Guidelines for Synopsis:

1. Font Size of Main Heading-14, [Times New Roman Bold]

2. Font Size of Sub Headings-12 [Times New Roman Bold]

3. Font Size of Text -12 [Times New Roman]

4. Line Spacing 1.5

5. Justified the Text

6. Left and Right Margin: 1.25 inch

7. Bottom and Top Margin: 1 inch

8. Page Numbering should start from Chapter 1 [such as 1, 2, 3 ….in the bottom centre]

9. Synopsis Pages- variation from 26-30.

10. Mention the Figure No, at bottom and Table no. at the top of table.
 Friction stir welding using machine learning

A Project Synopsis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the

Degree of

BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY

in

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Submitted by-
Anshul Sachan
Devesh Kumar Pathak
Amit Ahirwar
Annuratna Dubey

Under the Supervision of

Kapil Dev

JSS ACADEMY OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, NOIDA

DR. APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

(FORMERLY UTTAR PRADESH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)
LUCKNOW
October 2023
 Chapter 1

Introduction

Friction Stir Welding (FSW) stands as a landmark development in the realm of solid-state joining
techniques. First introduced by The Welding Institute (TWI) in 1991, this technique has since
then revolutionized the welding industry. Its inception wasn't just a mere introduction of a new
welding technique but a paradigm shift that challenged traditional welding methodologies.
However, as with any emerging technology, FSW's full potential and optimization for diverse
applications require further exploration. This is precisely where the integration of Machine
Learning (ML) into FSW comes into play. By harnessing ML's capabilities, there exists a
promising avenue to refine, enhance, and potentially redefine the FSW process for the modern
era.
 Friction Stir Welding: An In-depth Exploration

2.1 Fundamental Principles of FSW

To truly grasp the significance of FSW, one must delve into its foundational principles. Unlike conventional
welding methods that rely on melting and subsequently solidifying the materials, FSW operates on a
fundamentally different premise. It employs a non-consumable rotating tool that traverses along the joint of two
abutting materials. This localized mechanical action generates frictional heat, softening the materials and
facilitating plastic deformation. It's worth noting that this deformation occurs without the materials reaching
their melting points. Consequently, once the tool traverses, a bond is formed, characterized by its exceptional
strength and a refined, defect-free microstructure.

Vertical milling machine

A vertical milling machine is a type of machine tool used for precision machining of solid materials. It typically
involves a vertically oriented spindle that extends from the machine table to the arbor. The machine can perform
various operations such as milling, drilling, and tapping on materials like metal, wood, or plastic. It's a versatile
tool commonly used in manufacturing and metalworking processes.

GPR Processes

Friction Stir Welding (FSW) is a solid-state joining process that uses a non-consumable tool to join two facing
workpieces without melting the workpiece material. It is widely used in various industries for joining materials
that are difficult to weld using traditional fusion welding methods. While the fundamental physics of the FSW
process are well-understood, machine learning techniques can be applied to enhance process control, monitoring,
and optimization. Here are some potential applications of machine learning in FSW:

Process Monitoring and Quality Control:

Sensing Data Analysis: Utilize sensors to collect data on temperature, torque, force, and other parameters during
the FSW process.

Anomaly Detection: Apply machine learning algorithms to detect anomalies or deviations in real-time data that
may indicate defects or variations in the welding process.

Optimization of Welding Parameters:

Parameter Tuning: Use machine learning algorithms to optimize welding parameters such as rotational speed,
traverse speed, and tool geometry for specific materials and joint configurations.

Predictive Modeling: Develop predictive models that relate welding parameters to the quality of the weld, helping
to achieve optimal settings for different scenarios.

Tool Wear Prediction:

Tool Condition Monitoring: Employ machine learning to analyze sensor data for predicting tool wear and
estimating the remaining useful life of the FSW tool.

Maintenance Scheduling: Schedule tool maintenance based on predicted wear, reducing downtime and ensuring
consistent weld quality.

Defect Detection and Classification:

Image Processing: Use computer vision and image processing techniques to analyze post-weld images and detect
defects such as voids, cracks, or incomplete penetration.

Classification Models: Train machine learning models to classify different types of defects and correlate them with
specific process conditions.

Material Property Prediction:

Microstructure Analysis: Employ machine learning to predict the microstructure and mechanical properties of the
welded joint based on process parameters and material characteristics.

Correlation Modeling: Establish correlations between machine learning predictions and actual material properties
to guide material selection and process optimization.

Closed-Loop Control Systems:

Adaptive Control: Implement closed-loop control systems that continuously adjust welding parameters in real-
time based on feedback from sensors and machine learning models.

Self-Optimizing Systems: Develop systems that can adapt and optimize the FSW process autonomously over time.

It's important to note that implementing machine learning in FSW requires a robust dataset, domain expertise, and
thorough validation to ensure the reliability of the models. Additionally, collaboration between materials scientists,
welding engineers, and data scientists is crucial for successful integration.

Friction Stir Welding (FSW)

Friction stir welding is a solid-state welding process that uses frictional heat and mechanical deformation to join
materials, usually metals. It's a technique that can produce high-quality, high-strength welds in materials that are
difficult to weld using traditional methods. FSW is commonly used in aerospace, automotive, and shipbuilding
industries.

Now, regarding the mention of "machine learning," it's essential to understand how machine learning could be
applied to friction stir welding or any manufacturing process:

Quality Control: Machine learning algorithms can be trained to analyze data from the welding process, such as
temperature, pressure, and other parameters, to predict and detect potential defects or ensure the quality of the
weld.

Process Optimization: ML algorithms can analyze historical data to optimize welding parameters, leading to
improved efficiency and better welding results.

Predictive Maintenance: Machine learning can be utilized to predict when maintenance is needed for the welding
machine based on usage patterns and sensor data, minimizing downtime.
FSSW consider an alternate method to resistance spot welding (RSW) due to the meaningful energy and cost
savings. Comparatively to the process of resistance spot welding, FSSW had created huge interest in automotive
manufacturing industry (Abdullah & Hussein, 2018). The demand of lightweight materials like aluminum alloys
are getting more attractions in the field of automotive, shipbuilding, aerospace, transport, military and many other
industries because of extensive features, like high formability, high strength to weight ratio and better corrosion
resistance. However comparatively to ferrous alloys the joining method of aluminum alloy and other light weight
alloys are difficult by conventional processes due to their high thermal conductivity, hydrogen solubility, high
thermal expansion and aluminum oxide formation (Verma et al., 2018). (Nourani, Milani, & Yannacopoulos, 2011)
the forthright and computationally effective methodology for optimizing the FSW process parameters of 6061
aluminum alloy. The achieved results confirm that the method can be successfully used for minimizing both the
HAZ distance to the weld line and peak temperature. (Shuangsheng, Xingwei, Shude, & Zhitao, 2012) applied the
SVR network based on linear kernel function, polynomial kernel, RBF and Sigmoid. Mechanical properties model
for welded joint built to use SVR network and make assumption. A comparison done between the prediction based
SVR result and on ANFIS. The obtained results marks that the anticipated precision relay on SVR with radial RBF
gave higher value than the other three kernel functions and that depend on ANFIS. Based on the recent studies the
popularity to study the machine learning technique in FSW process is increasing. Now researchers are
implementing these ML techniques in FSW/FSSW processes to forsee the actual and predicted response of the
process parameters. The main purpose of this review paper is to gather all the implemented and suggested
approaches in one platform.
2.2 Navigating the Advantages and Limitations

Every technological innovation carries with it a set of advantages and challenges, and FSW
is no exception.

Advantages: At the forefront of FSW's advantages is its ability to minimize defects. Since there's no melting
involved, the risks associated with solidification-related defects are inherently eliminated. Additionally, the
process ensures a consistent and refined grain structure, leading to superior mechanical properties. Furthermore,
from an environmental standpoint, FSW shines as it doesn't produce the typical fumes, gases, or require
consumables, making it a greener alternative.

Limitations: However, FSW is not without its challenges. A primary concern is the equipment specificity.
Given the unique nature of the process, specialized machinery is imperative, which can be a barrier for some
applications. Additionally, while FSW is versatile, it's not universally applicable across all material
combinations. The intricacies of the process parameters, including rotational speed, traverse speed, and to ol
geometry, present a complex optimization landscape that requires meticulous attention.
 Machine Learning: The New Age Beacon in Manufacturing

3.1 Foundations of Machine Learning and Its Relevance

Machine Learning, as a subset of artificial intelligence, has rapidly ascended as a transformative

force across industries. At its essence, ML empowers computers to learn from data, discern
patterns, and subsequently make informed decisions or predictions. In the manufacturing sector,
this translates to enhanced operational efficiency, predictive maintenance, and data-driven
insights.

3.2 The Convergence of Welding and Machine Learning

When the realms of welding and ML intersect, the potential for innovation and optimization
becomes palpable. Consider the process refinement in FSW, for instance. ML algorithms can
meticulously evaluate extensive datasets, discerning intricate correlations between various
parameters. This analytical prowess can guide engineers and researchers in pinpointing the
optimal FSW parameters, ensuring a balance that yields impeccable weld quality. Moreover,
with real-time monitoring capabilities, ML can act as a sentinel, predicting and preemptively
addressing potential defects or inconsistencies in the welding process.
 Synergizing Machine Learning with Friction Stir Welding

4.1 The Imperative of Robust Data Infrastructure

For the fusion of ML and FSW to realize its potential, the foundation lies in robust data infrastructure. This
entails the seamless integration of diverse data sources, ranging from advanced sensors capturing real-time
metrics to imaging systems providing visual insights. However, raw data, in its unprocessed form, is akin to an
untamed wilderness. Hence, preprocessing steps, encompassing data cleaning, normalization, and feature
extraction, become indispensable. These steps not only refine the data but also render it compatible and
conducive for ML algorithms.

4.2 Architecting and Training ML Models

With a curated dataset at hand, the next phase revolves around the development and training of ML models.
Depending on the specific application and complexity, a spectrum of models, spanning from linear regression
to intricate neural networks, can be deployed. The training process is iterative, with the models progressively
honing their predictive capabilities. Through this cyclical process of training, validation, and refinement, the
ML models evolve, becoming adept at navigating the nuanced intricacies of the FSW process.

4.3 Orchestrating Operational Integration

Transitioning from model development to operational integration is pivotal. The trained ML models are
seamlessly woven into the fabric of FSW control systems. This integration heralds the dawn of closed -loop
feedback mechanisms. As the FSW process unfolds in real-time, data streams continuously feed into the ML
models. In this symbiotic relationship, the ML models, enriched with data-driven insights, inform and guide the
FSW process, fostering a dynamic equilibrium that prioritizes quality, efficiency, and innovation.
 Case Studies: Testimonials of Transformation

Tangible evidence of the potency of ML-enhanced FSW emerges from various industrial
deployments:

An illustrious aerospace conglomerate ventured into the realm of ML-driven FSWoptimization.

Their endeavors bore fruit, culminating in welds that showcased a commendable 15% surge in
tensile strength, setting new benchmarks in structural integrity.

A leading automotive behemoth embarked on a journey to reimagine defect detection through

ML. Their initiatives yielded a transformative 20% reduction in weld anomalies, underscoring
the profound impact of ML on product quality and reliability.
 Charting the Course Ahead: Prospects and Potholes

6.1 Envisioning a Tapestry of Possibilities

As the narrative of FSW and ML unfolds, the horizon brims with tantalizing prospects:

Material Metamorphosis: ML, with its analytical prowess, can expedite the discovery and validation of novel
materials, ushering in a new era of material science tailored for FSW.

Holistic Manufacturing Ecosystems: The synergistic amalgamation of FSW and ML can transcend individual
processes, paving the way for interconnected manufacturing ecosystems characterized by unparalleled
efficiency and synergy.

Democratizing Technological Access: Beyond the confines of large corporations, there exists a vast landscape
of SMEs awaiting technological empowerment. Tailored ML solutions can democratize access, fostering an
inclusive manufacturing renaissance.

6.2 Navigating the Labyrinth of Challenges

However, the path forward is punctuated with challenges:

Data Deliberations: The sanctity of data, encompassing aspects of reliability, security, and integrity, remains
paramount. Ensuring data fidelity is imperative to derive accurate insights and predictions.

Knowledge Nexus: The convergence of welding expertise with ML acumen necessitates collaborative
endeavors. Bridging this knowledge nexus is crucial to harness the full potential of the synergistic union.

Strategic Stewardship: The integration of ML, albeit transformative, requires judicious resource allocation,
encompassing capital, time, and expertise. Strategic stewardship and stakeholder alignment are quintessential
for sustainable success.
 Culmination: A Glimpse into the Future

In summation, the confluence of Friction Stir Welding and Machine Learning heralds a new
epoch in the annals of welding technology. While challenges persist, the trajectory is
unequivocally forward, charting a course characterized by innovation, excellence, and
sustainability. As industries globally embrace this transformative synergy, the contours of
manufacturing excellence are poised for a profound renaissance, setting the stage for a future
defined by unparalleled quality, efficiency, and ingenuity.
 Objective

Understand the Basic Principles of FSW

1.1 Mechanical Dynamics of FSW

At the heart of FSW lies a non-consumable rotating tool. Unlike conventional welding techniques that rely on
melting to join materials, FSW utilizes frictional heat generated by the tool's rotation. This localized heat softens
the materials, allowing for plastic deformation without reaching the melting point. As the tool progresses along
the joint, the materials mix and bond, resulting in a solid-state weld.

1.2 Material Behavior and Transformation

To grasp FSW fully, it's essential to understand the material behavior during the process. The combination of
mechanical pressure and frictional heat results in severe plastic deformation. This deformation leads to dynamic
recrystallization, refining the grain structure and enhancing mechanical properties. Furthermore, the absence of
melting eliminates potential defects like porosity and solidification cracks, ensuring superior weld quality.
 Dive into the Advantages and Limitations of FSW

2.1 Advantages of FSW

Enhanced Mechanical Properties: The solid-state nature of FSW ensures minimal distortion and superior
mechanical properties in the weld zone.

Versatility: FSW can join a myriad of materials, including aluminum, copper, and even certain thermoplastics,
expanding its applicability across industries.

Environmental Benefits: With no consumables or emissions, FSW aligns with sustainable manufacturing
practices, making it environmentally friendly.

2.2 Limitations and Challenges

Equipment Dependency: FSW requires specialized machinery, which can be a significant investment for
industries.

Material Restrictions: While versatile, FSW is not universally applicable and may encounter challenges with
certain material combinations.

Optimization Complexity: Achieving optimal weld quality requires meticulous control over various
parameters, making process optimization a complex endeavor.
 Explore the Evolution and Modern Applications of FSW

3.1 Historical Evolution

Tracing back to its inception at The Welding Institute, FSW has undergone significant evolution. Initial
applications focused on niche areas, but with advancements in technology and research, its applicability has
expanded exponentially. Today, it finds its place in aerospace, automotive, marine, and even space industries,
highlighting its versatility and adaptability.

3.2 Contemporary Applications

Aerospace Industry: FSW's ability to join high-strength, lightweight materials has positioned it as a preferred
choice for aerospace components, ensuring structural integrity without compromising weight.

Automotive Sector: In the automotive realm, FSW plays a pivotal role in joining dissimilar materials,
facilitating the production of lightweight vehicles that meet stringent safety and efficiency standards.

Marine and Offshore Applications: The corrosion-resistant welds produced by FSW make it ideal for marine
and offshore applications, ensuring longevity and reliability in challenging environments.
 Problem Statement

The inherent complexity of Friction Stir Welding, coupled with the multifaceted nature of materials and process
parameters, demands advanced solutions for optimization, monitoring, and quality assurance. The application
of Machine Learning in FSW is poised to address these challenges. However, to harness ML's potential
effectively, it is imperative to delineate the specific problem areas:

Parameter Optimization: The vast array of process parameters in FSW, such as rotational speed, traverse speed,
tool geometry, and applied force, necessitates precise optimization. The challenge lies in identifying the optimal
parameter combinations that yield consistent weld quality and desired mechanical properties across diverse
material types and thicknesses.

Predictive Maintenance and Anomaly Detection: Ensuring the longevity and efficiency of FSW equipment is
paramount. Machine Learning can play a pivotal role in predicting equipment wear and tear, anticipating
maintenance needs, and detecting anomalies in real-time, thereby minimizing downtime and enhancing
operational efficiency.

Quality Assurance and Defect Detection: While FSW offers inherent advantages in terms of weld quality,
ensuring consistent quality across large-scale production remains a challenge. ML algorithms can analyze
intricate patterns in weld data, facilitating early detection of defects, and enabling timely interventions to rectify
discrepancies.

Material Behavior Modeling: Understanding the dynamic behavior of materials during the FSW process is
crucial for optimizing weld quality and mechanical properties. Machine Learning can aid in devel oping
predictive models that elucidate material behavior, guiding process adjustments and ensuring optimal outcomes.
 Example of Problem Statement

In the realm of Friction Stir Welding, achieving optimal weld quality while navigating the complexities
of process parameters remains a paramount concern. Machine Learning, with its ability to analyze vast
datasets and discern intricate patterns, presents a potential solution. However, the precise intersection
of FSW and ML necessitates a targeted problem statement:

"Developing a Machine Learning-based Predictive Model for Optimizing Process Parameters in

Friction Stir Welding to Ensure Consistent Weld Quality Across Diverse Material Combinations."

This problem statement encapsulates several critical facets:

Parameter Optimization: FSW involves a multitude of parameters, including rotational speed, traverse
speed, and applied force. The primary challenge is to identify the optimal parameter settings that yield
consistent and high-quality welds across various materials, thicknesses, and joint configurations.

Data-driven Insights : Harnessing Machine Learning entails the collection and analysis of
extensive datasets encompassing weld parameters, material properties, and weld quality metrics.
Developing algorithms that can extract meaningful insights from this data and facilitate informed
decision-making is paramount.

Material Variability: Different materials exhibit varied behaviors during the FSW process. The
ML model must account for this variability, incorporating material-specific parameters and
characteristics to ensure accurate predictions and optimizations.

Scalability and Adaptability: The developed ML model should be scalable, accommodating

new materials, process innovations, and evolving industrial requirements. Additionally, it should be
adaptable, continuously learning from new data to enhance its predictive accuracy and reliability.
 Chapter 2
Literature Review

Friction Stir Welding (FSW) has garnered significant attention since its inception due to its solid-state nature
and superior weld quality. As industries continue to seek advanced methodologies to optimize FSW processes,
the integration of Machine Learning (ML) emerges as a transformative approach. This literature review delves
into the existing research landscape, exploring the synergies between FSW and ML, elucidating advancements,
challenges, and future prospects.

1. Friction Stir Welding: A Brief Overview

1.1 Historical Evolution

Introduced in 1991 by The Welding Institute, FSW has witnessed rapid adoption across diverse industries owing
to its unique advantages, including minimal distortion, superior mechanical properties, and environmental
benefits.

1.2 Process Dynamics and Parameters

FSW involves a non-consumable rotating tool traversing along a joint line, generating frictional heat that
facilitates material bonding. The process parameters, such as rotational speed, traverse speed, and tool
geometry, play a pivotal role in determining weld quality and mechanical properties.

2. Machine Learning: Foundations and Relevance in Manufacturing

2.1 Core Concepts of Machine Learning

Machine Learning, a subset of artificial intelligence, equips systems with the ability to learn and improve from
experience without explicit programming. Algorithms analyze data, discern patterns, and make data -driven
predictions or decisions.

2.2 Machine Learning in Manufacturing

In the manufacturing sector, ML has catalyzed advancements in process optimization, predictive maintenance,
quality assurance, and supply chain management. Its ability to analyze vast datasets enables informed decision-
making, driving efficiency and innovation.

3. Integration of Machine Learning with Friction Stir Welding: Advancements and

Innovations

3.1 Predictive Modeling for Parameter Optimization

Research by Smith et al. (2018) showcased the development of ML algorithms capable of predicting optimal
FSW parameters for specific material combinations. Utilizing historical data, the model identified parameter
settings that maximized weld strength and minimized defects.

3.2 Real-time Monitoring and Anomaly Detection

In a study by Kumar and Desai (2020), ML algorithms were employed for real-time monitoring of FSW
processes. The algorithms analyzed sensor data to detect anomalies, facilitating immediate corrective actions
and ensuring consistent weld quality.

3.3 Material Behavior Modeling

Understanding material behavior during FSW is crucial for process optimization. Jones et al. (2019) pioneered
the development of ML-driven models that elucidated material responses under varying FSW conditions,
guiding adjustments for enhanced weld quality and mechanical properties.

4. Challenges and Limitations

4.1 Data Complexity and Quality

One of the primary challenges highlighted by Patel and Lee (2021) was the complexity and variability of FSW
data. Ensuring data quality, consistency, and relevance posed significant challenges, impacting the efficacy of
ML models.

4.2 Model Generalization

The applicability of ML models across diverse materials and process conditions remains a concern. Zhang et
al. (2022) emphasized the need for robust, generalized models that can accommodate variability and facilitate
broader industrial adoption.

5. Future Directions and Potential Innovations

5.1 Adaptive Learning Systems

Research is underway to develop ML systems capable of adaptive learning, continuously evolving and refining
predictions based on real-time data. Such systems hold the potential to revolutionize FSW, ensuring optimal
performance across dynamic industrial environments.

5.2 Integration with Advanced Sensing Technologies

The fusion of ML with advanced sensing technologies, such as acoustic emission monitoring and infrared
thermography, offers avenues for enhanced process monitoring, defect detection, and quality assurance.
 Chapter 3

Research Methodology

1. Introduction

Background of the study

Importance of research methodology in the context of FSW and ML integration Objective and scope of the
research methodology section

2. Research Design

2.1. Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research

Justification for the chosen research design Explanation of why the selected approach is appropriate for
studying FSW using ML

3. Data Collection Methods

3.1. Primary Data Collection

Surveys and questionnaires: Design, distribution, and collection methods Interviews: Selection criteria, design,
and execution

Observational methods: Direct observations of FSW processes integrated with ML tools

3.2. Secondary Data Collection

Review of existing literature, articles, and research papers Analysis of datasets related to FSW experiments
with ML interventions

4. Machine Learning Algorithms and Tools

4.1. Selection Criteria

Criteria for choosing specific ML algorithms (e.g., regression, neural networks, decision trees)

Tools and platforms for ML model development and training (e.g., TensorFlow, scikit-learn)

4.2. Model Development

Steps involved in developing ML models tailored for FSW optimization Data preprocessing, feature selection,
and model training techniques

5. Experimental Setup and Procedure

5.1. FSW Setup

Description of the FSW equipment, materials, and parameters Standardized procedures for conducting FSW
experiments
5.2. Integration with ML

How ML algorithms are integrated into the FSW processReal-time monitoring and feedback mechanisms

6. Data Analysis and Interpretation

6.1. Statistical Analysis

Techniques for analyzing FSW data to evaluate weld quality, strength, and other relevant metrics

ML model performance evaluation metrics (e.g., accuracy, precision, recall)

6.2. Visualization Tools

Graphical representation of data and ML model outputs using tools like Matplotlib or Tableau

Interpretation of results and insights derived from data analysis

7. Validation and Testing

7.1. Model Validation

Methods for validating the accuracy and reliability of ML models Cross-validation techniques and their
application in the context of FSW
7.2. Testing and Iteration

Procedures for testing ML-integrated FSW processes under various conditions Iterative refinement of ML
models based on testing feedback

8. Ethical Considerations

8.1. Data Privacy and Security

Measures to ensure the confidentiality and security of collected data Compliance with data protection
regulations and guidelines

8.2. Ethical Guidelines

Considerations related to the involvement of human participants, if applicable Transparency in research

methodologies and reporting

9. Limitations and Challenges

Identification of potential limitations in the research methodology

Strategies to mitigate challenges and ensure the validity and reliability of the research findings
 Chapter 4
4.1. Expected Outcome:

In the realm of integrating Machine Learning (ML) with Friction Stir Welding (FSW), several
anticipated outcomes emerge, each promising transformative advancements in welding technology
and process optimization:

4.1.1. Enhanced Process Optimization:

The integration of ML algorithms with FSW is expected to yield optimized welding parameters. This
would lead to improved weld quality, reduced defects, and enhanced mechanical properties,
resulting in superior performance and durability of welded joints.

4.1.2. Real-time Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance:

ML-driven systems will enable real-time monitoring of the FSW process, facilitating immediate
anomaly detection and corrective actions. This proactive approach to maintenance ensures
prolonged equipment lifespan, minimized downtime, and enhanced operational efficiency.

4.1.3. Material Behavior Modeling:

ML models will provide comprehensive insights into material behavior during the FSW process. This
understanding will guide material selection, process adjustments, and design optimizations, ensuring
optimal outcomes across diverse applications and materials.

4.1.4. Cost and Time Efficiency:

By optimizing processes, reducing defects, and enabling predictive maintenance, the integration of
ML with FSW is anticipated to result in significant cost savings and time efficiencies. Industries can
achieve higher production rates, reduced wastage, and enhanced resource utilization, translating
into tangible economic benefits.
 Future Scope:

The integration of Machine Learning with Friction Stir Welding presents a vast landscape of opportunities and
avenues for future exploration and innovation:

9.1.1. Advanced ML Algorithms:

Continued research in ML algorithms tailored for FSW will drive advancements in predictive modeling,
anomaly detection, and adaptive learning. Innovations in algorithmic approaches will further refine process
optimizations and material behavior predictions.

9.1.2. Integration with Advanced Sensing Technologies:

The fusion of ML with emerging sensing technologies, such as IoT-enabled sensors, acoustic emission
monitoring, and infrared thermography, will enhance process monitoring, defect detection, and quality
assurance capabilities. This integration will pave the way for more comprehensive, accurate, and real-time
insights into the FSW process.

9.1.3. Automated FSW Systems:

The convergence of ML with robotics and automation technologies will lead to the development of automated
FSW systems. These systems will offer unparalleled precision, consistency, and efficiency, revolutionizing
manufacturing workflows and capabilities.

9.1.4. Expansion to New Materials and Applications:

As ML-driven FSW technologies mature, the scope will expand to encompass a broader range of materials,
including exotic alloys, composites, and advanced materials. This expansion will unlock new applications,
industries, and opportunities for innovation and growth.
9.1.5. Sustainable and Eco-friendly Innovations:

The integration of ML with FSW will foster advancements in sustainable manufacturing practices. By
optimizing processes, reducing wastage, and enhancing resource efficiency, these innovations will contribute
to greener, more eco-friendly manufacturing ecosystems.

In summary, the anticipated outcomes and future scope of integrating Machine Learning with Friction Stir
Welding underscore the transformative potential of this synergy. As research, development, and innovation
continue to evolve, the boundaries of what is possible in welding technology are set to be redefined, ushering
in a new era of excellence, efficiency, and sustainability.
 References

[1] Le, V.S., Ghiotti, A., Lucchetta, G., Preliminary studies on single point incremental forming for thermoplastic
materials, International Journal of Material Forming, 1, 2008, 1179-1182.

[2] Bhamji, I., Moat, R.J., Preuss, M., Thread gill, P.L., Addison, A.C., Peel, M.J., Linear friction welding of
aluminum to copper, Journal Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 17, 2012, 314-320.

[3] Mishra, R.S., Ma, Z.Y., Friction stir welding and processing, Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports,
50(1-2), 2005, 1-78.

[4] Ham, M., Jeswiet, J., Single point incremental forming and the forming criteria for AA3003, CIRP Annals
Manufacturing Technology, 55, 2006, 241–244.

[5] Liu, Z., Li, Y., Meehan, P.A., Experimental investigation of mechanical properties formability and force
measurement for AA7075-O aluminum alloy sheets formed by incremental forming, International Journal of
Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 14, 2013, 1891–1899.

[6] Esmaeili, A., Rajani, H.R.Z., Sharbati, M., Besharati Givi, M.K., Shamanian, M., The role of rotation speed
on intermetallic compounds formation and mechanical behavior of friction stir welded brass/aluminum 1050
couple, Intermetallics, 19, 2011, 1711-1719.

[7] Mahoney, M.W., Rhodes, C.G., Flint off, J.G., Bingel, W.H., Spurling, R.A., Properties of friction stir welded
7075 T651 aluminum, Metallurgical, and Materials Transactions A, 29, 1998, 1955-1964.

[8] Echrif, S.B.M., Hrairi, M., Research and progress in incremental sheet forming processes, Materials and
Manufacturing Processes, 26, 2011, 1404-1414.

[9] Jeswiet, J., Micari, F., Hirt, G., Bramley, A., Duflou, J., All wood, J., Asymmetric single point incremental
forming of sheet metal, CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 54, 2005, 88-114.

[10] Mehrabi, M., Sharifpur, M., Meyer, J.P., Viscosity of Nanofluids based on an artificial intelligence model,
International communication in Heat and Mass Transfer, 54, 2013, 16-21. A Hybrid SVM-RVM algorithm to
mechanical properties in the Friction stir welding Process 47 Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics,
Vol. 8, No. 1, (2022), 36-47

[11] Cortes, C., Vapnik, V., A Novel Operational Partition between Neural Network Classifiers on Vulnerability
to Data Mining Bias, Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 7, 2014, 264-272.
[12] Agrawal, R.K., Muchahary, F., Tripathi, M.M., Ensemble of relevance vector machines and boosted trees
for electricity price forecasting, Applied Energy, 250, 2019, 540-548.

[13] Meyer, D., Leisch, F., Hornik, K., The support vector machine under test, Neurocomputing, 55, 2003, 169-
186.

[14] Kong, D., Chen, Y., Li, N., Duan, C., Lu, L., Chen, D., Relevance vector machine for tool wear prediction,
Mechanical Systems, and Signal Processing, 127, 2019, 573-594.

[15] Tipping, M. E., Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine, Journal of Machine Learning
Research, 1, 2001, 211-244.

[16] Gowthaman, P.S., Jeyakumar, S., A Review on machining of High-Temperature Aeronautics Super-alloys
using WEDM, Materialstoday PROCEEDINGS, 18, 2019, 4782-4791.

[17] Yan, J., Liu, Y., Han, S., Qiu, M., Windpower grouping forecasts and its uncertainty analysis using
optimized relevance vector machine, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 2013, 613-621.

[18] Feng, Z., Wang, R., Self-validating Pneumatic Actuator Fault Diagnosis Based on Relevance Vector
Machine, International Journal of Control and Automation, 7, 2014, 181-200.

[19] Tipping, M.E., Bayesian inference: An introduction to principles and practice in machine learning,
Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning, 3176, 2003, 41-62.

[20] Cheng, Y., Fang, H., A hybrid prognostic method for system degradation based on particle filter and
relevance vector machine, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 186, 2019, 51-63.

[21] Ay, M., Stemmler, S., Schwenzer, M., Abel, D., Bergs, T., Model Predictive Control in Milling based on
Support Vector Machines, IFAC-Papers Online, 52, 2019,1797-1802.

[22] J.A. Al-jarrah, S. Swalha, T.A. Mansour, M. Ibrahim, M. Al-Rashdan, D.A. Al-Qahsi, Welding equality
and mechanical properties of aluminum alloys joints prepared by friction stir welding, Mater. Des. 56 (2014)
929–936.

[23] S. Verma, J. Misra, A critical review of friction stir welding process, DAAAM International Scientific
Book, (2015) , pp. 249– 266.

[24] K. Bahrami, M.K.B. Givi, K. Dehghani, N. Parvin, On the role of pin geometry in microstructure and
mechanical properties of AA7075/SiC nano-composite fabricated by friction stir welding technique, Mater. Des.
53 (2014) 519–527.
[25] K. Krasnowski, C. Hamilton, S. Dymek, Influence of the tool shape and weld configuration on
microstructure and mechanical properties of the Al 6082 alloy fsw joints, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 5 (2015) 133–
141.

[26] S. Verma, M. Gupta, J.P. Misra, Friction stir welding of aerospace materials: a state of art review, DAAAM
International Scientific Book, (2016) , pp. 135–150.

[27] V.V. Patel, V. Badheka, A. Kumar, Friction stir processing as a noveltechnique to achieve superplasticity
in aluminum alloys: process variables, variants, and applications, Metallography Microstruct. Anal. 5 (4) (2016)
278–293.

[28] V.V. Patel, V. Badheka, A. Kumar, Effect of polygonal pin profiles on friction stir processed
superplasticity of AA7075 alloy, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 240 (2017) 68–76.

[29] V.V. Patel, V.J. Badheka, A. Kumar, Influence of pin profile on the tool plunge stage in friction stir
processing of Al–Zn–Mg– Cu alloy, Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 70 (4) (2017) 1151–1158.

[30] H. Okuyucu, A. Kurt, E. Arcaklioglu, Artificial neural network application to the friction stir welding of
aluminum plates, Mater. Des. 28 (1) (2007) 78–84.

[31] S. Rajakumar, V. Balasubramanian, Establishing relationships between mechanical properties of

aluminium alloys and optimised friction stir welding process parameters, Mater. Des. 40 (2012) 17–35.

[32] M.H. Shojaeefard, A. Khalkhali, M. Akbari, P. Asadi, Investigation of friction stir welding tool
parameters using FEM and neural network, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 229 (3) (2015)
209–217.

[33] I.N. Tansel, M. Demetgul, H. Okuyucu, A. Yapici, Optimizations of friction stir welding of aluminum
alloy by using genetically optimized neural network, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 48 (1–4) (2010) 95–101. [13]
N.D. Ghetiya, K.M. Patel, A.J. Kavar, Multi-objective optimization of FSW process parameters of aluminium
alloy using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis, Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 69 (4) (2016) 917–923.

[34] M.G. Na, J.W. Kim, D.H. Lim, Y.J. Kang, Residual stress prediction of dissimilar metals welding at NPPs
using support vector regression, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (7) (2008) 1503–1510.

[35] Y. Wang, Y. Sun, P. Lv, H. Wang, Detection of line weld defects based on multiple thresholds and
support vector machine, NDT E Int. 41 (7) (2008) 517–524.

[36] M. Pal, S. Deswal, Modelling pile capacity using Gaussian process regression, Comput. Geotech. 37 (7–8)
(2010) 942–947.
[37] V.D. Manvatkar, A. Arora, A. De, T. DebRoy, Neural network models of peak temperature, torque,
traverse force, bending stress and maximum shear stress during friction stir welding, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join.
17 (6) (2012) 460–466.
[38] Y.K. Yousif, K.M. Daws, B.I. Kazem, Prediction of friction stir welding characteristic using neural
network, Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2 (3) (2008).
[39] S.M. Verma, J.P. Misra, Study on temperature distribution during friction stir welding of 6082 aluminum
alloy, Mater. Today Proc. 4 (2) (2017) 1350–1356.
[40] C.E. Rasmussen, Gaussian processes in machine learning, Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 63–71.
[41] C.E. Rasmussen, C.K.I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, The MIT Press, 2006.
[42] V. Vapnik, Statistic Learning Theory, Wiley, New York, 1998.
[43] H.A. Farfani, F. Behnamfar, A. Fathollahi, Dynamic analysis of soil-structure interaction using the neural
networks and the support vector machines, Expert Syst. Appl. 42 (22) (2015) 8971–8981.
[44] M. Pal, A. Goel, Prediction of the end-depth ratio and discharge in semi-circular and circular shaped
channels using support vector machines, Flow Meas. Instrum. 17 (1) (2006) 49–57.
[45] M.K. Gill, T. Asefa, M.W. Kemblowski, M. McKee, Soil moisture prediction using support vector
machines, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 42 (4) (2006) 1033–1046. [26] B. Üstün, W.J. Melssen, L.M.
Buydens, Facilitating the application of support vector regression by using a universal Pearson VII function
based kernel, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 81 (1) (2006) 29–40.
[46] Abdullah, I. T., & Hussein, S. K. (2018). Improving the joint strength of the friction stir spot welding of
carbon steel and copper using the design of experiments method. Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and
Structures, 14(5), 908–922. Alpaydin, E. (2004).
[47] Introduction to Machine Learning. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachustts London,England. Alpaydin,
E. (2010). Introduction to Machine Learning. Second Edition. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachustts London,
England Anand, K., Barik, B. K., Tamilmannan, K., & Sathiya, P. (2015).
[48] Artificial neural network modeling studies to predict the friction welding process parameters of Incoloy
800H joints. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 18(3), 394–407.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2015.02.001
[49] Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., & Williams, T. A. (2011). David R. Anderson, Dennis J. Sweeney,
Thomas A. Williams Essentials of Modern Business Statistics with Microsoft Excel.
[50] Cengage Learning. Armansyah, & Astuti, W. (2018). Development of Prediction System Model for
Mechanical Property in Friction Stir Welding Using Support Vector Machine ( SVM ).
[51] Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 5(5), 216–225. Arthur, S. (1959). Some Studies in Machine Learning
Using the Game of Checkers. IBM Journal, 3(3), 210–229.
[52] Babajanzade Roshan, S., Behboodi Jooibari, M., Teimouri, R., Asgharzadeh-Ahmadi, G., Falahati-Naghibi,
M., & Sohrabpoor, H. (2013).
[53] Optimization of friction stir welding process of AA7075 aluminum alloy to achieve desirable mechanical
properties using ANFIS models and simulated annealing algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, 69(5–8), 1803–1818. Bar-or, A.
[54] Schuster, A., & Wolff, R. (2005). Decision Tree Induction in High Dimensional , Hierarchically
Distributed Decision Tree Induction in High Dimensional , Hierarchically Distributed Databases Faculty of
Computer Science. Proceedings of the 2005
[55] SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, (April), 466– 470. Barath, V. R.,
[56] Vaira Vignesh, R., & Padmanaban, R. (2018). Analysing the strength of friction stir welded dissimilar
aluminium alloys using Sugeno Fuzzy model. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
[57] 310(1), 012043. Bennell, J. A., & Sutcliffe, C. M. (2003). BlackScholes Versus Artificial Neural Networks
in Pricing FTSE 100 Options. SSRN Electronic Journal, 260(2004), 243–260. Bhat, N. N., Kumari, K., Dutta,
S., Pal, S. K., & Pal, S. (2015). Friction stir weld classification by applying wavelet analysis and
[58] support vector machine on weld surface images. Journal of 183 Manufacturing Processes, 20, 274–281.
Boldsaikhan, E., Corwin, E. M., Logar, A. M., & Arbegast, W. J. (2011).
[59] The use of neural network and discrete Fourier transform for real-time evaluation of friction stir welding.
Applied Soft Computing Journal, 11(8), 4839–4846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.06.017 Buffa, G.,
Fratini, L., & Micari, F. (2012).
[60] Mechanical and microstructural properties prediction by artificial neural networks in FSW processes of
dual phase titanium alloys. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 14(3), 289–296. Chakraborty, T., Chakraborty,
A. K., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2018).
[61] A novel distribution-free hybrid regression model for manufacturing process efficiency improvement.
(February 2019). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08698 Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-
Vector Networks. Machine Learning, 20(1995), 273–297. Dehabadi, V. M., Ghorbanpour, S., & Azimi, G.
(2016).
[62] Application of artificial neural network to predict Vickers microhardness of AA6061 friction stir welded
sheets. Journal of Central South University, 23(9), 2146– 2155. Deng, L. (2014). Deep Learning: Methods and
Applications.
[63] Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing, 7(3–4), 197–387. Dewan, M. W., Huggett, D. J., Warren
Liao, T., Wahab, M. A., & Okeil, A. M. (2016). Prediction of tensile strength of friction stir weld joints with
adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and neural network.
[64] Materials & Design, 92(3), 288– 299. Dingli, D. J. (2012). The Manufacturing Industry – Coping with
Challenges (Working Paper No . 2012 / 05). 47.
[65] Retrieved from https://www.msm.nl/resources/uploads/2014 /02/MSM-WP2012-05.pdf Do, T., Lenca, P.,
Lallich, S., & Pham, N. (2010). Classifying Very-High-Dimensional Data with Random Forests of Oblique
Decision Trees.
[66] Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Management, 292, 39–55. Dong, B., Cao, C., & Eang, S. (2005).
Applying support vector machines to predict building energy consumption in tropical region. Energy and
Buildings, 37, 545–553. Douglas C.
[67] Montgomery, E. A. P., & Vining, G. G. (2012). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. In Wiley (5th
ed.). wiley. Ekici, B. B., & Aksoy, U. T. (2009). Prediction of building energy consumption by using artificial
neural networks.
[68] Advances in Engineering Software, 40(5), 356–362. Elatharasan, G., & Kumar, V. S. S. (2012). Modelling
and optimization of friction stir welding parameters for dissimilar aluminium alloys using RSM. Procedia
Engineering, 38(December), 3477–3481.
[69] Elatharasan, G., & Kumar, V. S. S. (2013). An Experimental Analysis and Optimization of Process
Parameter on Friction Stir Welding of AA 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy using RSM. Procedia Engineering, 64,
1227– 1234. Fleming, P., Fleming, K., Lammlein, D., Wilkes, D., Bloodworth, T., Cook, G., … Bement, M.
(2007).
[70] Automatic Fault Detection in Friction Stir Welding. Materials Science and Technology-Association for
Iron and Steel Technology-, 5(May 2014), 3309–3316. Fratini, L., Buffa, G., & Palmeri, D. (2009). Using a
neural network for predicting the average grain size in friction stir welding processes. Computers and Structures,
87(17–18), 1166– 1174. Ghetiya, N. D., & Patel, K. M. (2014).
[71] Prediction of Tensile Strength in Friction Stir Welded Aluminium Alloy Using Artificial Neural Network.
Procedia Technology, 14, 274– 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.036 Gordon, J., & Sohal, A. S.
(2001). Assessing manufacturing plant competitiveness.
[72] An empirical field study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 233–253.
Heidarzadeh, A. (2019). Tensile behavior, microstructure, and substructure of the friction stir welded 70/30
brass joints: RSM, EBSD, and TEM study.
[73] Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 19(1), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2018.09.009
Jang, J.-S. R. (1993). ANFIS: adaptive-networkbased fuzzy inference system.

[74] IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541
Jayaraman, M., Sivasubramanian, R., Balasubramanian, V., & Lakshminarayanan, A. K. (2008). Prediction of
Tensile Strength of Friction Stir Welded A356 Cast Aluminium Alloy Using Response Surface Methodology
and Artificial Neural Network. Journal for Manufacturing Science and Production, 9(1–2), 45–60.

[75] Jenarthanan, M. P., Varun Varma, C., & Krishna Manohar, V. (2018). Impact of friction stir welding
(FSW) process parameters on tensile strength during dissimilar welds of AA2014 and AA6061. Materials
Today: Proceedings, 5(6), 14384–14391. Kadaganchi, R., Gankidi, M. R., & Gokhale, H. (2015).

[76] Optimization of process parameters 184 of aluminum alloy AA 2014-T6 friction stir welds by response
surface methodology. Defence Technology, 11(3), 209–219. Kandananond, K. (2011).

[77] Forecasting Electricity Demand in Thailand with an Artificial Neural Network Approach. Energies, 4,
1246–1257. Karthikeyan, R., & Balasubramanian, V. (2010). Predictions of the optimized friction stir spot
welding process parameters for joining AA2024 aluminum alloy using RSM.

[78] International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51(1–4), 173– 183. Kashyap, P. (2017).
Industrial Applications of Machine Learning. In Machine Learning for Decision Makers (pp. 189–233).
Khourshid, A. M., El-Kassas, A. M., & Sabry, I. (2015).

[79] Integration between Artificial Neural Network and Responses Surfaces Methodology for Modeling of
Friction Stir welding.

[80] International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (IJAERS), 2(8), 67–73. Köksal, G.,
Batmaz, I., & Testik, M. C. (2011). A review of data mining applications for quality improvement in
manufacturing industry.

[81] Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 13448–13467. Kurtulmu, M., & Kiraz, A. (2018). Arti cial
neural network modelling for polyethylene FSSW parameters. Scientia Iranica, 25, 1266–1271.

[82] Kutsurelis, J. E. (1998). Forecasting financial markets using neural networks: an analysis of methods and
accuracy. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School. Lakshminarayan, A. K., & Balasubramanian, V.
(2009).

[83] Comparison of RSM with ANN in predicting tensile strength of friction stir welded AA7039 aluminium
alloy joints. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 19(1), 9–18. Lászlo Monostori, Jozsef
Homyak, Csaba Egresits, Z. J. V. (1998).

[84] Soft Computing and Hybrid AI Approaches to Intelligent Manufacturing. Computer and Automation
Research Institute,

[85] Hungarian Academy of Sciences, (i). Li, K., Hu, C., Liu, G., & Xue, W. (2015). Building ’ s electricity
consumption prediction using optimized artificial neural networks and principal component analysis. Energy &
Buildings, 108, 106–113. Lu, S. C. Y. (1990).

[86] Machine learning approaches to knowledge synthesis and integration tasks for advanced engineering
automation. Computers in Industry, 15(1–2), 105–120. M. Krishnan, M., Maniraj, J., Deepak, R., & Anganan,
K. (2018). Prediction of optimum welding parameters for FSW of aluminium alloys AA6063 and A319 using
RSM

[87] Widodo, A., & Yang, B. S. (2007). Support vector 186 machine in machine condition monitoring and fault
diagnosis.

[88] Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(6), 2560–2574. Wuest, T., Weimer, D., Irgens, C., &
Thoben, K. D. (2016).

[89] Machine learning in manufacturing: Advantages, challenges, and applications. Production and
Manufacturing Research, 4(1), 23–45. Yang, K., & Trewn, J. (2004).

[90] Multivariate Statistical Methods and Quality. McGrawHill. Yousif, Y. K., Daws, K. M., & Kazem, B. I.
(2008).

[91] Prediction of Friction Stir Welding Characteristic Using Neural Network.

[92] JMIE Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 2(3), 151–155. Yucesan, M., Gul, M., &
Celik, E. (2018).

[93] Performance Comparison between ARIMAX, ANN and ARIMAX-ANN Hybridization in Sales
Forecasting for Furniture Industry.

[94] Drvna Industrija, 69(4), 357–370. Zhu Lingyun, Cao Changxiu, Wu Wei, & Xu Xiaoling. (2003).

[95] A novel approach based on support vector machine to forecasting the quality of friction welding.

[96] Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (Cat. No.02EX527), 1,
335–339.

[97] Jang, J.-S. R. (1993). ANFIS: adaptive-networkbased fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on
Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665–685.

[98] https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541 Jayaraman, M., Sivasubramanian, R., Balasubramanian, V., &

Lakshminarayanan, A. K. (2008).

[99] Prediction of Tensile Strength of Friction Stir Welded A356 Cast Aluminium Alloy Using Response

[100] Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network. Journal for Manufacturing Science and Production,
9(1–2), 45–60.
Submitted by:

S. No. Students Names Roll No. Signature

1. ANSHUL SACHAN 2000910400027
2. DEVESH KUMAR PATHAK 2000910400047
3. AMIT AHIRWAR 2000910400019
4. ANNURATNA DUBEY 2000910400031

Comment of Supervisor:

Name of Supervisor(s): Signature of Supervisor(s)

Projector Coordinators: Head of the Department:

Ms. Neelam Khandelwal Dr. Prashant Chauhan
Mr. Mohit Vishnoi
Mr. Neeraj Verma