2023.02.15 PoC Technical Report PTA

THU DAU MOT UNIVERSITY
Technical Report
Proof of Concept (PoC) project of the CO2

reduction of the electric scooter as a mean for
the green Grab service in Thu Dau Mot City,
Binh Duong province
Execution Unit
INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, THU DAU MOT

UNIVERSITY
Binh Duong Province, February 2023

CONTENT SUMMARY
This technical report presents the proof of concept (PoC) project of the CO2
reduction of the electric scooter as a mean for the green GrabBike service in Thu Dau
Mot City, Binh Duong Province at the request of BlueWing Motors Co., Ltd. (hereinafter
“BWM”). 10 electric scooters named Pega AuraS were purchased for testing.
Accordingly, 10 students selected by interview participated in driving electric motorcycles
as Grab drivers. GPS devices were attached to the vehicles to record the distance
travelled, which would be physically checked and assessed. The testing procedures and
testing equipments are agreed according to the contract No. 325/HD-TDMU between the
BWM and Thu Dau Mot university (hereinafter “TDMU”). The Institute of Engineering and
Technology, Thu Dau Moi University (hereinafter “IET-TDMU”) was the representative
unit for TDMU to directly perform this test. When the project was completed, all the data
collected could be assessed collectively so that the amount of CO 2 reduction of the
electric scooter by comparing it with the assumed comparative example of motorcycles
powered by gasoline engines can be evaluated.
The PoC project was conducted between September 18, 2022 and November 04,
2022. This technical report is presented with the following main contents:
1. Measurement of the traveled distance of the Pega Aura S electric scooter for one full
charging condition.
2. Measurement of the daily traveled distance collected from the GPS devices of the 10
electric scooter Pega AuraS.
3. Estimation of the amount of CO2 reduction of the electric scooter by comparing it with
the assumed comparative example of motorcycles powered by gasoline engines
Noted: The experimental results in this technical report are true only for the
investigated cases with the defined test objects and the test conditions which have
been carried out in the PoC project.
i
TABLE OF CONTENT
CONTENT SUMMARY i
TABLE OF CONTENT ii
1. Objective of the PoC project 1
2. Implementation process 1
2.1. Experimental object 1
2.2. Testing process 5
3. Results and discussion 8
3.1. Traveled distance for one full charging condition 8
3.2. Daily traveled distance collected from the GPS device 10
3.3. Estimation of the CO2 reduction of the electric scooter 15
CONCLUSIONS 18
REFERENCES 19
APPENDIX 20
ii
1. Objective of the PoC project
The goal of the Proof of Concept (PoC) project is to estimate the amount of CO2
reduction of the electric scooter as a mean for the green GrabBike service in Thu Dau
Mot City, Binh Duong Province. The main contents can be as follows:
 Measuring the traveled distance of the Pega AuraS electric scooter for one full
charging condition.
 Measuring the daily traveled distance collected from the GPS devices of the 10
electric scooter Pega AuraS.
 Estimating the amount of CO2 reduction of the electric scooter by comparing it
with the assumed comparative example of motorcycles powered by gasoline
engines.
2. Implementation process
2.1. Experimental object
2.1.1. Tested electric scooter
Figures 1 & 2 show an image of the tested electric scooter used in the PoC project
named PEGA AuraS and the vehicle specifications, respectively. As provided by the
manufacturer [1], the distance traveled per charging under standard condition is 100
km with the type of the accumulator of 60V-20Ah.
Figure 1: The tested electric scooter – PEGA AuraS
Page 1
Figure 2: The PEGA AuraS specifications
2.1.2. GPS devices
The global positioning system (GPS) tracker named PT08 with real time function
vehicle tracking device was used in this PoC project to measure the daily traveled
distance. Figure 3 illustrates the image of GPS tracker PT08 attached in the tested
electric scooter, while its specifications are listed in Table 1 [2].
Figure 3: The PT08 GPS device attached in the tested electric scooter
Page 2
Table 1: The specification of the GPS tracker PT08
No. Content Specifications
1 Dimension 80mm x 40mm x 10mm
2 Weight 48.5g
3 Network GSM/GPRS
4 Band 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
5 GPS sensitivity -159dBm
6 GPS accuracy <5m
7 Time to first fix Cold status: < 38s
Warm status: < 15s
Hot status: < 2s
8 Input voltage 7.5 VDC-90 VDC
9 Backup battery 270mAh
10 GPS tracker PT08 was mounted in the 10 tested electric scooter PEGA AuraS.
GPS tracker PT08 can locate the vehicle position via highly sensitive GPS and GSM
receiver chip built into the device. All the collected data can be physically checked and
assessed via the domain of GPS tracking service provider in Vietnam [3]. Figure 4
shows the realtime interface of the GPS tracking software from the web browser where
the vehicle's travel history, the report data of the traveled distance, and the period of
stopping and parking modes can be monitored.
Figure 4: The realtime interface of the GPS tracking software from the web browser
Page 3
2.1.3. Selection of the PoC paticipants
TDMU students who have worked or been willing to work as Grab drivers with a
maximum travel distance not exceeding 40 km a day were directly interviewed by the
BWM Co. Ltd. to select 10 candidates to participate in the project implementation. All
participants traveled using the PEGA AuraS electric scooter and registered as Grab
drivers [4] as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5: 10 students participated in the PoC project registered as Grab drivers
Figure 6 shows the Grab services for motorcycle including: Grab Bike, Grab Food,
Grab Delivery, and Grab Mart. It can be seen in Figure 7 that most of the students
chose Grab Food service in this PoC project for their registration. Unlike Grab Bike or
Grab Express (i.e. customers are scattered everywhere), Grab Food customers often
gather in famous food or drink areas, where many restaurants are located in the city
Page 4
center. Therefore, this kind of Grab service was selected by most of student since the
TDMU location is in city center where many famous restaurants locate near by. Beside,
the peak-off time of TDMU student class schedule is very suitable with the peak time
of Grab Food ordering, so this is the main reason to explain the selection of 10
participants in the PoC project.
Figure 6: Grab services for motorcycle [5]
11
No. of Student selection of Grab Service
10
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1
0 0
0
Grab Food Grab Bike Grab Delivery Grab Mart
Figure 7: Number of student selection of Grab service
2.2. Testing process

10 PEGA AuraS electric scooters were purchased and registered for their license
plate as described in Table 2. After completing the license plate registration, the 10
GPS Tracker PT08 devices were attached to the tested PEGA AuraS electric scooter
Page 5
to collect the experimental data during the PoC project.
Table 2: License plate registration number of the 10 PoC participants
No. Name of participant License plate No.
1 Tran Van Duong 61-MĐ1 005.87
2 Nguyen Thanh Quang 61-MĐ1 005.32
Nguyen Thi Thuy
3 61-MĐ1 005.30
Trang
4 Tong Dai Thu 61-MĐ1 005.68
5 Vo Tan Ban 61-MĐ1 005.49
6 Nguyen Xuan Huy 61-MĐ1 005.55
7 Vo Duc Tai 61-MĐ1 005.85
8 Duong Ngo Chi Trung 61-MĐ1 005.59
9 Luu Hung Cuong 61-MĐ1 005.36
10 Le Truong Kha 61-MĐ1 005.86
There was no requirement for when to travel, meaning participants could decide
when they start and stop travelling if they fulfill the daily distance required. All participants
were required to weekly submit their travel data to a person assigned to the data collection
job. Data were collected manually, meaning participants should visit the person collecting
data in a regular manner on specific days. The person in charge of data collection
examined and checked the data validity to ensure the participants only provided data
correctly. Project schedule would be from September 18th, 2022 to November 04th, 2022
(07 weeks). When the project was completed, all the data collected could be assessed
collectively so that the amount of CO2 reduction of the electric scooter by comparing it
with the assumed comparative example of motorcycles powered by gasoline engines can
be evaluated. Summary of the main obtained results of the PoC project can be as follows:
 Measurement of the traveled distance of the Pega AuraS electric scooter for one
full charging condition.
 Measurement of the daily traveled distance collected from the GPS devices of the
10 electric scooter Pega AuraS.
 Estimation of the amount of CO2 reduction of the electric scooter by comparing it
with the assumed comparative example of motorcycles powered by gasoline
engines.
The entire testing process above is illustrated in detail in Figure 8.
Page 6
Phase 3: 18th September - 04th November, 2022
1. Project starts
2. Interim check
3. Project concludes
Phase 4:
1. Report preparation
2. Report submitted
Start End
Phase 2: 1st September – 17th September, 2022

1. Electric scooters delivered to TDMU
2. GPS traking device installation
3. Data collection preparation
4. Vehicle registration
Phase 1: 1st August – 31th August, 2022

1. PoC proposal submitted to TDMU
2. Contract made for the project
3. Participants selection and contract signed
Figure 8: Test plan for the PoC project with the PEGA AuraS electric scooters
Page 7
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Traveled distance for one full charging condition

Figure 9 shows the testing route for measuring the traveled distance of the
Pega AuraS electric scooter for one full charging condition. The starting and
destination points were at district Go Vap, Ho Chi Minh city and the TDMU location,
Binh Duong province, respectively and vice versa. The PEGA AuraS has a total of
03 driving modes including “I”, “II”, and “III” (shown in Figure 10) which could be
selected based on the desired maximum vehicle speed and the response sensitivity
of traction force of the hub electric motor. The driving mode of “I” limits the maximum
speed of the electric scooter below 25 km/h while the driver’s controllability of the
traction force of the electric scooter can be easily adjusted. This mode is commonly
used in city road conditions where traffic jams often occur during rush hour. The
maximum speed of the electric scooter can be increased up to 30 and 40 km/h,
respectively with the selection of the “II” and “III” driving modes. It can be inferred
that the driving mode of “III” can be used in city road conditions where the traffic is
clear.
Table 3: The experimental results of the traveled distance of the PEGA AuraS
No. Traveled distance per full charge
(km)
1 47.1
2 45.9
3 42.6
Average traveled distance 45.2
(km)
To perform the measurement of the traveled distance, the accumulator of the

PEGA AuraS electric scooter was fully charged. The driving mode of “III” was
selected to simulate conditions for the delivery of Grab Food in Thu Dau Mot city with
an average speed of the tested electric scooter varying from 30 to 40 km/h. Table 3
shows the experimental results of the traveled distance of the PEGA AuraS, while
Figure 11 compares the results of the traveled distance per charge announced by
the manufacturer under the standard conditions with the experimental results when
selecting the “III” driving mode. It can be seen that the average mileage is much
Page 8
lower than that of the manufacturer's announcement. The lower mileage of the
experimental results could be explained due to the continuous use of high speed
range of the driving mode “III” (i.e. lower electric motor efficiency region); thus leading
to the decrease in traveled distance of the tested electric scooter. Consequently, the
R&D activities for the PEGA AuraS controller are necessarily conducted to improve
the traveled distance per charge of the tested electric scooter.
Figure 9: Testing route for measuring the traveled distance of the Pega AuraS
Figure 10: The 03 driving modes of the tested PEGA AuraS electric scooter
Page 9
120
Traveled distance per charge (km)

100
100
80
60
45.2
40
20
0
Manufacturer at standard condition Experimental result
Figure 11: Comparison of the traveled distance per charge announced by the
manufacturer at the standard condition and that of the experimental result
3.2. Daily traveled distance collected from the GPS device

Figure 12 – 18 shows the comparison of the traveled distance per week of the
10 tested PEGA AuraS electric scooters from the 1st week to the 7th week of the PoC
project, respectively. From the obtained results, it can be seen that the maximum
traveled distance per week was 405.13 km (shown in Figure 13) while the minimum
traveled distance was 13.14 km (shown in Figure 14).
Figure 19 further shows the comparison of the average traveled distance per
week of the 10 tested PEGA AuraS electric scooters from the 1st week to the 7th week
of the PoC project with the range of traveled distance from 145.8 to 246.7 km. The
average traveled distance per day was then calculated and shown in Figure 20. It can
be said that the range of average traveled distance per day of the 10 tested PEGA
AuraS electric scooters varied from 23.7 to 35.2 km/day. As per discussion in the
section 3.1, the maximum traveled distance per charge was 45.2 km; therefore, it might
perhaps be concluded that the selection of PEGA AuraS electric scooter for the PoC
project is appropriate for the students who work as grab drivers.
Finally, the traveled distance of the 10 tested PEGA AuraS electric scooters
during the PoC project are compared in Figure 21. The maximum traveled distance
during the PoC project was 2204 km, while the minimum value was 916 km. Since
the participants are students, the total traveled distance may depend on their class
schedule every week and the receiving orders provided by Grab applications. The
further results of the PoC project in detail can be seen in the Appendix of this technical
Page 10
report.
400
371.48
350 1st week

Traveled distance per week (km)
300
240.76
250
202.54 210.29
200
148.37 145.91 155
150
109.26 101.28
100 83.89
50
0
61-MĐ1 61-MĐ1 61-MĐ1 61-MĐ1 61-MĐ1 61-MĐ1 61-MĐ1 61-MĐ1 61-MĐ1 61-MĐ1
005.87 005.32 005.30 005.68 005.49 005.55 005.85 005.59 005.36 005.86
Figure 12: Comparison of the traveled distance per week of the 10 tested PEGA AuraS
electric scooters in the 1st week of the PoC project
450
405.13
400
2nd week
350
304.4
300
250
192.45 184.15
200
143.68 139.98
150
108.6 118.31
106.92
100
63.16
50
0
005.87 005.32 005.30 005.68 005.49 005.55 005.85 005.59 005.36 005.86
electric scooters in the 2nd week of the PoC project
Page 11
400
350 328.98
3rd week
300 274.94
250 221.77
213.56
200
151.9 153.58
150 130.39
103.41
100
67.67
50
13.14
0
005.87 005.32 005.30 005.68 005.49 005.55 005.85 005.59 005.36 005.86
electric scooters in the 3rd week of the PoC project
450
390.85
400
4th week
350 322.85
294.02
300
266.49
242.91
250
206.79
195.12 191.15
200 181.09 175.66
150
100
50
0
005.87 005.32 005.30 005.68 005.49 005.55 005.85 005.59 005.36 005.86
electric scooters in the 4th week of the PoC project
Page 12
450
400 5th week 383.21

350
317.22
293.68
300
266.12
250
207.3 215.03 220.57 207.95
200
165.51
150 121.49
100
50
0
005.87 005.32 005.30 005.68 005.49 005.55 005.85 005.59 005.36 005.86
350
6th week 309.1
300 282.22
250 240.23
221.06
204.35
200 181.65
152.42 159.48
150
107.78
94.23
100
50
0
005.87 005.32 005.30 005.68 005.49 005.55 005.85 005.59 005.36 005.86
Page 13
250
7th week 207.33 203.32

204.51
200 190.53
178.39
150
106.29 105.99 101.53

100
81.22 78.46
50
0
005.87 005.32 005.30 005.68 005.49 005.55 005.85 005.59 005.36 005.86
300
246.7
239.8
Average traveled distance per week [km]
250
195.3
200
176.9 176.7
165.9
145.8
150
100
50
0
1st week 2nd week 3rd week 4th week 5th week 6th week 7th week
Figure 19: Comparison of the average traveled distance per week of the 10 tested
PEGA AuraS electric scooters from the 1st week to the 7th week of the PoC project
Page 14
40
35.2
34.3
35
Average traveled distance per day [km]
30 27.9
25.3 25.2
23.7 24.3
25
20
15
10
0
1st week 2nd week 3rd week 4th week 5th week 6th week 7th week
Figure 20: Comparison of the average traveled distance per day of the 10 tested
PEGA AuraS electric scooters from the 1st week to the 7th week of the PoC project
2500
2204
2000 1925
1628
1500 1397
1215 1199
1028 1008
950 916
1000
500
0
005.87 005.32 005.30 005.68 005.49 005.55 005.85 005.59 005.36 005.86
Figure 21: Comparison of the traveled distance of the 10 tested PEGA AuraS electric
scooters during the PoC project
3.3. Estimation of the CO2 reduction of the electric scooter

Table 4 shows the assumptions for the comparative study, while Figure 22
Page 15
shows the estimating the amount of CO2 reduction of the tested electric scooter by
comparing it with the assumed comparative example of motorcycles powered by
gasoline engines. From the obtained results, it can be seen that the CO2 reduction
of the tested electric scooter with the 03 cases of maximum, average and minimum
traveled distance in the PoC project are 1.816; 01.11; and 0.755 ton of CO2e/year,
respectively. Additionally, 1 ton of CO2 saving per year is purchased with 35~40 USD
in Korea and Japan, and 85 USD in Europe; this could make electric motorcycles
become a very appealing solution that guarantees environmental sustainability and
opens up market opportunities for firms.
Table 4: The assumption of parameters to calculate the CO2 reduction of the tested
electric scooters
No. Content Value Note
1 Fuel economy of motorcycles 50 Ref. [5]
powered by gasoline engines
[km/l]
2 CO2 emission per km of 113 Ref. [6]
motorcycle powered by gasoline
engines [gCO2e/km]
3 Maximum travaled distance during 2204 Data can be
the PoC project (07 weeks or 48 found in
days) [km] Section 3.2
4 Minimum travaled distance during 916 Data can be
the PoC project (07 weeks or 48 found in
days) [km] Section 3.2
5 Average travaled distance during 1347 Data can be
the PoC project (07 weeks or 48 calculated
days) [km] from the data
in Appendix
Page 16
2
CO2 reduction by using the electric scooter [ ton CO2e/year]

1.816
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2 1.110
0.8 0.755
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Maximum traveled Minimum traveled Average traveled
distance distance distance
Figure 22: The estimation of the amount of CO2 reduction of the tested electric
scooter with the 03 cases of maximum, minimum and average traveled distance in
the PoC project
Page 17
CONCLUSIONS
The main conclusion can be withdrawn from this PoC project as follows:
 In this PoC project, the average traveled distance per charge of the tested
PEGA AuraS electric scooter was 45.2 km and much lower than that of the
manufacturer's announcement. This lower mileage could be explained due to
the continuous use of high speed range of the driving mode “III”; thus leading
to the decrease in traveled distance of the tested electric scooter.
Consequently, the R&D activities for the PEGA AuraS controller are
necessarily conducted to improve the traveled distance per charge of the
tested electric scooter.
 The average traveled distance per week of the 10 tested PEGA AuraS electric
scooters from the 1st week to the 7th week of the PoC project varied from 145.8
to 246.7 km; while the calculated average traveled distance per day was from
23.7 to 35.2 km/day. Hence, it might perhaps be concluded that the selection
of PEGA AuraS electric scooter for the PoC project is appropriate for the
students who work as grab drivers.
 The CO2 reduction of the tested electric scooter with the 03 cases of maximum,
average and minimum traveled distance in the PoC project are 1.816; 01.11;
and 0.755 ton of CO2e/year, respectively.
The strong will of the Vietnamese government to achieve carbon neutrality was
confirmed by the official announcement made on 25 July, 2022 under document
number of 888/QD-TTg, which poses urgency to the market. To that end, the PoC
project may initially provide solutions to acquire carbon rights and financial benefits by
establishing a green mobility ecosystem.
Page 18
REFERENCES
[1] https://www.pega.com.vn/aura.html
[2] https://www.dinhvinguyenviet.vn/san-pham/thiet-bi-dinh-vi-pt08-2
[3] http://www1.gpsnguyenviet.com/Realtime
[4] https://www.grab.com/vn/
[5] https://quantrimang.com/o-to-xe-may/muc-tieu-hao-nhien-lieu-cua-
cac-mau-xe-may-171268
[6] https://www.co2everything.com/co2e-of/motorbike
Page 19
APPENDIX
1st Week Traveled

License
distance
No. Name of participants plate
per week
No.
18/09/2022 19/09/2022 20/09/2022 21/09/2022 22/09/2022 23/09/2022 24/09/2022 [km]
61-MĐ1
1 Tran Van Duong 005.87 64.48 8.88 0 9.44 65.57 0 0 148.37
61-MĐ1
2 Nguyen Thanh Quang 005.32 27.86 33.93 6.26 6.93 15.75 10.27 8.26 109.26
61-MĐ1
3 Nguyen Thi Thuy Trang 005.30 52.59 8.62 15.05 17.05 18.05 17.05 17.5 145.91
61-MĐ1
4 Tong Dai Thu 005.68 13.75 19.46 8.06 11.55 31.46 12.38 4.62 101.28
61-MĐ1
5 Vo Tan Ban 005.49 14.55 63.94 56.33 68.84 68.48 53.4 45.94 371.48
61-MĐ1
6 Nguyen Xuan Huy 005.55 31.34 32.03 30.8 38.07 21.7 16.92 31.68 202.54
61-MĐ1
7 Vo Duc Tai 005.85 10.23 20.66 22.5 23.65 28.5 29.53 19.93 155
61-MĐ1
8 Duong Ngo Chi Trung 005.59 1.49 13.63 0.04 17.2 35.37 16.16 0 83.89
61-MĐ1
9 Luu Hung Cuong 005.36 13.54 47.88 51.33 8.4 48.81 30.89 9.44 210.29
61-MĐ1
10 Le Truong Kha 005.86 58.23 53.85 29.54 9.35 28.1 47.44 14.25 240.76
2nd Week Traveled

License
distance
per week
No.
25/09/2022 26/09/2022 27/09/2022 28/09/2022 29/09/2022 30/09/2022 01/10/2022 [km]
61-MĐ1
1 Tran Van Duong 005.87 27.05 13.72 22.39 0 0 0 0 63.16
61-MĐ1
61-MĐ1
61-MĐ1
4 Tong Dai Thu 005.68 16.38 32.5 45.65 18.56 27.8 51.56 0 192.45
61-MĐ1
5 Vo Tan Ban 005.49 57.05 56.51 30.41 64.7 51.39 35.69 8.65 304.4
61-MĐ1
6 Nguyen Xuan Huy 005.55 15.23 17.33 35.19 16.89 7.25 20.99 27.1 139.98
61-MĐ1
7 Vo Duc Tai 005.85 29.85 14.52 19.5 26.1 30.85 32.83 30.5 184.15
61-MĐ1
8 Duong Ngo Chi Trung 005.59 0 29.4 43.39 10.24 0.04 30.65 4.59 118.31
61-MĐ1
9 Luu Hung Cuong 005.36 9.37 37.12 51.7 63.22 90.03 91.47 62.22 405.13
61-MĐ1
10 Le Truong Kha 005.86 10.62 7.93 5.3 39.51 11.43 16.1 16.03 106.92
3rd Week Traveled

License
distance
per week
No.
02/10/2022 03/10/2022 04/10/2022 05/10/2022 06/10/2022 07/10/2022 08/10/2022 [km]
61-MĐ1
1 Tran Van Duong 005.87 0 25.24 18.64 8.37 15.57 35.59 0 103.41
61-MĐ1
61-MĐ1
61-MĐ1
4 Tong Dai Thu 005.68 0 62.06 14.17 10.31 4.79 41.97 20.28 153.58
61-MĐ1
5 Vo Tan Ban 005.49 8.88 7.68 25.88 31.53 18.49 91.7 90.78 274.94
61-MĐ1
6 Nguyen Xuan Huy 005.55 20.19 13.81 7.07 26.93 5.84 37.07 19.48 130.39
61-MĐ1
7 Vo Duc Tai 005.85 31.25 30.15 30.47 31.25 33.45 35.65 29.55 221.77
61-MĐ1
8 Duong Ngo Chi Trung 005.59 0 0 4.57 0 5.17 3.4 0 13.14
61-MĐ1
9 Luu Hung Cuong 005.36 31.67 59.73 71.61 32.81 33.46 58.64 41.06 328.98
61-MĐ1
10 Le Truong Kha 005.86 5.88 16.09 6.08 1.89 20.78 16.51 0.44 67.67
4th Week Traveled

License
distance
per week
No.
09/10/2022 10/10/2022 11/10/2022 12/10/2022 13/10/2022 14/10/2022 15/10/2022 [km]
61-MĐ1
1 Tran Van Duong 005.87 31 31.46 20.74 25.58 20.56 28.65 37.13 195.12
61-MĐ1
61-MĐ1
61-MĐ1
4 Tong Dai Thu 005.68 59.4 38.94 41.87 18.75 38.75 41.71 27.07 266.49
61-MĐ1
5 Vo Tan Ban 005.49 18.49 58.31 55.4 71.61 38.42 68.83 11.79 322.85
61-MĐ1
6 Nguyen Xuan Huy 005.55 26.27 14 7.43 16.07 46.62 43.78 21.49 175.66
61-MĐ1
7 Vo Duc Tai 005.85 25.77 31.49 33.25 39.25 38.9 38.5 35.75 242.91
61-MĐ1
8 Duong Ngo Chi Trung 005.59 0 26.18 65.08 38.22 2.4 33.21 26.06 191.15
61-MĐ1
9 Luu Hung Cuong 005.36 33.4 57.85 36.3 57.36 101.04 54.51 50.39 390.85
61-MĐ1
10 Le Truong Kha 005.86 10.77 15 47.91 33.49 8.29 44.24 47.09 206.79
5th Week Traveled

License
distance
per week
No.
16/10/2022 17/10/2022 18/10/2022 19/10/2022 20/10/2022 21/10/2022 22/10/2022 [km]
61-MĐ1
1 Tran Van Duong 005.87 0 33.23 32.3 46.39 46.81 26.07 22.5 207.3
61-MĐ1
2 Nguyen Thanh Quang 005.32 23.5 25.65 36 13.44 12.42 26.75 27.75 165.51
61-MĐ1
3 Nguyen Thi Thuy Trang 005.30 32.42 40.06 33.35 56 58 44.16 53.23 317.22
61-MĐ1
4 Tong Dai Thu 005.68 43.67 12.38 43.78 9.36 45.11 49.16 11.57 215.03
61-MĐ1
5 Vo Tan Ban 005.49 38.83 35.44 29.66 2.48 42.05 59.58 12.53 220.57
61-MĐ1
6 Nguyen Xuan Huy 005.55 35.31 15.44 7.44 0.8 15.17 21.5 25.83 121.49
61-MĐ1
7 Vo Duc Tai 005.85 42.47 34.5 35 36.5 37.85 39.25 40.55 266.12
61-MĐ1
8 Duong Ngo Chi Trung 005.59 12.23 43.32 34.19 40.67 9.24 36.86 31.44 207.95
61-MĐ1
9 Luu Hung Cuong 005.36 99.36 40.26 47.59 52 57.36 49.38 37.26 383.21
61-MĐ1
10 Le Truong Kha 005.86 43.19 69.1 39.35 45.5 37 49 10.54 293.68
6th Week Traveled
License
distance
per week
No.
23/10/2022 24/10/2022 25/10/2022 26/10/2022 27/10/2022 28/10/2022 29/10/2022 [km]
61-MĐ1
1 Tran Van Duong 005.87 30.57 31.09 26.5 28.5 27.5 49.3 10.89 204.35
61-MĐ1
61-MĐ1
3 Nguyen Thi Thuy Trang 005.30 32 56.3 42.25 39.4 47 58.15 34 309.1
61-MĐ1
4 Tong Dai Thu 005.68 21.67 28.06 29 1.43 2.96 14.41 10.25 107.78
61-MĐ1
5 Vo Tan Ban 005.49 28.57 16.41 31.66 41.06 37.85 42.73 41.95 240.23
61-MĐ1
6 Nguyen Xuan Huy 005.55 26.5 3.6 37.26 32.63 9.89 15.2 34.4 159.48
61-MĐ1
7 Vo Duc Tai 005.85 42.55 43.5 44 20 26 28 17.01 221.06
61-MĐ1
8 Duong Ngo Chi Trung 005.59 13.51 45.77 8.39 0 26.48 0.08 0 94.23
61-MĐ1
9 Luu Hung Cuong 005.36 38.29 45.84 44.41 41.9 68.86 21.4 21.52 282.22
61-MĐ1
10 Le Truong Kha 005.86 30.71 44.25 9.22 32 21.95 15.79 27.73 181.65
7th Week Traveled

License
distance
per week
No.
30/10/2022 31/10/2022 01/11/2022 02/11/2022 03/11/2022 04/11/2022 [km]
61-MĐ1
1 Tran Van Duong 005.87 18.74 9.87 19.36 15.03 12.48 30.81 106.29
61-MĐ1
2 Nguyen Thanh Quang 005.32 18.95 30 9.14 7.32 2.67 13.14 81.22
61-MĐ1
3 Nguyen Thi Thuy Trang 005.30 38 29.27 33.95 39.05 31.88 32.36 204.51
61-MĐ1
4 Tong Dai Thu 005.68 13.24 34.07 29.09 39.05 28.41 34.53 178.39
61-MĐ1
5 Vo Tan Ban 005.49 20.82 39.8 25.72 30.54 26.35 47.3 190.53
61-MĐ1
6 Nguyen Xuan Huy 005.55 36.5 7.97 5.66 16.33 8.05 3.95 78.46
61-MĐ1
7 Vo Duc Tai 005.85 22.74 20.64 41.96 15.65 10.65 17.09 105.99
61-MĐ1
8 Duong Ngo Chi Trung 005.59 26.98 21.19 23.47 47.1 42.61 45.98 207.33
61-MĐ1
9 Luu Hung Cuong 005.36 28.58 52.87 14.77 46.05 18.66 42.39 203.32
61-MĐ1
10 Le Truong Kha 005.86 25.44 18.78 16.78 17.33 9.9 13.3 101.53
During the PoC Project (07 weeks) Total

License traveled
No. Name of participants plate distance
No. during the
1st week 2nd week 3rd week 4th week 5th week 6th week 7th week PoC [km]
61-MĐ1
1 Tran Van Duong 005.87 148.37 63.16 103.41 195.12 207.3 204.35 106.29 1028
61-MĐ1
2 Nguyen Thanh Quang 005.32 109.26 108.6 151.9 181.09 165.51 152.42 81.22 950
61-MĐ1
3 Nguyen Thi Thuy Trang 005.30 145.91 143.68 213.56 294.02 317.22 309.1 204.51 1628
61-MĐ1
4 Tong Dai Thu 005.68 101.28 192.45 153.58 266.49 215.03 107.78 178.39 1215
61-MĐ1
5 Vo Tan Ban 005.49 371.48 304.4 274.94 322.85 220.57 240.23 190.53 1925
61-MĐ1
6 Nguyen Xuan Huy 005.55 202.54 139.98 130.39 175.66 121.49 159.48 78.46 1008
61-MĐ1
7 Vo Duc Tai 005.85 155 184.15 221.77 242.91 266.12 221.06 105.99 1397
61-MĐ1
8 Duong Ngo Chi Trung 005.59 83.89 118.31 13.14 191.15 207.95 94.23 207.33 916
61-MĐ1
9 Luu Hung Cuong 005.36 210.29 405.13 328.98 390.85 383.21 282.22 203.32 2204
61-MĐ1
10 Le Truong Kha 005.86 240.76 106.92 67.67 206.79 293.68 181.65 101.53 1199

2023.02.15 PoC Technical Report PTA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2023.02.15 PoC Technical Report PTA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THU DAU MOT UNIVERSITY

Proof of Concept (PoC) project of the CO2

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, THU DAU MOT

Binh Duong Province, February 2023

1. Objective of the PoC project 1

2.1. Experimental object 1

2.2. Testing process 5

3. Results and discussion 8

3.1. Traveled distance for one full charging condition 8

3.2. Daily traveled distance collected from the GPS device 10

3.3. Estimation of the CO2 reduction of the electric scooter 15

2.1. Experimental object

2.1.1. Tested electric scooter

Figure 1: The tested electric scooter – PEGA AuraS

2.1.2. GPS devices

Figure 5: 10 students participated in the PoC project registered as Grab drivers

Figure 6: Grab services for motorcycle [5]

Figure 7: Number of student selection of Grab service

2.2. Testing process

The entire testing process above is illustrated in detail in Figure 8.

Phase 2: 1st September – 17th September, 2022

Phase 1: 1st August – 31th August, 2022

3.1. Traveled distance for one full charging condition

To perform the measurement of the traveled distance, the accumulator of the

Traveled distance per charge (km)

3.2. Daily traveled distance collected from the GPS device

350 1st week

400 5th week 383.21

7th week 207.33 203.32

106.29 105.99 101.53

3.3. Estimation of the CO2 reduction of the electric scooter

CO2 reduction by using the electric scooter [ ton CO2e/year]

1st Week Traveled

2nd Week Traveled

3rd Week Traveled

4th Week Traveled

5th Week Traveled

7th Week Traveled

During the PoC Project (07 weeks) Total

You might also like