Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MATERIALS
AND
METHODS
\ i
I. MATERIALS
A. CHEMICALS
Mumbai), Uric acid kit (Aspen Laboratories, New Delhi), kit for
SGPT (Euro Diagnostic Systems Pvt. Ltd., Chennai) and kit for
1. FOODS
soya flour, soya oil, safflower oil, coconut oil, sugar and milk
powder were also purchased from the local market. The food
86
Commercially available oatmeal (Bagrry's brand), defatted
powder (SMP) and Amul Whole milk powder (WMP) were also
2 . NUTRACEUTICALS
All the necessary vitamins and minerals were added to the food
a. PROBIOTICS
87
B. METHODS
2 . PROCESSING OF F O O D INGREDIENTS
88
lightly toasted over a flame at z. 80+5°C, milled and passed
(176).
below.
i) Rice
The raw paddy were cleaned and washed to remove any
any heat produced. The water that was added also contained
wet j u t e cloth was used to cover it. Paddy was germinated for 3
89
days (~72h) at room temperature (28±3°C) in ambient conditions
about 65+5°C. The grains were kilned at about 75-80±5°C till the
were later tempered with 5-7% of water and allowed to stand for
ii) Ragi
potable water for about 24h. The water was changed after about
90
l%v/v level to inhibit the growth of micro organisms during
layer of moistened jute cloth. The thickness of the grain bed was
cloth was used to cover it. Ragi was allowed to germinate for 2
about 65±5°C. The grains were kilned at about 70-75±5°C till the
Hi) Barley
clean, potable water for about 24h. The water was changed after
91
about 10 h o u r s and the grains mixed thoroughly to help in
about 65+5°C. The grains were kilned at about 75-80±5°C till the
92
iv) Green gram
double layer of wet jute cloth was used to cover it. Green gram
about 65±5°C. The grains were kilned at about 70-75±5°C till the
93
Subsequently the green gram malt flour were sieved through 100
3 . ENTERAL F O O D FORMULATION
14).
a. General formulation
The flour from the malted grains viz., rice, barley, ragi and
green gram, lightly roasted soya flour, oat flour, milk powder,
GEF.
triglycerides (MCTs).
94
Table 14. Proportion of ingredients in the
formulated enteral foods
95
c. Formulation specific for HIV/AIDS patients
4 . PHYSICO-CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
a. Proximate c o m p o s i t i o n
96
processed food samples. All estimations described here were
carried out in triplicate and the data pooled for average values.
i) Moisture
ii) Protein
(b.p. 60-80°)
97
5h. The weight was recorded after cooling. The difference in
v) Carbohydrate by difference
b. Carbohydrate profile
i) Sugars
Reducing sugar
tube was capped with a funnel and kept in a boiling water bath
98
added from the side along with 3ml of 2N sulphuric acid. This
cuprous oxide and was allowed to stand for 5 min in cold water.
Total s u g a r s
sugar.
ii) Glucose
99
resistant starch (RS) fractions, the method described by Englyst
buffer and placing the tube in water bath at 100°C for SOmin to
obtain values for RDS and TS. To obtain values for RDS and TS,
TG and G120 without the necessity to correct for FG, since this is
included in both m e a s u r e m e n t s .
100
The values for different starch fractions of TS, RDS, SDS
and TG as follows:
filter aid. Soluble dietary fibre was precipitated from the filter
101
SAMPLE 2 X STANDARD BLANK
0.8-4.0g (@ 700-900 mg dry matter) 25 ml gljcose std. 25 ml acetate buffer
30 min. at 70°C
102
Gelatinization and •C-amy lase
i n c u b a t i o n , pH 6 . 0 , 15 m i n , 100 '-C
^
Pepsin incubation , pH 1.5 , 1 h , JtO°C
^^
Pancreatin incubation, pH 6 8 , 1 h, 40° c]
< N
Total f i b r e determination
I n s o l u b l e and s o l u b l e I
/ \
Washing Precipitation
with alcohol with 4 vol.
and acetone ethanol
i
Filtration
Drying Filtration
(insoluble
fibre)
i i
Washing w i t h Washing w i t h a l c o h o l andl
a l c o h o l and acetone
acetone
i i
Drying Drying total fibre)
(soluble fibre)
1 1
I
C o r r e c t i o n for indigest b l e p r o t e i n and ash
103
v) Degree of gelatinisation
petroleum ether (b.p. 40-60°C) was taken for the estimation. The
was allowed to stand for 5min with gentle agitation. The alkaline
treated with 1ml hydrochloric acid (0.5N) and diluted with water
104
c. Amino acid profile
105
acids (pmol) = (Area of unknown amino acid/Area of standard
i) Chemical score
106
d. Functional properties
i) Bulk density
every 15 min. for 30 min. after which, the tube was centrifuged
for 25 min. at 3200 rpm and the volume of free oil was read. Fat
rod, taking care to see that no food adheres to the sides of the
107
e. Storage Study
2°C) for shelf study. All the samples were stored for a total period of
60 days and were evaluated twice for quality and sensory evaluation
Moisture, peroxide value and free fatty acids were evaluated by the
panellists for evaluation. Along with the sample, water was provided
to remove any traces of previous sample from the oral cavity. The
evaluation was conducted for the fresh and stored (30 and 60 days)
samples.
108
was enumerated for Coliform, yeast, moulds and spores (mesophils).
parameters in duplicates.
24 hours.
109
poured and after solidifying, plates were incubated at 30°C for 5
days.
ii) Spores
sterilized empty test tubes and was kept in boiling water bath for 15
minutes. Then the tubes were cooled and from this sample were
plated.
5. CLINICAL STUDIES
HIV/AIDS patients. Each group had ten subjects being fed the
formulated enteral food and ten on control diet, except the last
a. Pilot study
110
Table 15. Details of subjects s e l e c t e d for clinical studies
Cases
(Men, Women)^
Hospital
General Head &
Diabetes
Critically Neck HIV/AIDS
Mellitus
ill cancer
17 8
BHIO, Mysore
(lOM, 7W) (5M, 3W)
Vikram 8
Hospital,
Mysore (5M, 3W) (2M, 2W)
J S S Hospital, 8
Mysore (4M, 4W) (3M, 3W)
Sri Krishna 5 5 7
Hospital,
Gujarat (2M, 3W) (3M, 2W) (2M, 3W) (4M, 3W)
Total 21 22 23
*Figures in p a r e n t h e s e s indicate n u m b e r of Men and Women
respectively
111
wiPAf^CH^y^L seer
The GEF was tested on a few surgical and non-surg
patients from the general ICU and feedback collected. The CSEF
bland for patients able to ingest food orally. The DSEF was
condition.
the study was finalised. The final clinical study was conducted
b. S e l e c t i o n of subjects
112
The age group of the subjects ranged from 18 to 55 years
special wards was not suitable for measuring the outcome of the
study.
113
the data was collected from secondary sources, viz., hospital
over a low flame with constant stirring. The slurry was then
d. Mode of feeding
The patients who were able to ingest food orally were also
ingest food orally, enteral feeding was carried out using Ryle's
114
placement was nasogastric since this method is easiest to
e. Feeding regimen
this effect.
f. Outcome indicators
115
i) Anthropometry
Serum creatinine
Mumbai.
Urea
Uric acid
116
Serum proteins
Electrolytes
routine basis.
117
5. Alkaline p h o s p h a t a s e - Serum alkaline p h o s p h a t a s e was
Urinary creatinine
picrate (211). This estimation was also carried out using the
Mumbai.
6. COMPUTATION
frequency c o u n t s .
118
Heights and weights were classified into percentiles of
vegetables, milk and milk products, sugar and jaggery, fats and
was computed based on RDI for adults with ideal body weight to
give 1800-2100 Kcal and 50-60g protein per day. From the
119
computation of RDI and nutrient intake along with DDP is
described below.
i.e., breaking u p the menu items into its basic raw ingredients
other than milk), fruits, fats and oils and sugar and jaggery.
composition tables.
energy and protein for each person which was derived based on
the ICMR, RDA, for age, sex and activity. Resting metabolic energy
WHO/FAO Equations.
4. The nutrient intake data of farm women was also used to derive
based on ICMR-RDA.
approximately 20 - 30 g.
carbohydrates.
121
e) The amount of proteins from cereals and pulses (as per the
remainder was made up with the milk and milk products (in a
invisible fat from the total. The resulting amount was provided
7 . S T A T I S T I C A L ANALYSIS
122