Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Theory & Event, Volume 22, Number 1, January 2019, pp. 222-226 (Review)
A Brief Overview
The book is organized into seven chapters. Chapter one follows the “the quest
for Beta-Israel identity in Ethiopia”. It examines the origin of the identity of
the Beta-Israel from all possible accounts and debates the ancient roots of the
Beta-Israel based on oral history. However, due to the lack of written sources
before the 4th century, none of these accounts can provide conclusive and com-
pelling evidence to establish with absolute certainty when and how the Jewish
presence in Ethiopia began. The author, therefore, concludes that even though
the Beta-Israel cannot be considered as “a distinct, pure and authentic social
group untouched to the multidimensional dynamics in Africa and Ethiopia”,
their strong religious commitment and struggle to defend their faith supports
their claim for historical Jewishness in their own eyes. Thus, they deserve
acceptance in Israeli identity, despite being isolated from mainstream Judaism.
However, Zegeye’s wider theoretical understanding of Beta-Israel identity
concerns their constant struggle against isolation from the Christian rules of
Ethiopia, which in turn reinforced their peculiarity and perseverance against
all odds.
Chapter two continues the search for the identity of the Beta Israel by
examining the history of Judaism in Ethiopia. His thorough survey of the
interpenetration of Judaism and Ethiopian identity leads him to conclude that
there is no other country today as highly influenced by Judaism as Ethiopia.
Similarly, the identity of the Beta-Israel has undergone Ethiopianisation. Thus,
one may say, Ethiopia was Judaized as Judaism was Ethiopianized. This chapter
focused on reconstructing the Jewish identity of the Beta-Israel along with the
ancient history of Ethiopia. In doing so, the author has unearthed a grotesque
image of the extreme violence against the Beta-Israel that shaped the nature
of their identity. Zegeye concludes that the Beta Israel have a legitimate claim
to Jewishness owing to the endless persecution, violation and discrimination
they faced.
Chapter three, the shortest of all the chapters, presents a watershed point
in the history of the Beta-Israel: the relocation to Jerusalem, which involved
the dramatic smuggling out and airlifting of tens of thousands of Ethiopian
Jews from Ethiopia and Sudan. Four major operations were carried out from
1983 to 1991: Operation Brothers, Moses, Sheba and Solomon. The title of the
chapter, “Back to Jerusalem”, captures the age-old aspiration of the Beta-Israel
to return to their imagined old religious home, as was the case with the wider
Theory & Event Vol. 22, No. 1, 222–237 © 2019 Johns Hopkins University Press
Review Forum 223
Jewish diaspora, an aspiration voiced in the prayer “We shall meet next year
in Jerusalem”. The author describes, the arrival of 14, 000 Ethiopian Jews at
Ben Gurion airport during the Operation Solomon as “a defining and mythical
moment” of union between Jewishness and Zionism despite multidimensional
differences. This was a euphoric moment among both Secular and religious
Jews. However, the cumulative effect of the three-failed exodus of the 19th cen-
tury and the immediate stress, disorders and suffering on the body and mind
of the Beta-Israel left an enduring legacy, a topic fully addressed in chapters
four and five.
Chapter four analyzes the legal, religious and socio-cultural challenges
faced by the Beta-Israel in the process of their absorption into Israeli society.
Like the tribulations the Beta-Israel endured through centuries in Ethiopia,
they faced in Israel a distressing situation of marginalization, discrimination
and dehumanization. In all aspects of their identity, they were denigrated as
backwards, inferior and unfit for the advanced Israeli way of life. Zegeye’s
account leaves the reader wondering how the Israeli state and society failed to
have empathy for the pain and suffering the Beta-Israel endured to maintain
their identity.
Chapter five addresses the Beta-Israel resistance to Israeli education. It
mainly focuses on their perseverance to preserve their identity from being
crushed and recreated in the Israeli mould, which resulted in their cultural
and social ghettoization. In all measurements of education, skill and employ-
ment they faced a system of segregation or Ketotkelot - a term designating and
justifying an Apartheid type of system of separate development.
Chapter six discusses the cumulative effect of this explicit and structural
discrimination, segregation and abuse, namely the social disintegration of the
Beta-Israel identity. It also describes the social degeneration of 26,000 Beta-Is-
raelis in Ethiopia under the effects of drought and famine. In response, Zegeye
recommends a relaxation of Israeli conception of Jewishness to fully integrate
the Ethiopian Jews into Israeli society and relocate those in Ethiopia.
The final chapter describes the critical dilemma facing the Beta-Israel, who
are caught between the devil and the blue sea. They cannot return to Ethiopia
and cannot make a meaningful existence in Israel; they are caught between
their longing for their old home and way of life in Ethiopia and their steadfast
adherence to their Jewishness, which is not recognized as such in Israel. Their
predicament is best expressed in a nostalgic song by the Beta-Israeli singer pre-
sented in the book as the last word of the author. As Zegeye argues the Israel
government needs to rethink its approach to help the Beta Israel become a pro-
ductive and contributing part of contemporary Israeli society rather than treat-
ing them as a backward and uncivilized vestige of an ancient Hebraic past.
Israel. This also has a historical parallel in ancient Jewish struggle against the
Romans, as in the story of Masada. The Beta Israel have similar tragic stories of
mass suicide to escape enslavement. The association of Beta-Israel resistance to
extreme violence with the Ambas of Masada, Semien Mountain, and Mekidela
is a puzzle requiring further examination.
At the structural level, the Beta-Israel were demonized for their unique
blacksmith skills, which played a part in their alienation and marginaliza-
tion (giving them the derogatory name Falasha), and for their unique forms
of religious worship and rituals as falling between the animal and superhu-
man forces constituted structural violence. For instance, the Beta-Israel were
accused of employing Buda, in short, the evil power of changing a human
being into objects and animals. The religious and social values supporting the
discrimination, dehumanization and oppression of the Beta-Israel detailed
in the book constituted the worst form of cultural violence, in that it made
violence against them morally permissible. In this respect, it resembled the
European Anti-Semitism that was the basis for the extreme violence of the
Holocaust. Until the Ethiopian revolution, this major trend of violating the
Beta-Israel continued, contributing to the age-old desire of the Beta-Israel to
relocate to Israel.
The process of relocation to Israel involved yet more violence. The three-
failed exodus attempted during the 19th century culminated in the near-to-
tal destruction of the Beta-Israel, except for a few who settled in Tigray. The
20th-century relocation from the 1950s through the 1980s, and finally the mas-
sive airlifting operations discussed above were also characterized by traumatic
experiences. The first two periods required travelling through the unfriendly
territories of Sudan and Egypt to arrive in Israel, during which the Beta-Israel
Immigrants were exposed to massive death, starvation, detention and abuse.
In the 1980s alone, 4000 Beta-Israeli immigrants perished in the Sudan desert,
and during the four operations of the early 1990s, they were exposed to phys-
ical, mental and emotional trauma with lasting consequences, contributing to
the marginal integration of the Beta-Israel into Israeli society.
The post-relocation situation of the Beta-Israel in the Israeli state involved
both direct and structural violence. In the first instance, they were made to
serve in the military roles in the war against the Arabs. In the second instance,
they suffered a dehumanizing reintegration process involving various forms
of discrimination, marginalization, alienation and denigration as a “black
underclass”. They were further subjected to cultural violence in the form of
negative religious and secular attitudes.