Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Property Short Outline
Property Short Outline
I. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
There is no actual object just an idea (nothing is physically there)
You own a right and no one else can own that right (bc it was your idea)
TRADEMARK: Distinguishable mark (word, phrase, logo, etc.) to identify goods/manufacturer from others
Elements:
The mark cannot be merely descriptive Ex: Nike
Cannot be deceptively similar to another company Logo
Cannot confuse a consumer
Can arise automatically without government registration BUT registration can…
Evidence a mark
Increase geographical coverage
Make it “uncontestable”
The Lahman Act: gives seller/producer right to “register” a trademark & prevent competitors from using
“Infringement” = when someone else is using the trademark
1
Secondary Meaning: acquired when… in minds of the public, primary significance of
product feature is to identify source of the product rather than product itself Ex: Word
Merely descriptive/generic marks need to have a secondary meaning “Nike”
itself
Not trademarkable until this happens
Functionality Doctrine: product is functional and cannot serve as a trademark if it is
essential to use or purpose of article, OR if it affects cost/quality of article
If exclusive use would put competitors at a significant non-reputation-related disadvantage
Trade Dress = the vibezzzzz the appearance of something
Will be distinctive and protectable Ex: NYC
If not specific symbol/device that can be described/depicted, may not be a registerable Nike Store
trademark
If it looks like everyone else must become established in that area and used a lot
TRADE SECRETS
6 Factor Test: OIPVMTE
O = Known outside the business Ex: Nike’s
I = Known inside business marketing
P = Precautions taken ideas
V = Value
M = $ spent to develop
TE = Time/expense for someone else to develop
RIGHT OF PUBLICITY:
Test = suggestion/confusion of endorsement
Not always right of publicity issue the second there is a commercial interest
@ Common Law… may be pled by alleging: [IACI]
I = D’s use of P’s identity
A = Appropriation of P’s name or likeness to D’s advantage
Commercial or otherwise
C = Lack of consent
I = Resulting injury
NIL = Name; Image; Likeness
Defense:
Parody
Biography
Journalists
Transformative Image
2
II. PERSONAL PROPERTY
FINDERS’ CASES: finder of piece of personal property has rights above everybody except OG owner
Mislaid = someone forgets they put property there, but intended to come back for it
Order of Recovery: [true owner] landowner
Lost = a mistake/involuntary/carelessness; item there unintentionally
Ambiguous = lost
Order of Recovery: [true owner] finder
Abandoned = intentionally left behind
Order of Recovery: 1st person to take it!
Treasure Trove = needs to be antiquity; pirates!; buried or hidden treasure that consists of metals,
currency, or other similar valuables intentionally concealed in distant past by someone who intended to
return to it but didn’t
Order of Recovery: finder
BAILMENT: delivery of personal property by one person (bailor) to another who holds the property
(bailee) for a certain purpose; usually under express or implied K
Bailment Theory
Elements: [ADAFD] To recover, P must establish…
A = An implied or express agreement
D = A delivery of property in good condition
A = Bailee’s acceptance of the property
AND
F = Bailee’s failure to return the property
D = OR bailee’s redelivery of the property in damaged condition
Tell bailor what property is and they accept responsibility of it; presumption of negligence if something
is damaged
Rebuttable Presumption: bailee can avoid liability by showing loss/damage was not their fault
Bailee is liable upon proof that…
Property was in good condition at time of bailment
AND
It was returned in damaged condition (or not at all)
Bail For Hire: duty to exercise “reasonable care” in safekeeping the bailed property and is liable for
negligence that causes loss or damage
Bailee has duty to…
Exercise care
Not be negligent
Gratuitous Bailee: someone keeping bailed articles only for benefit of bailor
Less liability
FUGACIOUS THINGS
The creation of rights of yet-owned property
RULE = ownership should be unambiguous and easily recognizable
Limitations Pooling: oil under land collected from multiple properties; don’t want others to
collect revenue of product under your property just because they withdrew it first
3
Solution: determine where resource comes from exactly and split revenue between properties
RULE OF CAPTURE
The one who actually possess the fugacious thing is the owner
Rewards success reflected a kind of distributive justice or fairness
Possession = complete control
If you take significant steps to obtain possession of abandoned property, and the efforts are
interrupted by the unlawful acts of another actor, you get legal interest in property
Partial/Probable Capture: modification to the rule of capture to protect whaling industry (since whales
often break free); if whaler does all things possible to make the animal his own, that is sufficient
Can’t be Determined? SPLIT
Unauthorized Transfers:
Stolen property does not pass title (voidable)
Key is entrustment
Exceptions:
If you make it easy by entrusting it to someone else
4
Merchant Exception: if entrusted to agent
Security Interest:
Interest in someone else's property (created by K or by law); putting property as collateral
Gives holder the right to seize, repossess, and then sell that property
Repo man & inventory sales
Bank could repossess if payments not made
Do not hold title to that property (giving title, and then getting back a security interest)
Perfecting Security Interest: By filing doc. (UCC-1)
Key is timing!
Through UCC-1 all inventory belongs to the bank; once bank seizes it, becomes bank’s
property; bank can come collect on all the property, then sell to someone else
If there are collateral changes, need a new UCC-1 signed K
You can trace proceeds of secured personal property
CL FORMS OF PLEADING
Can wrongfully interfere with personal property
Trespass: something is wrongfully taken; invasion of real property; damage to personal property
Replevin: action to get property back
Conversion: does not depend on wrongful taking, only wrongful act
Only personal property (has expanded to include documents)
Bodily Extracts?
[morality unclear]
No rights to things given away (including body parts)
BUT can’t sell your body parts (Black Market)
What about organ donors then?
5
III. REAL PROPERTY
OWNERSHIP
You can create real property interest by…
Creation; adverse possession (use); transfer; government grants; discovery & occupation; gift; devise
or descent; purchase/sale or K
Equitable Title = A beneficial interest in real property that gives the title holder the right to acquire legal
title to the property at time of K
Legal Title = Title that can be documented & available through public records when deed is executed
Grantor = a person who transfers an interest in real property
Grantee = the party granted the property interest
Elements of Property Transfer:
Parties; preconditions; expressions that form K; obligations created for each party; representations &
warranties; breach and remedies; termination
CREATION
Creation by Gift:
ELEMENTS:
Intention on part of donor to make a gift;
Delivery (or transfer) of the subject matter of the gift;
Acceptance of gift by donor
Includes: wills; descent
Creation by Adverse Possession (Use):
ELEMENTS:
Open, hostile, notorious, visible, exclusive, continuous possession…
For a number of years… [usually 20+ cumulative years, regardless of change in ownership]
Without permission
Strict; multiple burdens to prove; objective
Creation by K
TYPES OF OWNERSHIP
Adverse Possession:
Possession (for a statutorily prescribed period of time) can become title if CONAH met
Balances interest of the rightful owner against those of the possessor
o Rightful Owner who is afforded a significant amount of time within which to assert
his right in the face of another’s visible occupation of his land
o Possessor whose period of uninterrupted use yields expectation and reliance interests
CONAH Elements (Objective)
Continuous = uninterrupted for the statutory period (≈20 years depending on jurisdiction)
o Tacking regarding adverse possessor
Open & Notorious = possession the owner would make under circumstances
o must be visible (actual or constructive)
o supposed to go out to look at your own property
o could be investigated
Actual = possessor must make an actual physical entry onto the premises and take possession
to start the appropriate SOL
6
Hostile = possessor does not have true owner’s permission to be there
Marital Property:
Body of law that directs how property held by husband, wife, or both is divided or owned
Common Law States [Equitable Distribution] =
Marital estate = equitable (not necessarily equally divided)
3 Circumstances:
o All property is split (50/50)
Includes pre-marital property
o All property acquired during the marriage is shared
Does not include pre-marital property
o All property acquired during the marriage is shared except by will, gift, or property
earning income
Does not include pre-marital property
Essentially a community property system
Community Property States =
Property that the couple has gotten during marriage will be divided
o Can be equitably split
Not necessarily 50/50, but fair split
Future earning capacity also taken into account
Presumption that everything in the union is community property…
o BUT separate property only when it belongs to a specific spouse
Determinations:
Inception of title how it came about
Ex: will or inheritance; gifts to one spouse; pre-marital property
Commingled Property if ambiguous, presumed to be community property
If one spouse paid to improve property, can be reimbursed for it
Valuation of Property
Experts & Appraisers
Determining “fair market price”
Not a science (value fought about)
What about degrees? hard to value
8
Trusts:
Trustor sets up the trust, gives property to trustee who holds property for benefit of beneficiary
Requirements:
Clear form of writing [Who is in trust; who beneficiaries are; how to pay beneficiaries]
Duty of Trustee = [high fiduciary duty] LARPAA
o L = Loyalty
o A = avoid self-dealing
o R = reasonable and prudent investment
o P = protect and preserve trust property
o A = account to the beneficiary
o A = avoid commingling
TRANSACTIONS
Brokerage:
RULE:
Broker will get a commission if they find…
… a ready, willing, and able buyer…
…even if no sale occurs
Have completed their duty if they find a buyer but no sale is made
Broker = an intermediary; controls everything; used by buyers and sellers (seller pays for it all)
Wants to know everything about property to avoid being held liable for something
Brokerage Agreement = has to be in writing to be enforceable (SOF)
“Accidental Sale” – even if broker hasn’t begun to make an effort (or seller finds buyer), must
still provide broker with commission; sometimes even if sale occurs post K with broker
3 Possibilities:
Sell below list price with agreement from seller
Sell at list price
Sell above list price (ex: through bidding war)
Broker Liability = brokers can be liable for mistakes in transactions…
Hoffman Rule Split (3 Approaches/Jurisdictions):
(1) NO LIABILITY on broker who makes a mistaken representation
o If property speaks for itself (Buyer beware!)
o Does not have to be in good faith
(2) NEGLIGENCE (middle ground)
o If the broker should have checked on something the seller informed them of
o Broker liable for negligence misrepresentation even when unaware of mistake (no intent)
(3) STRICT LIABILITY
o As broker, never say anything!!
o Impose liability on broker even for innocently passing on a false representation from the
seller (even if you believe it true or had not checked info)
Letter of Intent (LOI): Deal Letter
9
Done in anticipation of making a bigger K; holds you to duty to negotiate in good faith; not
enforceable unless all essential terms are present; agreement to agree ≠ enforceable
Make it clear that the duty to negotiate is enforceable (risky)
Agree to negotiate in good faith (but do not have to complete agreement)
Statute of Frauds (SOF)
In order to prevent oral testimony, statement has to be in writing
3 Approaches:
Strict = terms must be in K
Middle = use the description in K and other context clues (extrinsic evidence) to look for further
clarification to determine missing information
Loose = relaxed approach; just need a memorandum of an agreement and can then introduce
other forms of evidence
Negotiation needs to avoid fraud
Cannot misrepresent about actual facts, but can “puff”
AGREEMENTS
Preconditions to Sale:
Buyer wants…
Title; Inspection; Financing
Can walk if all not met
Inspection = can be conditioned precedent that needs to be satisfied before an agreement becomes
binding or before a duty to perform arises
Financing = inserted to protect buyers so they do not have to pay for the whole property themselves
Purchase conditional on ability to get financing; dangerous for buyer to not have a financing
condition; important to be specific
Bank can provide “pre-qualification”
Not a final absolute commitment from the bank
For when buyer finds property and as soon as K is formed
o Cannot get final financing from bank until there is a K
Title = the aggregate of legal rights enjoyed by a person under law towards the ownership and
possession of a property
Obligation to purchase only when the satisfactory title is delivered
“Satisfaction” Clauses risky…
o Can easily get out of them; seller wants buyer to be specific about what they are worried
about
Buyers want to look at title report before purchasing
o Most sellers want this done quickly to not tie up property for so long
Options:
Option Agreement = agreement that one party (usually the buyer) decides within a specific time
period whether or not to complete the deal
Paying for right to decide if you want property (which gets temporarily taken off the market)
A separate agreement/K that needs own K requirements (separate offer, consideration,
acceptance)
Must be in writing (SOF)
Specific Performance:
10
K remedy where court orders a party to actually perform its promise as closely as possible bc
monetary damages are inadequate to fix the harm
Granted bc a parcel of real estate is such that nothing else will satisfy you (unique)
Every piece of property is unique even if “identical”
Escrow Agreements:
Escrow = a neutral 3rd party who holds the money/documents for the parties
Escrowee must make an independent determination of compliance with conditions of K (except
where it is beyond their ability)
Earnest Money = money put down to show you are earnest
A deposit but NOT a down payment (money releases at closing and can become part of down
payment at that time)
Liquidated Damages = if buyer breaches, seller can keep earnest money
Held in escrow until closing
Seller Liable:
Usually liable for misrepresentation
Innocent misrepresentation = depends on jurisdiction
Non-disclosure
Warranty (1 year)
Consumer protection
Liability Outside Agreement:
Parole Evidence Rule
Can’t introduce any extrinsic evidence to alter a written K
Common Exception = Fraud
K not enforceable; then allowed to introduce external evidence if it’s evidence of fraud
CL requires an intentional deception and there had to be reliance on that misrepresentation
See also… [to the buyer]
Negligent Misrepresentation = there were red flags, but never checked and misled seller
Innocent Misrepresentation = honestly think house is fine and see no red flags, but incorrect
Consumer Registration = implied warranty
Strict Liability
FINANCE / CONVEYANCE
Real Estate Finance: Seller
$$$ deed
The Main Players = seller; buyer-borrower; lender
All giving something up & getting something Mortgage:
Buyer-
Lender
Lender = always has duty to foreclose on default “deed of trust”
Borrower
11
Freddie Mac (FNMC) = publicly traded & gov’t sponsored; expanded secondary market for
mortgages
Ginnie Mae (GNMA) = fed gov’t corp. that guarantees securities that underwrite mortgages
Credit Quartet:
(1) Interest Rate (%) = can be fixed (remains the same throughout mortgage) OR adjustable (based
on fluctuating index)
(2) Duration of payments = common for fixed-rate residential mortgages
(3) Amortization = separating the payments for the loan principal and interest into periodic payments
to where the loan is paid off at a specified time
(4) Amount financed = the principal
Types of Mortgages:
Straight Mortgage = go to court/auction [Judicial foreclosure]
Property gets foreclosed and auctioned off at sheriff's auction
Similar to “deed of trust” in all other aspects
Deed of Trust = private sale [attorney conducts]
Borrower, lender, seller, and trustee conduct foreclosure sale
NO COURT ACTION NEEDED
Default on payment leads to private foreclosure sale
Lender gets everything in their favor bc risky money (trustee acts on behalf of lender)
Duties of Trustee = sale must be properly advertised; must specify time, place, and forum of
the trustee’s sale; requires a reasonable auction
FOR BOTH
Valid security interest; can be sold; timely payment is essential; insurance requirement on the
borrower; due on sale clause; right to reinstate; default/accelerate for any breach; trustees can be
replaced; releases issue upon full payment
Promissory Note:
A promise to pay a certain amount on certain date(s)
K that has an accelerated clause permits the lender to “accelerate” which makes the entire
outstanding debt due immediately (foreclosure time!)
Deed:
Must be lawfully executed and delivered
Must be in writing; signed by grantor; lawfully executed in accordance with statutory
requirements
Standard of delivery accomplished when grantor manifests the present intent to part with legal
control, regardless of whether the deed instrument is actually or literally transferred to grantee
Covenants: [SECQED]
o Formal agreement/promise (usually included in a K) to do or not do particular act
PRESENT FUTURE
- Breached (if ever) at the instant of delivery - Not breached (if ever) until future date when grantee is disturbed
- SOL begins from moment the deed is delivered in possession
- SOL will not begin until that future date
S = Seisin E = Against C = Right to QE = Quiet D = Defend Title
Encumbrances Convey Enjoyment
grantor promises grantor promises that grantor promises grantor promises that grantor promises to defend grantee against
that he owns the there are no that he has the grantee will not be any lawful claims of title asserted by
land that he now servitudes or liens on power to make this disturbed by a 3rd party’s others
12
conveys the property transfer lawful claim of title
grantor promises to do whatever future acts
are reasonably necessary to perfect
grantee’s title if it later turns out to be
imperfect
TYPES:
Quitclaim Deed =
NO COVENANTS
o Worst deed for a buyer, as grantor is not even promising that he has good title to convey
Simply a declaration of record that the seller has no interest in the property
Used just to clear things up on the title
Not promising anything; no rights to the property
General Warranty Deed =
SIX CONVENANTS
Grantor willingly assumes the sins (if any) of predecessors, and promises grantee that grantor
will be held accountable
Promise that the title is valid against anyone
o Grantor warrants title against the world
Limited/“Special” Warranty Deed =
Grantor only speaking upon his own actions, not predecessors
o Warrants only against defects created by grantor
Only promises:
o Grantor has not conveyed property to another
AND
o Property is free from encumbrances created by grantor
FORECLOSURE
Equity of Redemption:
Dying doctrine
Could redeem property if made payment within a certain time
Upon payment, deed would be nullified
Upon default, deed would be absolute
Highly limited after auction
Based on Old English history (not likely nowadays)
Most states hold you can pay loans up until they foreclose
Clogging Doctrine: prohibition on the erection of artificial barriers; or “clogging” the equity of
redemption except in a “workout”
What banks do
Wrongful Foreclosure:
Tort action P must prove that when the foreclosure proceeding begun, there was no default on
their part that would give rise to a right to foreclose
Damages are only available when the foreclosure was absolutely void bc the mortgagee had no
right to foreclose at the time they attempted foreclosure
13
LIENS
14
IV. REAL ESTATE
TITLE
Types:
Record Title = “of record”; whoever is listed in the record
Does not actually get you the title
Won’t show adverse possession
Good Title = title can be defended against anyone who might claim it through litigation
A challenge in court, but could win it
Usually shows adverse possession
Marketable Title = beyond reasonable doubt you have a better than good title and can
defend it
No one will question title
No one has been adversely possessing it
Marketable Legislation:
Any interest goes away after period of time UNLESS it stays “on record”
Insurable Title = insurance on title by a company
Does not have to be a record title
Objective
Limited unless extra K liability
15
Can award fraudulent people
(2) Pure Notice Jurisdiction
Winner = B wins if they have no notice (regardless of if they ever record)
Buyer should still record promptly and properly to avoid any disputes
(3) Race-Notice Jurisdiction
Winner = B IF: 1st to record & has no notice
Chain of Title:
The historical record of ownership transfers of a specific piece of property
The sequence of recorded documents capable of giving record notice to later takers
Problems Reasonable Title Search = search of the public records for any defects or encumbrances
in a property's chain of title
Looks at what each owner did while they owned the property
CLOSING
Should be quick, uneventful, and mechanical bc it is simply an exchange of [signed] forms, and money
should be in escrow
Termination…
(1) …under option =
Giving buyer an option (of usually around 30 days)
Buyer must watch time and perform appropriate steps before it runs out
(2) …for failure =
Usually can terminate
Either reasonably clear to buyer OR the seller is willing to return to marketing the property
Buyer must act IF
Buyer is unable to obtain financing as provided by agreement
The title does not meet its requirements
The inspections lead to a decision to terminate
(3) …due to breach =
Ex: late discovery of second easement; encumbrance; sellers’ position
Destruction/Loss of Property Before Closing:
Views =
Majority View From time of K to closing, loss/burden is on buyer
Burden/loss on party in possession
Burden/loss on the seller
Solution = spell it out in K what happens!!
Breach of K Remedies:
Have to put innocent party in position as if there had been no breach = make whole again
Must be proven with reasonable certainty
Remedies for Buyer = seller must try to resell
Damages; earnest money; mitigation
Actual Damages:
Expectation = they should get benefit of the bargain
Consequential = foreseeable loss; beyond the market value if there were things that were
foreseeable; usually not mental distress; on top of expectation damages
16
Incidental = out-of-pocket
Liquidated Damages:
Elements: RAP
R= reasonable estimate
A= actual damages difficult to calculate
P = parties intended to liquidate damages (in K)
17
V. LAND USE REGULATIONS
TAKINGS
Taking: physically occupying property
A regulation that wholly frustrates the owner’s reasonable investment-backed expectations, or
otherwise renders property completely useless
NOT a taking limitations that allow a reasonable use or ability to exploit ones property
TYPES:
Per Se Taking = a physical invasion
Temporary Taking = must be compensated for the amount of time owner could not build
Requires compensation, otherwise cities could just regulate until they get caught by courts
Ex: amount of income they lost; the difference in costs to build now
Also: rent regulations; price regulations; moratorium on construction
Metaphorical Taking = so many restrictions that property has no value/use to you anymore
Eminent Domain Taking = gov’t taking private property for public purposes
5th Amendment: Due Process:
Government can take your land IF…
They provide just compensation
Paid fair market price
Exceptions: Can’t find at time of the taking; manifest injustice
AND
It’s for reasons that benefit society
The health, safety, and welfare of fellow citizens
Essentially government just need a rational basis to “take” property
Deference to local government
th
14 Amendment: Equal Protection
Can only claim if government took property through unequal treatment
Low standard = as long as gov’t wasn’t being totally irrational, they will fulfill test
Any plausible reasoning will do, but there must be a reason
Regulatory Taking = Tests…
(1) Loretto Test: a gov’t regulation is a taking when the gov’t authorizes a permanent physical
occupation of real/personal property
LoreTOE permanent physical occupation
(2) Lucas Test: a taking when the regulation causes the loss of all economically
beneficial/productive uses of the land, unless the regulation is justified by background principals
of property/nuisance law
Lucas = USELESS valueless & noxious (nuisance)
(i) IF useless = taking
18
(ii) IF [nuisance]
Valid = NOT taking
Invalid = taking
(3) Nollan-Dolan Test: regulation is a taking if the gov’t demands an exaction that lacks a nexus
with a legitimate state interest, or lacks proportionality to project’s impacts
Exaction = a requirement that the developer provides specified land,
improvements, payments, or other benefits to the public to help offset the
project’s impacts
Is the gov’t demanding that the owner must convey property rights in
exchange for approval of project?
(a) Nollan = nexus there must be a connection between the burden you’re creating and
what the gov’t is trying to limit/regulate
Is there an essential nexus?
Nollan = Nexus = con-NEX-ion
(b) Dolan = proportionality gov’t may not place land use restrictions on property unless
there is a rough proportionality between the conditions imposed and the impact of land use
Is the exaction roughly proportional?
Dolan = dole out portions = proportionality
(4) Penn Central Balancing Test: Consider 3 Factors…
C (character) OI (owner’s investment) EI (economic impact) PPPish [koi fish]
C = (a) the character of the gov’t action involved in the regulation
If the gov’t’s action is a physical action, rather than a “regulatory invasion,” then the
action is almost certainly a taking
OI = (b) the extent to which the regulation has interfered with the owner’s reasonable
investment-backed expectations for the parcel as a whole
EI = (c) the regulation’s economic impact on the affected property owner
PPP = (d) physical invasion (e) broad public purpose (f) comprehensive plan (not
predictable)
19
Remedies:
Compensatory Damages
Inverse Condemnation = when gov’t takes property for public use that greatly damages the value
Property owner must show that gov’t’s taking has failed to promote substantial gov’t interests
OR has deprived the owner of the economic value of one’s property
20
Exclusionary Zoning = to exclude from single-purpose-areas (particularly residential) land uses
that are incompatible with primary land use
NIMBY = Not-In-My-Backyard
Cannot outwardly discriminate (14th Amendment)
Performance Zoning = any land that complies with set standard for district is permitted
21
Process: Developer produces plat that is reviewed by an entity any department may request
alterations once recorded, developer can sell individual lots
Once plat is approved, neighboring landowners do not have private cause of action against
the developer to challenge the community effects
“Hold Zones” = prevent development on designated property
Not a taking if it covers something…
essential; short-term; narrow; shared among multiple landowners
Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction city can expand city limits by controlling property outside of
boundaries (problem when two cities collide)
Environmental Regulation Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act [CERCLA]
Authorizes gov’t to remove hazardous materials and then to seek compensation from
potentially responsible parties by imposing liability on them
Current owners; past owners; treatment/disposal person; transporters
Easement: non-possessory interest in land providing the dominant estate holder rights against the
servient estate; right to do something
Means by which a landowner grants another person the right to use the landowner's property for a
specific purpose
Affirmative Easement = gives its holder the right to do something on another’s land
Negative Easement = entitles its holder to compel the servient landowner to refrain from doing
something that would otherwise be permissible
EITHER…
Appurtenant to Land = benefits the easement holder in his physical use/enjoyment of own land
Must have a dominant estate and servient estate
Passes automatically with the dominant estate (and servient estate)
Not personal to a particular holder
In Gross = when it grants upon its holder only a personal or commercial gain
Does not involve a dominant estate; can be transferred independently of any dominant estate
Not transferable unless it is for commercial purposes
Formation:
(1) Expressed by agreement
(2) Implied through…
Necessity Prior Use Prescriptive Public Dedication Estoppel
Elements: Has always been used Basically adverse Use alone Equity Including
Unity of title possession Estoppel
Severance Elements: Elements:
Necessity at Common Elements: Landowner inducement of Elements:
22
time of ownership Open belief in dedication False
severance Pre-existing Notorious Landowner competence Statement
Necessity Adverse Public reliance + service (promise)
Continuous by dedication Relied upon
Public acceptance
License
A freely revocable mere privilege to enter another’s land for some narrow purpose
At the will of the licensor (unless estoppel applies)
Right to come onto land to do something
Non-permanent variation of easements
Profit
Entitles its holder to enter the servient estate and take from it
Right to enter another’s land and exploit product/profits of the land
Covenants
Real Covenants: a promise to do or not do something related with the land; arises from K
“Covenant that runs with the land” = covenant enforceable against and/or by future owners
Spencer’s REQUIREMENTS: [In writing]
Intent to run with the land (as opposed to being a personal obligation)
Touch and concern land (not attached to person; not
personal)
Vertical privity (successors to dom/serv)
With last person on their property
Horizontal privity
The nexus between the originally conveying parties
(who were successions of estate)
In connection with conveyance; created with transfer
of property
Abolished by Restatement bc too easy to overcome
Restrictive Covenants = a promise to refrain from doing something related to land
Majority of covenants are restrictive
Affirmative Covenants = a promise to do something related to land
Equitable Servitudes
A promise that equity will enforce against successors (with injunctive relief)
Implied by courts where the requirements to establish a real covenant fail
Where it would be unfair to allow a purchaser of land to ignore clear evidence that use of nearby
parcels by implication limited the use of an adjoining parcel to similar, residential purposes
“Reciprocal Negative Easements” = imposing restrictions bc obviously that was not intended
Servitudes:
Describes an interest in one person’s land held by another person; regulates relationships
Can…
…be expressly conveyed (as by written easement or covenant)
…arise from implication in a multitude of ways
…be modified or terminated by agreement or implications
23
RIGHTS GRANTED:
Affirmative Use + Access = gives the owner a privilege to exploit the land of another
Negative Obligations = prevents landowners from doing something
Affirmative Objections = a duty
“50 Shades of Grey” Terms:
Dominant Estate = parcel that obtains benefits
Servient Estate = parcel that is burdened
VI. COMMON LAW ESTATES
POSSESSORY ESTATE
Fee Simple from grantor “to A and his/her heirs…”
Indefinite duration; cannot create a future interest; freely devisable, descendible, and alienable
Signifies that “A” gets everything and can give it away when they die
The “heirs” are not guaranteed anything; “A” owns all the legal rights
Not even used anymore
Gives maximum away; implication is that when “A” dies it goes to their “heirs”
Life Estate from grantor “to A for life…”
Automatically creates a future interest; “A” receives property until their death
If nothing else said, after “A” dies… property goes back to grantor (and then their own heirs)
who gave property to “A”
Must name a REMAINDER or else REVERSION occurs
[See “FUTURE INTEREST” below]
Fee Tail from grantor “to A and the heirs of his body…”
Property passes directly to “A’s” lineal blood descendants (no matter what)
Virtually abolished today
Term of Years from grantor “to A for # years…”
Essentially a lease
FUTURE INTEREST
Reversion from grantor “to A for life…” [and nothing else noted]
Back to grantor (who needs to be alive)
Grantor transfers a shorter estate than they own
Grantor with a Fee Simple transfers a Life Estate
Remainders from grantor “to A for life… and then to [remainder] and his/her heirs…”
Who personal property goes to after “A” dies
Class Gifts = Remainders in a class are…
Contingent IF no member of class yet exists
Vested IF all possible members exist
Vested Subject to Open IF more member come to exist
Contingent Remainders
If created in an unascertained; an unknown person is subject to a condition precedent; or both
If contingency gets removed, then the Remainder’s interests vests
Vests = when property is secured; the beneficiary of the right or property interest
is certain to receive a specific amount, either now or in the future
Condition Precedent “if”
24
The condition may or may not occur
Ex: “to A for life, and then to B if she survives C…”
B’s interest is contingent on them surviving C
Unascertained Holder “children” [if no children born at the time]
It is not possible at the time interest is created to identify the people who will take possession
Ex: “to A for life, and then to his children…”
At the time interest is created, A does not have children
Vested Remainders
If no contingency or unascertainable
Indefeasible
No condition; not to be lost, annulled, or overturned
Ex: “to A for life, and then to B…”
Vested Subject to Open
If more members come to exist
Ex: “to A for life, and then to A’s children…”
Vested Subject to Divestment
The interest can be taken away under the circumstances
Ex: “to A for life, and then to B, but if B divorces, then to C…”
Executory Interest
Cuts short an existing estate
Shifting follows a grantee [“A”]
Diverts the estate of “A”
Ex: “to A for life, and then B and her heirs; but if B marries C, then to D and his heirs…”
The interest for B can be cut short and shifted to D
Springing follows a grantor
Leaves a gap in between the preceding interest and executory interest
Ex: “to A for life, and then one year after A’s death, to B…”
Interest from A sprung to B after one year of A’s death
DEFEASIBLE FEES
Cuts the interest short; cuts short an inherently permanent estate
FEE SIMPLE TYPES
Determinable “until”; “so long as”; “while”; “during”
The interest ends automatically upon the occurrence of an event
Possibility of a Reversion
Ex: from grantor “to A and their heirs so long as A does not divorce…”
The interest reverts back to grantor if A divorces
Subject to a Condition Subsequent “but if”; “provided, however”; “upon the condition that”
A condition that permits grantor to terminate
Creates a right of entry
Ex: “to A and their heirs, but if A divorces, then grantor and his heirs shall have the right to enter”
Creates a condition that the grantor could cut the interest short if a condition is met
To an Executory Limitation “but if”; “on condition”; “however”
Does not revert back to grantor not retained by grantor; given to a 3rd person
25
Shifting =
Ex: “to A and his heirs, but if property is not used residentially, then to B and her heirs…”
Springing =
Ex: “to A and his heirs, but if property is not used residentially, then to B five years later…”
MODERN MARKETABILITY
Restrictions on Alienation
Cannot give property in Fee Simple Absolute with a restriction on it
Some states allow a partial restriction
Rules Against Perpetuities
No interest is valid unless it must vest (if at all) with the lives being +21 years
Limits on ancient grantor’s ability to create contingent interest far into the future
Limits a non-vested interest by a period that will end 21 years after the deaths of the identified
living persons
Modifications:
Savings Clause = included a granting clause that states every interest will vest one day before the
end of the perpetuities period
Replace the “what might happen approach” with the “wait and see” approach
Disadvantages = no one knows what will happen in the future
Reformation = changing the terms
Court revises K to make the gift vest in time to avoid the rule
Reduction of the age category
Revising age to 21 years old
Ex: if the interest vests when the remainder turns 35, it just changes to 21
automatically
NY Rule = if a grant is contingent upon the recipient’s reaching +21 years old, the
condition shall be reduced to avoid a violation
Applies to:
Contingent Remainders; Vested Remainders Subject to Open; Executory Interest
Does NOT Apply to:
Vested Interests that are Defeasible; Fee Simple Determinable; Fee Simple Subject to a
Condition Subsequent; Future Interests; Charitable Trusts
26
VII. LEASES
TYPES
Estate for a Fixed-Term/Years
Elements:
A tenancy with a definite length
Notice not necessary to terminate
>1 year must be in writing (SOF)
Periodic Tenancy with Automatic Renewal
Extends itself for successive specified periods unless proper notice termination is given
By landlord or tenant
Tenancy at Will
Terminable at the pleasure of either party; has no fixed termination
No fixed period/duration; lasts as long as either landlord or tenant desires
Tenancy at Sufferance
Results from rightful beginning of the process… followed by wrongful retention after the estate has
terminated
Tenant who holds over may become a Tenant at Sufferance at least until the landlord treats tenant as
either: trespasser OR a periodic tenant
When a tenant has wrongfully held over (past conclusion of OG lease)… landlord can continue to
recover rent
Statutory Tenancies
Regulate the circumstance of notice, thereby changing the periodic tenancy
Ex: rent control
Trespass
Some occupiers of land are trespassers
Squatters!!!
TRANSFER OF LEASEHOLDS
Ask: What does the K say? What has been agreed to?
Kendall Case
Majority Rule allows landlord to refuse consent; landlords allows that level of discretion
Minority Rule must be a commercially reasonable ground
A “mix” is reasonable
ASSIGNMENTS
27
Elements:
All of the lease is transferred
New tenant liable for destruction
1st tenant gone
New tenant has taken over every obligation
Rule = landlord basically has to let assignment happen; must have a reasonable reason to deny it; OG
tenant (assignor) can ask for lease back if new tenant stops paying rent
SUBLEASE
Elements:
Only a portion
Right to enter
Lessee stays on
Just giving a portion of lease property right; subleasor still on the hook & has right to reenter
RENT CLAUSES
Types
Fixed
Percentage
Escalating
Triple-Net
Tenant Responsible for TIM = Taxes; Insurance; Mortgage
Only for commercial
28