Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gracie Moravecky
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a concept that is relatively new to the field of nursing
as in years prior to the 21st century, EBP was more exclusively seen in medicine and doctoral
practice (Mackey & Bassendowski, 2017, p. 52). However, in their review of the history of EBP,
Mackey and Bassendowski explain that EBP is becoming more prevalent in the field of nursing
as the scope of nursing practice has broadened and thus, patient outcomes are more heavily
reliant on the actions of nurses (p. 54). Evidence-based practice can be defined as an approach
for improving patient outcomes that involves an extensive review of recent evidence, verification
of its reliability and relevance, and ultimately the implementation of the evidence in the clinical
implementing the evidence should always have improved outcomes, safety, and quality
EBP plays a crucial role in the clinical setting because as previously stated, the role of the
nurse is rapidly growing which means the outcomes of patients are increasingly dependent on the
care provided by and practice of the nurse. Additionally, modern technology has made it possible
for the average client and nurse to access the latest research which has precipitated an increased
demand for a review of current practices in the healthcare field (Mackey & Bassendowski, 2017,
that involves individuals, experts, and stakeholders across a variety of disciplines. According to a
study conducted to determine what makes EBP most successful, an EBP model that involves a
multidisciplinary approach creates a supportive environment in which nurses are more likely and
able to provide evidence-based care, which ultimately improves patient outcomes (Duff et al.,
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING 3
2020, p. 3). The following paper will discuss EBP in the clinical setting, the importance of an
Clinical Experience
When considering the use of EBP in the clinical setting, the situation that comes to mind
of hydromorphone (Dilaudid) every 4 hours as needed for pain rated >7 out of 10 on the numeric
pain scale. However, there was an additional order entered that read to administer 1 mg of the
medication every 4 hours as needed for pain rated 5-7 out of 10 on the numeric scale. An order
written this way can be confusing because it is entered as two separate orders and the nurse must
be aware that the provider’s intention is for only one of these orders to be followed every 4 hours
depending on what the client states their pain level is. The nurse misinterpreted the orders and
every 4 hours over the course of a 12-hour shift. The nurse likely did not perform all 5 rights of
medication administration which would include verifying the right patient, right drug, right dose,
right time, and right route. Performing the 5 rights of medication administration is a part of
evidence-based practice taught in nursing school that aims to prevent medication errors from
occurring.
The responsibility for this medication error does not fall solely onto the nurse, but rather
there was an entire interdisciplinary team at play. For example, the provider likely made an error
when writing the order because it should not have been written as two separate orders with the
same dosage. The second order should have been a lower dose and specified that it is to be given
for breakthrough pain when the next dose is due. Additionally, the order then goes through the
pharmacy who is supposed to verify and approve the order. The nurse is the last line of defense
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING 4
in the event that there is a mistake in the order and should have contacted the provider for
clarification. Other members of the interdisciplinary team that should have an understanding of
EBP priorities include the nurse manager, the charge nurse, and the facility’s legal and ethical
team. The implications of an error like this could be dire including overdosing the patient which
may result in serious illness or death as well as the revocation of the nurse’s license. Following
EBP could have prevented this error from occurring because EBP recommends performing the 5
rights of medication administration. EBP also recommends utilizing the interdisciplinary team to
prevent such errors from occurring. The pharmacist failed to catch the provider’s error in the
order and the nurse failed to contact the provider or pharmacy for order clarification. Each part
of the interdisciplinary team must collaborate to implement effective EBP and prevent such
There are various approaches, or models, of EBP that each aim to promote quality
improvement and ensure that current healthcare practices are rooted in the most relevant and
significant scientific evidence. One of the most commonplace EBP models is the Revised Iowa
Model. According to an article from the Journal of Pediatric Nursing, this model consists of a
stepwise approach to implementing EBP that begins with identifying a “trigger” or issue in the
clinical setting and putting the issue into the form of a question. Then, a collaborative
multidisciplinary team will be formed that will systematically review current evidence, design
and implement a potential solution to the clinical issue, and finally share the solution with other
units and/or facilities if the results prove the solution to be effective (Hanrahan et al., 2019, p. 1).
The Iowa Model may be implemented in a variety of ways in nursing practice. For example, an
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING 5
interdisciplinary nursing team may use the Iowa Model to answer the question of how to
The Stetler Model is a similar EBP model that involves a multi-phase approach to
improving nursing practice and patient outcomes. The phases of the Stetler Model include
evaluation of results (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018, p. 262). Preparation begins with
identifying a potential issue and data/evidence collection. Validation involves extensive review
determining which evidence to implement in the clinical setting. The translation phase involves
formulating a plan to implement the evidence into the clinical setting and the final phase is the
evaluation of the effectiveness of the solution (Stetler, 2001, p. 272). Like the Iowa Model, the
Stetler Model may be used to address myriad issues in the clinical setting. An example may be to
determine the best methods for preventing and reducing the rate of nosocomial infections on a
medical-surgical unit.
Another well-known EBP model in the nursing research community is the Johns Hopkins
Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) Model. This model seeks to expedite the process of
implementing EBP in the clinical setting by focusing on making EBP more attainable and
terms as described by Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, this model involves an inquiry phase that is
broken down into subphases of formulating a practice question, gathering evidence, and
translating that evidence into the clinical setting. The interdisciplinary team will then determine
the best practice based on review of the patient outcomes, which will lead to the process starting
over again indefinitely to promote continuous improvements in nursing practice (p. 413). One
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING 6
example of how the JHNEBP Model can be implemented in the clinical setting was brought
forward in a research experiment conducted by the Weinberg Peri-Anesthesia Unit that involved
determining the best ways to improve the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) environment in
order to promote therapeutic healing in patients. (Anicoche & Kaiser, 2020, p. 21). This proposal
gathering of evidence, implementation of the evidence into the clinical setting, and evaluation of
the outcomes.
All three of these models aim to promote improved patient outcomes and ensure that the
most relevant and credible evidence is being implemented in the clinical setting. All three
models share similarities in their structure in that they all involve the identification of an issue
and formulation of an inquiry. There is also an extensive research and evidence selection process
that ultimately ends with implementing the best practice into the clinical setting and evaluating
the outcomes. All the EBP models promote working with a team because this provides a
While these EBP models share a multitude of similarities, there are a few notable differences as
well. For example, the JHNEBP Model varies from the Iowa and Stetler models because it is a
more continuous, constantly evolving cycle that has more variables. The Iowa and Stetler models
offer a more step-by-step approach to EBP in the field of nursing. Although there are more steps
involved in these models, the steps may be perceived as more straightforward while the JHNEBP
Model can be interpreted as broader. Additionally, while all of the models support a teamwork
approach to EBP, the Iowa Model places more emphasis on multiple discipline collaboration
because the development of an interdisciplinary team is actually built into one of the steps of the
model.
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING 7
Conclusion
EBP has become increasingly prevalent in the field of nursing due to the progression of
technology and the growing scope of practice of the nurse. Because the role of the nurse has
broadened, patient outcomes are significantly more dependent on the actions of the nurse. EBP is
crucial to the field of nursing because it is proven to improve patient outcomes by implementing
the best and safest practices rooted in credible, scientific evidence. Interdisciplinary
collaboration is the key to effective EBP because it promotes an environment that supports the
nurse to conduct and ultimately implement EBP. A collaborative approach offers a variety of
backgrounds and perspectives, provides support, and enhances accountability. Because nurses
are the last line of defense when providing patient care, the importance of the nurse to practice
EBP is paramount. Additionally, the nurse has first hand exposure to issues in the clinical setting
which means they hold the responsibility of identifying potential problems to be researched.
Unfortunately, while most nurses acknowledge the value of EBP, many do not feel
confident or prepared in their ability to research and implement best practices. According to a
literature review from the American Journal of Nursing Science, one of the most prevalent
barriers to EBP in nursing is a lack of proper education or training on how to effectively conduct
research, implement best practice, and evaluate outcomes (Munirah et al., 2020, p. 38). However,
the responsibility nurses have in the proliferation of EBP is only continuing to grow and will not
cease any time soon. With more education and training on how to identify issues, conduct
research, and implement EBP, nurses would likely feel more confident in their ability to do so
and thus, be more willing to. Implementing EBP education in nursing schools is a fantastic first
step in producing confident nurses capable of following various EBP models with the aim of
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING 8
improving patient outcomes. Hospitals and other facilities may also offer continuing education
on the importance of EBP and training on how to implement various EBP models in the clinical
setting. Once nurses become more confident and educated in their EBP implementation skills,
the improvement seen in patient outcomes and nurses’ satisfaction will be monumental.
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING 9
References
Anicoche, M. L., & Kaiser, L. (2020). The Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice (EBP)
Duff, J., Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., & Steelman, V. (2020). Determinants of an evidence-based
Hanrahan, K., Fowler, C., & McCarthy, A. M. (2019). Iowa model revised: research and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.04.023
Mackey, A., & Bassendowski, S. (2017). The history of evidence-based practice in nursing
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.05.009
Munirah, A., Eman, A., Fatimah, A., Kawakeb, A., Rehab, R., Sara, A., & Maram. B. (2020).
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN NURSING 10
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200901.16
Stetler, C. (2001). Updating the Stetler model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based