Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 5 Share
In this particular case, the word I’m looking for is one that describes the “us”
or the “we” that I’m wanting to speak about. The “us” or “we” that is
conversant in such topics as election theft, MK ULTRA, medical freedom, the
Deep State Cabal, the Woke agenda, vaccine injury data, pro-life arguments,
the Q drops, Cestui Que Vie, child trafficking, and the crimes of the Biden
family.
I’m lacking the word that names this group, my group, so I end up writing or
speaking a long string of descriptors. “So and so is a member of the
Patriot/Truth/Christian/
MAGA/Deplorable/Conspiracy/Conservative/Anon/Republican/Sovereign
ty/Anti-Vax community,” I might say.
Which, let’s face it, is a bit of a mouthful, and can ravage the poetry of one’s
prose.
https://clarencetheseventeenth.substack.com/p/the-justice-league-of-strange-bedfellows 1/6
01/09/2023 22:30 The Justice League of Strange Bedfellows
So I’m looking for a word or two. A name. A label. A descriptor. Is there such
a word? Is there a word you use? I kinda like Justice League, but I’m afraid
we’d run into copyright problems there. Otherwise, in all this time in the
movement, I’ve never found a word or short phrase that really satisfies.
But maybe there’s no one word because there’s no one “thing” to name here.
On the one hand, it feels like “we” are all on the same “side.” On the other
hand, there are so many differences between us. We™ are, in the end, a
rather ragtag assortment of somewhat strange bedfellows, we who stand in
opposition to the Cabal and its narratives, we who ain’t gonna take it any
more, bless our meme-posting hearts.
This guy considers himself a Patriot and a Truther but no longer trusts
Trump. That lady embraces the word Deplorable and is certain the 2020
election was stolen, but does not follow Q or call herself an Anon. These
folks are all in favor of Medical Freedom and consider the alleged deadly
pandemic a fraud, but some of them are Republicans and some are
https://clarencetheseventeenth.substack.com/p/the-justice-league-of-strange-bedfellows 2/6
01/09/2023 22:30 The Justice League of Strange Bedfellows
And even within any one descriptive term you'll find great differences of
opinion. We need only look at the word “Christian” to see the truth of that.
This Ufologist considers “aliens” to be extra-terrestrial beings from some
other time or space. That Ufologist considers “aliens” to be demons from
Hell. And inside the Medical Freedom and Vaccine Risk Awareness
movements you’ll find people who remain convinced that “viruses” are real
and others who are just as convinced that the existence of “viruses” has
never been scientifically proven.
Are we stuck just describing “we” by what “we” are NOT? Anti-Cabal? Anti-
Tyranny? Anti-Bad-Guys? Could we even agree on these?
Or maybe my underlying assumption is off here. I’m looking for a word that
describes “we” and “us,” but maybe that just keeps me stuck in “Us vs Them”
thinking. Should I stop talking about “us” and “we” altogether?
Well, um, hell to the no, no, no, to quote the great Bishop Bullwinkle. We’re
living here in the realm of separation, the realm of individuation, the realm
of distinctions, the realm of labels and naming. We’re not all here to just
melt together into the unconditional love and gray-goo bliss of Gott im
Himmel. Not as far as I can see. That’s for the next level up, not for this
https://clarencetheseventeenth.substack.com/p/the-justice-league-of-strange-bedfellows 3/6
01/09/2023 22:30 The Justice League of Strange Bedfellows
That’s how you get stereoscopic vision, after all. How you see with greater
clarity and depth perception. You take two different eyeballs and put them
side by side with each other and figure out how to make them work
together. You don’t make the eyeballs the same. You don’t put two eyeballs
in the same damn spot. You only get stereoscopic vision when different
eyeballs are in different places, and looking at things from a different angle.
And your brain dialogues the sensory data from those two eyeballs together
and, voila! depth perception!
So I think we definitely need to keep that “we” and “us.” We need to keep
that “them.” We just have to stop hating on the other eyeballs, come
together in dialogue, and use our differences to see more clearly and deeply
than we can on our own. Remember those good old days when classical
conservatism, held in balance by classical liberalism in a sort of dynamic
tension, resulted in a world that kinda sorta made a bit more sense than this
one? There’s a clue there somewhere…
Do you?
Perhaps, in the end, having spent some years living in the South, maybe I’ll
just go with “all ya’ll” and leave it at that. Or, in the first person, “we-uns.”
https://clarencetheseventeenth.substack.com/p/the-justice-league-of-strange-bedfellows 4/6
01/09/2023 22:30 The Justice League of Strange Bedfellows
Pax-Clarence
@ClarenceThe17th on TruthSocial
https://t.me/qclarence on Telegram
5 Comments
Write a comment...
https://clarencetheseventeenth.substack.com/p/the-justice-league-of-strange-bedfellows 5/6
01/09/2023 22:30 The Justice League of Strange Bedfellows
3 more comments...
https://clarencetheseventeenth.substack.com/p/the-justice-league-of-strange-bedfellows 6/6