Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 CORPORATE-LEVEL STRATEGIES
decisions related|to:
Corporate-level strategies (or simply, corporate strategies) are basically about
allocating resources among the different businesses of a firm
transferTing resources from one set of businesses toothers and
managing and nurturing aportfolio of businesses.
These decisions are taken so that the overall corporate objectives are achieved.
strategies help to exercise the choice of direction that an organisation adopts. There could be a
Corporate complex and diversified conglomerate with
involved in a single business or a large,
Small business firm these cases would be about the basic direction of
businesses. The corporate strategy in both
Several different business, it could mean the adopion of
whole. In the case of the small firm having a single
the firm as a case of the large, multi-bus1ness Iirm, the
that yield better profitabilityfor the firm. In the
Courses of action
businesses for maximising their contribution to
Corporate strategy would also be about managing the various
resources from one set of businesses to others.
the overallcorporate objectives and transferring Abell has suggested defining
Recallthat in Section 2.4, we referred to the concept of business definition.
functions and alternativetechnologies.
a business along the three dimensions of customer groups, customer would be quite complex.
The business definition for a small firm would be simple while that for a large firm, it terms of these three
could be defined in
A large firm would consist of several businesses, each of which
dimensions.
along the three
The complexity of large firms arises from the fact that each of its businesses, defined
dimensions, result in a variety of customer groups, customer functions and alternative technologies that a
firm is involved with. It is therefore common to find multi-business firms with interests in serving a diverse
base of customer groups, performing for them a variety of customer functions, and making use of a range ol
several different technologies.
Ananalysis basedon business definition provides a set of strategic alternatives that an organisation can
consider. 'Strategic alternatives revolve around the question of whether to continue or change the busines
the enterprise is currently in or improve the efficiency and effectiveness with which the firm achieves is
3
corporate objectives in its chosen business sector. According to Glucck, there are four strategic alternatives
expansion, stability, retrenchment and anycombination of these threc.
Lorporate-Level Strategies: Concentration, Integration and Diversification 147
Let us get a bird's eye-view of the four
subsequently,in the rest of this strategic alternatives before we go into the details of each of these
chapter.
Expansion Strategies
The corporate strategy of
oning the scope of oneexpansion
is followed when an
or more of its
businesses organisation aims at high growth by substantially
in terms of their
alternative or jointly-in order respective
functions and customer groups, customer
technologies-singly
Expansion strategies are also often known as
growth or
to improve its overall performance.
intensification strategies.
Eyhibit 5.1 Major reasons Tor adopting different
corporate strategies
Expansion strategy is adopted because:
4 lt may become imperative when
the
9 Psychologically, strategists may feelenvironment demands increase in pace of activity.
more satisfied with the prospects of growth from
executives may take pride in presiding over organisations expansion: chief
o Inoreasing size may lead to perceived to be growth-oriented.
more control over the market vis-à-vis competitors.
A Advantages from the experience curve and scale of operations may accrue.
Stability strategy is adopted because:
1. It is less risky, involves less changes and
people feel comfortable with things as they are.
2. The environment faced is relatively stable.
3. Exparnsion may be perceived as being threatening.
4. Consolidation is sought through stabilising after a period of rapid
expansion.
Retrenchment strategy is adopted because:
1. The management no longer wishes to remain in business either partly or wholly, due to continuous
losses
and the organisation becoming unviable.
2. The environment faced is threatening.
3. Stability can be ensured by realocation of resources from unprofitable to profitable businesses.
Combination Strategy is adopted because:
1. The organisation is large and faces complex environment.
2. The organisation is composed of different businesses,each of which lies in a different industry, requiring a
different response.
Exhibit 5.l presents the major reasons why each of the different corporate strategies is adopted. Because of
the many reasons for which they are adopted, expansion strategies are quite popular. Given below are three
examples to show how companies can aim at expansion either in terms of customer groups, customer
functions or alternative technologies.
" Achocolate manufacturer expands its customer group to include middle-aged and old persons to its
existing customers comprising children and adolescents.
apart from its normal func
AStockbroker's firm offers personalised financial services to small investors
its
uons of dealing in shares and debentures, iin order to increase the scope of its business and spread
risks.
desk-top publishing in order to
pming firm changes from the traditional letter press printing to
Increase its production and efficiency.
or the other direction so as to substantially alter its
arsO the above cases, the company movesin one internal
ent business definition. Expansion strategies have a profound impact on the company's
internal functioning.
configuration. causing extensive changes in almost all aspects of
148 Strategic Management and Business Policy
Stability Strategies
corporate strategy of stability is adopted by an organisation when it attempts at incremental
Ihe
of its pertormanceby marginally
changing onc or more of its businesses in
groups, customer tunctions, and alternative
technologies - either singly or collectively.
strategies work, here are three examples to illustrate how
In orderto understand how stability dimensions of customers groups, customer
inprovceursntMee
terms of their respective
PRODUCT
PRESENT NEW
MARKET
MARKET PRODUCT
PRESENT PENETRATION DEVELOPMENT
MARKET DIVERSIFICATION
NEW DEVELOPMENT
Backward PRESENT
POSITION Forward
Integration OF FIRM Integration
Filament
Hydrocarbons Petrochemicals extrusion
Domestic/
Spinning Processing Garments Export
markets
diversification.magazimonevsingis
laterally into new types of products. Our example of the book publisher going into publishing
also an example of horizontal integration. Sometimes, it is also called horizontal
we will focus here on just two types of diversifications, that of concentric and conglomerate
horizontal integration has already been discussed under the topic of horizontal integration.
díversificHoatwioevner, as
When an organisation adopts astrategy which requires taking up those activities which are unrelated to the
existing business definition of any of its businesses, either in terms of their respective customer groups,
customer functions or alternative technologies,it is conglomerate diversification.
Offering a new product manutactured through an unfamiliar technology for a new set of customerS
inyolves considerable risk. There has to be asound rationale for taking the risk of unrelated diversification.
In order to understand the rationale for unrelated diversification, we need to understand the condition under
which such diversification can be undertaken. Often, strategists would embark upon diversification when
their organisation has excess capital. Excess capital means surplus cash over and above what is needed to run
the existing businesses profitably and to meet debt commitments. Proper managerial action demands that any
surplus cash generated by the organisation must be returned in the form of dividend to shareholders. It can
only be reinvested in the present businesses if there are bright chances of increasing the worth of the
organisation and enhancing the sharcholders' value. Thus, unrelated diversification can only be justified
when the surplus cash reinvested intonew ventures can generate more value for the shareholders, otherwise
it is prudent to return it to them." Carrying the argument further, if shareholders are looking for
diversification, they couldtake an individual decision to diversify their own portfolio of investment rather
than keep investing in a company that does diversification on their behalf.
In formulating unrelated diversification strategies, strategists act as portfolio managers, constantly on the
look out for undervalued companies that might be acquired at low price, quickly turned around for
profitability, and sold out at ahigher price. The managerial competence required is of financialacumen to
identify acquisition candidates, managing the proces of acquisition, skill at turming around loss making
businesses, and then selling them in the corporate market for a higher price.
There are several examples of Indian companies in different sectors which have adopted a path of growth
and expansion through conglomerate diversification. Almost all private sector business groups, whether
Tamily-owned or professional. are diversified entities. The Aditya Birla Group is in a variety of unrelated
DUSihesses such as aluminium, business process outsourcing, carbon black, cement, chemicals, copper,
erlisers, gas, insulators, mining, retail, software, sponge iron, telecom and textiles. The Godrej Group
poultry,
Pales in agriculture products, animal feed, branded tea, chemicals, pest management services,
FMCG, hotels,
seaTood, property development and rural retailing. The ITCGroup is in agribusiness,
retail, specialties,
tPaperboards and packaging. RPG Enterprises is in entertainment, power, such as baby care
tduCts, transmission, and tyres. The TTK Group has presence in such diverse areas
echnology,condoms, food products. kitchenware, maps, medical devices, personal carediversified,
products and
if tend
usually can focus on one or few ines of business and
pharmaceuticals. Small But
to be in related lines. companies
sometimes, even small business groups could venture into unrelated lines of
business. For example, the New Delhi-based Shiva Group operates in cotton socks, latex gloves and printing,
Wood-free, and writing papers.
160 Strategic Management and Business Policy
Public sector organisations, even ofa very large size, normally would not go beyondtheir
When they diversify. thcy do so through vertical intcgration as it happens in the case of oil core
But cven here, sometimes onc may come across a company like Indian Oil that has and gas
ventured into
which is unrelated to its mainline business of oil. State-level public sector companies
busines e
beyond thcir core arcas, with some exceptions like Sikkim Time Corporation that likewise, dorelail ng
businesses of watch manufacturing, semiconductors and TV speakers manufacturing. operates in
and dve ,
NGOs and voluntaryorganisations, owing to the nature of their activities, are usuallysmal1
alimited area of activity. Large NGOs like Child Rights and You (CRY) too
area. Within the area they operate in,the voluntary
organisations
concentrate action
foc
into resticted
can however diversify use
on ad on
CAPART, for instance, is a well-known voluntary organisation working in the area of rural unrelated area
a
While doing so, its activities encompass a wide range including disability action, disaster
marketing development, public cooperation, international funding, rural technology
development. and dmaevnewatlaogpeemmrseehnnea.,
Why are Diversification Strategies Adopted?
There are many reasons why organisations adopt diversification strategies. In
important reasons are:
general, the three hacis ..
1. Diversification strategies are adopted to minimise risk by
spreading it over several
ample, a company offering seasonal products (e.g. air coolers) may diversify into businesses Fors
sonal products (e.g. water heaters) to complement its product range in a another range of se
way so as to offset the
disadvantages of one set of products with that of the other.
2. Diversification may be used to capitalise on its
capabilities and business model sO as to maximise
organisational strengths or minimise weaknesses. For example, a company
the area of after-sales service may establish a specialised agency for havinga core competence in
other manufacturers. offering after-sales services for
3. Diversification may be the only way out if growth in
existing businesses is blocked due to environmental
and regulatory factors. For example, a cigarette making company perceiving
ing to the impact of anti-smoking legislation, growing opposition to threats to its business ow
smoking and increasing health
awareness, may diversify into paper manufacturing.
The two types of diversification strategies we are discussing here have
their own specific reasons tor
adoption.
Reasons for Concentric or Related Diversification The reasons for concentric
deduced from the concept ofsynergy we discussed in Section 4.1. Synergy is an idea thatdiversification
the
can te
or lesser than the sum of its parts. The organisation enters into a whole is greate
related business so that it can reap ul
benefits of synergy. The major reasons why organisations adopt concentric
" Realising financial synergies in terms of diversification strategies ae.
transaction cost savings and tax savings
Realising marketing synergies by increased market power (e.g. offering a complete range of
plv Oui-
and multipoint market contact with the distribution channel partners (e.g. using the same retailing
lets)and customers (e.g. users of a range of
complementary
Realising operational synergies through economies of scale,products)
i.e., increasing the size of operationsa
economies of scope, i.e., using a common base of resources and capabilities for varied,but
related businesses operating
" Realising personnel synergies through utilising human resources with
cies for another business common skill sets anu
Corporate-Level Strategies: Concentration, Integration and Diversification 161
Risks of Diversification
t is amoot point that any diversification -relatedor unrelated is risky. These risks arise because of the
conditions mentioned below: o nt
" Diversification,especially unrelated, is acomplex strategy to formulate and implement. It demands a
very high levelof managerial, operational and financialcompetence to be successful.
" Diversification strategies demand a wide variety of skills. Different businesses operating in diverse in
dustries would require dissimilar sets of skills to manage them successfully.as
"Diversification results in decreasing commitment to a single or few businesses and diverting it to several
of them at the same time. This phenomenon often results in a situation where businesses that need more
atention get less and the ones needing little get more. Imbalance of commitment does not help to realise
the many benefits of diversification such as maximising returns.
" Diversification often does not result in the promised rewards. Experience around the world shows that it
1S easy to be lured by the glamour of diversification and not be able to reap the benefits of synergies and
Strategic advantage ultimately. In fact, cases are legion where the shareholders value instead of being
enhanced, has been lost due to diversification.
" Diversification increases the administrative costs of managing, integrating and controlling awide port
loioof businesses. This can often offset the savings expected through synergies in the case of related
diversification or decreasing risks anticipated in unrelated diversification. concentration and integration
Diversiges,ficattoiothat
n takes organisation away from the comfortable confines of
of ananenvironment fraught with many risks. Unfamiliarity is frightening. Getting through
more
o r Situations safely demands astute survival skills. Emerging succe_sful from risky situations is
ging. Yet, the lure of the rewards of success often outweigh the dread of difficulties experienced in the
Exhlblt 0.2 Four types of
Internatlonal strateglen
Global
alralegy Tranensllonal
slalouy
Internatilonal Multldonestic
slralegy slrategy
" Firms adopt atransnational strategy when they adopt acombined approach of
low-cost high
responsiveness simultaneously, for their products and services. Dealing with these tWo and
tory objectivesis adifficult proposition and calls for acreative approach to managing the often Ioca
marketing of products and services. Bartlett and Ghoshal make a strong case for contradic.
transnational strategy as they opine that this is possibly the only viable strategy in a production
They fecl that the flow of expertise should not be aone-way process from the
transnational a
competdo
itp
i
in a developed country tothe developing countries it operates in. Rather, as Bartlett and firm wotd.
vtin
eg he
gest, atransnational firm shouldtransfer the expertise from its foreign subsidiaries to its Ghoshaslituaed
andfrom one foreign subsidiary to another foreign subsidiary through aprocess they
learning.
As you will note, Indian firms would find it challenging to adopt any of the four types of
headquagobalren
term as
strategies. For doing so, they would either need to adopt a low-cost approach and/or offer
products and services across different countries. Both these approaches are difficult to adopt in idinfteerrneantitoiantaeld
the
of the capabilities required. It is for this reason that the only world-class industry that India
has is
development. Here, a low-cost approach is possible owing to a variety of fortuitous reasons such asof lows ab:sence
widely available expertise in IT and less government interference. Further, local software
sary in the case of software development due to the technical nature ofIT responsiveness is not
products and Iservices.
similar line of thought,one could say that the other industries where
industries, in general and knowledge-based industries such as
India could find a niche are the se
pharmaceuticals and entertainment.
Followinga
International Entry Modes
When a firm adopts one or more of the
that the firm should adopt. Mode of entryinternational strategies, the question arises about the mode of entry
means the manner in which the firm would
tional operations. There are several entry modes, each with their commence its intema.
fim would have to decide which mode suits its own set of advantages and disadvantages A
circumstances
Root presents a three-part classification of entry modes, best before it could be adopted.
modes mentioned by various authors. under which we could place the different entry
1. Export Entry Modes Under these
modes, the firm produces in the home country and
overseas markets. markets in the
(a) Direct exports do not involve
home-country intermediaries and marketing is done either through adirect
agent/distributor or through a direct
(b) Indirect exports involve branch/subsidiary in the overseas markets.
products. intermediaries the home country, who are responsible for exporting the fim s
in
Reasons for Mergers and Acquisitions For amerger to take place, two organisations have to act. One
isthe buyer organisation and the other is the seller. Both these types of organisations have aset of reasons on
the basis of which they merge. Glueck has identified the reasons as follows.
Whythe buyer wishes to merge:
1. Toincrease the value of the organisation's stock.
2. To increase the growth rate and make a good investment.
3. To improve the stability of its earnings and sales.
4. Tobalance, complete or diversify its product line.
5. To reduce competition.
6. To acquire a needed resource quickly.
7. To avail tax concessions and benefits.
8. To take advantages of synergy.
Why the seller wishes to merge:
1. To increase the value of the owner's stock and investment.
2. To increase the growth rate.
3. Toacquire resources to stabilise operations.
4. To benefit from tax legislation.
J. To deal with top management succession problem.
Imp ortance that have to be
Joint Venture Strategles long-term contractual
as an entityresulting from a agreement
tWO or venture
Ajoint more partics, considered
couldtobeundertake mutually
betwe n
beneficialeconomicactivities, exercise joint control and contrib.
losses of the entity.
ute cquity and share inthe profits or more companies into one company and may be possible
two or
Mergers refer to a combination of place in mergers and acquisitions where
Absorption takes the
acquires and consolidation.
another company.
Ways: absorption Consolidation takes place when two or more companies combine to form aneM
consolidation.
case of by
company
Company. Joint vcntures
The technical arcaofspecjal
definition joint venture the Reserve Bank of India is: 'a foreign concern formed
registered or incorporated in accordance with the laws and regulations of the host country in which: he Indvan
party makes adirect investment, whether suchinvestment amounts to a majority or minority shareholding: $
to new
Conditions for Joint Ventures Joit
under four conditions: 46
Joint ventures may be useful to gain access business, mainly
1. When an activityis uneconomical for an organisation to do alone.
2. When the risk of business has to be shared and, therefore, is reduced for the participating firms.
together.
J. When the distinctive competence of two or more organisations can be brought
4. When setting up an organisation requires surmounting hurdles such as import quotas, tariffs, nationak.
tic-political interests and cultural roadblocks.
From the above conditions, it can be seen that joint ventures are an effective strategy when development cos
have to be shared, risk spread out and expertise combined to make effective use of resources.
47
Business Today identified five triggers for ajoint venture:
" Technology The foreign partner in the joint venture can bring in high-class technology while the India
partner has agood understanding of the local market. Telecom and automobiles are examples where this
is seen to be taking place.
Geography This could be a case where a foreign player has a presence in many key global markets and
India is necessary to complete the story. Insurance here is a relevant example where large players like
Prudential and Standard Life are large global players. For the Indian partner, it is a big opportunity to
participate in the joint venture.
Regulation This is normally the case when a highly regulated sector opens up. Insurance, which fora
long time wasclosed to foreign investment, today allows up to 26 per cent equity participation. This as
seen a flow of foreign players, with players like Bajaj and ICICI being the Indian partners.
Sharing of risk and capital This includes capital-intensive sectors like heavy-engineering that a9
require technological expertise. Here, both the partners look for a scenario where risks can be equáaly
shared.
"Intellectual exchange Here, asector like the legal business could serve as an example. Though thehardto
no clear-cut law on the entry of foreign law firms, the intellectual advantage at both ends
ignore.
Corporate-Level Strategies: Internationalisation, Cooperation and
ofoinr Ventures Joint ventures are Digitalisation 193
npes pOssible within industries, across
tries.But they are especially useful for entering industries and acroSs cOun-
foreign
markett in a joint venture with a international markets.
foreign company. Aforeign company Frequently, Indian firms will enter a
intoa jointventure with an Indian company. From entering India would also enter
possible:
the point of view of Indian
ypesof fjoint
Between
ventures are
two Indian organisations in one
organisations, the following
1.
Dn Railways for setting up a Rs. industry (e.g. Ajoint venture between NTPC Ltd
J,352-crore thermal power plant at Nabinagar in Bihar. to meet and the
requirements of the rail network across the the
country. The joint venture company,
1000 MW plant, with NTPC
holding 74 per cent equityBharatiya
Company, will execute the Rail Bijlee
will provide the balance). while the Railways
Datteentwo Indian organisations across different industries (e.g.
SacialSciences in a joint venture, offering degree courses for ruralAction Aid India and Tata Institute of
, Datween an Indian organisation and a foreign communities in India).
organisation in India (e.g. DLF Ltd. forging a 50:50 joint
Nenture with Nakheel, a large property developer of the UAE, for two
investment of US$ 10 billion). integrated townships in India at an
ARetween an Indian organisation and aforeign
organisation in that foreign country (e.g. Kirloskar Broth
ers Ltd. having a joint venture with SPP Pumps Ltd, UK, for
s Between an Indian organisation and a foreign catering to the EUmarket).
and Continental AG of Germany setting up a tyre
organisation in a third country (e.g. Apollo Tyres of India
manufacturing joint venture in Malaysia).
Strategic Issues in Joint Ventures Joint ventures offer the advantages of
by the participating firms. Eliminating, controlling or reducing competition may achieving objectives mutually
andcan be brought about through joint ventures. Increasing the market share can be of strategic importance
also be achieved. Diversi
fication strategies may be adopted by the participating firms if a joint venture is planned across
industries. If technology is a critical variable in strategy, then joint ventures with foreign different
feasible. If legal and regulatory hurdles come in the way of external expansion, they could companies can be
be
through ajoint venture strategy of combining with a foreign firm in that foreign country or in a thirdsubverted
Environmental threats within the country or opportunities abroad may cause firms to undertake joint country.
tures.
ven
A special mention need be made of joint ventures abroad by Indian companies, as they
have become
SIgnificant in recent years. Sometimes, these take the form of joint enterprises with firms from other coun
tes, which along with Indian firms set up projects in third countries. Administratively, the Ministry of
Lommerce deals with joint ventures. Despite the problems faced, joint ventures offer a viable strategic alter
auve for organisations interested in external expansion strategies. Strategic advantages are important for
J ventures to be set up and sustained. Consider the following examples of Indian and foreign organisa
Uons coming together in joint
" ventures:
Japanese auto major Nissan entered into atripartite joint venture with Renault of France and Mahindra
AAindra of India for setting up a car manufacturing plant in Chennai to introduce its premium
sedan Teana in Indian markets. the setting up of ajoint venture with Star Group Ltd. to create aleading
Balaji Telefilms Ltd. announced
television network of regional language general entertainment channels, initially targeted at the fast
growing South Indian market. The joint venture, 51-per cent owned by Star and 49-per cent by Balaji
lelefilms,
"Biocon Ltd,will be based in Chennai.
India's largest biotechnology company, Will set up a joint venture with Abu Dhabi-basedis
BiBiNeophar
con'tsmheamaiden ventureinthe region and since the GCCregion is emerging as an important nmarket
to manufacture and market a range of bio-pharmaceuticals in the Gulf countries. Thisfor
oocon,
Proposed joint venture could help in strengthening its global forays.
Policy
Strategic Management and Business
194" Tata Tea has entered into a joint venture company withthe Chinese state owned tea company,
to
differences
be on
the
the
and
guard
reasons by
the
as
possibility of conflict among the
the
partne
there is a high probability of joint ventures
Business Today, as to why joint ventures could
paric pati ,
analysis of
totheir advantage. An 48
the"following
Change concusions:
of strategy India could cease to be of interest to aforeign partner. This happened in tthe caseo
decided that Asia as a market was not strategic. Following
this
Bell Canada when
sold its stake
itRegulatory changes
the company
Indian promoters. deisioa
Often, thistoisthebeyond the control of the partners. This could work against the jom
in Tata Cellular
venture when either the limit on FDI has not been hiked in time or if it has been reduced. Insurance ba
been asector where the 26 per cent FDI limit for sometime now, has not gone down too well withtk
foreign partners.
doing too well, one of the partners
Success of joint venture Ironically, if the joint venture is becotes
partner. Suddenly as
very keen on increasing its holding, which is not acceptable to the other
partnership becomes hard to manage.
Having partners hampers growth Sometimes, having a partner can hamper grOWth prospects. In b
case of Tata Telecom, the Tatas decided to sell their holding tothe other partner, Avaya lInc. It warted
wellfor both the partners who felt that they would be better off on their own.
" Lack of transparency tis very important that the ground rules are laid down well in advance. If nta
mation is withheld, it can cause considerable levels of mistrust among partners. This can have ver
serious consequences. The break-up of the Hutchison-Essar joint venture is one where the lack of tan
parency has been one of the key reasons.
Joint venture is arisky, yet arewarding strategy, provided the partners share strategic interests right fromt:
beginning and work diligently to make the partnership work.
Strategic Alliances
Yoshino and Rangan define strategicalliances in terms of three necessary and sufficient characteristc
" Two or more firms unite to pursue a set of agreed upon goals, but remain independent subsequent
formation of the alliance:
The partner firms share the benefits of the alliance and control over the performancee of assigne ttasts-
perhaps the most distinctive characteristic of alliances andthe one that makes them So difficult to mat
age; and
The partner firms contribute on a continuing basis, in one or more key strategic areas, for exalmple
technology, product and so forth.
Lando Zeppei, managing partner of Bo0z, Allen & Hamilton, defines strategic alliance as a cooperatik
arrangement between two or more companies where:U
A
common strategy is developed in unison and a win-win
attitude is adopted by all pårue
Corporate-level Strategies: Internationalisation, Cooperation and Digitalisation 193
relationshipis reciprocal, with each partner
The prepared to share specific strengths with cach other,
. lendingpower to the enterprise.
thus
poolingofresources, investment and risks occurs for mutual (rather than individual) gain.
A Mehtaand Samanta, strategic alliances are 'cooperation betweentwo of more independent firms
say
briet.
involving sharedcontrol and continuing contributions by all partners for mutual benefit"
n
Stratcgicalliances, by definition, cannot be tactical. In order to be strategic, an alliance must satisfy one of
thesecriteria:
critical to the success of a core business goal or objective
be
[ must criticalto the
must be
development or maintenance of a core competency or other source of competi-
e It
tiveadvantage
enable blocking a competitive threat
e It must create or maintain strategic choices forthe firm
lt must
a significantrisktto the business
It must mitigate
Reasonsfor Strategic Alliances The primary reason why firms enter into strategic alliances is to en-
hancetheir
organisational capabilities and thereby gain competitive or strategic advantage. Forthis to hap-
pen,they
continually strive to gain access to new markets and new supply sources. They also wishto become
When the firms
more profitableby using the latest technology and making optimum utilisation of resources.
findthat it is not
feasible to either create resources internally or to acquire them, they rely on strategic
relationships.
alliances to create a network of beneficial alliances are used:3
Walters. Peters and Dess list several reasons why strategic
product or service may wish to look for new
1Entering new markets A Company that has a successful
This is especially true in case a com
markets. Doing soon one'soWn capabilities may seem tobe difficult.
enter into a partnership with a local firm which
nany wishes to explore foreign markets. Here, it is better to
them. This isone of the reasons why multi
Inderstands the markets better and is more culturally attuned to
with Indian firms.
national corporations have entered into strategic alliances
used to pool resources to gain economies of scale
2. Reducing manufacturing costs Strategic alliances are manufacturing costs. This is especially true of
or make better utilisation of resources in order to reduce
procompetitive alliances where a long-term relationship is developed with suppliers and buyers.
and diffusing technology Strategic alliances may be used to develop technological capabil
3. Developing firmsan act which may be difficult to perform if
more
y by leveraging the technical expertise of two or
these firms act independently. over
these reasons, strategic alliances are also used toaccelerate product introduction and
Apart from implementing strategies.
timing are of essence in
Onme legal and trade barriers expeditiously. Speed and and services are imitated quickly by competitors.
products
es may help firms to attain these. New pre-empt such imitation. For
When firms enter Into strategic alliances with other firms, it is possible to
introduce new products in foreign markets quickly with the help of local firms.
T8lobal firm may permitting foreign companies to enter their mar
participation before
kets Eountnes insist upon local contingent upon local participa-
kets. Entry into life and generalinsurance marketsin India has been made foreign andIndian firms.
tion,in which case it is imperative for strategic alliances to take place between
available in business policy