Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
exactly anti ferromagnetic, the spin cancel each other. The magnetic property rise
due to the Fe3+which align themselves on the application of field. Depending on
the magnetic properties, ferrites can be categorized as “Soft” and “hard” ferrite.
Soft ferrites have low corecivity while the hard ferrites have high corecivity. Hard
ferrites have high corecivity and moderate magnetization. Corecivity stands for the
resistance to get demagnetized on the removal of the applied field which satisfies it
for being a permanent magnet [1-7].
Therefore in this project we report synthesis copper ferrite with general
formula CuFe2O4.The spinel ferrite were synthesized by chemical co-precipitation
method has several advantages such as good chemical homogeneity, high purity,
simple and economical method to produce large quantity of smaller particles and
low sintering temperature as compare to ceramic method.
2. Experimental Procedure :
Copper sulphate 0.2N were taken in a 50ml beaker. In another beaker 0.4N
ferric nitrate was taken in 100ml beaker. Then solutions were mixed in 500ml
beaker and stirred for 1 hour to make the mixture homogeneous. Then add 50 ml
1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) to above precursor solution. Then drop-wise
addition of ammonia with the help of lab made assembly to adjust flow rate
approximately 1 ml/min with constant stirring at 1000rpm on Remi’s magnetic
stirrer. The pH of the solution was maintained between 8-10. The color of the
solution changed from dark red to black. The solution was left for ageing (24
hours). The product was filtered and then washed with ethanol and distilled water
repeatedly. It was then subjected to annealing at 110 0C for 24 hours and finally
sintered at temperature 700 0C for 5 hours. The characterization is to be done with
XRD.
3
Procedure : 1
4
Flow Chart
1% SDS addition
Cu-salt + Fe-salt Mixture stirred with
PH = 8-10
Filter
Annealing @ 1100C
Reddish-Brown powder
Final Product
5
2.2 Synthesis of Copper ferrite through different route
S. A. Jasimet. al. [9] has worked to observe the behaviour of Copper ferrite
magnetic nanostructures had lowtoxicity at a concentration of 250 µg/mL.In this
study, magnetic spinel copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) nanostructures were eco-friendly
synthesized using Nasturtium officinaleextract.CuFe2O4 nanostructures with
spherical surface morphologiesnanostructures can be considered as suitable
candidates for drug delivery and other biomedical applications, because of their
low toxicity effects. K. H. Kahkeshet.al has worked on synthesis of high corecivity
of copper ferrite by co-precipitation method. In this work, Copperferrite was
synthesized by proper control on the circumstances during the ferrite formation in
aqueous phase. The effect on crystal growth was resulted in improvement of
corecivity value from 237 Oe, with no control of flow-rate, up to 1337 Oe, with
controlled flow rate [10].
Smitha Bhaskaran et.al has worked on synthesis of cobalt substituted copper
ferrite nanoparticles prepared by a modified sol-gel method. In his work, using Fe,
Cu and Co nitrates as precursors, citric acid (C6H8O7) and ammonia as a precipitant
of manufacturing of Copper cobalt ferrite ultrafine and pure particles was
successfully done. With suitable heat treatment it is possible to control the textural
and magnetic characteristics of Copper cobalt ferrite as desired. It is confirmed
from XRD analysis that the samples prepared by this route exhibit cubic structure
with crystallite size in the range 12–32 nm. The saturation magnetization of the
samples shows an increasing pattern with the concentration of cobalt.
6
Photograph:
7
Result :
Conclusion : -
From the experiments it was concluded that :
1. Copper ferrite prepared from different procedure showed different
morphology and particle size.
2. The magnetic corecivity value decreased with the increase in calcinations
temperature and also with the sintering temperature.
8
References:
[1] B.D. Cullity, Introduction to Magnetic Materials, Addison-Wisley, USA, 1972
185.
[2] R. R. Powar, V. D. Phadtare, V. G. Parale, H-H. Park, S. Pathak, P. R. Kamble, P.
B. Piste, D. N. Zambare, Ceram. Int. 44 (2018) 20782−20789,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.079.
[3] F.zhang, S.Kantake, Y.Kitamoto, M.Abe, IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 (1999) 27512753
[4] Rohit R. Powar, V. D. Phadtare, V. G. Parale, S. Pathak, P. B. Piste, Dnyandevo
N. ZambareStructural and magnetic properties of Cr-Zn nano ferrites synthesized
by chemical co-precipitation method. Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society, Vol.
56, No. 5, pp. 474-482, 2019.
[5] Rohit R. Powar, V. D. Phadtare, V. G. Parale, Sachin Pathak, D. R. Patil, P. B. Piste,
D. N. Zambare.Effect of zinc substitution on magnesium ferrite nanoparticles:
structural, electrical, magnetic, and gas sensing properties. Materials Science &
Engineering: B (2020) 262:114776.
[6] A.E. Berkowitz, W.Schuele, J.Appl. Phys.30 (1959) 134S-135S
[7] C.N. Chinnasamy, B.Jeyadevan, O.Perales Perez, K.Shinoda, K.Tohji, A.Kasuya,
IEEE Trans.Magn. 38(2002) 2640-2642.
[8] Smitha Bhaskaran, Imaddin A. Al-Omari, E. Veena Gopalan,J. of Alloys and
Compounds. 884 (2021) 161096.
[9] SaadeAbdalkareemJasim, IndrajitPatra, Maria Jade Catalan Opulencia,
KaddaHachem*, Rosario Mireya Romero Parra, Mohammad Javed Ansari,
AbduladheemTurkiJalil, Moaed E. Al-Gazally, MahinNaderifar, Mehrdad Khatami*,
and Reza Akhavan-Sigari. Nanotechnology Reviews 11 (2022) 2483–2492.
[10] KavehHatamiKahkesh, ZahraBaghbantaraghdari , DonyaJamaledin,
FarnazDabbaghMoghaddam , Naoki Kaneko,MahsaGhovvati, Mater. Chem.
Horizon. 2 (2023) 49-56.