Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Benjamin H. Nam, Alexander Scott English & Kun Dai (31 Jan 2024):
Intercultural capital and ambiguous loss in in-between space: a digital ethnography of Anglo-
Sino academic families amid China’s transformation into the post-pandemic era, Identities,
DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2024.2309825
ABSTRACT
This study presents a digital ethnography of the Anglo-Chinese academic family
community (ASAFC) amid China’s transformation into the post-pandemic era.
The ASAFC members are men from Anglophone countries married to Chinese
women. Thus, two American male authors and one Chinese male author
observed WeChat group texts shared by 64 individuals from Anglophone
countries between 16 November 2022, and 31 January 2023, and in turn,
triangulated their field notes to analyse the experiences of the ASAFC. By
underpinning the concepts of intercultural capital and ambiguous loss within
the context of in-between space, this study promoted scholarly conversations
about the life stories of the ASAFC during the rapid public policy paradigm shift
and the peak time of the COVID-19 infection. Overall, this study discusses
China’s transformation into the post-pandemic era, culminating with an over
view of the most overarching challenges in recent history.
KEYWORDS International academic mobility; cultural capital; social capital; emotional capital; ambig
uous loss; international marriage
Introduction
The myth of brain drain and gain has glorified Western capitalist and social
welfare regimes as the primary host countries and promoted a barometer
of cultural and economic globalization through skilled migrants and their
contribution to the global political economy. The field of international
higher education (IHE) is a prominent part of this social phenomenon
(Marginson 2022). The higher education (HE) systems in Anglophone
CONTACT Alexander Scott English AEnglish@kean.edu Center for Behavioral Research Across
Cultures in the School of Psychology, Wenzhou-Kean University, Ouhai, Wenzhou 325060, China
© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
2 B. H. NAM ET AL.
nations (i.e. the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and
New Zealand) have influenced numerous international students to aspire
for fundamental forms of intercultural capital, such as social network
circles and academic degrees, to become rebranded as human capital
and settle in the host countries (Bai, Nam, and English 2023; Chi, Zhang,
and Kulich 2022; Nam and English 2023; Nam and Jiang 2021; Pöllmann
2013).
Despite the mainstream ideas about the Western and social welfare
regimes as the major host countries, scholars have recently illuminated the
Chinese national context of IHE as an emerging topic (Bai and Nam 2023; Bai
et al. 2023; Nam et al. 2023; Nam, Yang, and Draeger 2023; Song 2023; Xu
2023; Xu, Stahl, and Cheng 2022). In recent decades, China has been raising
a soft power globally in recent decades, demonstrating remarkable eco
nomic, social, cultural, and educational development along with the ‘Belt
and Road Initiative (BRI)’ (Xu et al. 2022, 525). The BRI illustrates that economic
alliances and cultural exchanges with the Asia-Pacific, African, and European
commonwealth states have been strategic tools for China and their higher
education institutions (Liu, Nam, and Yang 2023).
China has retained the most significant number of internationalized edu
cational institutions: a total of 146 institutions classified as double first-class
disciplined universities (DFCDU) that provide English as a medium of instruc
tion (EMI) for both domestic and international students; a total of 26 public
international/foreign studies universities; approximately 60 foreign language
secondary schools; and more than 500 international baccalaureate pro
grammes into local education systems. These educational infrastructures
have facilitated China’s global talent development policy, encouraging
numerous international faculty members and language teachers to pursue
their academic careers in the nation (Dai and Hardy 2023; Liu, Nam, and Yang
2023).
Despite the positive educational movement, over the past three and a half
years of the COVID-19 pandemic have hampered educational sojourners from
pursuing their social and emotional well-being at home and abroad.
Although the World Health Organisation (WHO) recently declared that the
post-pandemic era began with great hope for humanity (as of 5 May 2023),
numerous individuals may still have psychological and emotional unrest due
to the lack of physical, social, and economic activities, especially family well
being that can grow into ambiguous loss at the time of public health crisis
(Horton et al. 2023; Nam and Jiang 2021; Testoni et al. 2021). At this chaotic
time, whereas most countries attempted mitigating their cross-border traffic
and normalizing transnational higher education policies (TNHE), namely
international student mobility (ISM) and international academic mobility
(IAM), China implemented a strict public health policy to control their internal
and international migration (Li, Dai, and Zhang 2023).
IDENTITIES: GLOBAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POWER 3
In this paper, we are two American and one Chinese male academics in
comparative and international education (CIE) and intercultural commu
nication (IC). We are currently educational sojourners and a returnee from
Anglophone nations to China. We are colleagues and members of the
Anglo-Sino academic family community (ASAFC); the American authors
are married to Chinese, and the Chinese author is an experienced
researcher and observer. In previous research, we explored the pandemic
experiences of international students in the early stage of the COVID-19
pandemic in China (English et al. 2022). Briefly, a novel coronavirus and its
explosive chain of lethal transmission began growing around Wuhan, the
capital city of Hubei Province in China, from the end of December 2019 to
early January 2020. Known as ‘Wuhan’s 76-day lockdown’, the Chinese
government sealed the city and rapidly implemented nationwide lock
down and social distancing policies. The ‘Zero-COVID’ policy was
a strategy that sealed whole communities, compounds, districts, and cities,
respectively, if positive cases were found. In this regard, we witnessed that
these international students expressed long-term trauma despite social
and emotional support from their schools and the local community mem
bers (English et al. 2022).
Additionally, we also conducted a line of longitudinal research on the
long-term and snap lockdown experiences of international faculty members
(i.e. American, British, German, Turkish, Japanese, and Korean) in China during
the Delta and Omicron outbreak (July 2021-November 2022) (Nam 2023; Nam
and English 2022). In the initial investigation, we found the potential trau
matic risk factors and symptoms, such as extreme stress, burnout, dropout,
and ambiguous loss due to the strict national public policy. Notably, some
participants lost their family members in their home countries (e.g. parents
and childbirth), which could grow into the long-term trauma (Nam and
English 2022).
In the next investigation, we explored how this cohort could establish
coping mechanisms in unpredictable time and unreliable space. The partici
pants sought to promote collective resilience by engaging in diverse social
services and cultural activities with domestic faculty members via online. In so
doing, they reflected on their collective academic identity. However, some
participants could not negotiate with their emotional challenges, which could
determine factors influencing long-term trauma without families and friends
in a different cultural domain (Nam and English 2023). Overall, as China used
the dynamic ‘Zero-COVID’ policy, the nation alleviated a level of the public
health crisis during the summer of 2020 through the spring of 2021. The Delta
and Omicron variant outbreaks since the summer of 2021 developed a severe
public health crisis in China. Most Chinese citizens endured snap lockdowns
for about one and a half years (English et al. 2022; Nam 2023; Nam and
English 2022; Nam et al. 2022).
4 B. H. NAM ET AL.
Theoretical underpinnings
Global migration and intercultural capital in in-between space
For Bourdieu, social and cultural forms of capital entail symbolic power for
individuals in various social, cultural, economic, and public domains, raising
dignity, honour, and life competencies. Social capital describes social relation
ships and network circles, and cultural capital depicts cultural tastes and
knowledge, as well as educational background and professional knowledge
in specific social spaces (Bourdieu and Passeron 2000; Bourdieu and
Wacquant 1992). Thus, migration capital illustrates new immigrants’ social
and cultural capital that can be exchanged for human capital; skilled migrants
can improve their life competencies through their career positions, qualifica
tions, and contributions to the local economic market (Ryan, Erel, and
D’Angelo 2015).
Scholars have underpinned Bourdieu’s thinking tools to view global social
phenomena more broadly as intercultural capital. For instance, international
students and academics seek potential benefits by establishing global social
networks and gaining cross-cultural and cross-linguistic competencies and
academic and professional knowledge in their chosen fields (Dai and Hardy
2021, 2023; Nam and Jiang 2021). These diverse forms of migrant and
cosmopolitan capital can be seen as intercultural capital. According to
Pöllmann (2013, 2), intercultural capital means ‘intercultural friendships or
experiences of living abroad’ through which sojourners strive to obtain
particular social benefits from the locals and develop intercultural under
standings, such as ‘awareness, acquisition, and application’.
IDENTITIES: GLOBAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POWER 5
the specific timeframe of the three years of the COVID-19 pandemic in China.
We collectively created field notes through mutual communications via
online meeting platforms like Zoom and Tencent. We also conducted direct
and participant observations via WeChat, the most widely used social media
messaging app among Chinese citizens and oversea Chinese. Due to the
COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face interactions were considerably limited. As
a means of facilitating data collection, Qian and Mao (2021) used WeChat to
explore Chinese immigrant mothers’ health information sharing. Nam et al.
(2022) also observed WeChat groups to conduct a digital ethnography of
expats during the Shanghai lockdown. Hence, we also relied on WeChat as
the primary platform to collect data and interact with various individuals
(Nam et al. 2022; Qian and Mao 2021).
We observed two sets of the WeChat group chat categorized as our work
and family balance from 16 November 2022, through 31 January 2023. The
first group includes 84 international faculty members from across the globe,
classified as non-Anglo-Chinese Academic Family Community (non-ASAFC)
members. They are not married to Chinese but hold foreign expert visas in
teaching and research. Even though we observed this group chat, their texts
were not used for the current study but only for reference. However, our
observations were documented in our field notes and reflective diaries to
develop co-constructive narratives.
The second group includes 64 ASAFC members from the UK, the U.S.,
Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, who are married to Chinese citizens.
A few members hold dual citizenship with other European countries, such as
France, Germany, and Spain. All members are university academics or
international school teachers in China (see Figure 1). We utilized this group
chat as the primary data source. We generated all texts via WeChat and
divided them into 11 data sets by considering weekly conversations, 77
days in total (see Figure 2). Although using web-based objects does not
always require institutional review board (IRB) approval (Murthy 2008), we
respected ethical considerations according to our IRB protocol, as our data
entails empirical voices. Thus, we obtained consent from all text providers
and used pseudonyms to protect their personal identities, including the co-
authors in the current research (Creswell 2013).
Data analysis
Combining all written and textual data sources of evidence, we used
a thematic and taxonomic analysis approach (Corbin and Strauss 2007),
which helps interpret the ‘complexity of views’ and ‘narrowed the meanings’
of emotional, social, and cultural factors in real-world situations as social
phenomena (Creswell 2013, 24). We initially considered three specific time
frames: (a) the rapid public health policy paradigm shift (November 16-
10 December 2022); (b) the peak time of the COVID-19 infection
(December 11-10 January 2023); (c) the normalization process and successful
transformation into the post-COVID era (January 10-January 31).
We reviewed the written and textual data in each timeframe in the first
coding stage and broadly coded participants’ expressions about crucial
issues and events. In the initial timeframe, the most dominant factors were
related to anxiety, confusion, and uncertainty about the rapid policy para
digm shift. In the second timeframe, the most dominant factors were the
IDENTITIES: GLOBAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POWER 9
The United States has no higher priority than the safety, health, and well-being
of American citizens overseas. We are actively working with and assisting our
citizens experiencing challenges related to the recent rise of COVID-19 infec
tions in China . . . We encourage all U.S. citizens to keep a 14-day supply of
medications, bottled water, and food for yourself and any members of your
household (Fieldnote, December 4, 2022).1
ASAFC-Member-2: Would we have to be locked down with just bread and water
for a long time [again]?
From the end of November through early December 2022, China declared
that the nation terminated the long-term Zero-COVID policy and allowed
people to move without health codes and PCR test records. The ASAFC
members were aware of potentially growing positive cases and medical
system crises in this specific timeframe. However, as husbands from overseas
in China, they developed a social and emotional support network (Fieldnote,
4 December 2022). The conversation on their WeChat group demonstrated:
ASAFC-Member-3: I hope it’s true, but it really sounds too good to be true.
ASAFC-Member-6: It seems more coming too. This might finally be over . . . A lot
of people got together [Chinese people] and asked nicely, so it seems polite
ness goes a long way.
ASAFC-Member-8: I’m going to the beach on Christmas. Bring on Chaos and let
it be!
In interpreting the rapid public health policy shift from the middle of
November to late November 2022, the distinction in an in-between world
IDENTITIES: GLOBAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POWER 11
was clearly identified; while the non-ASAFC expressed a lack of social and
emotional support, the ASAFC could gain sources of certain forms of
capital. Concerning the experiences of the ASAFC during the late stage of
the COVID-19 pandemic as outsiders, their positionalities can be in in-
between spaces; they may feel awkward and confused about their col
lective identity as foreigners from a dominant cultural sphere challenge,
which may significantly influence habitus. For Bourdieu, habitus is
a system of relatively durable and transposable dispositions, which is
stimulated by competing different forms of logic. However, it is usually
shaped by the dominant logic within divergent fields. When individuals’
habitus fits the logic of practice in a specific field, they may develop
appropriate forms of social and cultural capital. Therefore, diverse forms
of capital are intertwined with habitus formation in specific logical fields
of life practices (Bourdieu and Passeron 2000; Bourdieu and Wacquant
1992).
The cultivation of new habitus and capital under the Zero-COVID policy in
China, each social actor/agent had to spend considerable time developing
cultural knowledge and skills as well as social relationships (i.e. social and
cultural capital). The fundamental forms of capital can be symbolic power
facilitating individuals’ lives and producing numerous benefits (Bourdieu and
Passeron 2000; Bourdieu and Wacquant 1992). From these perspectives, the
distinction between the ASAFC and non-ASAFC groups may have shown
different sets of intercultural learning experiences in the logical field of the
Chinese public health policy and management system (i.e. Zero-COVID) and
different examples of how their subjectivities reveal their teaching practices
and daily struggles over time. In this context, while the ASAFC could have more
sources of intercultural capital, the non-ASAFC may have felt disenfranchised;
they could feel deprived of their privileged positions as educational sojourners.
In migration research, social and emotional forms of capital are pro
minent coping mechanisms, facilitating educational sojourners’ holistic
well-being. As a collective resilience practice, the roles of host group
members, especially the capital shared by family members like spouses,
can empower them to feel a sense of belonging, increase their knowl
edge about the local culture, and maximize their abilities to collect
information (Ryan, Erel, and D’Angelo 2015). From the Bourdieusian
perspective, these fundamental forms of capital as symbolic power can
be exchanged for their wellness support network. However, symbolic
violence co-exists as the social structure is not neutral (Bourdieu and
Passeron 2000; Bourdieu and Wacquant 1992). Thus, those educational
sojourners who are not married to Chinese could not have equal oppor
tunities to use the same social and emotional capital as those ASAFC
members at the nexus between symbolic power and violence (Ryan, Erel,
and D’Angelo 2015).
12 B. H. NAM ET AL.
ASAFC-Member-9: Maybe they feel the pressure from the people who got
COVID? I’m not sure, I think the cost of millions infected is far more superior
to sustain.
In analysing the peak time of the COVID-19 infection, all the ASAFC members
were diagnosed as positive cases. In this timeframe, the ambiguous loss
meant that they could not develop optimistic minds and expectations
about China’s transformation into the post-pandemic era. Despite their
aspiration for freedom of physical mobility, they felt confused and had to
be in self-imposed isolation, dealing with past negative memories, uncertain
ties, and confusion about the rapid lifestyle shift from the long-term dynamic
Zero-COVID policy in China.
In a broader global context, many individuals have encountered ambig
uous loss during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, Testoni et al. (2021)
discussed the family loss experiences among Italians during the early stage of
the COVID-19 pandemic. Even though the participants were not physically
sick, the sudden absence of loved ones could develop feeling of ambiguous
loss, such as non-acceptance of reality and lack of humanity, expressing
extreme depression and confusion about the rapid lifestyle changes.
Further, Horton et al. (2023) discussed the family experiences of ambiguous
loss in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the U.S. public health
policy was mitigating the internal and cross-border traffic and facilitating
physical mobility, there were more than one million death, and more than
IDENTITIES: GLOBAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POWER 13
nine million individuals lost jobs. These rapid socio-economic and socio-
political climate shifts could be seen as ambiguous loss. In this context, family
bonds and wellbeing could help individuals to develop mental coping
mechanisms at a chaotic time.
Additionally, Nam and Jiang (2021) explored the experiences of short-term
Chinese exchange students in the U.S. during the early stage of the COVID-19
pandemic and mentioned their ambiguous loss as lacking social and emotional
capital. While they came to the U.S. hoping to gain cosmopolitan and intercul
tural forms of capital, they had to stay in their dormitories and lost all meaningful
academic, social, and cultural learning opportunities. By the same token, during
the peak time of the infection, the ASAFC lost opportunities to enjoy the holiday
seasons (i.e. Christmas and Chinese New Year holidays). Yet, as aforementioned,
family bonds could mitigate a level of ambiguous loss, potentially providing
positive implications for promoting resilience. In this way, family members can
bolster resilience, which can also promote collective resilience network chains
among community members (Horton et al. 2023; Nam and English 2023).
ASAFC-Member-16: You will get better soon mate. The first few days are the
worst. I had the shakes followed by a horrific fever at the weekend. It will slowly
get better.
ASAFC-Member-17: Drink those sports drinks, the isotonic ones. They help,
especially in the first few days. If you have, ibuprofen helps.
Some others discussed their confusion about their health codes when they
need to travel. Here is also another example:
14 B. H. NAM ET AL.
ASAFC-Member-20: The children probably had it, and it made them throw up
a lot.
ASAFC-Member-19: My kids have not had it yet, but I’m sure it’s only a matter of
time. Thanks for the heads up about the symptoms.
ASAFC-Member-21: My daughter gave us a real scare, wouldn’t eat nor even cry,
and the hospitals were full, looking for a private doctor to come to the house,
and the next day she was doing cartwheels! [sharing photos of the ill child]
Despite the family chaos, the ASAFC members expressed how they appre
ciated their Chinese wives’ major contributions to their families. The conver
sation continued:
ASAFC-Member-22: Ok, now I feel less nervous about how my 3-year-old girl
should cope with it because my wife is with her day and night.
ASAFC-Member-23: My wife kept looking for people who work in the service
industry or have had it, given the number of people they see.
ASAFC-Member-24: My wife [while being nearly recovered] is also staying with her
parents and our kids, while I’m positive to try to avoid getting it and passing it to
them. Hopefully can get negative before Xmas day to have a good one with them.
Regarding Chinese family values, our findings showed that Chinese wives are
gatekeepers to secure migration capital for their husbands from a different
cultural sphere. In reflecting on the Confucian heritage, one of the utmost
Chinese virtues and values was the role of women, who build guanxi (关系) –
social network circles that produce mutual benefits among wives and mothers
who sacrifice their lives over to increase honour, privilege, and sake for their
families (O’Dwyer 2017). In this context, Chinese Confucian ideology has often
been viewed as a male-dominant society and patriarchal culture, which produce
female roles as wise wives and mothers. However, modern Chinese social norms
have positioned women as more independent and responsible, as the nation has
emphasized the social quality of education, justice, and inclusion for females.
Thus, the Chinese values and wives as gatekeepers meant how they could create
avenues for empowerment for their husbands and children regardless of race,
ethnicity, national origin, and geographical location. Namely, they have devoted
themselves to promoting migration capital in the ASAFC (Liu, Nam, and Yang
2023; Qian and Mao 2021).
16 B. H. NAM ET AL.
were not that severe but had some fever, sore throat (pharyngitis), and dehy
dration. I had to deal with my academic jobs and grade students’ finals while
enduring the COVID infection.
Concluding remarks
This study examined how ASAFC members dealt with rapid public health policy
shifts and negotiated with diverse emotional, social, and cultural challenges as
educational sojourners in China. This research positioned three co-authors as
digital ethnographers to explore those who are married to Chinese women. We
implied that the long-term dynamic zero-COVID policy caused numerous
emotional and social well-being issues and feelings of ambiguous loss. Many
educational sojourners in China missed opportunities to manage diverse forms
of essential social and cultural capital, especially because of the lack of inter
cultural capital. At the same time, the ASAFC members secured their accumu
lated migration capital. While focusing on examining the lived experiences of
foreign husbands, we neglected to explore foreign female academics married
to Chinese men. This portion has remained as the limitation of this study. Thus,
future research should consider exploring the missing side of global migration
research, thereby expanding the existing knowledge into global scholarship.
We wrote that collaboration between international and intercultural mar
riage couples could develop appropriate social and emotional support net
works. At this point, it is significant to recognize that there is a long historical
concern and ideological problem related to Sino-Anglo relations. For this
complex issue, we, the three co-authors of this study, asked ourselves to discuss
the meaning of intercultural capital and its flows in our in-between spaces
through the lens of the ASAFC, and in turn confront the nexus between
ambiguous loss and family dynamics in global migration and identity research.
In our scholarly conversation, we highlighted key public concerns, social issues,
and cultural events during China’s transformation into the post-pandemic era
aimed at strengthening social bonds and mutual trust in the Sino-Anglo con
text. Our response to this question culminated with an overview of the most
overarching challenges among societally and culturally diverse individuals
during the most severe public health crisis in recent history. We conclude this
paper by emphasizing the social importance of education and integrity con
cerning the host and sojourner group relations.
Notes
1. Texts directly retrieved from Statement from the U.S. Mission to China to U.S.
Citizens. https://china.usembassy-china.org.cn/zh/u-s-mission-china-statement
-to-american-citizens-2/
18 B. H. NAM ET AL.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Funding
This work was supported by the Wenzhou-Kean University Research Support
Programs [IRSPK2023004]; The 2024 Soft Science Program supported by Science
Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2024C25042].
ORCID
Benjamin H. Nam http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-4783
Alexander Scott English http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0142-146X
Kun Dai http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6947-7710
References
Bai, Q., and B. Nam. 2023. “Symbolic Power for Student Curators as Social Agents: The
Emergence of the Museum of World Languages at Shanghai International Studies
University During the COVID-19 Era.” Museum Management & Curatorship 38 (3):
317–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2023.2188473.
Bai, Q., B. H. Nam, and A. S. English. 2023. “Acculturation and Linguistic Ideology in the
Context of Global Student Mobility: A Cross-Cultural Ethnography of Anglophone
International Students in China.” Educational Review 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/
00131911.2023.2285253 .
Boss, P. 1999. Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief. Cambridge:
Harvard University.
Boss, P. 2010. “The Trauma and Complicated Grief of Ambiguous Loss.” Pastoral
Psychology 59 (2): 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-009-0264-0.
Bourdieu, P., and J. Passeron. 2000. Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. 2nd
ed. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Chi, R., H. Zhang, and S. Kulich. 2022. “A Collaborative Autoethnography of Developing
a ‘Cultural Stories’ Exercise for Intercultural Teaching in China.” Language and
Intercultural Communication 22 (5): 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.
2022.2112207.
Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2007. Basic Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures
for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. CA: SAGE.
Creswell, J. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five
Approaches. 3rd ed. CA: SAGE.
Dai, K., and I. Hardy. 2021. “The Micro-Politics of Cultural Change: A Chinese Doctoral
Student’s Learning Journey in Australia.” Oxford Review of Education 47 (2): 243–259.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1825369.
Dai, K., and I. Hardy. 2023. “Pursuing Doctoral Research in an Emerging Knowledge
Hub: An Exploration of International Students’ Experiences in China.” Studies in
Higher Education 48 (6): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2166917.
IDENTITIES: GLOBAL STUDIES IN CULTURE AND POWER 19
English, A., Y. Yang, R. Marshall, and B. Nam. 2022. “Social Support for International
Students Who Faced Emotional Challenges Midst Wuhan’s 76-Day Lockdown
During Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic.” International Journal of
Intercultural Relations 87:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.01.003.
Gitterman, A., and C. Knight. 2019. “Non-Death Loss: Grieving for the Loss of Familiar
Place and for Precious Time and Associated Opportunities.” Clinical Social Work
Journal 47 (2): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0682-5.
Gobo, G., and A. Molle. 2017. Doing Ethnography. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Horton, A., B. Russell, R. Tambling, H. Elias, and M. Mas. 2023. “Family Experiences of
Ambiguous Loss During COVID-19.” Family Relations 73 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.
1111/fare.12918.
Huang, J., G. Cook, and Y. Xie. 2021. “Between Reality and Perception: The Mediating
Effects of Mass Media on Public Opinion Toward China.” Chinese Sociological Review
53 (5): 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2021.1980720.
Li, X., K. Dai, and X. Zhang. 2023. Transnational Higher Education in China: Policies,
Practices, and Development in a (Post-) Pandemic Era. https://doi.org/10.1057/
s41307-023-00328-x.
Li, A., Z. Liu, M. Luo, and Y. Wang. 2021. “Human Mobility Restrictions and
Inter-Provincial Migration During the COVID-19 Crisis in China.” Chinese
Sociological Review 53 (1): 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2020.
1821183.
Liu, T., and Z. Lin. 2021. “Caring Masculinity as Caring Capital in the Field of Marriage:
Chinese Rural Migrant Men’s Engagement with Digital Dating.” Information,
Communication & Society 26 (8): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.
2020869.
Liu, Y., B. Nam, and Y. Yang. 2023. ““Revisiting Symbolic Power and Elite Language
Education in China: A Critical Narrative Ethnography of the English Education Major
at a Top Language University in Shanghai.” Educational Review 1–26. https://doi.
org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2184774.
Marginson, S. 2022. “Space and Scale in Higher Education: The Glonacal Agency
Heuristic Revisited.” Higher Education 84 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-
022-00955-0.
MFAPRC. 2022. ‘Foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning’s regular press conference.
Press and Media Service’. MFAPRC, November 16. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_
eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/202211/t20221116_10976372.html.
Murthy, D. 2008. “Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New
Technologies for Social Research.” Sociology 42 (5): 837–855. https://doi.org/10.
1177/0038038508094565.
Nam, B. 2023. “Promoting Global Citizenship And Multiculturalism In Higher
Education: the Korea International Cooperation Agency’s global volunteering in
the Asia Pacific Region.” Culture and Education 35 (1): 218–257. https://doi.org/10.
1080/11356405.2022.2133284.
Nam, B., and A. English. 2022. “Trauma-Informed Care: A Transcendental Phenomenology
of the Experiences of International Faculty During the Delta and Omicron Variant
Outbreaks in East China.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health 19 (11057): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711057.
Nam, B., and A. English. 2023. “Collective Resilience and Coping Mechanisms Among
International Faculty Members Amid Snap Lockdowns During the Delta and
Omicron Variant Outbreaks in East China.” Psychological Reports 1–28. https://doi.
org/10.1177/00332941231166614.
20 B. H. NAM ET AL.
Nam, B., A. English, X. Li, H. Van, and J. Nyman. 2023. “Subjectivities and the Future of
Comparative and International Education: Teacher Researchers and Graduate
Student Researchers as Co-Constructive Narrative Inquirers.” Educational Review
1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2159934.
Nam, B., and X. Jiang. 2021. “Aspiration for Cosmopolitan Capital and Ambiguous Loss:
Chinese Exchange Students’ Experiences in U.S. Higher Education Institutions
During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 43 (4): 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.2016372.
Nam, B., H. Weber, Y. Liu, and A. English. 2022. “The ‘Myth of Zero-COVID’ Nation:
A Digital Ethnography of Expats’ Survival Amid Shanghai Lockdown During the
Omicron Variant Outbreak.” International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health 19 (9047): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159047.
Nam, B., Y. Yang, and R. Draeger. 2023. “Intercultural Communication Between Chinese
College Students and Foreign Teachers Through the English Corner at an Elite
Language University in Shanghai.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations
93 (201776): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101776.
O’Dwyer, S. 2017. “Deflating the ‘Confucian Heritage Culture’ Thesis in Intercultural
and Academic English Education.” Language, Culture & Curriculum 30 (2): 198–211.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2016.1259321.
Pöllmann, A. 2013. “Intercultural Capital: Toward the Conceptualization,
Operationalization, and Empirical Investigation of a Rising Marker of Sociocultural
Distinction.” SAGE Open 3 (2): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013486117.
Qian, Y., and Y. Mao. 2021. “Coping with Cultural Differences in Healthcare: Chinese
Immigrant Mothers’ Health Information Sharing via WeChat.” International Journal
of Intercultural Relations 84:315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.05.001.
Ryan, L., U. Erel, and A. D’Angelo. 2015. Migration Capital: Networks, Identities and
Strategies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Song, Y. 2023. ““Does Chinese Philosophy Count as Philosophy?”: Decolonial
Awareness and Practices in International English Medium Instruction Programs.”
Higher Education 85: 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00842-8 .
Testoni, I., C. Azzola, N. Tribbia, G. Biancalani, E. Iacona, H. Orkibi, and B. Azoulay. 2021.
“The COVID-19 Disappeared: From Traumatic to Ambiguous Loss and the Role of
the Internet for the Bereaved in Italy.” Frontiers in Psychology 12 (620583): 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.620583.
WHO. 2023. ‘WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing −
5 May 2023’. WHO, May 5. https://www.who.int/news-room/speeches/item/who-
director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing—5-may-2023.
Xu, W. 2023. “Educating Global Africans: Possibilities of Chinese Language Learning in
International Higher Education.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10
(604): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02125-8.
Xu, W., G. Stahl, and H. Cheng. 2022. “The Promise of Chinese: African International
Students and Linguistic Capital in Chinese Higher Education.” Language and
Education 37 (4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2074797.