Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pravin U. Dugel MD
Managing Partner
Retinal Consultants of Arizona
Phoenix Arizona
Advantages of microincision surgery
66.26%
Microincision Surgery
• Displace conjunctiva
ARS...
A. Never
B. Always
C. Only for 23g
D. Other
Wound construction
7 / 18 open
Round opened 38.9% Chevron closed
(0.216 mm2) (0.055 mm2)
25g
Straight Angled
11 / 19 open 0.2 mm
55.6%
P = 0.04
4 / 17 open
Round opened 27.8% Chevron closed
(0.186 mm2) (0.038 mm2)
(Chi-square test)
Histopathology
25g
Straight Angled
0.2 mm 0.2 mm
High magnification
Histopathology
23g
Straight Angled
0.2 mm 0.2 mm
High magnification
Kupperman 25g pressure study
Angled vs straight
Kupperman 25g pressure study
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Rabbit #
Eye number 2 excluded due to damage during testing
Dynamic wound study
• Bioptigen
spectral domain
anterior
segment OCT
• Evaluate wound
integrity
• Variable IOP
Dynamic wound study
23g 23g
23g
25g
Dynamic wound study
• x 25g 23g
23g
Angled Incisions
25g
• x
23g
Amount of angle important
No gap
Stanislao Rizzo, MD
Wound construction surgical tips
Vitreous wick
?increase risk of
endophthalmitis
20g = 0.07%
25g = 0.14%
Wound closure
IOP = 40 mm Hg
IOP = 14 mm Hg
B
IOP = 5 mm Hg
C
• Endophthalmitis prevention
• Subconjuctival antibiotics, all cases
• I never use aminoglycosides
Surgical Pearls
4.6% hypotony
ARS...
Trailing edge
Lead edge –
stab cut
Old New
.009”
.013”
25+ Performance Summary
27 mm
Needle Length 32 mm
w/needle stiffener
3.75
4.05
x
2.5 3.17
x
1.25 1.77
1.45 x
x
0
Port Entrance Mid Vitreous Macular Surface Far Periphery
Conclusions