PEER REVIEW FORM

Part 1: Individual

reviewing the work (your name)

Aadya Tiwari reviewing Amanda’s work

Complete one form on a podcast of your choice every person

should be reviewed so make sure the work is evenly
distributed.

Part 2: Individually

Part 1: Who you reviewed

,Amanda (name)

1234
● Does the podcast follow artistic principles of what a podcast
4
recording should be?
○ Timing
○ Clear voices
○ Music used
○ A commercial included from the time period

Does the podcast appear to be designed appropriately Yes / No /

and sound professional is this worka podcast? Partially

● Does the podcast focus on one of the main research 1234

prompts?
Economics problems and Political change 4

○ (Hyperinflation and how it lead to the rise of Adolf Hitler and

the Nazi Germany) 1918-1924
 ○ (The great depression and how it lead to the rise of Adolf
Hitler and the Nazi Germany) 1929 - 1933

■ WWI and Expansion of rights

○ (WWI and how it lead to an expansion of voting rights for
Women)
■ Cultural change through the arts or consumerism
○ (The arts; Jazz, Music, or art and how your choice or choices
changed world culture)
○ (Consumerism; Mass Production and Credit changed world
culture)

● Does the podcast thoroughly answer the prompt above? 1234

● Does the podcast discuss sources of material and discuss 1234

the limitations of the those sources?
3

● Does the podcast attempt otherside of the issue or do they 1234

acknowledge other factors that could have led to the main
argument? 4
 How can the presenter improve their work in the future?
Amanda’s podcast was very entertaining and interesting. I liked the fact that she used
pictures and showed her sources clearly while also having other pictures. She answered the
research question in great depth and was able to add all the necessary details needed. She
explained her sources in clear detail and gave the limitations, problems and clarification of her
sources. Her podcast was well made and was very professional as well. Her podcast also had a
real podcast feel to it because it felt like something that you would find on Spotify and listen to
professionally. However, to improve Amanda could’ve turned down her music a bit because it
was a bit too loud and it was a little difficult to hear her in some parts. Also, it would be good if
she spoke a little slower and paused a bit because she was going very fast. All in all, it was a
very good podcast and had all the correct properties of a proper podcast.

My reflection
I feel like my podcast was successful. It had plenty of information. It successfully answers the research
question and has important details. I described my two sources in detail by explaining their origin,
limitations, purpose and value. I mentioned a lot of other views and explained them. My podcast didn’t have
music or photos. While editing my podcast, I couldn’t add music because my ipad had some technical
difficulties. I didn’t add photos because most professional podcasts don’t have that. I think I did a successful
job with my podcast and it was everything that a real podcast should be.