You are on page 1of 17

Project AL RYADA PROJECT TRIPOLI

Address LYBIA
Report A-L5-01
GRAITEC INNOVATION Designed by Date
www.graitec.com Verified by Date
17 Burospace 91572 Bièvres
Revision 0 Drawing L5 FLOOR

Reinforced concrete beam

Table of Contents

1 Geometry description............................................................................................................. 1
2 Loads and combinations......................................................................................................... 2
3 Global assumptions................................................................................................................. 4
3.1 Materials.....................................................................................................................................5
3.2 Concrete covers..........................................................................................................................5
4 Creep coefficient..................................................................................................................... 6
5 Fire resistance minimum conditions...................................................................................... 6
6 Internal forces......................................................................................................................... 7
6.1 Envelope of ULS combinations..................................................................................................8
7 Longitudinal reinforcement................................................................................................... 8
8 Transversal reinforcement................................................................................................... 10
9 Stresses verification............................................................................................................... 11
9.1 Envelope of SLS-CRQ combinations.......................................................................................11
9.2 Envelope of SLS-FRQ combinations........................................................................................12
9.3 Envelope of SLS-QP combinations..........................................................................................12
10 Crack width check.............................................................................................................. 14
11 Anchorage calculation......................................................................................................... 14
12 Support strut verification................................................................................................... 16
13 Support reactions................................................................................................................ 16
14 Deflections........................................................................................................................... 17

1 Geometry description
Element: Main beam 1
Drawing: L5 FLOOR
Span: 1
Span: 7
Length
Width of the beam web
Total height of the beam Right flange thickness
Width of the left support Right flange width
Width of the right support
Total width of T - section
Span: 2
Span: 5
Span: 6
Length
Width of the beam web
Total height of the beam Right flange thickness
Width of the left support Right flange width
Width of the right support
Total width of T - section
Span: 3
Length
Width of the beam web
Total height of the beam Right flange thickness
Width of the left support Right flange width
Width of the right support
Total width of T - section
Span: 4
Length
Width of the beam web
Total height of the beam Right flange thickness
Width of the left support Right flange width
Width of the right support
Total width of T - section

2 Loads and combinations

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 2 of 171** Expression is


faulty **
Load cases description
Title
1 Dead loads 1 - - - 1.1 1.35 0.9 1
4 Live loads 1 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

Uniform linear loads


Load Span Case f x L h'
ID ID ID (kN/m) (mm)
1 1 1 9.21 913 5125 -
2 1 4 3.05 913 5125 -
3 1 1 11.77 0 7200 -
4 1 1 9.21 8238 1525 -
5 1 4 3.05 8238 1525 -
6 1 1 11.77 7200 3600 -
7 1 1 9.21 11713 5215 -
8 1 4 3.05 11713 5215 -
9 1 1 11.77 10800 7290 -
10 1 1 9.21 18933 1525 -
11 1 4 3.05 18933 1525 -
12 1 1 11.77 18020 3600 -
13 1 1 9.21 22748 1540 -
14 1 4 3.05 22748 1540 -
15 1 1 11.77 21710 3615 -
16 1 1 9.21 26223 1525 -
17 1 4 3.05 26223 1525 -
18 1 1 11.77 25310 3600 -
19 1 1 9.21 29823 5125 -

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 3 of 171** Expression is


faulty **
20 1 4 3.05 29823 5125 -
21 1 1 11.77 28910 7200 -

Variable loads
Load Span Case f₁ f₂ x L h'
ID ID ID (kN/m) (mm)
1 1 1 0.00 9.21 0 1038 -
2 1 4 0.00 3.05 0 1038 -
3 1 1 9.21 0.00 6038 1038 -
4 1 4 3.05 0.00 6038 1038 -
5 1 1 0.00 9.21 7200 1038 -
6 1 4 0.00 3.05 7200 1038 -
7 1 1 9.21 0.00 9763 1038 -
8 1 4 3.05 0.00 9763 1038 -
9 1 1 0.00 9.21 10800 1038 -
10 1 4 0.00 3.05 10800 1038 -
11 1 1 9.21 0.00 16928 1038 -
12 1 4 3.05 0.00 16928 1038 -
13 1 1 0.00 9.21 18020 1038 -
14 1 4 0.00 3.05 18020 1038 -
15 1 1 9.21 0.00 20458 1038 -
16 1 4 3.05 0.00 20458 1038 -
17 1 1 0.00 9.21 21710 1038 -
18 1 4 0.00 3.05 21710 1038 -
19 1 1 9.21 0.00 24288 1038 -
20 1 4 3.05 0.00 24288 1038 -
21 1 1 0.00 9.21 25310 1038 -
22 1 4 0.00 3.05 25310 1038 -
23 1 1 9.21 0.00 27748 1038 -
24 1 4 3.05 0.00 27748 1038 -
25 1 1 0.00 9.21 28910 1038 -
26 1 4 0.00 3.05 28910 1038 -
27 1 1 9.21 0.00 34948 1038 -
28 1 4 3.05 0.00 34948 1038 -
Combinations description
ID Combination Code Type

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 4 of 171** Expression is


faulty **
101 1.35x[1 G] ECELUSTRQ ULS
102 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[4 Q] ECELUSTRQ ULS
103 1x[1 G]+1x[4 Q] ECELSCRQQ SLS
104 1x[1 G]+0.5x[4 Q] ECELSFRQQ SLS
105 1x[1 G]+0.3x[4 Q] ECELSQPMQ SLS

3 Global assumptions
Concrete design calculation: EN1992-1-1 / EN1992-1-2.
Loadings and combinations: EN1990 / EN1991.
Longitudinal reinforcement design: EN1992-1-1 / 6.1 - 'Limit reduced moment' method
Transversal reinforcement design: Standard method (EN1992-1-1, 6.2.2 / 6.2.3).
Concrete: No concrete with silica fume
No high performance concrete
Reinforcement diagram: Bilinear stress-strain diagram
Seismic dispositions: No seismic dispositions.
Fire resistance: R 60
Self weight: Self weight considered without compression flanges.
Calculation section type: T-section design.

3.1 Materials
Concrete quality (EN1992-1-1 / 3.1) Steel grade (EN1992-1-1 / Section 3 / Annex C)
Span 1: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 1: Steel class: B500A
Span 2: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 2: Steel class: B500A
Span 3: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 3: Steel class: B500A
Span 4: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 4: Steel class: B500A
Span 5: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 5: Steel class: B500A
Span 6: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 6: Steel class: B500A
Span 7: Concrete class: C30/37 Span 7: Steel class: B500A

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 5 of 171** Expression is


faulty **
3.2 Concrete covers

Exposure class (4.2) XC1


Structural class, according to Table 4.3 S4

Concrete covers (4.4.1)

Concrete covers
Top Bottom Lateral
Cover Cover Cover
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
30 25 14 30 25 14 30 25 14

4 Creep coefficient

The effects of creep are not taken into account.

5 Fire resistance minimum conditions

Fire resistance class R60


Span 1
Minimum width verification Passed

Minimum concrete cover Passed

Span 2
Minimum width verification Passed

Minimum concrete cover Passed

Span 3
Minimum width verification Passed

Minimum concrete cover Passed

Span 4

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 6 of 171** Expression is


faulty **
Minimum width verification Passed
6 Internal forces

Synthetic values table


Minimum concrete cover Passed
Span - Section Abscissa Face
Span 5 (m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN) (kN⋅m)
Minimum width
1 - Left verification 0.00
support Top -29.07 -21.29 -20.18 -19.74 Passed
116.36 0.00
Bottom 14.74 10.80 10.28 10.07 0.00 0.00
1 - Right support 6.95 Top -131.32 -96.08 -90.69 -88.53 0.00 0.00
Minimum concrete cover Passed
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -154.55 0.00
Span 6 1 - MInf 2.99 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Minimum width verification Bottom 193.83 141.93 134.54 131.58 Passed
-1.53 0.00
1 - VMax 6.95 Top -131.32 -96.08 -90.69 -88.53 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -154.55 0.00
Minimum concrete cover Passed
1 - wk Max 2.99 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Span 7 Bottom 193.83 141.93 134.54 131.58 -1.53 0.00


1 - Max Concrete
Minimum Stress
width verification 2.99 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Passed 0.00
Bottom 193.83 141.93 134.54 131.58 -1.53 0.00
1 - Max Steel Stress 2.99 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Minimum concrete cover Bottom 193.83 141.93 134.54 131.58 Passed
-1.53 0.00
1 - Max Deflection 0.00 Top -29.07 -21.29 -20.18 -19.74 116.36 0.00
Bottom 14.74 10.80 10.28 10.07 0.00 0.00

6.1 Envelope of ULS combinations

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 7 of 171** Expression is


faulty **
7 Longitudinal reinforcement

Longitudinal reinforcement
Position Bending moments Reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa Face Work Theo Real Min
(mm) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) Ratio (cm²) (cm²) (cm²)
1 - Left support 0 Bottom 14.74 111.29 13.25 % 3.13 8.06 3.13
Top -29.07 -76.46 38.02 % 3.13 5.14
1 - Right support 6950 Bottom - - - 0.00 2.46 3.13
Top -131.32 -151.69 86.57 % 9.17 10.78
1 - MInf 2989 Bottom 193.83 203.06 95.45 % 13.59 14.07 3.13
Top - - - 0.00 0.00
1 - VMax 6950 Bottom - - - 0.00 2.46 3.13
Top -131.32 -151.69 86.57 % 9.17 10.78
1 - wk Max 2989 Bottom 193.83 203.06 95.45 % 13.59 14.07 3.13
Top - - - 0.00 0.00
1 - Max Concrete Stress 2989 Bottom 193.83 203.06 95.45 % 13.59 14.07 3.13
Top - - - 0.00 0.00
1 - Max Steel Stress 2989 Bottom 193.83 203.06 95.45 % 13.59 14.07 3.13
Top - - - 0.00 0.00
1 - Max Deflection 0 Bottom 14.74 111.29 13.25 % 3.13 8.06 3.13
Top -29.07 -76.46 38.02 % 3.13 5.14

Real longitudinal reinforcement


Span Position Family Reinforcement
1 Bottom 1 7 × ø16 (18.69 cm²)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 8 of 171** Expression is


faulty **
Top 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
Bottom 1 7 × ø16 (14.07 cm²)
2
Top 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
Bottom 1 7 × ø16 + 3 × ø16 (20.11 cm²)
3
Top 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
Bottom 1 7 × ø16 (14.07 cm²)
4
Top 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
Bottom 1 7 × ø16 (18.69 cm²)
5
Top 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
Bottom 1 7 × ø16 (14.07 cm²)
6
Top 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
Bottom 1 7 × ø16 (14.07 cm²)
7
Top 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)

Real longitudinal reinforcement over supports


Support Family Reinforcement
1 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
2 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
3 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
4 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
5 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
6 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
7 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
8 1 7 × ø14 (10.78 cm²)
The value of the effective height (d) is defined automatically according to the real reinforcement in place.

8 Transversal reinforcement
The transversal reinforcement calculation is done according to article 6.2 of EN1992-1-1.
Strut angle: 45.00 °
No direct transmission for shear force

Transversal reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa Work
(mm) (kN) (cm²/m) (kN) Ratio
1 - Left support 0 108.53 92.95 986.52 8.02 5.26 25.13 345.68 31.40 %

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 9 of 171** Expression is


faulty **
Transversal reinforcement
1 - Right support 6950 147.29 92.95 986.52 10.88 5.26 25.13 345.68 42.61 %
1 - MInf 2989 4.37 118.32 986.52 5.26 5.26 25.13 344.70 1.27 %
1 - VMax 6950 147.29 92.95 986.52 10.88 5.26 25.13 345.68 42.61 %
1 - wk Max 2989 64.27 105.27 986.52 5.26 5.26 25.13 344.70 18.65 %
1 - Max Concrete Stress 2989 4.37 118.32 986.52 5.26 5.26 25.13 344.70 1.27 %
1 - Max Steel Stress 2989 64.27 105.27 986.52 5.26 5.26 25.13 344.70 18.65 %
1 - Max Deflection 0 108.53 92.95 986.52 8.02 5.26 25.13 345.68 31.40 %

Real transversal reinforcement

Span Pack Reinforcement


1 13 × ø8 / 240 mm
1 2 1 × ø8 / 230 mm
3 14 × ø8 / 240 mm
1 6 × ø8 / 240 mm
2 2 1 × ø8 / 230 mm
3 6 × ø8 / 240 mm
1 13 × ø8 / 240 mm
3 2 3 × ø8 / 163 mm
3 13 × ø8 / 240 mm
1 6 × ø8 / 240 mm
4 2 2 × ø8 / 160 mm
3 6 × ø8 / 240 mm
1 6 × ø8 / 240 mm
5 2 1 × ø8 / 230 mm
3 6 × ø8 / 240 mm
1 6 × ø8 / 240 mm
6 2 1 × ø8 / 230 mm
3 6 × ø8 / 240 mm
1 13 × ø8 / 240 mm
7 2 1 × ø8 / 230 mm
3 14 × ø8 / 240 mm

9 Stresses verification

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 10 of 171** Expression


is faulty **
9.1 Envelope of SLS-CRQ combinations

Concrete compressive stress

Reinforcement tension stress

9.2 Envelope of SLS-FRQ combinations

Concrete compressive stress

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 11 of 171** Expression


is faulty **
Reinforcement tension stress

9.3 Envelope of SLS-QP combinations

Concrete compressive stress

Reinforcement tension stress

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 12 of 171** Expression


is faulty **
Synthetic values table

Stresses verification
Span - Section Abscissa Envelope Stresses (MPa)
(mm) Type WR WR
CRQ 3,14 19,12 2.12 7.08 % 129.75 32.44 %
1 - Left Support 0 FRQ 3,14 19,81 1.97 6.58 % 123.15 30.79 %
QP 3,30 20,11 1.91 6.38 % 120.51 30.13 %
CRQ 3,12 19,01 7.62 25.40 % 286.81 71.70 %
1 - Right Support 6950 FRQ 3,12 19,78 7.07 23.57 % 271.17 67.79 %
QP 3,30 20,11 6.85 22.85 % 264.91 66.23 %
CRQ 3,13 19,09 9.14 30.47 % 325.58 81.39 %
1 - MInf 2989 FRQ 3,13 19,80 8.56 28.52 % 309.21 77.30 %
QP 3,30 20,11 8.32 27.75 % 302.66 75.66 %
CRQ 3,12 19,01 7.62 25.40 % 286.81 71.70 %
1 - VMax 6950 FRQ 3,12 19,78 7.07 23.57 % 271.17 67.79 %
QP 3,30 20,11 6.85 22.85 % 264.91 66.23 %
CRQ 3,13 19,09 9.14 30.47 % 325.58 81.39 %
1 - wk Max 2989 FRQ 3,13 19,80 8.56 28.52 % 309.21 77.30 %
QP 3,30 20,11 8.32 27.75 % 302.66 75.66 %
CRQ 3,13 19,09 9.14 30.47 % 325.58 81.39 %
1 - Max Conc Stress 2989 FRQ 3,13 19,80 8.56 28.52 % 309.21 77.30 %
QP 3,30 20,11 8.32 27.75 % 302.66 75.66 %
CRQ 3,13 19,09 9.14 30.47 % 325.58 81.39 %
1 - Max Steel Stress 2989 FRQ 3,13 19,80 8.56 28.52 % 309.21 77.30 %
QP 3,30 20,11 8.32 27.75 % 302.66 75.66 %

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 13 of 171** Expression


is faulty **
CRQ 3,14 19,12 2.12 7.08 % 129.75 32.44 %
1 - Max Deflection 0 FRQ 3,14 19,81 1.97 6.58 % 123.15 30.79 %
QP 3,30 20,11 1.91 6.38 % 120.51 30.13 %

10 Crack width check

Crack width verification


Span - Section Abscissa Section Work
(mm) Position (mm) (mm) (mm) (‰) (mm) (mm) Ratio
1 - Left support 0 Top 0.152 0.039 421 0.36 0.152 0.400 38.03 %
1 - Right support 6950 Top 0.250 0.000 253 0.99 0.250 0.400 62.46 %
1 - MInf 2989 Bottom 0.000 0.292 231 1.26 0.292 0.400 72.92 %
1 - VMax 6950 Bottom 0.250 0.000 0 0.00 0.250 0.400 62.46 %
1 - wk Max 2989 Bottom 0.000 0.292 231 1.26 0.292 0.400 72.92 %
1 - Max Concrete Stress 2989 Bottom 0.000 0.292 231 1.26 0.292 0.400 72.92 %
1 - Max Steel Stress 2989 Bottom 0.000 0.292 231 1.26 0.292 0.400 72.92 %
1 - Max Deflection 0 Top 0.152 0.039 421 0.36 0.152 0.400 38.03 %

11 Anchorage calculation

Anchorage calculation
Bar Position

mark (kN) (mm) (MPa) (mm) (mm)


1 Start 8.31 64 41.34 54 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,97 160
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,96 160
7 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,98 160
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,99 160
12 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,96 160
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,96 160

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 14 of 171** Expression


is faulty **
Anchorage calculation
Bar Position

13 Start 0.00 0 434.78 500 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 415
End 0.00 0 434.78 500 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 415
18 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,97 160
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,99 160
23 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,98 160
End 0.00 0 11.19 15 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,98 160
28 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,99 160
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,97 160
33 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,96 160
End 7.92 64 39.40 52 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,97 160
2 Start 0.00 0 217.39 357 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 357
End 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
3 Start 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
End 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
8 Start 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
End 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
14 Start 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
End 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
19 Start 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
End 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
24 Start 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
End 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
29 Start 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
End 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
34 Start 0.00 0 434.78 715 1.00 0,83 1,00 1,00 1,00 592
End 0.00 0 217.39 357 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 357
Anchorage calculation: anchorage at support face.
Anchorage calculation is done according to EN1992-1, 8.4.

12 Support strut verification

The support strut verification and dimensioning of the sliding reinforcement is done according to article 6.5
of EN 1992-1-1.
Effective support stress for intermediate
supports:

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 15 of 171** Expression


is faulty **
Effective support stress for edge
supports (Fig. 6.26):
Effective compressive strength for
intermediate supports (6.5.4(4a))
Effective compressive strength for edge
supports (6.5.4(4a))

Support strut verification


Span Sliding reinforcement Support strut stress
ID Position Real Minimum θ' Work Status
(cm²) (cm²) (°) (MPa) (MPa) Ratio
1 Left 8.06 3.52 - 1.24 14.96 8.28 % Passed
Right 4.68 3.52 49.79 1.60 17.60 10.70 % Passed
2 Left 3.94 3.52 - 1.60 17.60 9.10 % Passed
Right 3.94 3.52 - 1.29 17.60 7.32 % Passed
3 Left 5.63 3.52 - 1.29 17.60 7.32 % Passed
Right 5.63 3.52 - 1.61 17.60 9.13 % Passed
4 Left 3.94 3.52 - 1.61 17.60 9.13 % Passed
Right 3.94 3.52 - 0.71 17.60 4.02 % Passed
5 Left 4.68 3.52 - 0.71 17.60 4.02 % Passed
Right 4.68 3.52 - 0.61 17.60 3.45 % Passed
6 Left 3.94 3.52 - 0.61 17.60 3.45 % Passed
Right 3.94 3.52 - 1.81 17.60 10.26 % Passed
7 Left 3.94 3.52 49.79 1.81 17.60 10.26 % Passed
Right 8.06 3.52 - 1.18 14.96 6.71 % Passed

13 Support reactions

Load case / combination Support 1 Support 2 Support 3 Support 4


ID Title Fz (kN) Fz (kN) Fz (kN) Fz (kN)
1 Dead loads 1 -79.21 -157.50 -124.59 -159.99
4 Live loads 1 -8.21 -15.38 -12.60 -15.74
101 1.35x[1 G] -106.93 -212.63 -168.20 -215.99

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 16 of 171** Expression


is faulty **
102 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[4 Q] -119.47 -240.13 -193.19 -241.03
103 1x[1 G]+1x[4 Q] -87.56 -175.84 -141.25 -176.69
104 1x[1 G]+0.5x[4 Q] -83.39 -166.67 -132.92 -168.34
105 1x[1 G]+0.3x[4 Q] -81.71 -163.00 -129.59 -165.00
Max (ULS) -119.47 -240.13 -193.19 -241.03
Max (SLS) -87.56 -175.84 -141.25 -176.69
Load case / combination Support 5 Support 6 Support 7 Support 8
ID Title Fz (kN) Fz (kN) Fz (kN) Fz (kN)
1 Dead loads 1 -68.34 -56.90 -179.64 -75.96
4 Live loads 1 -5.20 -4.50 -18.17 -7.42
101 1.35x[1 G] -92.26 -76.82 -242.52 -102.55
102 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[4 Q] -106.08 -91.18 -270.86 -113.89
103 1x[1 G]+1x[4 Q] -77.56 -66.48 -198.54 -83.53
104 1x[1 G]+0.5x[4 Q] -72.95 -61.69 -189.09 -79.75
105 1x[1 G]+0.3x[4 Q] -71.11 -59.77 -185.31 -78.23
Max (ULS) -106.08 -91.18 -270.86 -113.89
Max (SLS) -77.56 -66.48 -198.54 -83.53

14 Deflections

Deflection verification
Span L/d Limit Work Ratio Status
1 20,79 27,51 75.56 % Passed
2 10,00 71,14 14.06 % Passed
3 20,84 41,40 50.34 % Passed
4 10,25 8020,94 0.13 % Passed
5 10,39 126,11 8.24 % Passed
6 10,00 5867,33 0.17 % Passed
7 20,79 28,66 72.54 % Passed

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 17 of 171** Expression


is faulty **

You might also like