Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The most colorful and meaningful sympathy 1901 – The American Governor-General William
held abroad in commemoration of Rizal was on Howard Taft in 1901 named Rizal a Philippine
November 20,1897 in Berlin under the National Hero
Anthropological Society of Berlin under the
How well do you know Rizal?
supervision of Dr. Rudolph Virchow.
Do you think Rizal is proclaimed as Philippine
National Hero?
December 29, 1897 – Emilio Aguinaldo and the
-The answer is No, he has never been explicitly
rest of his officials conducted a program that
proclaimed as the (or even a) national hero by
commemorate the first death anniversary of
the Philippine Government
Rizal
Republic Act 1425
September 15, 1898 - Emilio Aguinaldo in his
opening speech at the opening of the congress (Known as Rizal Law)
in Malolos recalled the memory and patriotic
aspirations and deeds of peaceful heroes like
Rizal Historical Context of R.A. 1425
December 20, 1898 – President Emilio During the 1950s, there were several
Aguinaldo issued a decree entitled “Decree efforts to instill among Filipinos the
declaring December 30th of every year a day of value of patriotism and the vision of the
national mourning in honor of Dr. Jose Rizal and Philippines as a nation.
other victims of the Philippine Revolution” One of the prominent
recommendations during the 1950s was
Jose Lansang’s proposition to make a
1898 – Fernando Ma. Guerrero and Cecilio “common patriot program for a building
Apostol (2 Great Writers in Spanish and Filipino) the country.” (Schumascher, 2011)
created a poem dedicated to Rizal
Matutong
Knights of Columbus
Criticism about Rizal’s Famous Novel
Catholic Teachers Guild
Oppositors argued that among the 333
pages of Noli Me Tangere, only 25 passages are
nationalistic while 120 passages are anti- The Catholic Church Appeal
catholic. While upon scrutiny of the two novels
by some members of catholic hierarchical, 170 Priest suggested that it’s better to read “Rizal
passages in Noli Me Tangere and 50 in El Anthology”, collections of Rizal literary piece
Filibusterismo are against catholic faith. that tackles nationalism instead of Noli Me
Tangere
The Catholic Bishops Conference of the
Philippines (CBCP) submitted a pastoral letter to
which according, Rizal violated Canon Law 1399
Catholic School threats
which forbids or bans books that attack or
ridicule the catholic doctrine and practices. While the opponents vigorously fought
for that Act, Senator Francisco Rodrigo
proposed that all the Catholic schools will be
Recto and the Catholic Hierarchy put-hold if the Rizal Bill was approved.
The church played a big role in this fight However, Recto quickly rebutted that if
because they are the ones who ever this were to happen, the schools would be
intervened with the approval and nationalized in which the Catholic Churches
signing of this bill to become a law. The truly against to it.
proponents thought that by
The Church and the implementation of the the Noli Me Tangere and El
Reproductive Health Law Filibusterismo as well as Rizal's other
works and biography.
The Rizal Law, which mandated the all
educational institutions in the country offer • It authorized and directed the Board of
courses about Rizal and his works, and this was National Education to work for the
clearly against by the Catholic Churches. translation of Noli Me Tangere and El
Filibusterismo as well as other writings
In a line now echoed by the anti-RH
of Dr. Jose Rizal into English, Tagalog
legislators, opponents of the Rizal Law argued
and other principal dialects and their
that the legislation violated the freedom of
printing in cheap or popular editions
conscience and religion of Filipino Catholics.
and their circulation.