TITLE 4: “THE ROLE OF ANALOGY IS TO AID UNDERSTANDING RATHER THAN TO

PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION”

Word count: 1598

Analogies are known as one of the most significant ways that help students understand some

opinions and the capacity to remember these ideas for future applications when solving problem.

Successful outcomes can be seen from a variety of work sources. A clear justification can be

seen when one object is compared to the other along with their similarities. In this essay, the

association amid 'aiding understanding' as well as 'providing justification' will lead us through

the understanding of various areas of knowledge. The distinction between these critical words

provides a better insight into this analogy.

Provision of Justification can be explained in a way reasoning can be accepted based on

explanation which also helps in understanding of means retaining idea with low arguments.

Analogical reasoning is completely dependent on an analogy, while an analogical argument is an

explicit illustration of a system of analogical reasoning showcasing the comparisons prevailing

amid the two items. Ultimately, several analogies that concur with the same inference make the

opinion count. Metaphors are reflected on analogical figures of communication. Like analogies,

a metaphor explains that two objects are similar. Reasoning and argumentation enhance the

learning and teaching efficiency.

Metaphor aids in teaching as well as retention as it manifests a well-organized and structured

concept by mapping the sets of correspondents involved. For example, "all the world's a stage."

This metaphor allows one to find out the comparison of the world to a stage. Through this, the
 world is conceptualized as a stage where individuals on the earth are actors on this stage. It

builds an idea of fortune as well as fate. Justification of thought can be the main concept for

analogical approach. Analogical reasoning can be better way of understanding History whereas

Science is based on analogical argumentation of facts given by the scientists.

In an historical perspective, it is visible that the significance of analogy is to provide better

understanding rather than providing validation. Analogical reasoning application is significant in this

concept because it vividly describes past activities. The application of this reasoning is accomplished

from an ethnographic similarity. Ethnography is a kind of similarity used to give interpretation of

non-observable actions of the early people of a prehistoric values on the basis resemblance of their

items to those used by people existing in the present world. Archaeologists often apply ethnographic

analogies in various ways; this analogy is heuristically established through examinations and the

appearances of an item from archaeological evidence. The above reasoning creates an imagination

relating to historical society's norms. Also, ethnographic information gathered is then combined and

the data is compared with physical science information to provide valid clarification. Historical

approaches maximize the use of ethnographic as well as historical sources to give assumptions of

analogies between persons who lived in prehistoric times. For example, ethnographic analogy is when

archaeologists used the analogy that prehistoric stones were fossils, and they were formed as a result

of meteorites falling in the sky or formed through a natural process. However, scholars in the

archaeologist field, questioned whether the view of fossils was true. It was then discovered that

Europeans who lived during the agrarian revolution used to make their tools from stones.

However, the historical area of knowledge has been made significant to the present. It is possible to

come up with policy justification from historical ideologies. The policymakers have made ancient

metaphors significant in the current century. Through analogical reasoning, they have drafted policies
in relation to history. Analogical reasoning has become significant, too, in decision making. Over the

years, it has become a vigorous idea of informed policy justification (Gonzalezz and Wong, 2015).

The role of historical analogical reasoning in justification of public policies has been noted to shed

light on how lessons can be learned through its past occurrence. Although, over the past years,

analogies in policy creation have become more politicized. Historical analogies are majorly debated

to give the audience a greater outlook on the current events related to past events giving room for

more improvement and lessons to note. For example, the United States of America, scholars,

policymakers, and other decision-makers have repeatedly used historical analogies in defending their

policies. After the First World War, policymakers in the United States of America kept on referring to

the "lessons from history" as the anticipated for the war with other countries. A great example of how

they learned from history is how they responded to the 9/11 attack back in the year 2001 in

comparison to other similar attacks. Besides that, another justification of lessons from the past was

back in the World economic forum where China and Japan rising economic growth was compared to

a similar tension between Britain and German previously. As much as historical analogies are

substantial, there exist some factors that affect its strength. These include the variability of the

examples, shared similarities in the analogy, and the relevance of the analogy to modern activities.

The main implication of historical analogy in decision making is that decision-makers may fail to

notice important ways of providing solutions to a problem. Therefore, it is acceptable to say history

analogies are employed for both aiding of understanding and for justification of concepts.

Under natural disciplines, usually the importance of analogical views, is to make a factual

explanation instead of understanding. The reasoning in this concept under natural sciences, is that

they are generally experimental, while physical indication can be attained to offer justification.

Analogy in the field of science is used to establish a comprehensive insight into expectations,
clarifications, and enquiries about a phenomenon. The perspective of science has experienced

fluctuations over the time. The application of this methodology as well as the formal logical

illustration has been broadly embraced. Innovative methodologies have been initiated, making it

easier for the public to connect to this analogy. Two objects provide an analogy if there is a

correlation between them. This model explains that information from one object is related to the other

with some specified attributes. Analogies in science is influenced by the constant relation between

two objects. They should resemble goods that complement each other i.e., one object depends on the

other to function fully. An example of this similarity is the flow of blood in respective vessels. It

corresponds a representation of water flowing through a pipe. Blood flows through the blood vessels

depending on the size as well as the viscosity of the vessels. From the example, there is a connection

amid the blood its vessels based on its characteristic that enables its functionality. Not only does

Analogies helps in understanding but also define thoughts and detail perceptions into the proposition.

Human body have several biological associations with each other, showing that analogies can be

justified. The thoughts explain above demystify the misconception of the experimental analogy

between the pipe and blood vessels. This states that analogy aids in giving justification rather than

understanding.

Analogical reasoning in terms of science and explanation is the important form of reasoning

which is been proved through many scientific theories. Through the development of these

theories which will involve comparison and contrast between dual reasoning which will lead to

elaborated theory, hence such type of theories can be achieved through reasoning which can be

called analogical abduction. Well explained and meaningful theories should be known by

scientific communities.
 Darwin's theory of natural selection serves as an essential example of analogical abduction.

The theory explains how organism naturally change over time due to genetic behaviors or physical

traits. Such variations allow the organism to endure in an environment and reproduce more. It is a

theory supported by a variety of natural science such genetics, biology, and paleontology. Darwin was

able to create as well as justify the explained diversity among natural resources. It's a clear indication

that diversity of life is subject to changes in the population through natural selection. Therefore,

analogy provides both understanding and justification ideology and concepts in natural science.

Illusion created in the minds of people is termed vital if defined analogy.

Also, it assists individuals to pledge crucial steps moving towards making a more meaningful

comprehension. People are inclined to think that analogy goes beyond the overarching because

human beings desire to be understood by others as well as to understand them. Individuals' beliefs,

ideas, plus beliefs are vital since they represent a section of who humans areas well as how they want

to express themselves to others or colleagues in a clear manner. Thus, an analogy is responsible for

connecting the gap into the complex ideas people need to explain to others. The moment the initial

comprehension is achieved, human beings can continue to enhance their learning.

Analogies often make a contrast, for instance, regardless of individual level of knowledge or

experience, it always provides concepts which boosts a better understanding of something people, an

idea, ancient activities, and many more. People do not attempt to give justification or proof by

themselves of an idea through analogy. Mostly, individuals use analogical application to achieve the

outcome of their reasons or even help people close to them in understanding the concept. Hence,

analogies assist in giving understanding relative to providing justification because general

comprehension is referred to as justification, which provides valid proof for all. The key purpose is

not to show validation; but to provide better understanding. However, it simply gives reasoning
alongside it because it exists as the best proof rather than letting someone discover knowledge,

indication, understanding amongst themselves and within their minds.