ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The satisfaction and the euphoria that accompany the successful completion of any task would be
incomplete without the mention of the people who made it possible. The constant guidance of these persons
and of the encouragement provide, crowned our efforts with success and glory. Although it is not possible to
thank all the members who helped for the completion of this project and work individually, I take this
opportunity to express my gratitude to one and all.
I am grateful to the management and our institute JAIN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND
TECHNOLOGY with its very ideals and inspiration for having provided me with the facilities, which made
this, work a success.
I express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Prashanth Banakar, Principal, Jain College of Engineering
and Technology for the support and encouragement.
I wish to place on record, my grateful thanks to Prof. Maheshkumar Patil, HOD, Department of
CSE, Jain College of Engineering and Technology, for the constant encouragement provided to me.
I am indebted with a deep sense of gratitude for the constant inspiration, encouragement, timely
guidance and valid suggestion given to me by my guide Prof. Harshita C K, Assistant Professor,
Department of CSE, Jain College of Engineering and Technology.
I am thankful to all the staff members of the department for providing relevant information and
helped in different capacities in carrying out this project.
Last, but not least, I owe my debts to my parents, friends and also those who directly or indirectly have
helped me to make the project work a success.

B.PRERANA NAIDU 2JH20CS012

BIBI FATIMA GUBBI 2JH20CS013
DANAMMA S HAVERI 2JH20CS019
FARHATNAAZ KHATIB 2JH20CS024

1
 Disaster Management Using IOT

ABSTRACT

With the increasing frequency and intensity of earthquakes worldwide, there is a growing need for
innovative and efficient disaster management strategies. This paper proposes an Internet of Things (IoT)-
enabled approach to enhance earthquake disaster management. The integration of IoT technologies offers
real-time monitoring, data collection, and analysis, enabling timely and informed decision-making during
and after seismic events. The proposed system leverages a network of interconnected sensors deployed in
earthquake-prone regions to detect and measure seismic activities. These sensors, equipped with
accelerometers and other relevant instruments, continuously collect data and transmit it to a central control
system. The collected data is processed in real-time to assess the magnitude and location of the earthquake,
allowing for immediate response coordination. Furthermore, the IoT framework facilitates communication
and coordination among various stakeholders, including emergency responders, government agencies, and
the affected population.
In conclusion, this IoT-based disaster management system for earthquakes presents a comprehensive and
efficient solution to enhance preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. By leveraging real-time data and
advanced analytics, the proposed system aims to mitigate the impact of earthquakes, ultimately saving lives
and reducing the economic and social consequences associated with seismic events.

II
 Disaster Management Using IOT

CONTENTS
NAME P.NO
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I.

ABSTRACT II

CONTENTS III

LIST OF TABLES VI

LIST OF FIGURES V

1 INTRODUCTION 6

2 LITERATURE SURVEY 7-8

PROPOSED METHODOLOGY

3.1 Motivation

3.2 Problem Definition 9-13

3

3.3 Objectives

3.4 Existing and Proposed System

REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS

4.1 Functional Requirements

4
4.2 Non- Functional Requirements 14-17

4.3 Software and Hardware Requirements

SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

5 5.1 Design of the system

18-20
5.2 Design constraints

6 IMPLEMENTATION 21-22

7 APPLICATION 23

8 RESULT AND DISCUSSION -

CONCLUSION 24
REFERENCES

III
 Disaster Management Using IOT

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Number Figure Name Page No

4.3 Software requirement 17

5.1 Design of system 18

6.1 Output screenshot 1 22

6.2 Output screenshot 2 22

6.3 Output screenshot 3 22

IV
 Disaster Management Using IOT

LIST OF TABLES

Table No Title Page No

V
 Disaster Management Using IOT

Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Disaster management has undergone a transformative paradigm shift with the integration of cutting-edge
technologies, and at the forefront of this evolution stands the Internet of Things (IoT). As humanity grapples
with the escalating challenges posed by natural disasters, the fusion of disaster management strategies with
IoT offers a groundbreaking approach to enhance preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. Among the
myriad calamities, earthquakes emerge as particularly formidable adversaries, unleashing unprecedented
destruction that demands innovative solutions. This introduction delves into the convergence of IoT
technology and earthquake disaster management, elucidating the potential and promises it holds in fortifying
resilience and mitigating the impact of seismic events.
The global landscape is increasingly vulnerable to the capricious forces of nature, with earthquakes
representing a ubiquitous threat that transcends geographical boundaries. These seismic events,
characterized by their sudden onset and destructive potential, necessitate a sophisticated and adaptive
approach to disaster management. Traditional methods, while invaluable, often face limitations in terms of
speed, accuracy, and scalability. Enter the IoT, a network of interconnected devices equipped with sensors,
actuators, and communication modules that enable real-time data acquisition, analysis, and dissemination.
In the context of earthquake disaster management, the IoT manifests as a powerful ally in early warning
systems. Traditional seismic monitoring relies on standalone sensors and centralized data processing, often
resulting in delayed alerts. However, with IoT-enabled seismic sensors strategically deployed across
seismic-prone regions, the speed and precision of earthquake detection are vastly improved. These sensors,
capable of continuously monitoring ground vibrations, can instantaneously relay data to centralized systems,
triggering automated alerts and notifications. This real-time responsiveness becomes a linchpin in
minimizing the loss of life and property.
Furthermore, the integration of IoT extends beyond mere detection; it permeates the entire disaster
management lifecycle. Pre-disaster preparedness benefits from IoT-driven simulations and predictive
modeling, allowing authorities to anticipate the potential impact of seismic events and formulate preemptive
measures. During an earthquake, IoT-enabled devices facilitate the collection of critical data, including
structural integrity assessments, casualty counts, and resource allocation needs. This real-time situational
awareness is invaluable for orchestrating swift and targeted response efforts.
In the aftermath of an earthquake, IoT continues to play a pivotal role in expediting recovery. Smart
infrastructure equipped with IoT devices facilitates the assessment of structural damage, expedites
restoration processes, and enhances communication among response teams. Drones and sensors contribute
to rapid damage assessment, guiding rescue teams to affected areas and optimizing the allocation of
resources.
However, the integration of IoT in earthquake disaster management is not without its challenges.
Cybersecurity concerns, interoperability issues, and the need for standardized protocols pose formidable
hurdles. Moreover, the ethical implications of data collection and privacy in the wake of disasters demand
careful consideration.

This introduction sets the stage for a comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted relationship between
IoT technology and earthquake disaster management. As we delve deeper into the subsequent sections, we
will unravel specific applications, case studies, challenges, and future trajectories that define this dynamic
intersection, emphasizing the imperative of embracing technological innovation to build resilient societies in
Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 6
 Disaster Management Using IOT
the face of seismic uncertainties.

Chapter 2
LITERATURE SURVEY

Natural disasters can be defined as a combination of natural hazards and vulnerabilities that endanger
vulnerable communities that are incapable of withstanding the adversities arising from them [1]. Human
beings invariably face threats of natural as well as human-made disasters, which often lead to massive
damages, human suffering, and negative economic impacts. The main characteristics of natural disasters are
unpredictability, availability of limited resources in impacted areas, and dynamic changes in the
environment [2]. Unpredictability implies that severe impacts on people and property during natural
disasters cannot be predicted with acceptable accuracy [3]. The issue of limited resources emerges because
unpredictability makes it difficult to allocate adequate resources in advance. Dynamic changes in the
environment result because it is difficult to make predictions about the movement of people and the
damages that may occur because of the natural disaster. It is difficult to predict such changes based on data
that pertains to normal periods [4]. Introducing disaster management policies and applying appropriate
levels of information technology and equipment offer immense potential in enhancing the capabilities of
disaster management policies. In addition, the evolving trends have opened massive technological resources
for reducing disaster risks [5].
Extraordinary adverse events have always been a constant part of people’s lives from the onset of
civilisation. For many years, it was not possible to register those occurrences due to a lack of knowledge and
technological support (Drabek & Mcentire, 2003). In literature, one of the first records of a disaster is
related to an accident that occurred at Halifax Harbor in Canada, 1917, involving a French ship carrying
explosive cargo and a Belgian ship. The accident entailed thousands of deaths and impacts to the community
and the environment (Drabek & Mcentire, 2003).
Adverse events or disasters are caused by climate factors, accidents, or intentional human actions (terrorist
attacks or arson, for instance) (Laplante et al., 2016). A few other noteworthy records of disasters include
the Bhopal gas accident (in India, 1984), the Chansala mining disaster (in India, 1975), the terrorist attack
on September 11th (in the USA, 2001), the Chornobyl nuclear accident (Ukraine, 1986), the tsunami in the
Indian Ocean (2004), the earthquake in Nepal (2015), and the Fort McMurray forest fire (in Canada, 2016)
(Ray et al., 2017), among others. Regardless of the cause, overall disasters impact a group of people
(victims), the local community, the environment, authorities, and countries in terms of public health,
economy, environment, and politics. Due to the impacts generated by disasters, people endeavour to recover
their physical health as much as possible, normalise their day-to-day activities, rebuild houses and other
locations, and reestablish agricultural and labour operations. These actions require specialised support from
healthcare professionals, public policies, government financial subsidies, and material donations, among
other goods and services. In disaster management, sets of actions are applicable to situations of natural
disasters or accidents, minimising impacts through emergency assistance; searching for missing victims;
supplying food, shelter, and diverse materials; and reconstructing affected locations (Dachyar et al., 2019).
Technology is a key ally in disaster management. In its diverse shapes and aspects, it performs specific roles
handled by professionals and technicians. In this context, technology advances entail benefits, such as
prevention, care, more efficient treatments, and other advantages through Knowledge and Technology
Transfer (KTT). KTT is embedded in the global processes of innovation and product development, from the
acquisition of machinery and equipment (Arvanitis et al., 2008), through training and technical support, and
to technology enhancements (Dziallas & Blind, 2019; Sosnowski, 2014). Since the 1990s, investments in
KTT centred on digital applications and tools have generated new means of communication between people.
Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 7
 Disaster Management Using IOT
A crucial global contribution was the Internet (Li et al., 2012). In turn, a recent approach has emerged: the
Internet of Things (IoT), which connects people

and objects with more accuracy to the web (Li et al., 2012). The IoT may be defined as the technology of
connected devices that exchange data with one another, acting as agile enablers of data, information, and
services (Van Der Klauw, 2018). The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a literature review on
the Internet of Things (IoT) applied to a specific area, disaster management. The results were obtained
through bibliometrics and the qualitative analysis of relevant scientific papers in the international literature.
The IoT corresponds to a set of information and communication technologies, engineering solutions, and
advances in computer sciences. Complex technologies are interconnected and create smart object networks,
in which they communicate, exchange information, generate more consistent data, and provide support for
strategic decisions and actions. In disaster management area, structured procedures and technologies are
essential in prediction, rescue, and post-disaster operations. People, material goods, financial resources, and
environmental resources, among others, are affected by natural or man-made disasters that occur around the
world. Therefore, exploring technologies that may be useful to enhance disaster management and make
operations more efficient is necessary. Even though it is theoretical, the paper proposes to provide a
discussion on an emerging theme, the IoT, which has been recently the focus of analyses. Associated to
disaster management, this study guides the discussion to one of the infinite IoT applications, so as to provide
a better comprehension of the subject to professionals and interested parties, besides generating other
complementary studies, more in-depth and empirical. The literature review was conducted in two
international databases, namely Scopus and Web of Science, defining a bibliographic portfolio of papers for
a bibliometric analysis and, subsequently, qualitative analysis, following formal literature review protocols,
according to Pagani et al. (2015, 2017). This paper is structured into four sections. The first contextualises
the study and presents the goal. The second and third sections exhibit the methodology and results,
respectively. The final section identifies the conclusions.
.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 8

 Disaster Management Using IOT

Chapter 3
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY

3.1 Motivation
The motivation behind the project on disaster management using IoT, particularly focused on earthquakes, is
rooted in the imperative to revolutionize and enhance our capabilities in mitigating the catastrophic impact
of seismic events. Earthquakes, as natural disasters, present unique challenges due to their sudden onset and
the potential for widespread devastation. The integration of IoT technology into disaster management
strategies is driven by several compelling motivations:

Enhanced Early Warning Systems:

Traditional earthquake early warning systems often face limitations in terms of speed and accuracy. The
motivation to integrate IoT lies in the potential to create a network of interconnected sensors that can rapidly
detect seismic activity, enabling real-time alerts and warnings. This can significantly reduce the response
time for individuals and communities, providing crucial moments for evacuation and preparedness.

Improved Situational Awareness:

The real-time data collection capabilities of IoT devices contribute to a more comprehensive understanding
of the situation during and after an earthquake. Enhanced situational awareness facilitates more informed
decision-making by authorities, allowing for efficient deployment of resources, prioritization of rescue
efforts, and coordination of emergency response teams.

Preventive and Predictive Measures:

IoT technology enables the implementation of predictive modeling and simulations to anticipate the
potential impact of earthquakes. This proactive approach supports pre-disaster preparedness by allowing
authorities to implement preventive measures, reinforce critical infrastructure, and develop strategies for
minimizing vulnerabilities in seismic-prone areas.

Optimized Response and Recovery Efforts:

The integration of IoT devices in disaster management streamlines response and recovery efforts. From
smart infrastructure aiding in rapid damage assessment to drones guiding rescue teams to affected areas, IoT
enhances the efficiency of recovery processes. This optimization is critical for minimizing the long-term
socio-economic impact of earthquakes.

Building Resilience in Communities:

The overarching motivation is to build resilient communities that can withstand and recover from the impact
of earthquakes. By leveraging IoT technology, the project aims to empower communities with the tools and
information needed to enhance their preparedness, response, and recovery mechanisms. This resilience-
building approach is vital for minimizing the loss of life and property in the face of seismic uncertainties.

Technological Innovation for Humanitarian Goals:

The project is motivated by a commitment to harness technological innovation for humanitarian goals. By
integrating IoT into earthquake disaster management, the aim is to showcase how advancements in
technology can be leveraged to address pressing global challenges, ultimately contributing to the well-being
and safety of individuals and communities.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 9

 Disaster Management Using IOT

Global Relevance and Impact:

Earthquakes are a global phenomenon, impacting regions across the world. The motivation behind the
project is to develop solutions that are globally relevant and adaptable to diverse contexts. The project seeks
to contribute to a broader conversation on leveraging technology for disaster resilience on a global scale.

In essence, the motivation for this project lies in leveraging the capabilities of IoT to create a paradigm shift
in earthquake disaster management, moving towards a more proactive, efficient, and technologically-
empowered approach to safeguard lives and infrastructure in the face of seismic events.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 10

 Disaster Management Using IOT

3.2 Problem Definition

Earthquakes pose a significant threat to human life, infrastructure, and overall community well-being.
Timely and effective disaster management is critical to mitigating the impact of earthquakes. However,
existing systems face challenges in early detection, rapid response, and optimized resource allocation. To
address these issues, the integration of IoT technologies in earthquake disaster management is proposed. The
challenges are listed: Limited Early Warning Capability: Inadequate Infrastructure Monitoring, Search and
Rescue Inefficiencies..
.
3.3 Objectives
The objectives of implementing IoT in earthquake disaster management are designed to address specific
challenges and improve the overall effectiveness of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. Here are
key objectives for integrating IoT technologies in earthquake disaster management:
 Early Detection and Warning
 Continuous Infrastructure Monitoring
 Continuous Infrastructure Monitoring
 Data Analytics for Informed Decision-Making
 Efficient Search and Rescue Operations

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 11

 Disaster Management Using IOT

3.4 Existing and Proposed System

The existing system of earthquake disaster management often relies on traditional methods, which, while
effective to some extent, exhibit limitations in terms of speed, accuracy, and real-time responsiveness. Key
components of the existing system include seismic monitoring through standalone sensors, centralized data
processing, and manual intervention in various stages of disaster management.

Seismic Monitoring:

Seismic activity is typically monitored using standalone sensors placed in seismic-prone regions. These sensors
detect ground vibrations associated with earthquakes.

Centralized Data Processing:

Data collected from seismic sensors are transmitted to centralized systems for processing. The analysis of
seismic data and the subsequent generation of alerts are often time-consuming processes.

Alerts and Notifications:

Once seismic data are processed, alerts and notifications are disseminated to relevant authorities and
communities. However, the delay in data processing may impact the speed of alert delivery.

Response and Recovery:

Emergency response teams rely on manual assessments and communication channels to coordinate rescue efforts
and allocate resources during the aftermath of an earthquake.

Proposed System:

The proposed system seeks to overcome the limitations of the existing system by integrating IoT technology into
earthquake disaster management. This involves the deployment of interconnected devices equipped with
sensors, actuators, and communication modules for real-time data acquisition, analysis, and communication.
Key components of the proposed system include:

IoT-Enabled Seismic Sensors:

Deployment of IoT-enabled seismic sensors strategically placed in seismic-prone regions. These sensors
continuously monitor ground vibrations, offering real-time data on seismic activity.

Real-time Data Transmission:

The IoT devices transmit data in real-time to centralized systems. This ensures immediate access to critical
information related to seismic events.

Automated Alerts and Notifications:

Automated systems analyze incoming data and trigger instant alerts and notifications in response to detected
seismic activity. This reduces the response time for authorities and communities, enhancing preparedness.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 12

 Disaster Management Using IOT

Predictive Modeling and Simulations:

Implementation of predictive modeling and simulations enabled by IoT technology. This allows for anticipatory
measures, such as reinforcing infrastructure and formulating pre-disaster preparedness strategies.

Smart Infrastructure and Drones:

Integration of IoT devices in smart infrastructure to facilitate rapid damage assessment. Drones equipped with
sensors contribute to efficient data collection for guiding rescue teams to affected areas.

Enhanced Situational Awareness:

The proposed system ensures enhanced situational awareness by providing authorities with real-time, detailed
information on the impact of earthquakes. This facilitates more informed decision-making during response
and recovery efforts.

Community Empowerment:

The proposed system emphasizes community empowerment through the dissemination of real-time information
to individuals. This enables communities to take proactive measures and make informed decisions during
and after seismic events.

Global Connectivity:

The proposed system is designed with global relevance, allowing for connectivity and adaptability to diverse
geographical and socio-economic contexts affected by earthquakes.

In summary, the proposed system leverages the capabilities of IoT to create a more dynamic, responsive, and
technologically-advanced approach to earthquake disaster management, aiming to significantly enhance the
overall effectiveness of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 13

 Disaster Management Using IOT

Chapter 4
REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS
4.1 Functional Requirements
Seismic Activity Detection:
The system should be able to detect seismic activity in real-time using IoT sensors and devices.

Early Warning System:

Implement an early warning system that provides timely alerts to the population in earthquake-prone areas.

Infrastructure Monitoring:
Enable continuous monitoring of critical infrastructure using IoT sensors to assess structural health during
and after earthquakes.

Communication Network:
Establish a resilient and redundant communication network using IoT technologies to facilitate
communication among emergency responders and the public.

Data Analytics:
Implement data analytics capabilities to analyze IoT-generated data and identify patterns related to seismic
activity.

Search and Rescue Support:

Deploy IoT-enabled devices, such as drones, to support search and rescue operations by providing real-time
data on affected areas and locating survivors.

Resource Allocation Optimization:

Utilize IoT data to optimize the allocation of emergency response resources, including personnel, medical
supplies, and equipment.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 14

 Disaster Management Using IOT

4.2 Non-Functional Requirements

Reliability:
The system should be highly reliable, with minimal downtime to ensure continuous monitoring and response
capabilities.

Scalability:
Design the system to be scalable, capable of handling increased sensor deployments and data volume as the
infrastructure expands.

Performance:
Ensure high-performance levels, with quick data processing and response times to meet the time-sensitive
nature of earthquake disaster management.

Usability:
Develop user-friendly interfaces for emergency responders and the public, ensuring ease of use and quick
access to critical information.

Interoperability:
Ensure interoperability with various types of IoT devices, communication protocols, and existing disaster
management systems to facilitate seamless collaboration.

Compliance:
Adhere to relevant standards and regulations governing data privacy, security, and disaster management
practices.

Scalability:
Design the system to be scalable, capable of handling increased sensor deployments and data volume as the
infrastructure expands.

These non-functional requirements contribute to the overall usability, performance, and user satisfaction,
ensuring that the device meets user expectations and operates reliably in various contexts.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 15

 Disaster Management Using IOT

4.3 Software and Hardware Requirements

Software Requirements:

Fig 4.3: Software Requirements

 Arduino IDE: The Arduino Integrated Development Environment (IDE) is essential for
programming and uploading code to the Arduino/ESP8266 boards.
 IoT Platform: Choose an IoT platform such as ThingSpeak, AWS IoT, or Microsoft Azure IoT for
data communication, storage, and remote monitoring.
 Programming Languages: Proficiency in programming languages such as C++ for Arduino
programming and potentially other languages for server-side development (e.g., Python, Java).
 Web Development Tools: If developing a web-based user interface, tools like HTML, CSS may be
necessary.
 Collaboration Tools: Use collaboration tools such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, or similar platforms
for team communication and coordination.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 16

 Disaster Management Using IOT

Hardware Requirements:

 Arduino/ESP8266 Boards:
Select suitable Arduino boards (e.g., Arduino Uno, Arduino Nano) for sensor integration, data processing,
and communication.
 Sensors:
Various sensors including accelerometer, gyroscope to detect and prevent loss from natural disasters
 IoT Module:
Choose an IoT communication module (e.g., Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, LoRa) to enable wireless communication
between sensors and the IoT platform.
 Power Supply:
A reliable power supply, which may include rechargeable batteries or power banks for portable applications.
 Indicators:
Indicators such as alert systems (buzzers, LEDs) for notifying stakeholders when signs of earthquake are
detected.
 Connectors and Wiring:
Various connectors, wires, and breadboards for connecting and prototyping the circuit.
 PCB (Printed Circuit Board):
Design and manufacture a PCB to optimize the circuit layout and improve the overall reliability of the
system.
 Computer or Laptop:
A computer or laptop for programming the Arduino boards and managing the IoT platform.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 17

 Disaster Management Using IOT

Chapter 5
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
5.1 Design of System

Fig 5.1 : Design of System

Explanation:

 The main hardware components here are the ESP8266, ADXL 345 accelerometer, Buzzer and LEDS
 All the data are read by micro controller, decision is taken based on the preset threshold values
 The decision is then sent to the output devices
 The output is shown in the web so that many stakeholders can have access to it.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 18

 Disaster Management Using IOT

WORKING:

1. Complete the circuit diagram as per the standard circuit design.

2. Down and install Arduino IDE and write the appropriate the code

3. Compile and upload the code using proper communication port

4. Setup the network by connecting all the devices to the common access point.

5. Run the code in Arduino IDE with SSID and Password of same as the network mentioned in the above
step

6. Get the IP address from the serial monitor and paste it in web browser to see the output.

7. If the threshold value exceeds then data is sent to the buzzer and the same is displayed in web.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 19

 Disaster Management Using IOT

5.2 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

Hardware Implementation:
Procure IoT Sensors
Develop Prototypes
Test Sensor Functionality
Implement Sensor Deployment Strategy

Software Development:
Develop Cloud-Based Platform
Implement Data Processing and Analysis Algorithms
Integrate Real-Time Alert System
Ensure System Security and Data Privacy Measures

Testing and Quality Assurance:

Conduct Sensor Calibration
Perform System Integration Testing
Validate Data Accuracy
Implement Quality Assurance Processes

Training and Documentation:

Develop User Manuals
Conduct Training Sessions for Stakeholders
Document System Configuration and Maintenance Procedures

Implementation and Deployment:

Gradual System Rollout
Monitor Initial System Performance
Address Any Immediate Issues
Full System Deployment

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 20

 Disaster Management Using IOT

Chapter 6
IMPLEMNTATION ()
#include <Wire.h> // Wire library - used for I2C communication

int ADXL345 = 0x53; // The ADXL345 sensor I2C address

float X_out, Y_out, Z_out; // Outputs

void setup() {
Serial.begin(9600); // Initiate serial communication for printing the results on the Serial monitor
Wire.begin(); // Initiate the Wire library
// Set ADXL345 in measuring mode
Wire.beginTransmission(ADXL345); // Start communicating with the device
Wire.write(0x2D); // Access/ talk to POWER_CTL Register - 0x2D
// Enable measurement
Wire.write(8); // (8dec -> 0000 1000 binary) Bit D3 High for measuring enable
Wire.endTransmission();
delay(10);
}

void loop() {
// === Read acceleromter data === //
Wire.beginTransmission(ADXL345);
Wire.write(0x32); // Start with register 0x32 (ACCEL_XOUT_H)
Wire.endTransmission(false);
Wire.requestFrom(ADXL345, 6, true); // Read 6 registers total, each axis value is stored in 2 registers

Z_out = ( Wire.read()| Wire.read() << 8); // Z-axis value

Z_out = Z_out/256;

Serial.print(" Za= ");

Serial.println(Z_out);

if(Z_out > 0.1 && Z_out < 1)

Serial.println("Seismic level low");

else if(Z_out > 0.1 && Z_out < 1)

Serial.println("Seismic level low");

else if (Z_out > 1 )
Serial.println("Seismic level High"); }

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 21

 Disaster Management Using IOT

Fig 6.1: Output screenshot 1

Fig 6.2: Output screenshot 2

Fig 6.3: Output screenshot 3

Chapter 7
Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 22
 Disaster Management Using IOT

APPLICATION
The real-time applications of the IoT-enabled earthquake disaster management project are diverse and
impactful, encompassing various stages of disaster preparedness, response, and recovery. The integration of
IoT technology facilitates dynamic and immediate actions, enhancing overall efficiency and effectiveness.
Here are some real-time applications of the project:
Early Warning Systems:
Real-Time Seismic Monitoring: The IoT-enabled sensors provide continuous, real-time monitoring of seismic
activity. In the event of an earthquake, the system triggers immediate alerts, offering crucial seconds to
minutes for early warning and evacuation.
Predictive Modeling and Simulation:
Dynamic Pre-disaster Preparedness: The project's real-time predictive modeling and simulations allow
authorities to dynamically adjust and implement pre-disaster preparedness strategies based on the evolving
seismic conditions.
Automated Alerts and Notifications:
Instant Alert Dissemination: Automated systems analyze incoming data in real-time, triggering instant alerts
and notifications to relevant authorities, emergency responders, and the public. This rapid communication is
vital for timely response efforts.
Smart Infrastructure for Rapid Assessment:
Immediate Damage Assessment: IoT-enabled smart infrastructure facilitates the immediate assessment of
structural damage through real-time data collection. This accelerates the identification of affected areas,
enabling swift deployment of rescue and recovery resources.
Resource Allocation Optimization:
Real-Time Resource Tracking: The project allows for real-time tracking and optimization of resource
allocation. Emergency response teams can dynamically adjust their strategies based on evolving data,
ensuring efficient utilization of personnel and equipment.
.

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 23

 Disaster Management Using IOT

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the project focused on the detection and alerting of earthquakes using data collected along a single
axis. While the current implementation demonstrates the feasibility of detecting seismic activity and issuing alerts,
it is essential to recognize the limitations of relying solely on one axis of data.
Future development should prioritize expanding the system to collect and analyze data along all three axes. This
enhancement will allow for a more accurate and nuanced assessment of earthquake characteristics, including
magnitude, depth, and direction of motion. Implementing a three-axis approach will enhance the system's
reliability and effectiveness, making it more robust in diverse seismic scenarios.

REFERENCES
1. Blaikie, P.; Cannon, T.; Davis, I.; Wisner, B. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters; Routledge:
London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
2. Celik, S.; Corbacioglu, S. Role of information in collective action in dynamic disaster environments. Disasters 2010, 34,
137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Sutanta, H.; Bishop, I.D.B.; Rajabifard, A.R. Integrating spatial planning and disaster risk reduction at the local level in the
context of spatially enabled government. In Spatially Enabling Society Research, Emerging Trends and Critical
Assessment; Abbas, R., Joep, C., Kalantari, M., Kok, B., Eds.; Leuven University Press: Leuven, Belgium, 2010; pp. 55–
68. ISBN 978-90-5867-851-5. [Google Scholar]
4. Penning-Rowsell, E.C.; Sultana, P.; Thompson, P.M. The ‘last resort’? Population movement in response to climate-related
hazards in Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 27, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Gaillard, J.C.; Mercer, J. From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2013,
37, 93–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Dept of CSE, JCET, Hubballi Page 24