments and
national interests in the global
arena.
 ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL
INSTITUTIONS
The United Nations Security Council
faced challenges in responding to the
crisis due to Russia's veto power. This
raised concerns about the limitations of
existing international institutions in
preventing conflicts when one of the
major actors is a permanent Security
Council member, emphasizing the need
for reforms.
 ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AND
LEGAL MEASURES
The international community responded
to Russia's actions with economic
sanctions, showcasing the use of legal
and economic measures to deter
aggression. The effectiveness of such
sanctions in altering behavior, however,
remains a subject of ongoing debate and
scrutiny in the context of the Ukrainian
crisis.
 RESPONSIBILITY TO
PROTECT (R2P)
The concept of "responsibility to
protect" gained prominence as the
conflict unfolded. The international
community grappled with questions
about when and how to intervene
when a state fails to protect its
population, highlighting the evolving
nature of international norms in
response to complex crises.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the war in Ukraine, particularly
from the standpoint of the Budapest
Memorandum, weaves a complex narrative
that intertwines historical, legal, diplomatic,
and humanitarian dimensions. The events
challenge traditional notions of international
law, underscoring the imperative of adapting
legal frameworks to meet the evolving
THANK
YOU