You are on page 1of 10

NEBOSH

DO – CONTROLLING WORKPLACE HEALTH ISSUES


(INTERNATIONAL)

UNIT ID2:
For: NEBOSH International Diploma for Occupational Health and Safety
Management Professionals

Guidance to learners

This assessment is not invigilated, and you are free to use any learning resources to which you have
access, eg your course notes, or the HSE website, etc.

By submitting this completed assessment for marking, you are declaring it is entirely your own work.
Knowingly claiming work to be your own when it is someone else’s work is malpractice, which carries
severe penalties. This means that you must not collaborate with or copy work from others. Neither
should you ‘cut and paste’ blocks of text from the Internet or other sources.

The examination begins with a scenario to set the scene. You will then need to complete a series of
tasks based on this scenario. Each task will consist of one or more questions.

Your responses to most of these tasks should wholly, or partly, draw on relevant information from the
scenario. The task will clearly state the extent to which this is required.

The marks available are shown in brackets to the right of each question, or part of each question.
This will help guide you to the amount of information required in your response. In general, one mark
is given for each correct technical point that is clearly demonstrated. Avoid writing too little as this
will make it difficult for the Examiner to award marks. Single word answers or lists are unlikely to
gain marks as this would not normally be enough to show understanding or a connection with the
scenario.

You will have 4 weeks (20 working days) to complete the assessment.
Please refer to your registration confirmation email for the upload deadline.
Please note that NEBOSH will be unable to accept your assessment once the deadline has passed.
You must use the available answer template.

ID2-0004-ENG-OBE-QP-V1 May23 © NEBOSH 2023 page 1 of 9


SCENARIO

Established in 1998, Nutripex is a manufacturer of a wide range of vitamins and food supplements for
supply to supermarkets. Most of the products, such as Vitamin C, are solid tablets; some products,
such as Vito-iron, are in liquid form.

Nutripex operates in a modern industrial unit, consisting of a large production department, some
office space, and a warehouse. There are 150 workers at the site, and the majority of these work in
the production department. There is a break room and changing area with lockers that workers can
use. The workers are allowed two 15-minute breaks and a 30 minute break for lunch during a normal
8-hour shift. There is an early and late shift operating five days a week.

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is provided to all workers in the form of earplugs, safety
glasses, disposable dust masks and overalls. All workers wear the overalls provided, to protect their
own clothes. The use of the rest of the PPE provided is sporadic. The dust masks are particularly
unpopular with workers who have beards.

Vitamin and food-supplement production

Mixing
The vitamins and supplements are made within the production department, which consists of three
main areas: mixing, tableting and packaging. The production manager (PM) is responsible for all the
workers in these areas. The mixing area is particularly busy and noisy, as it has five mixing
machines (designated by the letters A to E) often operating simultaneously.

At the start of the production of a batch of product, raw materials are emptied into the mixing vessels
at the charging point above the mixer. Most of the raw materials are usually in the form of powders,
in 25kg sacks. There are typically 30 sacks of raw materials added to each batch. To empty the
contents of one of these sacks into the mixing vessel the ‘rip and tip’ method is used. This involves
the worker standing on a platform that provides access to the charging point, holding the sack, while
cutting the end open with a knife. The sack contents are then poured into the mixing vessel. The
empty sacks are then flattened and stacked nearby. It takes around an hour to add all the raw
materials to the mixing vessel at the start of each batch. Workers often complain about getting too
hot while carrying out this work.

During the production, dust can be seen in the air, even though there is local exhaust ventilation
(LEV) at the charging point. There have been complaints from some of the workers about the dust,
especially when handling vitamin C (ascorbic acid) powder. Workers also point out that there is a
thin layer of dust on most surfaces, not just at the charging point, but throughout the production
department. As a result of this, the PM has reviewed the raw material safety data sheet (SDS) for
vitamin C powder. The vitamin C powder is described as non-hazardous and there is no
occupational exposure limit assigned. Therefore, the PM has concluded that a hazardous substance
risk assessment for the handling of this raw material is not required.

On any given day, any one of the mixing machines may be mixing a different product from any of the
other machines. However, the weekly production schedule for a specific mixing vessel is often the
same, with certain days allocated to the production of a particular product. For example, if one
product is being manufactured all day in one mixing vessel, it is likely that up to three batches of that
product will be made in one day. Usually, two batches in the morning (starting at 09.00 and 11.00)
and one batch in the afternoon (starting at 14.00).

When all of the raw materials are sufficiently blended in the mixing machine, the product is moved to
the tableting machine. When manufacturing vitamin tablets, the particle size is extremely important
in determining how well the product will run through the tableting machine. When the raw materials
such as vitamin C powder are delivered, information about the particle size distribution is provided by
the supplier.

ID2-0004-ENG-OBE-QP-V1 May23 © NEBOSH 2023 page 2 of 9


LEV ducting runs throughout the whole production department. This ducting is often fixed high above
the machines, with branch ducts to the charging points for each of the five mixing machines A to E,
and tableting machines 1 and 2. There are a number of joints in the ducting; not all of them are
sealed well and dust can be seen escaping in some places. The mixing machines and surfaces that
workers can reach are cleaned down regularly as part of the weekly production schedule.

Tableting
In the tableting area the product makes its way through several processes, including a punch press;
here, pressure is applied to the product by dies to form the completed tablet. The tablets are ejected
onto a vibrating belt to shake off any loose dust. The two tableting machines are particularly noisy.

In this area, there is a long run of LEV ducting that branches to two hoods, one for each tableting
machine. Some of this ducting is sagging in places and has adhesive tape wrapped around the
joints. In most cases this has made the sagging worse.

Nearby is the LEV dust-collector and air-cleaner unit. Workers in this area are responsible for
changing the collection bags and have commented on how, recently, the bags are taking much
longer to fill up. Also located here is the fan for the LEV system. When the fan is running it is very
difficult to have a conversation in this area. Workers are supplied with earplugs, that are not used
regularly. When questioned, workers frequently say that they have lost one or both of their earplugs.

Several workers, including Worker Y, have been working in the tableting area since they joined
Nutripex, 18 months ago. They had all previously worked in a nearby drinks-bottling plant, that was
making people redundant just as Nutripex was recruiting for more production workers.

Packaging
The final stage in the process of producing vitamins and supplements is packaging. Once the tablets
are packaged, they are labelled, boxed, and placed on pallets. The pallets of finished product are
shrink-wrapped and stored in the warehouse before despatch to customers.

The warehouse is used for the storage of raw materials and finished products. The warehouse
manager (WM) has a team of forklift truck (FLT) drivers and warehouse workers. This is also where
the maintenance team are located. All of these workers have a good working relationship, and this
extends to frequent social events outside of work.

Worker X

Recently, several of the workers in the warehouse have been concerned about Worker X, one of the
FLT drivers. There have been several occasions when Worker X has been reported to the WM for
driving erratically. The WM has suggested to Worker X that they attend an FLT driver refresher
training course, but so far Worker X has been reluctant to do this.

It is 26 April, and in the warehouse the early shift is about to start. Worker W (one of the other FLT
drivers) is awaiting the arrival of their colleague, Worker X. They have worked together for a long
time and have formed a strong bond over the years. Recently, Worker W has expressed concern,
because Worker X hardly spends any time talking to them and does not laugh and joke or socialise,
as they used to. The two workers used to spend breaks and lunch together in the break room, but
this has recently stopped. The early shift has started, and Worker W goes to get on with their job.

An hour into the shift, Worker X arrives for work and goes into the changing area. Worker W follows
them and asks if they are feeling alright, showing typical concern for their colleague’s wellbeing.
Worker X mutters that they are ‘fine’ and that they wish everyone would leave them alone. Worker W
is concerned about their friend, but decides not to question them any further.

The WM is going through the job sheets with Workers X and W, indicating there are five urgent
despatch jobs that must be finished today. The WM jokes with Worker X about them being late for
the second time that week, and Worker X makes the same excuse as a previous time.
ID2-0004-ENG-OBE-QP-V1 May23 © NEBOSH 2023 page 3 of 9
During the morning it has again been reported to the WM that Worker X has been driving the FLT
erratically. The WM makes a mental note to speak to Worker X later, when the shift is coming to an
end. In the meantime, the WM decides to have a quiet word with Worker W.

Worker W feels awkward and does not want to make things worse for Worker X, but does mention to
the WM that the team are concerned about Worker X. Worker W also has suspicions that Worker X
may have problems at home, as they are drinking a lot of alcohol and seem to be taking longer
breaks.

Half an hour after lunch, the WM is in their office preparing for an off-site meeting with an important
customer, when they see Worker X reverse into a pallet of finished product that was on the urgent
despatch list. The WM is angered by this, especially because they are in a rush to get to their
meeting. They phone the CEO and ask them to speak to Worker X. The WM quickly explains to the
CEO what has been happening recently, the suspicions raised by other workers, and about the
incident that has just occurred.

The CEO does not want to hear excuses when they speak to Worker X. The CEO immediately
accuses Worker X of being drunk at work and says that this will not be tolerated. They issue a
warning to Worker X and state that if anything like this happens again, they will be immediately
dismissed from their job. Before Worker X can say anything, the CEO tells them to go home and
sober up!

Involvement of specialists
The PM has taken some noise readings at various points within the tableting area, as part of a risk
assessment. This has never been done before. Noise levels have been found to be between 84
dB(A) and 86 dB(A). Because of these findings the human resources (HR) manager engaged a
consultant from Healthy and Safe (HaS) to carry out more detailed noise measurements and advise
on noise reduction methods and a health surveillance programme. Based on HaS’s
recommendations, the HR manager is introducing audiometry testing for all existing workers in the
tableting department and any new workers going forward.

Workers remain concerned about the levels of dust, so Nutripex have decided to engage an
Occupational Hygienist (OH) to help review exposure of workers to vitamin C powder and other raw
materials. Some initial results of the OH’s work are given in supporting document 1.

In the last couple of weeks there have been frequent alarms on the LEV control panel. As a result of
this, the PM arranged for a thorough inspection and test (TExT) of the LEV, which has just been
completed by a competent external contractor, AirTest. The PM is looking through the results and
recommendations in AirTest’s report. One of the recommendations is to change the current design
of the LEV at the charging point where raw materials are added to the mixing machines.

The PM and HR manager have now met with the OH to go through the dust exposure measurements
and decide what to do next. The OH agrees that the LEV design change recommended by AirTest
would be helpful, but understands that this will take some time.

In the meantime, the OH is concerned about the levels of dust exposure and recommends that
workers handling vitamin C powder should wear tight-fitting respiratory protective equipment (RPE).
The OH has made recommendations about the specific type of RPE and the PM says that they will
help ensure that it is used, just as soon as it arrives from the supplier.

ID2-0004-ENG-OBE-QP-V1 May23 © NEBOSH 2023 page 4 of 9


Supporting Documents
1. Information about workers’ exposure to vitamin C
2. Email about Worker X
3. Section of LEV system in tableting department
4. Current and recommended LEV designs at mixing vessel charging point
5. Health surveillance findings

ID2-0004-ENG-OBE-QP-V1 May23 © NEBOSH 2023 page 5 of 9


Task 1: Hazardous substance risk assessment

1 The occupational hygienist (OH) has made some initial measurements of dust
levels and gathered other information relating to exposure of workers to
vitamin C powder. All of this information is provided in supporting document
1.

(a) Explain what the OH should have considered when planning to measure
workers’ personal dust exposure levels. (15)
Note: You should support your answer, where applicable, using relevant
information from the scenario and the relevant supporting document.

(b) Looking at the information in section 1 of supporting document 1


(i) give reasons why the OH decided to take these fixed place (static)
measurements of dust levels. (11)
Note: You should support your answer, where applicable, using
relevant information from the scenario and the relevant supporting
document.
(ii) comment on the limitations of this information when assessing the
risks to workers exposed to vitamin C powder. (8)
(iii) comment on what the numerical information indicates. (14)

(c) Consider how the information in section 2 of supporting document 1


could be used when assessing the risks of workers’ exposure to vitamin
C powder. (20)

(d) Based on all available information in the scenario and supporting


documents, what are the considerations when carrying out a hazardous
substance risk assessment for the handling of vitamin C powder by
workers at Nutripex? (33)
Note: You do not need to consider again the specific detail regarding
dust exposure information referred to in your answers to parts b (iii) and
c.

ID2-0004-ENG-OBE-QP-V1 May23 © NEBOSH 2023 page 6 of 9


Task 2: Alcohol problems at work

2 (a) (i) Based on the scenario only, what behaviours of Worker X suggest
that they may have an alcohol problem? (4)
(ii) Give SEVEN other behaviours, not referred to in the scenario, that
could indicate a worker has an alcohol problem. (7)

(b) Discuss if alcohol testing might be appropriate for all workers at


Nutripex. (4)

(c) The CEO wants to set up alcohol testing (see supporting document 2).

What is the HR manager likely to outline to the CEO in relation to


(i) worker contractual considerations? (8)
(ii) practical considerations? (16)

(d) Explain why the actions taken by the CEO in relation to Worker X after
the incident on 26 April were NOT appropriate. (12)
Notes: You are not required to suggest what actions should have been
taken instead.
You should support your answer, where applicable, using relevant
information from the scenario and supporting document 2.

(e) Other than any reference to alcohol testing, outline what else should be
included in an alcohol policy for Nutripex. (22)
Note: You should support your answer, where applicable, using relevant
information from the scenario.

ID2-0004-ENG-OBE-QP-V1 May23 © NEBOSH 2023 page 7 of 9


Task 3: LEV effectiveness

3 According to HSG 258 (A guide to local exhaust ventilation) a local exhaust


ventilation (LEV) thorough examination and test (TExT) involves three stages.
The first of these three stages is a ‘visual and structural examination’ of the
LEV.

(a) (i) Based on the scenario only, what indicators suggest that there
may be a problem with the LEV system? (8)
(ii) What else should those carrying out the TExT do during this first
stage? (12)

The second stage of the LEV TExT is a review of the technical performance;
this includes measuring. In the diagram in supporting document 3, three
possible locations (marked X, Y and Z) for measuring duct velocity are shown.

(b) (i) What features make a suitable location for measuring duct
velocity? (4)
(ii) Discuss the suitability of EACH of these test locations when
measuring duct velocity. (12)
Note: You must discuss locations X, Y and Z in your answer.

(c) Identify FOUR measurements, other than duct velocity, that could be
made during the second stage of the LEV TExT. (4)

One of the recommendations made in the recent LEV TExT report is to


change the current design of the LEV at the mixing vessel charging points.
The current and recommended designs are shown in supporting document
4.

(d) Explain how the recommended new LEV design, shown in figure 2 of
supporting document 4, will help to reduce the exposure of workers
when working at the mixing vessel charging point. (18)
Note: You should support your answer, where applicable, using relevant
information from the scenario and the relevant supporting document.

ID2-0004-ENG-OBE-QP-V1 May23 © NEBOSH 2023 page 8 of 9


Task 4: Noise and health surveillance

4 (a) Suggest reasons why audiometry testing has been recommended for
workers in the tableting department at Nutripex. (9)

(b) (i) Discuss what the information in supporting document 5 shows. (9)
(ii) Using the HSE’s L108 appendix 4, explain how the information in
supporting document 5 could be used to aid decision making
with a hearing health surveillance programme at Nutripex. (10)
(iii) Use the numerical information in the shaded area of supporting
document 5 and in appendix 4 of L108 to determine the outcome
of the audiometry testing for Worker Y. (12)
Note: You should use simple calculations to support your answer.

(c) Based on the information in supporting document 5


(i) what effects on their hearing could Worker Y be experiencing? (4)
(ii) describe the likely physical changes in the inner ears of Worker Y. (6)

(d) Comment on why introducing audiometry testing for some workers might
be problematic for Nutripex. (8)

(e) Audiometry testing may sometimes not produce an accurate


representation of the effects of noise exposure on the hearing of
Nutripex workers.

Give reasons why this may be the case with Worker Y. (10)
Note: You should support your answer, where applicable, using relevant
information from the scenario.

End of examination

Now follow the instructions on submitting your answers.

ID2-0004-ENG-OBE-QP-V1 May23 © NEBOSH 2023 page 9 of 9

You might also like