Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10424475
1. Introduction
Climate change has had an impact on Africa's GDP. The continent's GDP has declined by
5-15% due to climate change. The high warming scenario will have particularly serious
consequences for African economies: the reduction in GDP per capita growth in this
scenario is expected to be between 16 and 64% by 2030 (AfDB, 2022). Africa is not the
only continent suffering losses from climate change; other continents are no exception.
According to the 2017 Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health, which used data from
the 2015 Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) study, pollution was responsible for
approximately 9 million deaths (16% of all deaths worldwide) and economic losses
totaling US$4.6 billion (6.2% of global economic output) in 2015 (Landrigan et al., 2018).
The degradation of ecosystems, which presents unsuspected risks, frightens today's man
and raises fears of harmful consequences for the future generation (Hugon, 2005). Even if
this concern is a global concern, the fact remains that it is in developing countries that it is
most acute. Indeed, in these countries, environmental issues are joined by another no less
important one: that of population growth. The strong growth of the population which is
* **
Emal: mjfmabio@gmail.com; pnsiella@gmail.com
Empirical Economics Letters, 22 (12): (December 2023) 40
Mpassa Lembombi (Franceville) and Mandji (Port-Gentil). However, this policy of local
processing of wood before export is not without consequences on the environment.
The timber industry is a very important natural resource exploitation industry in the world.
Trees are felled for various uses in most countries. Wood is increasingly in demand to
construct buildings, make furniture, for heating or simply to make paper. According to
FAO statistics (2018), nearly 4 billion m3 of wood have been harvested to satisfy global
needs. The demand for wood around the world continues to increase over time. Moreover,
projections from the organization “Living Forest Model” (published by the WWF in
2012), already predicted that if our planet continued to consume in 2030 in the same way
as we do today, the harvest of wood should exceed 7 billion m3.
Today, the irresponsible exploitation of forests has very serious social and environmental
consequences: these include the reduction of biodiversity, erosion, water pollution and
deforestation. The highest environmental impact comes from paper, particularly because
of the energy demand for its production. This is followed by domestic or industrial
heating, board manufacturing and tree cutting. If wood is used as a building material, the
carbon remains sequestered for the entire lifespan of the buildings. The production of
construction timber also releases significantly less CO2 than the production of other
materials. Furthermore, the transformation of materials such as concrete, bricks, glass or
steel requires more energy. The use of wood therefore makes it possible to avoid the
emission of large quantities of CO2. It is important to specify that the wood transformation
process generates fine particles which pollute the environment such as PM2.5 (these are
fine particles whose diameter is less than 2.5 µm).
Wood processing and manufacturing involves different types of machines and processes
such as sawing, drying, machining, assembling, gluing, finishing, etc. which can be linked
to environmental risks (Bluff 2014; Poisson and Chinniah 2016). The sawing process
involves debarking and cutting the logs into sections, which are then sawn into wooden
planks. Particulate matter in the environment comes from log debarking, sawing into
boards, wood residue and kiln drying, as these processing steps create environmental
hazards in the field. Likewise, heavy machinery is used throughout the process, impacting
soil, water and air quality.
The main sources of environmental impact are present throughout the wood supply chain,
from sawmills to finished products. Energy is mainly used for processing and handling of
materials, drying of raw materials and associated services such as boiler steam and
condensing system, space heating and lighting (Bergman et al., 2014). The main sources
of energy in sawmills are either electrical energy or thermal energy. Electrical energy
includes electricity supplied from the grid and is mainly used in the sawing process, while
Empirical Economics Letters, 22 (12): (December 2023) 43
thermal energy is generated by biomass and used mainly for drying sawn wood (Bergman
and Bowe, 2008). Energy sources and the way they are used contribute to the production
of greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts. The main environmental
impacts associated with wood products include air emissions and greenhouse gas
emissions (Van et al., 2017). This type of impact is called carbon footprint.
The forestry sector in general and the felling of trees through deforestation contribute to
17% of GHG emissions into the atmosphere (Miles and Kapos 2008; Baccini et al. 2012).
Other forms of environmental impact associated with wood products are due to the
transportation of wood products (Lindholm and Berg 2005), the use of chemicals and
wastage of wood (Jurgensen et al. 1997; Wootton 2012).
Empirically, some studies have analyzed the effect of resource consumption in sawmills
on environmental quality. It appears from these studies that energy consumption has led to
the release into the environment of a variety of gases (Eshun et al. 2010; Bergman and
Bowe 2012 and Tellnes et al. 2012). Eshun et al. (2010) pointed out that environmental
emissions vary from country to country and from sawmill to sawmill due to the diversity
of technologies, methods and environmental standards applied. Likewise, the study
ofRamasamy et al. (2015) on the environmental impact of the sawmilling industry
concluded that several gases such as CO2, CH4, NOx, N2O, SO2 and CO were released
into the environment and the impacts were taken the form of global warming,
acidification, human toxicity, eutrophication and photo-oxidant formation in Malaysia.
The common denominator in these studies is that they used the experimental approach.
This literature has two main limitations. The first highlights the absence of econometric
modeling of the environmental impact of the sawmilling industry. The second observation
reveals the partial nature of the results, because the wood sawing activity is far from
reflecting all of the activities in the forest-timber sub-sector (the wood industrysub-sector
is not limited only to sawing activity).
It is on the strength of the above that the objective of this article is to analyze the
environmental impact of the wood industry sector in the Congo Basin, more precisely in
Gabon. The choice of a country in the Congo Basin is explained by the fact that this area is
classified as the second largest rainforest on the planet behind the Amazon. Additionally,
it plays a vital role against global warming. The transformation process and transport
services for wood and its derived products require the consumption of electrical and
thermal energy which is not exempt from any criticism of environmental degradation. In
addition, the felling of trees results in deforestation, which reduces the capacity to absorb
greenhouse gas emissions from anthropogenic activities. Furthermore, the ban on exports
of wood logs from January 1, 2010 in Gabon led to a proliferation of processing structures
and consequently increased the share of exports of processed wood over time.
Empirical Economics Letters, 22 (12): (December 2023) 44
This study presents two main contributions. Among the studies that have analyzed the
relationship between industrialization and the environment, very few have focused on the
contribution of a manufacturing or industrial sub-sector to environmental quality.
Furthermore, the empirical literature used in this work reveals that the authors focused
exclusively on analyzing the environmental impact of sawmilling activity. Consequently,
this study is the first to analyze the environmental impact of the wood industry sub-sector.
Second, countries in Africa (notably Gabon) have responded to global calls for action on
climate change with laudable policy frameworks as well as other ancillary agreements and
pacts with measures to mitigate the impact of climate change (Appiah and Johnson, 2017).
Thus, understanding the explanatory factors of carbon emissions provides an empirical
basis for an effective fight against global warming. The rest of this work is structured
around three other sections. Section 2 describes the methodological approach. The
presentation of the results is established by section 3 and section 4 presents the conclusion.
capita; 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑡 represents the wood industry in period 𝑡. 𝜀𝑡 is the error term and α,
the constant. The transformation of equation (1) into an error correction model is given by:
𝑘 𝑝
∆𝑌𝑡 = 𝜑(𝑌𝑡−1 − 𝜃0 − 𝑝=1 𝜃𝑝 𝑋𝑡−1 − 𝛿1𝑖 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑡−1 )
𝑘 𝑝
− 𝑝=1 𝛽𝑝 ∆𝑋𝑡 − 𝛾1 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑡 + 𝜀𝑡 (2)
𝛼 𝛽𝑝 𝛾1
With 𝜃0 = , 𝜃𝑝 = , 𝛿1𝑖 = ,𝜑 = −( 1 − 𝜆)
1−𝜆 1−𝜆 1−𝜆
Where 𝜃𝑝 and 𝛿1 measure the effect of long-term dynamics while 𝛽𝑝 and 𝛾1 capture the
short-term dynamics. Finally, 𝜑 represents the speed of adjustment towards long-term
equilibrium; this coefficient must be negative and significant in order to confirm the long-
term relationship between the wood industry and environmental quality.
Following Pesaran et al. (1999) and Jouini (2015), the Pooled Mean Group (PMG)
approach is used to estimate the dynamic model by considering the potential long-term
links between the variables. The PMG estimation approach differs from techniques, such
as Mean Group (MG) developed by Pesaran and Smith (1995), which estimate a
regression for each group and then calculate averages of the coefficients (Lee et al. 1996;
Evans , 1997). The long-term GM estimators are consistent, but they are inefficient in case
of homogeneity of the coefficients. Under these conditions, the PMG estimation approach
is useful because it provides consistent and efficient long-term estimators when parameter
homogeneity is respected. The PMG approach is preferable to the MG method because it
provides estimates that are less sensitive to outlier estimates. We address endogeneity
issues by augmenting the PMG estimator with lags of the repressors and dependent
variables to minimize the resulting bias and ensure that the regression residuals are not
serially correlated. Equation (2) is rewritten as follows:
𝑘 𝑝
∆𝑌𝑡 = 𝜑(𝑌𝑡−1 − 𝜃0 − 𝑝=1 𝜃𝑝 𝑋𝑡−1 − 𝛿1 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑡−1 )
𝑘 𝑝
− 𝑝=1 𝛽𝑝 ∆𝑋𝑡 − 𝛾1 − Δ𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑡−1 + 𝜀𝑡 (3)
test and the last point highlights the results relating to the optimal number of lags of the
model. Before starting the analysis of a time series, it is important to study its properties
(stationary or non-stationary). Indeed, the use of certain estimation methods is conditioned
by the nature of the variables in the model. To this end, we carried out the Dickey-Fuller
Augmented (DFA) and Phillips Peron (PP) stationary tests with constant and trend. The
results of the stationary tests are reported in Table 3. This table reveals that the population,
trade and urbanization variables are stationary at level, while the other variables in the
model are stationary at first difference.
DFA with constant and trend PP with constant and trend Decision
At level First difference At level First difference
CO2 0.0940 0.00 0.0940 0.00 I(1)
PM2.5 0.7575 0.00 0.7575 0.00 I(1)
Logprod 0.6133 0.00 0.6133 0.00 I(1)
Processw 0.999 0.00 0.999 0.00 I(1)
Expw 0.9872 0.00 0.9872 0.00 I(1)
POP 0.00 - 0.00 - I(0)
Trade 0.0434 - 0.0434 - I(0)
Urban 0.00 - 0.00 - I(0)
GDPPC 0.2241 0.00 0.2241 0.00 I(1)
Since the variables in the model are integrated at different levels, it is important to perform
the cointegration test in order to check whether there is a long-run relationship between
them. To do this, we carried out the Johansen cointegration test, the results of which are
shown in tables 4 and 5. These tables show that the trace test as well as that of the
maximum eigenvalue confirm that there exists a (or more) long-term relationship(s)
between the variables in the model.
Table 4: Results of the Johansen cointegration test for the CO2 model
Hypothesized Trace 0.05
No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**
None * 0.879229 184.7288 125.6154 0.0000
At most 1 * 0.610263 98.06064 95.75366 0.0344
At most 2 0.438329 59.42701 69.81889 0.2534
At most 3 0.315105 35.77659 47.85613 0.4077
At most 4 0.285793 20.25853 29.79707 0.4055
At most 5 0.094228 6.458624 15.49471 0.6413
At most 6 0.056878 2.400936 3.841466 0.1213
Trace test indicates 2 cointegratingeqn(s) at the 0.05 level
Empirical Economics Letters, 22 (12): (December 2023) 48
Table 4 continued
Hypothesized Max-Eigen 0.05
No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**
None * 0.879229 86.66819 46.23142 0.0000
At most 1 0.610263 38.63363 40.07757 0.0721
At most 2 0.438329 23.65041 33.87687 0.4813
At most 3 0.315105 15.51806 27.58434 0.7062
At most 4 0.285793 13.79990 21.13162 0.3817
At most 5 0.094228 4.057688 14.26460 0.8532
At most 6 0.056878 2.400936 3.841466 0.1213
Max-eigenvalue test indicates 1 cointegratingeqn(s) at the 0.05 level
Table 5: Results of the Johansen cointegration test for the PM2.5 model.
Hypothesized Trace 0.05
No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**
None * 0.648887 83.77978 69.81889 0.0026
At most 1 0.408129 40.86720 47.85613 0.1929
At most 2 0.216142 19.36407 29.79707 0.4670
At most 3 0.155069 9.379460 15.49471 0.3314
At most 4 0.058487 2.470935 3.841466 0.1160
Trace test indicates 1 cointegratingeqn(s) at the 0.05 level
Hypothesized Max-Eigen 0.05
No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**
None * 0.648887 42.91258 33.87687 0.0032
At most 1 0.408129 21.50313 27.58434 0.2470
At most 2 0.216142 9.984610 21.13162 0.7461
At most 3 0.155069 6.908525 14.26460 0.5000
At most 4 0.058487 2.470935 3.841466 0.1160
Max-eigenvalue test indicates 1 cointegratingeqn(s) at the 0.05 level
respectively for CO2 and PM2.5 (column 1). This result is consistent with the work of
Managi et al. (2009) which validate the pollution haven hypothesis. In addition to foreign
trade, urbanization also degrades the environmentalquality. Thus, an increase of one unit
in urbanization generates an increase in CO2 and PM2.5 emissions of 0.4% and 0.3%
respectively (column 1). This result is consistent with the work of Avom et al (2020).
Finally, gross domestic product and gross domestic product squared significantly impact
environmental quality. Unlike the gross domestic product variable, the squared gross
domestic product variable exerts a negative and significant effect on the environment,
therefore, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the gross domestic product
per capita and the different pollutants (CO2 and PM2.5). This result allows us to validate
the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve.
Table 8: Effect of the timber industry on CO2 emissions in Gabon using the ARDL
method
Long run 1 2 3
Log (Logprod) 0.0961***
Log(Processw) 0.0532**
Log(Expw) 0.0442***
Log (pop) 0.1584 0.19 0.2316
Log(Trade) 0.0802** 0.0942*** 0.0865***
Log(Urbanisation) 0.0040* 0.0061** 0.0051**
Log(GDPPC) 1.4310** 1.2106** 1.7945**
Log(GDPPC2) -0.0003** -0.0005** -0.0004**
Cons 1.3586*** 2.0455*** 2.5172***
ECM -0.2308*** -0.3413*** -0.4610***
Short run Dynamic
DLog (Logprod) 0.0315
DLog(Processw) 0.0279
DLog(Expw) 0.0350
DLog (pop) 1.4261 1.3139 1.5133
DLog(Trade) 0.0321** 0.0421** 0.0534**
DLog(Urbanisation) 0.043 0.026 0.013
DLog(GDPPC) 0.4326 0.4060 0.3505
DLog(GDPPC2) -0.0091 -0.0087 -0.0078
Adjust R2 0.42 0.40 0.44
Breusch-Godfrey 0.72 0.27 0.36
Breusch -pagan-Godfrey 0.19 0.14 0.16
Remsey Reset 0.26 0.81 0.32
Wald test [prob(Chi2)] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Empirical Economics Letters, 22 (12): (December 2023) 51
Table 9: Effect of the wood industry on emissions of fine particles (PM2.5) in Gabon
using the ARDL method
Long run 1 2 3
Log (Logprod) 0.1054***
Log(Processw) 0.0714**
Log(Expw) 0.0055***
Log (pop) 0.2140 0.3254 0.4162
Log(Trade) 0.0314** 0.0231*** 0.0426***
Log(Urbanisation) 0.0031** 0.0043** 0.0046**
Log(GDPPC) 1.0411** 1.0105** 1.3150**
Log(GDPPC2) -0.0005** -0.0004** -0.0007**
Cons 2.2661*** 3.2356*** 3.4160***
ECM -0.3351*** -0.3678*** -0.4531***
Short runDynamic
DLog (Logprod) 0.0078
DLog(Processw) 0.0049
DLog(Expw) 0.0031
DLog (pop) 1.8715 1.9741 1.3831
DLog(Trade) 0.0451** 0.0671** 0.0432**
DLog(Urbanisation) 0.039 0.076 0.035
DLog(GDPPC) 0.3523 0.7490 0.4897
DLog(GDPPC2) -0.0089 -0.0097 -0.0048
Adjust R2 0.48 0.47 0.47
Breusch-Godfrey 0.52 0.51 0.49
Breusch -pagan-Godfrey 0.18 0.17 0.26
Remsey Reset 0.34 0.19 0.46
Wald test [prob(Chi2)] 0.00 0.00 0.00
To test the robustness of our results, we used the FMOLS and DOLS methods. The results
of these estimates are recorded in tables 10 and 11. The analysis of these tables reveals
that the wood industry significantly degrades the environmentalquality through emissions
of CO2 and fine particles (PM2.5). Furthermore, control variables such as trade,
urbanization and gross domestic product are also explanatory factors of environmental
degradation in Gabon. From the above, we can conclude that our results are robust.
Empirical Economics Letters, 22 (12): (December 2023) 52
Table 10: Effect of the timber industry on CO2 emissions in Gabon using the
FMOLS and DOLS methods
FMOLS DOLS
1 2 3 1 2 3
Log (Logprod) 0.0851*** 0.0843***
Log(Processw) 0.0671*** 0.0678***
Log(Expw) 0.0347** 0.0386**
Log (pop) 0.9335 0.7918 0.8962 0.9443 0.8218 0.9838
Log(Trade) 0.0612*** 0.068*** 0.072*** 0.081*** 0.075*** 0.093***
Log(Urbanisation) 0.0040* 0.0031* 0.0042* 0.0034** 0.008** 0.0041**
Log(GDPPC) 1.5392*** 1.6100*** 1.6707*** 1.5321*** 1.6120*** 1.6666***
Log(GDPPC2) -0.0015** -0.0014** -0.0017** -0.0015** -0.0014** -0.0017**
Cons 1.2423* 1.2180** 1.2957** 1.2957** 1.0649* 1.760***
Adjust R2 0.52 0.53 0.51 0.52 0.50 0.53
Table 11: Effect of the timber industry on PM2.5 emissions in Gabon using FMOLS
and DOLS methods
FMOLS DOLS
1 2 3 1 2 3
Log (Logprod) 0.0951*** 0.0763***
Log(Processw) 0.0421*** 0.0497***
Log(Expw) 0.0303** 0.0303**
Log (pop) 0.7342 0.8961 0.7941 0.7034 0.6853 0.8345
Log(Trade) 0.0734*** 0.0762*** 0.0639*** 0.0843** 0.0702*** 0.7275***
Log(Urbanisation) 0.0058* 0.0047* 0.0044* 0.0053** 0.0056** 0.0049**
Log(GDPPC) 1.0953** 1.0645*** 1.0481*** 1.0781*** 1.1574*** 1.0956***
Log(GDPPC2) -0.0009** -0.0008** -0.0009** -0.0008** -0.0009** -0.0007**
Cons 1.7680* 1.9834** 1.9987** 1.4679** 1.8940* 1.1736***
Adjust R2 0.58 0.59 0.57 0.58 0.59 0.57
4. Conclusion
Despite the abundant literature on the relationship between industrialization and
environmental quality, existing studies have not yet analyzed the environmental impact of
the timber industry. However, analysis of the timber industry sub-sector should make it
possible to measure its contribution to environmental degradation. It is through this idea
that we analyzed the environmental impact of the wood industry sub-sector in the Congo
Basin, more precisely in Gabon during the period 1980-2022. The use of the
Autoregressive Distributed Lags (ARDL) method revealed that the wood industry sector
measured by log production, local wood processing and exports of processed wood
Empirical Economics Letters, 22 (12): (December 2023) 53
References
AfDB, 2022, Fostering Climate Resilience and a Just Energy Transition in Africa.
https://www.afdb.org/fr/documents-publications/perspectives-economiques-en-afrique.
Ahmed, F., Ali, I. and Ahmed, S., 2022, The environmental impact of industrialization and
foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from Asia-Pacifc region. Environmental
Science and Pollution Research, 29, 29778–29792.
Ali, K., Bakhsh, S., Ullah, S., Ullah, A. and Ullah, S., 2021, Industrial growth and
CO2 emissions in Vietnam: the key role of financial development and fossil fuel
consumption. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 7515–7527.
Appiah, D.O. and Johnson, K., 2017, Climate policy ambivalence in Sub-Saharan Africa?
Climate policy ambivalence in Sub-Saharan Africa, ICCG Reflection No.60 /November.
Avom, D., Nkengfack, H., Fotio, H. K., and Totouom, A., 2020, ICT and environmental
quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Effects and transmission channels. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120028. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.12002.
Empirical Economics Letters, 22 (12): (December 2023) 54
Baccini, A.G.S.J., Goetz, S.J., Walker, W.S., Laporte, N.T., Sun, M., Sulla-Menashe, D.,
Hackler, J., Beck, P.S.A., Dubayah, R., Friedl, M.A. and Samanta, S., 2012,
Estimatedcarbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-
density maps. Nature Climate Change. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1354.
Bergman, R. D., and Bowe, S. A., 2012, Life-cycle inventory of manufacturing hardwood
lumber in Southeastern US. Wood and Fiber Science, 44(1), 71-84.
Bergman, R., Puettmann, M., Taylor, A. and Skog, K.E., 2014, The carbon impacts of
wood products. Forest Products Journal, 64: 220–231.
Bergman, R.D. and Bowe, S.A., 2008, Environmental impact of producing
hardwoodlumber using life-cycle inventory. Wood Fiber Science, 40, 448–458.
Bluff, E., 2014, Safety in machinery design and construction: performance forsubstantive
safety outcomes. Safety Science, 66, 27–35.
Chigbo A. M., Chidozie C. N. and Chekwubechukwu N., 2016, Industrialization and its
Backlash: Focus on Climate Change and its Consequences. Journal of Environmental
Science and Technology, 9: 301-316.
Eshun, J. F., Potting, J., and Leemans, R., 2010, Inventory analysis of the timber industry
in Ghana. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(7), 715-725.
Evans, P., 1997, How fast do economies converge? The Review of Economics and
Statistics, 79 (2), 219–225.
FAO, 2018, La situation des forêts du monde. https://www.fao.org/state-of-forests/2018/fr/
Hugon, P., 2005, Environment and economic development: the challenges posed by
sustainable development. International and Strategic Review, 60, (4), 113-126.
Jouini, J., 2015, Linkage between international trade and economic growth in GCC
countries: empirical evidence from PMG estimation approach. Journal of International
Trade and Economic Development, 24 (3): 341–372.
Jurgensen M, Harvey A, Graham R, Page-Dumroese D, Tonn J, Larsen M, JainT, 1997)
Review article: impacts of timber harvesting on soil organicmatter, nitrogen, productivity,
and health of inland northwest forests. Forest Science, 43, 234–251.
Landrigan, P.J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N.J.R.,….., 2018, The Lancet Commission on pollution
and health. Lancet, 391, 462-512.
Lee, K., Pesaran, M. H. and Smith, R., 1996, Growth and convergence in a multi-country
empirical stochastic Solow model. Journal of Applied Economics, 12, 357–392.
Empirical Economics Letters, 22 (12): (December 2023) 55
Van Hilst, F., Hoefnagels, R., Junginger, M., Shen, L. and Wicke, B., 2017, Sustainable
biomass for energy and materials: A greenhouse gas emission perspective. Working paper:
Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht, Utrecht University.
Wootton, J.T., 2012, Effects of timber harvest on river food webs: physical, chemical and
biological responses. PLoS ONE 7:43561.