Abstract. This document contains my solutions to the exercises and proofs of theorems given in the book.
0. Concepts from Set Theory. The Integers.
0.1. The Power Set of a Set. Definition 0.1 (Power Set). For any set S, define the power set P(S) to be the set of all the subsets of S. Theorem 0.2 (Distributive Law). Let A, B, C ⊂ S be sets, then; (1) A ∩ (B ∪ C) = (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C)
(2) and A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C).
Proof. Lets first show (1). We will show that for any e; e ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C) ⇐⇒ e ∈ (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C). Let e ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C); e ∈ A and e ∈ B ∪ C. Since e ∈ B ∪ C, either e ∈ B or e ∈ C, also e ∈ A in either case. So, either e ∈ A ∩ B or e ∈ A ∩ C. We get S ∈ (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C). Now, suppose S ∈ (A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C). We have; e ∈ A ∩ B or e ∈ A ∩ C. In either case, e ∈ A, and e ∈ B or C. So, e ∈ A and e ∈ B ∪ C, so e ∈ A ∩ (B ∪ C). Lets now show (2). We will show that for any e; e ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C) ⇐⇒ e ∈ (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C). Let e ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C); e ∈ A or e ∈ B ∩ C. If e ∈ A, then e ∈ A ∪ B and A ∪ C, so e ∈ (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C). If e ∈ B ∩ C, then e ∈ B and e ∈ C. So, e ∈ A ∪ B and e ∈ A ∪ C. So, e ∈ (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C). Now, suppose e ∈ (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C). We have; e ∈ A ∪ B and e ∈ A ∪ C. If e ∈ A then e ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C) holds. But if e ∈ / A, then we must have e ∈ B and e ∈ C. So e ∈ B ∩ C, and e ∈ A ∪ (B ∩ C). □
It is also possible to show (2) using (1);
1 2 ABHINAV NEGI
Proof. Let A′ = S − A, B ′ = S − B, and C = S − C. We have by (1);
A′ ∩ (B ′ ∪ C ′ ) = (A′ ∩ B ′ ) ∪ (A′ ∩ C ′ ). So, we get; e ∈ A′ ∩ (B ′ ∪ C ′ ) ⇐⇒ e ∈ (A′ ∩ B ′ ) ∪ (A′ ∩ C ′ ). But e ∈ A′ ∩ (B ′ ∪ C ′ ) is equivalent to e ∈ A′ and e ∈ B ′ ∪ C ′ . This is further equivalent to saying e ∈ / A and either e ∈ / B or e ∈/ C. This is further equivalent to, e ∈ / A and e ∈ / B ∩ C, i.e., e∈/ A ∪ (B ∩ C). Similarly, e ∈ (A′ ∩ B ′ ) ∪ (A′ ∩ C ′ ) is equivalent to e ∈ A′ ∩ B ′ or e ∈ A′ ∩ C ′ . This is just e∈/ A and e ∈/ B or e ∈/ A and e ∈ / C, i.e. e ∈/ A ∪ B or e ∈/ A ∪ C, or e ∈/ (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C). So, we have e ∈/ A ∪ (B ∩ C) ⇐⇒ e ∈ / (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C). So; A ∪ (B ∩ C) = (A ∪ B) ∩ (A ∪ C). □ Theorem 0.3 (General Distributive Law). Let Γ ⊂ P(S) be a set of subsets of S, and B ⊂ S, then; \ \ B∪ A= (A ∪ B) A∈Γ A∈Γ [ [ B∩ A= (A ∩ B) A∈Γ A∈Γ
0.2. The Cartesian Product Set. Maps.
Definition 0.4 (Cartesian Product). Given any two sets S and T , the cartesian product set S × T is {(s, t) : s ∈ S, t ∈ T }. Definition 0.5 (Map). A map of a set S into a set T is some α ⊂ S × T such that; (1) For any s ∈ S there exists a t ∈ T such that (s, t) ∈ α. (2) If (s, t) and (s′ , t′ ) ∈ α then t = t′ . S is the domain and T is the co-domain of the map α. Definition 0.6 (Image). Given sets S, T and a map α : S → T , the image of s ∈ S under α is the unique t ∈ T such that (s, t) ∈ α. For A ⊂ S, the image of A under α is α(A) = {α(A) : a ∈ A}. Definition 0.7 (Transformation). A map with domain and co-domain both S is called a trans- formation of the set S. Definition 0.8 (Bijective Maps). Let α : S → T be a map. (1) We say that α is injective if for each s1 , s2 ∈ S, s ̸= t =⇒ α(s) ̸= α(t). (2) We say that α is surjective if for each t ∈ S, there exists s ∈ S such that α(s) = t. (3) We say that α is bijective if it is both injective and bijective. In this case α can be said to be a one-to-one correspondence between S and T . Definition 0.9 (Composite of maps). Let α : S → T and β : T → U be maps. Then we define the composite map of α and β as βα : S → U such that; βα = {(s, β(α(s)) : s ∈ S)}. In simpler terms; (βα)(s) = β(α(s)).