A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

Ambo University

School of Informatics and Electrical Engineering

Department of Computer Science

MASTER’S THESIS PROPOSAL

A THESIS PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

FOR THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE

ENHANCING SOFTWARE PROJECT TEAM MANAGEMENT BY PRIORITIZING

THE PROJECT TEAM FOR THE SUCCESS OF THE PROJECT

Abdulsemed Negesso Dekebo (PGR/57818/14)

ADVISOR: Dr. Velmurugan.L

Submission date: April 17, 2024 G.C

Ambo
1
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

Contents
Abstract........................................................................................................................................................ 3
1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 4
1.1. Background of the study................................................................................................................ 5
1.2. Statement of the problem............................................................................................................. 6
1.3. Research Questions........................................................................................................................7
1.4. Research Objectives....................................................................................................................... 8
1.4.1. Main Objectives......................................................................................................................8
1.4.2. Specific Objectives................................................................................................................. 8
1.5. Significance.................................................................................................................................... 9
1.6. Scope of the study......................................................................................................................... 9
2. Review of Related Literature...............................................................................................................11
2.1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 11
2.2. Conceptual Framework................................................................................................................12
2.3. Description of the study area.......................................................................................................14
2.3.1. Understanding the Software Development Landscape..........................................................14
2.3.2. The Critical Role of the Project Team.................................................................................. 14
2.3.3. Limitations of Traditional Approaches.................................................................................15
2.3.4. The Team-Centric Approach:............................................................................................... 15
3. Research Method and Procedures........................................................................................................16
3.1. Data Collection.............................................................................................................................16
3.2. Data Analysis................................................................................................................................ 18
3.3. How AHP Problem Hierarchy will be used....................................................................................20
4. Timeline and Resources...................................................................................................................... 21
5. Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................... 22
6. References........................................................................................................................................... 23

2
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

Abstract

Proper team management and coordination between team members have a vital role in the success of any

project in distributed software organizations.

Software development projects often suffer from missed deadlines, budget overruns, and subpar quality.

This research investigates a critical factor often overlooked: the project team itself. Most project

management methods prioritize tools, schedules, and methodologies, treating teams as resources. Effective

software project team management involves coordination, communication, collaboration, and leadership

to guide the team toward achieving project goals efficiently and successfully.

This study proposes a new approach: prioritizing the project team for the success of the software

development project by addressing the crucial role of project team management and emphasizing the

importance of prioritizing the well-being and efficiency of the project team.

I will employ a mixed-method approach, combining a literature review on project success factors and

team dynamics with case studies of successful projects that prioritized the team. Additionally, surveys and

interviews with project managers and team members will be conducted.

This research aims to identify key factors affecting project success and effective team management when

prioritizing the team. We expect to discover how prioritizing the team impacts project success rates, team

performance, and team well-being. The ultimate goal is to develop practical recommendations for project

managers on how to invest in their teams and achieve better software project outcomes through a team-

centric approach. Generally, this research underscores the critical link between effective project team

management and project success, advocating for a people-centric approach that recognizes the team as the

backbone of successful software project delivery.

3
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

1. Introduction

In the realm of software project management, the success of a project heavily relies on the effectiveness of

the project team. Managing a software project team involves various aspects such as resource allocation,

task assignment, communication, conflict resolution, and overall team coordination. Prioritizing the

project team is crucial for ensuring that the right people are in the right roles at the right time to achieve

project success. This process involves identifying key team members, understanding their strengths and

weaknesses, and aligning their skills with project requirements.

Software development projects are often plagued by missed deadlines, budget overruns, and subpar

quality. While various factors contribute to this, a critical issue lies in neglecting the human element - the

project team itself. Most project management often focuses on methodologies, tools, and schedules,

treating teams as resources to be managed. This proposal challenges this approach and advocates for

prioritizing the project team as a key driver of project success.

Software project team management is a critical aspect of ensuring the successful delivery of any software

development project. Prioritizing the project team is crucial to ensure that they are motivated, engaged,

and working efficiently toward achieving project goals. Moreover, it is essential for achieving project

success as it ensures that the right resources are allocated to the most critical tasks and that team members

are motivated and engaged throughout the project lifecycle.

Research has shown that when teams are well managed and their needs are prioritized, they are more

likely to perform better, stay motivated, and deliver high-quality work consistently.

This research aims to explore how enhancing software project team management through team

prioritization can lead to improved project outcomes. This leads to improved collaboration, productivity,

and the successful completion of projects.

4
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

This requires a well-thought-out research methodology to identify key factors that enhance team

performance and prioritize resources accordingly.

The research work will employ a mixed-method approach, combining a literature review on project

success factors and team dynamics with case studies of successful projects that prioritized the team.

Additionally, surveys and interviews with project managers and team members will be conducted.

By focusing on aspects such as team composition, communication, collaboration, motivation, and

leadership, organizations can cultivate high-performing teams that deliver quality results consistently.

1.1. Background of the study

The background of the study sets the stage for understanding the context and rationale behind the research

focus.

Software development projects are notoriously complex and prone to failure. While various factors

contribute to this, a critical issue lies in overlooking the human element - the project team itself.

Traditional project management often focuses on methodologies, tools, and schedules, treating teams as

resources to be managed.

This study proposes a different approach: prioritizing the project team for the success of software

development project.

Project success relies heavily on the skills, motivation, and collaboration of the project team. A well-

functioning team can overcome challenges and deliver high-quality results.

The most project management methods often focus on processes and tools without adequately addressing

team dynamics, communication, and well-being. This can lead to burnout, low morale, and ultimately,

project failure.

5
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

This study builds upon existing research on project management and team dynamics. It aims to contribute

to a growing body of knowledge that emphasizes the human element as a critical factor for software

project success. By prioritizing the team, we can create a foundation for achieving project goals while

fostering a positive and productive work environment.

1.2. Statement of the problem

Software projects often fail to meet deadlines, budgets, or quality expectations. This can be attributed, in

part, to a lack of focus on the project team itself. While project management methodologies and tools are

important, the human element - the team - is critical for success.

Most of modern software project management practices often overlook the importance of team dynamics,

well-being, and motivation. This can lead to several problems: such as Low morale and burnout,

Communication breakdowns, Skill gaps, knowledge silos, and Unrealistic expectations and pressure.

Focusing solely on deadlines and budgets can create a stressful environment that hinders creativity and

problem-solving. These issues contribute to project failures and hinder the overall effectiveness of

software development efforts.

By investing in the team through proper composition, fostering a supportive work environment, and

promoting continuous development, we can expect; increased project success rates, improved team morale

and motivation, reduced burnout and turnover, enhanced overall project quality

This approach challenges the traditional view where project teams are seen as simply resources to be

managed. Instead, it emphasizes building a strong, empowered team as the foundation for achieving

project goals. This involves:

 Building teams with the right mix of skills, experience, and diversity to foster collaboration and

innovation.

6
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

 Creating a culture of open communication, recognition, and work-life balance to keep team

members motivated and engaged.

 Providing opportunities for training, skill development, and team-building activities to enhance

collaboration and problem-solving abilities.

1.3. Research Questions

The questions should be tailored to the specific research focus and adapt them as needed throughout my

investigation.

By addressing the following research questions, project managers can gain valuable insights into

optimizing project team management strategies to increase the likelihood of project success.

Here are some key research questions to guide the study:

1. What are the key factors that contribute to the success of a software project team?

2. What strategies can be implemented to enhance communication and collaboration within the

project team?

3. How does the allocation of resources affect the performance and outcomes of a software project

team?

4. What are the impacts of prioritizing the project team on the success of software projects?

5. How does the composition of the project team (skills, experience, and diversity) influence project

outcomes when the team is prioritized?

6. To what extent does prioritizing the project team influence project success rates, as measured by

factors like meeting deadlines, budgets, and quality expectations?

7. How do team dynamics and well-being, fostered through prioritizing the team, translate into

measurable project success outcomes?

7
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

8. What are the perceived benefits and challenges of prioritizing the project team from the

perspectives of project managers and team members?

1.4. Research Objectives

The purpose of this study is to shed light on the benefits of prioritizing the project team in software

project. It is expected that organizations that place a strong emphasis on their project teams will

experience higher levels of productivity, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction. The results will provide

valuable insights for practitioners looking to enhance their software project management practices.

1.4.1. Main Objectives

i. To explore effective strategies for enhancing software project team management.

ii. To analyze the impact of prioritizing the project team on the success of software

development projects

1.4.2. Specific Objectives

i. To identify Key Factors affecting the software project success

ii. To understand the importance of prioritizing the project team in software project

management.

iii. To Measure the Impact of prioritizing the project team on Project Outcomes

iv. To Develop Practical Recommendations

v. To Advance Knowledge of Team-Centric Management

By achieving these objectives, this research intends to provide valuable insights and practical guidance for

improving project management practices through a team-centric approach. This approach prioritizes the

well-being, skills, and development of the project team, ultimately leading to higher project success rates

and a more positive software development environment.

8
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

1.5. Significance

The success of a software project depends on the effectiveness of project management. Software project

management involves planning, organizing, and controlling resources to achieve specific software project

goals. However, the complexity of software development projects often results in several issues that affect

the performance of the software project management team. These issues can include poor communication,

unrealistic deadlines, lack of resources, and inadequate risk management, among others.

The motivation for conducting study for prioritizing issues of software project management team is to

identify the most critical issues that affect the performance of the software project management team.

Prioritizing these issues will enable project managers to focus their efforts on resolving the most critical

issues first, which can lead to better project outcomes.

Moreover, prioritizing the issues of software project management team can help in identifying the areas

where the team needs to improve their skills and knowledge. This can be achieved through training

programs, coaching, or mentoring. It can also help in identifying the areas where additional resources are

required to improve the project’s outcome.

Furthermore, the study can help in identifying the differences in the perception of issues among project

stakeholders, including project managers, developers, and clients. This can help in developing strategies to

address these differences, leading to better communication and collaboration between stakeholders.

A well-managed and cohesive project team is more likely to deliver high-quality results within budget and

schedule constraints. By emphasizing the importance of the project team, organizations can create an

environment that fosters innovation, creativity, and continuous improvement.

1.6. Scope of the study

The scope of the research study encompasses a broad range of elements related to optimizing project team

performance and project success.

9
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

By addressing the following key aspects within the scope of the study, I will explore deep into the multifaceted

nature of software project team management, paving the way for valuable insights and recommendations to enhance

project team effectiveness and overall project success.

Scope is outline as:

A. Inclusions: the points to be covered under the study.

 The study will encompass various software project teams, potentially including different sizes,

structures, and experience levels.

 The research will explore various approaches to prioritizing the team, such as focusing on team

composition, work environment, resource allocation and continuous development.

 The study will consider traditional success factors like meeting deadlines, budgets, and quality

expectations. Additionally, it will explore how prioritizing the team may influence team well-being

and performance metrics (e.g., communication, problem solving).

 The research will employ a combination of literature review, case studies, and surveys/interviews

to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

B. Exclusions: the points not to be covered under the study.

 While the research may touch upon project management methods that support team-centric

approaches (e.g., Agile), it will not delve deeply into comparing or evaluating specific

methodologies.

 The focus will be on the impact of prioritizing project team, not specific training programs or

team-building activities.

 While acknowledging the influence of organizational culture, the study will not conduct a deep

analysis of how to change organizational culture but rather focus on team-centric strategies

adaptable within various cultures.

C. Boundaries: limitations in the study

10
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

 Project Complexity: The research may initially focus on projects of a specific complexity level

(e.g., medium complexity) to establish a baseline. The impact of team prioritization on highly

complex projects can be explored in future research.

 Team Size: The study may focus on teams of a particular size range (e.g., small to medium-sized

teams) to ensure manageable data collection. The impact on larger teams can be explored further in

later investigations.

 Specific Software Development Technologies: The research will focus on the general software

development context, not on the impact of specific programming languages or technologies.

Defining the scope ensures your research stays focused and manageable while providing a clear path for

investigation. You can expand upon the scope in future research based on the initial findings.

2. Review of Related Literature

2.1. Introduction

This chapter will present a theoretical literature, and empirical review, which is a summary of previous

related studies and various literature on the research problem areas. The available literature is aimed at

reviewing empirical evidence to answer the research questions and identify the gap in project management

practice.

The literature review should explore existing research on project management, team dynamics, team

prioritization and their impact on software project success.

Numerous studies have highlighted the importance of effective project team management in software

projects. Research has shown that prioritized teams with strong leadership, clear communication channels,

11
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

and a shared vision are more likely to succeed in their projects. By prioritizing the project team,

organizations can create an environment that fosters collaboration, innovation, and high performance.

Research has shown that when teams are well managed and their needs are prioritized, they are more

likely to perform better, stay motivated, and deliver high-quality work consistently.

This study employs a qualitative research approach to investigate the impact of prioritizing the project

team on software project success.

Studies show a significant percentage of software projects fail to meet deadlines, budgets, or quality

expectations. This highlights the need for improved project management strategies.

2.2. Conceptual Framework

By utilizing this framework, I can explain how prioritizing the project team through composition, work

environment, resource allocation and development leads to project success, improved team performance,

and greater team well-being.

Central Concept: Prioritized Project Team

Independent Variables (Factors Influencing the Team):

 Team Composition

o Skills & Experience (technical, soft skills)

o Team Size & Diversity (expertise, backgrounds)

o Roles & Responsibilities (clear definition, ownership)

 Team Work Environment

o Communication & Collaboration Tools (effective communication channels)

o Workload Management & Delegation (fair distribution, avoiding overload)

12
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

o Recognition & Rewards (motivational incentives, appreciation)

 Team Development

o Training & Skill Development (continuous learning opportunities)

o Team Building Activities (fostering collaboration and trust)

o Conflict Resolution Strategies (healthy communication for resolving issues)

Dependent Variables (Outcomes):

 Project Success

o Deadline & Budget Achievement (meeting defined goals)

o High-Quality Software Delivery (functional, meets requirements)

o Customer Satisfaction (positive user experience)

 Team Performance

o Increased Productivity & Efficiency (optimized workflows)

o Improved Problem-Solving & Decision-Making (effective collaboration)

o Reduced Errors & Rework (higher quality output)

 Team Well-being

o High Morale & Motivation (enthusiasm and engagement)

o Low Stress & Burnout (healthy work-life balance)

o Increased Job Satisfaction (positive experience in the role)

Moderating Variables:

 Project Complexity (high complexity might require stronger team composition and development)

 Organizational Culture (supportive cultures amplify the benefits of prioritizing the team)

13
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

Relationships:

 Arrows flow from independent variables towards the "Prioritized Project Team" box, signifying

how these factors contribute to a well-functioning team.

 Arrows flow from the "Prioritized Project Team" box to the dependent variables, highlighting how

a strong team leads to success, performance, and well-being.

 Consider adding arrows between some dependent variables (e.g., high morale -> increased

productivity).

 Arrows from moderating variables point towards the relationships between independent and

dependent variables, indicating how complexity and culture can influence the impact of team

factors.

Visual Representation: …

This framework will be represented using Flowchart- emphasize the sequential process of building a

prioritized team for project success. Choosing the best visual representation depends on your needs and

audience.

2.3. Description of the study area

2.3.1. Understanding the Software Development Landscape

Software development projects are inherently complex endeavors. They often involve rapidly evolving

technologies, unforeseen requirement changes and High degree of collaboration and communication.

Traditional project management approaches often struggle to address these complexities effectively. They

tend to focus heavily on Schedules, deadlines, Methodologies, and tools.

14
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

2.3.2. The Critical Role of the Project Team

Software project success relies heavily on the skills, dedication, and collaboration of the project team.

Effective teams possess a blend of Technical expertise, Soft skills, and Domain knowledge.

2.3.3. Limitations of Traditional Approaches

Traditional project management often overlooks the human element, focusing on processes and tools over

people. This can lead to: Decreased team morale and motivation, Communication breakdowns, Skill gaps

and knowledge silos and suboptimal project outcomes.

2.3.4. The Team-Centric Approach:

This research advocates for a team-centric approach to software project management, where prioritizing

the project team is a core principle. This approach emphasizes:

 Building high-performing teams: Creating well-rounded teams with the right mix of skills,

experience, and diversity promotes collaboration and innovation.

 Fostering a supportive work environment: Encouraging open communication, recognition

programs, and a healthy work-life balance keeps team members motivated and engaged.

 Providing continuous learning and development: Investing in training, skill development, and

team-building activities enhances individual and team capabilities.

By prioritizing the team, we can create a foundation for successful software development projects,

fostering a positive work environment, and achieving exceptional results.

This research will focus on investigating the impact of prioritizing the project team on software project

success.

15
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

3. Research Method and Procedures

Three methods will be used for this research work. In the first step, Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

will be performed for the identification of Factors affecting Software Project Success, Prioritizing Project

Team Needs, Communication and Collaboration Strategies, Impact of Resource Allocation and Role of

Leadership in Motivating and Guiding Teams

.In the second step, a questionnaire-type survey will be performed to validate the SLR results. Finally, the

AHP approach will be utilized for the prioritization of identified factors by performing pairwise

comparisons of those issues.

3.1. Data Collection

Data will be collected through interviews with project managers, developers, and other stakeholders

involved in software projects.

The research will employ a Mixed-Method Approach. Employing a mix of qualitative approaches

(interviews, observations, case studies) and quantitative methods (surveys, data analysis) to gather

comprehensive insights and data for a holistic understanding of software project team management

dynamics and how prioritizing the project team impacts software project success.

 Literature Review: Examining existing research on project management, team dynamics, and

their impact on software project success.

16
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

 Case Studies: Analyzing real-world examples of successful software projects to identify best

practices in prioritizing and managing project teams.

 Surveys and Interviews: Gathering data from project managers, developers, and other team

members to understand their experiences and perspectives.

o Qualitative Research: will conduct interviews with project managers, team leads, and

team members to gather insights into current practices and challenges in managing

software project teams.

o Quantitative Research: By Utilizing surveys, I will collect data on factors influencing

team performance, such as communication effectiveness, resource allocation, and

conflict resolution strategies.

The following is how each aspect of the study will be approached:

1. Factors Contributing to Software Project Team Success:

- Qualitative Approach: I will conduct interviews or focus groups with project managers and team

members to explore their perspectives on success factors.

- Quantitative Approach: Distribute surveys to project teams to collect data on perceived success factors

and analyze correlations.

2. Prioritizing Project Team Needs:

- Qualitative Approach: Gather in-depth feedback through open-ended questions to understand specific

needs and challenges faced by the project team.

- Quantitative Approach: Use Likert scale questions in surveys to quantify the importance of different

team needs and preferences.

17
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

3. Communication and Collaboration Strategies:

- Qualitative Approach: Conduct case studies or observations to identify effective communication and

collaboration practices within project teams.

- Quantitative Approach: Administer questionnaires to measure the frequency and effectiveness of

communication tools and strategies used by project teams.

4. Impact of Resource Allocation:

- Qualitative Approach: Interviews with project stakeholders to gather insights on resource allocation

decisions and their perceived impacts.

- Quantitative Approach: Analyze project data to quantify the relationship between resource allocation

(time, budget, personnel) and project team performance metrics.

5. Role of Leadership in Motivating and Guiding Teams:

- Qualitative Approach: Use narrative interviews to explore leadership styles and their influence on team

motivation and guidance.

- Quantitative Approach: Develop leadership assessment surveys to measure leadership effectiveness in

motivating and guiding project teams.

By following a systematic research methodology and prioritizing the project team effectively, software

projects can enhance their chances of success by leveraging the strengths of their teams while addressing

any weaknesses or gaps proactively.

3.2. Data Analysis

The analysis will focus on identifying common themes and patterns related to team prioritization and its

effects on project outcomes.

18
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

Upon collecting qualitative and quantitative data through interviews and surveys, thematic analysis can be

employed to identify common themes related to effective team management strategies. Statistical analysis

can also be used to quantify the impact of prioritizing the project team on key performance indicators such

as project timelines, budget adherence, and stakeholder satisfaction.

 Analyze quantitative data from surveys (descriptive statistics, correlations) to identify patterns and

relationships between team factors and project outcomes.

 Analyze qualitative data from interviews and case studies using thematic analysis to identify

recurring themes and insights.

 Integrate findings from all three methods (literature review, case studies, and surveys/interviews)

to triangulate results and develop a robust understanding of the research question.

Expected Outcomes: By employing a mixed-method approach, this research aims to achieve the

following outcomes:

 Identify key factors that influence the success of software project.

 Identify key factors that contribute to effective team management when prioritizing the project

team.

 Understand the impact of prioritizing the project team on software project success rates, team

performance, and team well-being.

 Develop practical recommendations and best practices for project managers on how to prioritize

and invest in their teams.

 Contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the importance of the human element in software

project success.

19
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

This research design will allows for a comprehensive investigation of the proposed approach, providing

valuable insights for improving software project team management and achieving better results through a

team-centric approach.

3.3. How AHP Problem Hierarchy will be used.

The AHP problem hierarchy consists of a goal (the decision), a number of alternatives for reaching that

goal, and a number of criteria on which the alternatives can be judged that relate to the goal.

Here as an example, a simple AHP

hierarchy was generated in
DECERNS tool

For most realistic analyses, criteria are multi-tiered. Criteria weightings are calculated as pairwise

comparisons.

20
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

I will consider a problem hierarchy with 12

criteria (factors) on which the three alternatives

are to be judged. For pairwise comparison, the

first criteria will be compared against the

remaining 11, the second criteria against the

remaining 10, the third criteria against the

remaining 9 etc. In total 66

(11+10+9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1) pairwise

comparisons will need to be undertaken in order

to determine the weighting of the 12 criteria.

4. Timeline and Resources

This study is expected to be completed within Three months with the following resources:

 Researcher time

 Access to academic databases and research materials

 Budget for potential travel and software for data analysis

Thesis Stage Completion Target

Date(G.C)
Literature review April 13, 2024
First Draft thesis proposal, Cover through Chapter 3, and April 15, 2024
initial list of references “to advisor(s) to check background
knowledge and problem statement, and to approve proposed plan
to conduct research”
First Draft thesis proposal will be defended and checked by April 20/21, 2024
the department for format
Construct research design April 25/26, 2024

21
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

Conduct research by collecting data and any associated travel May 22, 2024
Analyze data: May 30, 2024
First Draft thesis to advisor(s) June 02, 2024
Final thesis submission for signatures June 15, 2024

5. Conclusion

Prioritizing the project team is a fundamental aspect of enhancing software project management

effectiveness and strategic approach to achieving software project success. By investing in the team's well-

being, skills, and development, we can create a foundation for high-performing teams that deliver

exceptional results. By recognizing individual strengths, optimizing resource allocation, fostering effective

communication, addressing challenges proactively, and implementing strategic management practices,

organizations can improve their project success rates significantly. Comprehensive plan to explore the

benefits of prioritizing the project team and contribute to the growing body of knowledge in this area.

This study will employs a qualitative research approach to investigate the impact of prioritizing the project

team on software project success. Data will be collected through interviews with project managers,

developers, and other stakeholders involved in software projects. The analysis will focus on identifying

common themes and patterns related to team prioritization and its effects on project outcomes.
22
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

Through thorough research and analysis, actionable recommendations will be developed to prioritize the

project team effectively, leading to improved team performance, enhanced productivity, and successful

project outcomes.

I encourage your support for this proposal. By prioritizing the project team, we can revolutionize software

development and deliver greater value to stakeholders.

6. References
1. Project Management Institute (PMI): PMI is a globally recognized organization that provides

standards, certifications, research publications, and resources related to project management

practices.

2. ACM Digital Library: The ACM Digital Library is a comprehensive database of computing

literature that includes research articles on effective strategies for managing software projects by

prioritizing project teams.

3. SpringerLink: SpringerLink hosts a vast collection of scientific articles covering various topics

including software engineering and project management techniques that emphasize the importance

of prioritizing project teams.

4. Mohd Hairul Nizam Nasir and Shamsul Sahibuddin(2011) Critical success factors for software

projects: A comparative study

23
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

5. Ahmad N, Laplante PA (2006) Software project management tools: making a practical decision

using AHP. 2006 30th Annual IEEE/ NASA Software Engineering Workshop. IEEE, pp 76–84

6. Dietrich P, Kujala J, Artto K (2013) Inter-team coordination patterns and outcomes in multi-

team projects. Proj Manag J 44(6):6–19

7. Herbsleb JD (2007) Global software-engineering: the future of socio-technical coordination.

Future of software-engineering (FOSE’07). IEEE, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp 188–198

8. Hu CP, Chang YY, Creswell JW (2017) Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed

methods approach. J Soc Adm Sci 4(2):205–207

9. Hussain M, Khan HU, Khan AW, Khan SU (2021) Prioritizing the issues extracted for getting

right people on right project in software project management from vendors’ perspective. IEEE

Access 9:8718–8732

10. Khan RA, Khan SU (2017) Empirical exploration of communication and coordination practices

in ofshore software development outsourcing. Phys Comput Sci 54(1):41–54

11. Khan SU, Khan AW, Khan F, Khan MA, Whangbo TK (2021) Critical success factors of

component-based software outsourcing development from vendors’ perspective: a systematic

literature review. IEEE Access 10:1650–1658

12. Khan MS, Khan AW, Khan F, Khan MA, Whangbo TK (2022b) Critical challenges to adopt

DevOps culture in software organizations: a systematic review. IEEE Access 10:14339–14349

13. Mohd SSF (2014) Developer coordination in Software-Engineering projects, Ph.D. dissertation.

The University of New South Wales, UK

14. Monasor MJ, Vizcaíno A, Piattini M (2010) A training tool for global software development”.

2010 9th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and

Training (ITHET). IEEE, Cappadocia, Turkey, pp 9–16

24
 A MASTERS THESIS PROPOSAL

15. Niazi M, Mahmood S, Alshayeb M, Riaz M, Faisal K et al (2016b) Challenges of project

management in global software development: a client-vendor analysis. Inf Softw Technol 80:1–19

16. Saaty TL (1988) “What is the analytic hierarchy process?” in Mathematical models for

decision support. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 109–121

17. Shameem M, Kumar RR, Kumar C, Chandra B, Khan AA (2018) Prioritizing challenges of

agile process in distributed software development environment using analytic hierarchy process. J

Softw Evol Process. 30(11):e1979

18. Yaghoobi T (2018) Prioritizing key success factors of software projects using fuzzy AHP. J

Softw Evol Process 30(1):e1891

19. Zwikael O, Aviram EU (2016) Team Development–Why doesn’t it work in project teams. In:

Australia and New Zealand academy of management. in 21st ANZAM 2007 Conference. New

Zealand, pp 1–19

7. Apendixes

25