Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Communicated by G. W. Anderson
1. INTRODUCTION
Let + m be the set of m-th roots of unity and + be the set of all roots
of unity in a fixed algebraic closure Q of Q. For each prime p, let (` p n ) be
the generator of Tate module Z p(1)= + p n . For each positive integer n,
let ` n be the generator of + n , ` n => ki=1 ` p ei where > ki=1 p ei is the prime
factorization of n. Let + *
n (resp. +* ) be + n "[1] (resp. + "[1]).
Let 5 be the Galois equivariant map from +* to Q defined by
E=R5.
Conjecture (Coleman).
F=R5.
It has turned out that this conjecture is strongly related with Kolyvagin's
Euler systems. The condition (1) can be used as the defining property of
Euler systems in the case of cyclotomic number fields. Hence Coleman's
conjecture may be reinterpreted as a characterization of Euler systems. We
introduce Kolyvagin's Euler systems. Briefly, let F be an abelian number
field. Write the norm map from F ( + pn ) to F (+ n ) as N F ( +pn )F ( +n) . Let S be
the set of positive squarefree integers divisible only by primes which split
completely in F. One can define Euler systems, EF over F as a set of maps
: defined on S, satisfying the following conditions: Let n # S and p be a
prime number in S with ( p, n)=1.
v :(n) # F (+ n )_.
v If n{1, :(n) is a global unit.
v N F ( +pn )F ( +n ) :( pn)=(Fr p &1) :(n).
In this paper we will prove some properties of E and F and prove some
results related to the conjecture. In section 4, we will construct Euler
systems F F over F from F. Let F F (+ n )(resp. EF (n)) be the following group,
Let JF the set of positive square free integers divisible only by primes which
split completly in F. Then arguments using Euler systems yield the follow-
ing theorem.
F(+ n ) Z p =Cn Z p .
One can also give another definition (cf. [10]) of Euler systems by
removing the third congruence relations. However in this case one must
impose norm conditions in Z p extensions for all prime p. We denote this
new Euler systems by E F : a function : defined on some subset S of the
natural numbers N prime to the conductor of F, satisfying the following
conditions.
v :(n) # F (+ n )_.
v If n{1, :(n) is a global unit.
For each prime p # S with ( p, n)=1,
v N F ( +pn )F ( +n ):( pn)=(Fr p &1) :(n).
e(n)=*n++p n +&,
CIRCULAR DISTRIBUTIONS 369
where *, + and & are constants, called Iwasawa invariants. The conjecture
of Greenberg (cf. [3]) asserts that
*=+=0,
for all totally real number fields k. In the case that k is the maximal real
subfield Q(` p +` &1
p ) of Q(+ p ), Greenberg's conjecture is a weakening of
Vandiver's conjecture, the latter implies &=0 as well. We write
for all n.
` f(`)= f (=),
`n ==
for any root of unity = and positive integer n. Let Fr l be the arithmetic
Frobenius map which maps ` to ` l for all n-th root of unity ` # + n ,
(n, l)=1. The following theorem shows that circular distributions are
characterized by some norm conditions.
v For n&i1,
i
N Q( +l nr )Q( +l n&1r ) f (` l n ` r )= f (` l n&i ` Fr
r ).
l
Proof. We will first show that conditions (1) and (2) imply (V) when
={1. Suppose ==` d0 for some ` 0 # +* and let d= p e11 } } } p err , e r 1, be the
prime factorization of d. Then,
` f (`)= ` f (` 0 :)= ` ` f ( ;` 0 #)
`d == :d =1 er er=1
; dp =1 # p
` ` f ( ; pr` 0pr #)
er er &1
; dp =1 # p =1
by condition (1). Thus, we see by induction that this product equals f (=).
One can use similar arguments to show the other direction. K
Let E be the set of all Galois equivariant functions:
N Q( +m )Q( +n ) a m =a n .
Proof. From the second norm property of Theorem 2.1, the sequence
( f (` p n )) is a norm coherent sequence, that is,
N Q( +p m)Q( +p n ) f (` p m )= f (` p n )
for any mn. Let p u be the prime ideal of Q( + p u ) over p. Let l u be a prime
ideal dividing the principal ideal ( f (` p u )) which is prime to any prime
ideals over p. The decomposition group D l of (l )=l n Q has a finite index
in Z p -extension Gal(Q(+ p )Q( + p )), so that the fixed field is of the form
Q(` p s ) for some s. We let choose ns. Then the norm coherent condition
implies that the principle ideal ( f (` p s )) is divisible by any sufficiently large
power of l s which is a contradiction. The same argument shows that
( f (` p ns )) is divisible by infinite power of any prime ideal which is prime to
p. Therefore it is also a p-unit. If s is divisible by a nontrivial prime q
(different from p), then ( f (` p ns )) is a p-unit and q-unit simultaneously
which implies ( f (` p ns )) is a unit. K
In fact, bounded norm coherent sequence were studied more completely
by Coleman [2]:
v Suppose a n # Q(+ p n )(m1) is a bounded norm coherent sequence of
cyclotomic numbers. Then a n is an integral circular p-unit for all m1.
v Conversely, any integral circular p-unit of Q(+ p n ) arises as the m-th
term of such a sequence.
For any finite set of odd primes S, we define ! S to be the Galois equiv-
ariant map on +* such that
E{R5.
where n runs over the positive integers and ` # + * n . One can construct Euler
systems of F with values in L # J(t) CF ( +L ) using these cyclotomic units but
our results suggest there are almost no other Euler systems except these.
CIRCULAR DISTRIBUTIONS 373
\
:(L)=N Q( +NL )F ( +L ) f ` ` ` l
l|L
+
is an Euler system for F for any ` # + t .
Proof. The first two axioms of the Euler systems are obvious.
\ +
N F ( +lL )F ( +L ) :(lL)=N F ( +lL )F ( +L ) N Q( +f lL)F ( +lL ) f ` ` ` S
S | lL
=N Q( +lL )F ( +L ) N
\
f ` ` `
+
Q( +f lL )Q( +NL)
S | lL
l
l&1
=N Q( +lL )F ( +L )
i=1
\
` f `` ` `
+
i
l
S|L
S
f ((` > S | L ` S ) l )
=N Q( +f L )F ( +L)
f (` > S | L ` S )
=(Fr l &1) :(L)
\
:(lL)=N Q( +f lL )F ( +lL) f `` l ` ` S
+
S|L
#N Q( +f L)F ( +L )
\ +
f ` ` ` modulo primes above l
S|L
S
F F =:(F_+ f )EF .
374 SOOGIL SEO
CF ( +n ) F F (n)EF (n).
e n =*n++p n +&
C G(Q(
m
+m )Q( +n ))
=Cn
376 SOOGIL SEO
En Em E+
n E+m
0Ä Ä , and 0Ä Ä . (2)
Cn Cm C+
n C +
m
From the class number formula, we obtain, for all odd prime q,
|E n Cn Z q | = |E + + (q)
n C n Z q | =h Q( +n )+ ,
N m, n : C m Ä C n , m, n : C m Ä C n ,
N+ + +
are surjective.
Proof. This follows easily from the definitions. K
Now consider the following diagram of exact sequences,
0 ww
ÄCm ww
Ä E m ww
Ä E m Cm ww
Ä0
Ä Cn ww
0 ww Ä E n ww
Ä E n Cn ww
Ä0
E+
p rs E p rs
=(E + +
p rs C p rs ) and =(E p rs Cp rs ). (3)
C +
p rs
Cp rs
(E + +
p rs C p rs )= ` [(E + +
p rs C p rs Z q )]. (4)
q: all prime
E p rs E p ts
0Ä Zq Ä Zq . (5)
Cp rs C p ts
E p us E p u+is
Zq $ Z q
Cp us Cp u+is
(E + + + +
p rs C p rs )=(E p rs C p rs Z p )_ ` Aq , (6)
q{ p
where Aq is an abelian group of order >(E p n(q)s Cp n(q)s Z q ). With these
notations, we have the following proposition.
Proposition 5.3.
E p rs Cp rs =(E p rs Cp rs Z p )_ ` Aq .
q{p
Let E p, s be the set of all Galois equivariant maps from +*p s to Q , which
satisfy
t&r
N p ts p rs f (` p t ` s )= f (` p r ` sp ).
6. PROOF OF THEOREM A
alent to
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank my advisor, Robert Coleman, for his encouragement and help throughout the
preparation of this paper. I also thank Karl Rubin and the referee for their helpful comments
and suggestions.
REFERENCES