See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/347051863

Using method analysis to improve productivity: case of a tap manufacturer

Article in International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · November 2020

DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2019-0253

CITATIONS READS

7 2,399

1 author:

Barnes Sookdeo
University of South Africa
9 PUBLICATIONS 27 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Barnes Sookdeo on 08 April 2022.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/1741-0401.htm

Using method analysis to improve Method

analysis to
productivity: case of improve
productivity
a tap manufacturer
Barnes Sookdeo
Operations Management, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
Received 31 May 2019
Revised 9 June 2020
Abstract Accepted 3 October 2020
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that basic interventions using method study
investigations can improve productivity in the workplace. Continuous improvement of operational processes
allows an organisation to develop its capabilities to keep it ahead of its competitors.
Design/methodology/approach – A mixed-methods approach was used as the research design of the study.
It involved an intensive method study investigation at a tap manufacturer to improve productivity. Structured
searches using keywords were carried to identify important contributors to research articles in the areas of
work-study, method study and productivity.
Findings – The empirical results indicate the essential need for method study investigations to improve
productivity in organisations. It can be concluded that the systematic implementation of this methodology will
ensure that productivity is enhanced in organisations.
Research limitations/implications – The research is restricted to a single manufacturing organisation.
Literature on method study was found to be limited.
Practical implications – This research is intended to support organisations by providing a methodology to
address areas of inefficiency and also to assist with subsequent turnaround strategies to ensure organisational
effectiveness and sustainability.
Originality/value – The essential contribution that this article makes is that it provides organisations with a
universally accepted, user-friendly technique to improve organisational effectiveness and productivity with
minimal capital outlay.
Keywords Work study, Method study, Productivity, Efficiency, Layouts
Paper type Case study

1. Introduction
In the early 20th century, special interest was devoted to the study of manufacturing
processes driven by the global concern related to inefficiencies and waste on material
resources. Frederick Taylor (1856–1915) devoted his research to this issue, proposing that the
biggest loss owing to inefficiencies was not material but indeed a waste of human effort. He
contributed to the emerging “scientific management” field with his time and motion study
method aiming at reducing process times (Lopetegui et al., 2014). This method was later
expanded by Taylor’s disciples, Frank and Lilian Gilbreth, who focused on motion (method
study). The motion study method sought to make processes more efficient by reducing the
motions involved.
The industrial and business environments are continually changing and seeking efficient
methods of working (Industrial Engineering, 2019). This is owing to a number of factors,
which include, competitiveness, Industry 4.0, globalisation and the ever-expanding
applications of technology in organisational processes (Freivalds and Niebel, 2014;
ElMaraghy et al., 2012 in Alkan et al., 2018). Organisations can grow and increase their
profitability by increasing their productivity. Productivity improvement entails measures
output per unit of input, such as labour, capital or any other resource (Kenton, 2018). Singh
(2018) very aptly defines productivity as the transformation of available materials and International Journal of
workforce resources into essential goods and services within an organisation. Productivity and Performance
Management
Working smarter and working fewer hours may have a positive impact on productivity. © Emerald Publishing Limited
1741-0401
Johnson (2017) asserts that working longer hours does not necessarily result in increased DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2019-0253
IJPPM productivity. Less fatigue occurs among workers or if employees work harder during the
shorter number of active hours (Belorgey et al., 2006; Bourles and Cette 2007 in Erken et al.,
2018). Organisations must attempt to reduce the consumption of resources, thereby reducing
cost per unit output through utilisation of proper methods. Herein lies the benefits of method
study. A method study investigation and the subsequent implementation of the
improvements can lead to significant productivity improvements with minimal financial
outlay.
The United States (US) has long enjoyed the world’s highest productivity. Over the last
100 years, productivity in the US has increased approximately 4% per year. In the past
two decades, the US rate of productivity improvement has been greatly exceeded by that of
China, at 13.4%, (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2015).
Unfortunately, South Africa (SA) is far behind their first-world counterparts. In 2017, SA’s
economic performance was ranked 58th out of 63 countries (Institute of Management
Development (IMD), 2017). This necessitates urgent interventions to ensure that productivity
is improved in individual organisations which, in turn, automatically improves the overall
productivity of a country. It is incumbent on organisations to improve their productivity,
which also contributes to competitiveness and their sustainability (Park et al., 2018). Riddle
(2010) in Sookdeo (2016) states that increasing employee productivity should be on the
forefront of any managerial mind.
This article reports on the method study investigation which was conducted in the
assembly department of a selected tap manufacturing organisation (company A). A mixed-
methods approach was used as the research design of the study. Method study is a technique
of the concept work study and is primarily concerned with improving the methods of
working. Work study is the systematic examination of any type of work being conducted in
order to effect improvements (Moktadir et al., 2017). It consists of two techniques, namely,
method study and work measurement (Kanawaty, 1995). It is no exaggeration to view work
study as being able to either “make or break” any organisation. Continuous improvement of
operational processes allows an organisation to develop its capabilities to keep it ahead of its
competitors (Slack et al., 2017). The method study investigation in the assembly department
will ensure this. The absence of scholarly articles on the use of method study in improving
productivity gives credence to the essential contribution that this paper makes (Sookdeo,
2018). More importantly, the paper provides organisations with a universally accepted, user-
friendly technique to improve organisational effectiveness and overall productivity.
Alkan et al. (2018) state that complexity in manufacturing systems remains a challenge
and leads to operational issues and increased production cost. An analysis of the existing
processes in the assembly department, by direct observation, revealed that systems were
complex and they used inefficient methods in their daily operational processes, some of which
were highly labour-intensive. Examples of inefficient methods included excessive handling of
materials, absence of jigs for assembly tools, unavailability of a substitute line operator and
unnecessary operations. The organisation measured the monetary value of the outputs and
referred to it as daily productivity. If they achieved their target (one million rands - monetary
output), they accepted this as 100% productivity. However, the number of resources that
were utilised to realise this monetary output were not taken into consideration via a dedicated
costing system. Management must be particularly interested in the relationship between
productivity and efficiency as this speaks to managerial effectiveness (O’Donnell et al., 2017).
The results of the investigation will show the interventions that were implemented to
improve the working methods of the operational processes, improve the layout of the work
environment to ensure a smooth flow of work and the subsequent improvement in
productivity.
The main contributions of this paper are three-fold. First, the paper seeks to conduct an
intensive method study investigation in the assembly department to improve working
methods of the operational processes. Second, to improve the layout of the work environment. Method
Third, to report on the results of the research instrument. The overall aim was to improve analysis to
productivity. The remainder of this paper is organised as follows: Section 2 states the problem
and research objectives. Section 3 provides the theoretical framework. Section 4 describes the
improve
research methodology. Section 5 and 6 discuss the findings and results of the research and the productivity
limitations of the study. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section 7.

2. Problem investigated and the research objectives

2.1 Problem investigated
A quick observation of the assembly department indicated ineffective operational processes.
Employees were content with the layout of their workstations, although it was evident from
direct observation that certain basic improvements could have led to greater effectiveness in
their working lives. It was also found that employees and management had become
“institutionalised” with their working methods and did not believe that it could be improved.
“Resistance to change” is widely recognised as a significant contributor to this problem
(Georgalis et al., 2014). Ineffective layouts and processes were not identified and hence staff
were content to continue working. Furthermore, it was found that the deterioration effect (of
workers, tools and machines) which increases the time required to produce units, was
prevalent in the assembly department (Rudek, 2013). There was no method study
investigation to identify poor working methods. This problem necessitated an urgent
method study investigation to improve working methods and to improve the layout of the
work environment as the current methods of working had an adverse effect on the
productivity of the department.

2.2 Objectives of the research

The primary objective of the research on which this article is based was to conduct an
intensive method study investigation to improve working methods of the operational
processes and to improve the layout of the work environment. The overall aim was to
improve productivity in the assembly department.

3. Unpacking the method study technique

The theoretical framework for this article contains references to certain textbooks that are
rather old. However, these are considered seminal works. The main reason for using these
references is the limited availability of literature on this topic. Continuous references are made
to the textbook by Kanawaty (1995) as this is regarded as the “Bible” of work study. The
theoretical framework aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice. It begins with the
definition and nature of method study, followed by the objectives, scope and structure of
the same.

3.1 Towards a definition of method study

Method study is the process of subjecting the methods of working to systematic and critical
scrutiny to make it more efficient. It was originally designed for the analysis and
improvement of repetitive manual work, but it can be used for all types of activity at all levels
of an organisation (IMS, 2018). Pycraft et al. (2010) define method study as the systematic
recording and critical examination of the existing and proposed methods of doing work, as a
means of developing and applying easier and more effective methods and reducing costs.
Slack et al. (2017) underscore that method study determines the methods and activities to be
included in jobs. Method study can also be seen as the systematic recording and critical
IJPPM examination of the factors and resources involved in an operation in order to develop a more
efficient method and to reduce costs (Kanawaty, 1995).
It can be seen from the above definitions that method study offers a systematic approach
to problem-solving. The objective is to make the work method or process more effective and
to eliminate unnecessary and inefficient operations and movements. These are then
simplified to determine the shortest possible route and the most effective sequence of
operations. Method study is therefore constantly identifying problems to determine what
caused them, what can be done to solve them and how to avoid them from recurring in future.
When starting a method study investigation, analytical thinking should be prioritised. Before
any existing or planned method can be improved, it is necessary to analyse the specific
process, procedure or task in detail. Throughout the years, this detailed investigation has
been developed into a fine art known as “method study”.
Overall, method study is concerned with the reduction of the work content of a job or
operation. It speaks to how well the available resources such as manpower, machines,
materials and money are utilised and compel manufacturers to rethink almost every aspect of
their business operations (Moon et al., 2018). The basic procedure followed in method study is
as follows: select, record, examine, develop, define, install and maintain, (see point 3.6). The
technique was initially developed to evaluate manufacturing processes but is now used more
widely to evaluate alternative courses of action. It is based on research into motion study
conducted by Frank and Lillian Gilbreth during the 1920s and 1930s.

3.2 The objectives of method study

Bhatawdekar (2010) accentuates that one of the objectives of method study is the
improvement in the use of all inputs and to develop better ways of doing things and reducing
costs in the organisation. It also contributes to improving efficiency by eliminating
unnecessary work, delays and preventing waste. The objectives of method study mentioned
above can be achieved through –
(1) improvements in the utilisation of all inputs, i.e. workers, machines, materials, money,
time and information;
(2) economy in human effort and reduction of unnecessary fatigue;
(3) layout improvements;
(4) improved planning and design of plant and equipment;
(5) improved work procedures, processes and methods; and
(6) development of a better working environment.

3.3 The scope of method study

There is a traditional view that method study can only be applied to light work. This
statement does not recognise the full potential of this technique. The scope of method study is
much wider, and it is explored briefly below (Bhatawdekar, 2010).
The application of method study in any organisation affects all hierarchical levels and
must incorporate the employee, the environment and their interaction for optimal efficiency
(Mor et al., 2016). This means that all levels in an organisation, from top management to the
shopfloor workers, are affected by the application of method study. According to Freivalds
and Niebel (2014), method study is the careful analysis of body motions employed in doing a
job. Seminal literature by Currie (1963, p. 57) postulates that method study can be applied
anywhere and everywhere where people are engaged in work since any method, process or
procedure is open to improvements.
3.4 The structure of method study Method
The structure of method study can focus on an individual, a section of an organisation or an analysis to
organisation as a whole. This means that a method study is carried out in order to assess the
present method of working. Here the method, i.e. how the work is executed, is investigated.
improve
Thereafter, the recorded data are analysed utilising the questioning technique (Kulkarni, productivity
2014) in order to develop an improved method of working. This is called the proposed method.
The best way to describe the structure of method study is in the form of the diagram below.
Figure 1 shows that method study covers a wide spectrum in an organisation and is
applicable to individual tasks as well as to the organisation as a whole. A further important
aspect of this structure is the sequence in which the steps of an investigation must be carried
out. By keeping to this sequence, the success of an investigation can largely be ensured.

3.5 Method study recording techniques

Method study utilises various techniques to record all the relevant information of an existing
method. Among them are outline process charts, flow process charts, two-handed process
charts, multiple activity charts, simo charts, flow diagrams, string diagrams, cyclegraphs,
chronocyclegraphs and travel charts. For the purposes of this study, flow process charts were
used. A flow process chart is a graphical representation of the sequence of steps or tasks
(workflow) constituting a process, right from raw materials to the final finished product
(Rathod et al., 2016). Flow process charts allowed the author to chart each step of the tap
assembly process using appropriate symbols. It was found to be the most convenient
recording technique in comparison to those mentioned above.

3.6 Method study procedure

Pycraft et al. (2010) assert that method study is a systematic approach to finding the best
method. There is a set procedure that must be followed in order to achieve success in a method
study investigation. In Figure 1, seven essential steps of method study were identified. These
steps represent the procedure that must be followed when conducting a method study
investigation (Slack et al., 2017). The process is often seen as linear and is described by its
steps of: SELECT the area to be studied, RECORD the data, EXAMINE the data, DEVELOP
alternative approaches, DEFINE the new method, INSTALL the new method and
MAINTAIN the new method. Although this linear representation shows the underlying
simplicity of method study, in practice, the process is much more than repeated passes
through the sequence of steps with each dominating at a different stage of the investigation
(IMS, 2018). Prior research into work study has largely focussed on work measurement where
the emphasis was on developing standard times for manufacturing processes – it has
generally failed to explicitly consider the role of method study in firstly improving the
methods of working to improve productivity (Stevenson, 2013).

4. Research methodology
The research design consisted of a mixed-methods approach which was used to generate
data, which enabled the researcher to come to conclusions and to make recommendations
regarding the method study investigation (Cresswell, 2013). The necessity for this research
design stemmed from the method study investigation which required an integration of theory
into practice. The data-generation techniques consisted of the method study investigation
and a structured, self-administered, web-based questionnaire. This was found to be the most
appropriate survey method as the respondents could easily be accessed, as noted by Alam
et al. (2010) in Sookdeo (2016). The respondents were invited by email to complete the
questionnaire online. The online approach was deemed appropriate as they are guaranteed to
IJPPM

Figure 1.
Structure of method
study (Sookdeo, 2012a,
p. 66)

deliver results, and surveys enable researchers to generalise their findings (Talikoti, 2019).
The purpose of the questionnaire was to generate critical responses as to the use of method
study investigations to improve productivity in organisations.
4.1 The population and sampling in the study Method
The population of the study reported in this article was composed of selected employees analysis to
(n 5 800) of organisations in South Africa. Their positions ranged from operators and
supervisory staff to management. Purposive sampling, popular in qualitative research, was
improve
utilised to select the participants. Purposive sampling simply looks for people who can help productivity
build the substantive theory further (Gouws and Shuttleworth, 2009). Two hundred and
thirty (230) respondents submitted their questionnaires online to the database, and all were
considered suitable for inclusion. The response rate was 28.75% and deemed to be
representative of the population.

4.2 Data collection and analysis

Data were collected via the method study investigation which consisted of process charting
and by means of a structured questionnaire.
4.2.1 Process charting. Flow process charts of the tap assembly process were compiled.
The data were analysed using the recommended seven steps of the method study procedure.
It is coincidental that the method study procedure and the tap assembly process consisted of
seven steps each.

5. Discussion of findings and results

5.1 Method study investigation A: process charting
The method study investigation consisted of intensive “observation and recording” of the
current method of working in the assembly department. Although there were a variety of taps
being assembled, the most popular tap was selected for this study. Flow process charts were
used to record the elements of each step of the assembly process. All the steps of each
assembly process was recorded via direct observation. A description for each element of each
process was noted and a symbol allocated to each element (see Table 1 for a description of
elements and symbols). The flow process chart utilises the following symbols:

Symbol Symbol name and description

Operation:
Indicates the main steps in a procedure. Usually, the part, material
or product concerned is modified or changed during an operation.
Inspection:
Indicates an inspection for quality and/or check for quantity.
Transport:
Indicates the movement of workers, material and equipment from
one place to another.

Temporary delay:
Indicates a temporary delay in the sequence of events.

Permanent storage:
Indicates a controlled storage in which material is received into or
issued from a store under some form of authorisation.
Combined activities: Table 1.
When activities performed at the same time or by the same worker Symbols used in
at the same workstation need to be shown, the symbols for those process charting
(Freivalds and
activities are combined. Niebel, 2014)
IJPPM Procedure step 1: “Select” the work to be studied
The assembly department was selected.
Procedure step 2: “Record” all the relevant information.
The assembly process consisted of seven steps. This means that on the assembly line, seven
different operators were utilised to assemble this tap, hence seven flow process charts were
compiled.
The seven assembly steps (AS) were:
(1) AS1:Fit head part;
(2) AS2: Water Pressure Test;
(3) AS3: Fit back nut to tap (brass);
(4) AS4: Fit cover and handle;
(5) AS5: Fit indice (cold);
(6) AS6: Cleaning and polishing; and
(7) AS7: Packaging.

Procedure step 3: Examine (critically), the recorded information.

Each of the flow process charts were subjected to a rigorous critical examination to eliminate
inefficient operations, reduce transportation and limit the number of inspections. The overall
aim was to “streamline” each step to make it more efficient. For example:
5.1.1 AS1: Fit head part to body of tap. AS1 consisted of consisted of 16 elements. Each
element was described and a process chart symbol allocated to it (see Figure 2). A summary of
the different symbols of the present method was completed. AS1 was critically examined and
improved. The outcome is a proposed flow process chart for AS1 (see Figure 3). Total savings
amounted to ten elements, indicating a significant improvement in the assembly process of AS1.
A new summary was completed showing the comparison between the present and proposed
methods (see “SUMMARY” in Figure 3). The rationale for the savings in the AS1 are as follows:
The ten elements which were eliminated, will be conducted as “inside work”. Kanawaty
(1995) asserts that inside work comprises those elements which can be performed by a worker
within the machine (or process) controlled time. This means that all the preparatory elements
leading up to AS1 must be conducted before AS1 starts. This helps to separate the setup times
from the processing times. The goal is to find optimal sequences that minimise interruptions to
the assembly process, (Soroush, 2012). Hence, the time that it takes to complete AS1 is
significantly reduced. A saving in distance travelled (100 metres) was also realised.
5.1.2 Assembly steps 2 to 7. The same process as AS1 was completed for the remaining six
assembly steps. The flow process charts for these steps is not shown owing to article space
constraints. However, an explanation is provided.
5.1.3 AS2: water pressure test. The tap was tested to determine whether there are any
leakages. AS2 consisted of 15 elements. No improvements could be made as all the elements
were compulsory.
5.1.4 AS3: fit back nut to tap. A back nut was fitted to the body of the tap. AS3 consisted of
six elements. No improvements could be made as all the elements were compulsory.
5.1.5 AS4: fit cover and handle. A cover and handle were fitted to the body of the tap. A
quality check was also conducted during this step. AS4 consisted of 11 elements. Elements 1,
4 and 7 were improved, and a proposed method was compiled. Here, a savings of five elements
were realised, which shows a significant improvement in the assembly process of AS4. The
savings are shown in Table 2.
 FLOW PROCESS CHART
Method
LOCATION: Assembly Department analysis to
SUMMARY
ACTIVITY: Assembly of tap EVENT PRESENT PROPOSED SAVINGS improve
DATE: 12-06-2018 productivity
Operation 10
OPERATOR: Line 1 ANALYST: B.
Sookdeo Transport 4
METHOD AND TYPE:
Delay 1
METHOD: Present
TYPE: Operator Storage 0

Inspection 1

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: Time (mins.)

Step 1: Fit head part
Distance (metres) 100

STEP NO. DESCRIPTION TIME DISTANCE

OF ELEMENTS SYMBOL (in minutes) (in metres) REMARKS
1 Prepare workplace

2 Fetch jig from store 40

3 Position at workplace

4 Fetch head parts from storage 10

5 Position at workplace

6 Fetches body parts from storage 10

7 Position at workplace

8 Wait for other stations to set up

9 Pick up body part and pos. in jig

10 Pick up head part and pos. in body

11 Screw on head part

12 Pick up assembled head part

13 Inspect head part Figure 2.

14 Aside head part onto conveyor
Present method: flow
process chart:
15 Remove and aside empty boxes assembly step 1: fit
16 Take jig back to store 40
head part

The rationale for the savings in AS4 is as follows: Elements 1–5 have been eliminated and
similar to AS1, these elements should be conducted as “inside work”.
5.1.6 AS5: fit indice (cold/hot). A plastic fixture was attached onto the handle of the tap to
denote a hot/cold water tap. AS5 consisted of six elements. No improvements could be made
as all the elements were compulsory.
5.1.7 AS6: cleaning and polishing. The tap was wiped clean using a cloth and polish. The
tap was inserted into a plastic packet, and a quality check was conducted. AS6 consisted of
five elements. No improvements could be made as all the elements were compulsory.
5.1.8 AS7: packaging. The packaging box was made up, and 10 taps were placed into the
box. The box was sealed and weighed to determine the quantity. AS7 consisted of seven
elements. One element (aside box on table) was eliminated. Hence, there was a saving of one
element, which shows an improvement. The rationale for this was that the packaged boxes
should be placed onto the pallet immediately after they had been closed.
IJPPM FLOW PROCESS CHART

LOCATION: Assembly Department

SUMMARY

ACTIVITY: Assembly of tap EVENT PRESENT PROPOSED SAVINGS

DATE: 12-06-2018 Operation 10 5 5

OPERATOR: Line 1 ANALYST: B. Sookdeo Transport 4 0 4
METHOD AND TYPE:
Delay 1 0 1
METHOD: PROPOSED
Storage 0 0 0
TYPE: WORKER

Inspection 1 1 0
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION:
TOTAL: 16 5 11
Step 1: Fit head part:
Distance (metres) 100 0 100
STEP DESCRIPTION TIME DISTANCE REMARKS
NO. OF ELEMENTS SYMBOL (in minutes) (in metres)
1 Pick up body part and pos. in jig

2 Pick up head part and pos. in body

3 Screw on head part

Figure 3. 4 Pick up assembled head part

Proposed method: flow
process chart: step 1: fit 5 Inspect head part
head part 6 Aside head part onto conveyor

Symbol Present method Proposed method Savings

Operation 7 5 2
Transport 3 0 3
Delay 0 0 0
Table 2. Storage 0 0 0
Summary of savings: Inspection 1 1 0
assembly step 4 Totals 11 6 5

5.1.9 Summary of improvements and savings. Table 3 shows a summary of the savings (24%)
that had been realised from the method study investigation. This serves as an indication of
the value of a method study investigation and how it can improve productivity in an
organisation. The duration of each of the improved steps would also be reduced, thereby
improving the capacity of the assembly process.

5.2 Method study investigation B: the present and proposed layouts of assembly department
At the time of the study, the assembly department utilised two types of layouts, namely,
product layout (line manufacturing) and u-cell layouts. Stevenson (2014) highlights that
layout refers to the configuration of departments, work centres and equipment, with
particular emphasis on movement of through the system. Management were in a quandary
about which layout would yield the greatest benefits in terms of manufacturing outputs. A
study conducted by the author revealed that the u-cell layout was best suited for the assembly
of taps. The proposed layout shows the elimination of assembly lines and the introduction of
u-cells as the advantages of u-cell far outweigh those of the assembly lines. Moreover,
 Number of elements
Method
Assembly step Description Present method Proposed method Savings analysis to
improve
1. Fit head part 16 6 10
2. Water pressure test 15 15 0 productivity
3. Fit back nut (brass) 6 6 0
4. Fit cover and handle 11 6 5
5. Fit indice (cold) 6 6 0
6. Cleaning and polishing 5 5 0
7. Packaging 7 6 1
Total savings 66 50 16
Note(s): Further to the above, the new method was subsequently installed and the onus remained with Table 3.
management to ensure that the new method was maintained Summary of savings

unbalanced assembly lines create bottlenecks and problems in managing production (Aqlan
et al., 2017). The u-cell assembly has been widely used in industry in recent years (Fathi
et al., 2016).
During a method study investigation, it is imperative that the layout of a department
is critically analysed to determine if it allows for the efficient and smooth flow of work. It
was evident from the beginning of the study that the layout of assembly department was
not done appropriately. Raw materials were not stored according to customer orders and
in close proximity to the assembly lines. Jigs and tools were stored in a toolroom and
were only requested when the need arose. Travelling distances to source all
requirements for the assembly process were lengthy. Company A had a large product
variety which necessitated a higher degree of flexibility for handling components owing
to the variations in the technical and functional aspects of the products (Chinnathai
et al., 2017).
The present layout of the assembly department was drawn and critically analysed.
Thereafter, an improved layout was designed (see Figures 4 (present layout) and 5 (proposed
layout)). The aim was to show an effective flow of materials and employees within the
assembly department in order to reduce transportation, eliminate delays and improve overall
effectiveness. Heizer and Render (2011) state that layout design needs to achieve the following
(see Figure 5):
(1) higher utilisation of space, equipment and people;
(2) improved flow of information, materials or people;
(3) improved employee morale and safer working conditions;
(4) improved customer/client interaction and
(5) flexibility (to be able to adapt to change).

5.3 Qualitative results

Only significant responses related to the method study investigation and the methodology
are reported on in this article. Poor working conditions and unrealistic working hours have a
serious effect on morale and output. Pryce-Jones (2012) states that employees who are most
productive are also the happiest workers. Happy workers help their colleagues 33% more
than their least happy colleagues; raise issues that affect performance 46% more; achieve
their goals 31% more and are 36% more motivated.
IJPPM EXIT

U-CELL ASSEMBLY JIG

STORES

PRINTING
QUARANTINE
AREA
OFFICE

RAW

MATERIAL

STORES

AREA RAW MATERIALS STORAGE

CLERKS
AREA
OFFICE

U-CELL ASSEMBLY
LINE 4
SUPERVISORS

LINE 3
FINISHED GOODS
OFFICE

STORAGE

LINE 2
MANAGERS
OFFICE

LINE 1

FINISHED GOODS STORAGE

Figure 4.
Present layout of the
assembly department
TO STORES

A total of 54.8% of employees indicated that management do not motivate them to perform
well. Management must ensure good working conditions in order to ensure job satisfaction.
Employees need to be recognised for a job well done. As many as 29.8% of employees
indicated that they were unhappy. There was, however, a very large percentage (14.3%) of
missing answers. A very large percentage (48.8%) of employees indicated that they were not
treated with respect by management. This is important for a healthy employer/employee
relationship.
Employees were asked to indicate whether they understood the term productivity. The
results revealed that 35.7% of employees indicated that they did not. This begs the question:
“How does management expect employees to perform to their maximum and to look at
opportunities for productivity improvement if they do not understand the basics of productivity?
” It is imperative that management conduct training in the basics of productivity to inculcate
a culture of productivity improvement in the assembly department. Some of the basic
productivity improvement tools include: time management, lean manufacturing, efficiency
reporting systems and employee motivation.
During the method study investigation, five primary problems which hindered effective
production were identified and employees were requested to indicate which of these problems
they encountered the most. The results revealed that the major production problem was
waiting for materials (63.1%). The assembly process was often held up owing to non-delivery
of assembly components. Employees should not wait for raw materials as this causes
bottlenecks in the operational processes which automatically has a negative effect on the
output. Method study ensures that employees do not wait for materials.
 PROPOSED LAYOUT 2
EXIT
Method
SUB- ASSEMBLY CELLS
JIG
analysis to
STORES improve
productivity
PRINTING
OFFICE

SUPERVISORS
OFFICE

RAW MATERIALS ARRANGE AREA

MANAGERS
OFFICE

QUARANTINE AREA
U- CELL ASSEMBLY

CLERKS
OFFICE

OTHER CELLS

Figure 5.
Proposed layout of the
TO STORES assembly department

6. Limitations of the research

As with all research, this study was not without limitations (see Van der Merwe and Nienaber,
2015, p. 51 in Sookdeo, 2018). The typical limitations of qualitative research apply (Denzin and
Lincoln, 2017; Marshall and Rossman, 2011). A limitation of this study was that it was
conducted at one manufacturing organisation. Literature on method study was found to be
limited, and the researcher made significant references to Kanawaty (1995). Method study is
not restricted to the manufacturing sector, and as future research the researcher intends to
conduct a comparative study in the services sector.

7. Conclusions
Currently, organisations find themselves in a continuous cycle of trying to outdo their
competitors through effective processes and the production of quality products at the
cheapest price. Majumder (2017) supports this by stating that in the current competitive
climate, manufacturing processes are caught between the budding needs for quality,
minimum production costs and short manufacturing times. This justified the necessity for the
method study investigation to improve methods of working, ensure organisational
effectiveness and improve productivity.
The objectives of the research on which this article is based were threefold, i.e. to conduct
an intensive method study investigation to improve working methods of the operational
processes, to improve the layout of the work environment and report on the results of the
IJPPM research instrument. The overall aim was to improve productivity in the assembly
department. These objectives and aim are revisited to determine the extent to which they
were achieved. The following noteworthy conclusions were drawn from this study:
Firstly, it is critical that organisations follow the set procedure of method study when
starting an investigation. Kanawaty (1995) asserts that method study must be conducted
prior to work measurement in order to improve the methods of working before setting time
standards. It is impractical to set time standards on inefficient methods of working. Process
charts should be utilised to record all information of the present situation, to critically analyse
and develop improved methods of working. This must be defined, implemented and
maintained by regular routine checks. The conclusion drawn from this is that if a method
study is conducted systematically, the success of the investigation will be guaranteed.
The second objective concerns the improvement of the layout of the work environment.
During various industry liaisons, the author had observed many examples of employees
working inefficiently. By conducting basic improvements using a common-sense approach,
methods of working were improved. It is common knowledge that employees become very
comfortable with their work environment over time and do not embrace change in a dynamic
way. Continuous communication between management and employees could prevent
resistance to change (Elving, 2005). It was recommended that only u-cell manufacturing be
utilised in Ccmpany A.
The final objective of this article reports on the results of the research instrument. The
work environment must be conducive to working conditions which speaks to job satisfaction.
Management must treat employees with respect, motivate them to perform and then
recognise their endeavours. In order to improve productivity, employees must be made aware
of the positive impact of improved productivity. More importantly, management must
conduct training in the basics of productivity to inculcate a culture of productivity
improvement. Factors which hinder effective production must be identified and improved. In
order to attain targets, all components for the assembly process should be readily available.
Method study investigations ensure that employees do not wait for materials.
It is recommended that management instil a culture of efficiency. Senior management
commitment is vital as it sets the example. The findings of this study may also be extended to
service industries. The essential contribution that this article makes is that it provides
organisations with a universally accepted, user-friendly technique (method study) to improve
organisational effectiveness and productivity with minimal capital outlay.

References
Alam, G.M., Hoque, K.E., Rout, G.K. and Priyadarshani, N. (2010), “State business of education or
private higher education business in developing nations? A study to understand the policy
impact in Bangladesh”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 4 No. 5, p. 770.
Alkan, B., Vera, D.A., Ahmad, M., Ahmad, B. and Harrison, R. (2018), “Complexity in manufacturing
systems and its measures: a literature review”, European Journal Industrial Engineering, Vol. 12
No. 1, pp. 116-150.
Aqlan, F., Ahmed, A., Ashour, O., Shamsan, A. and Hamasha, M.M. (2017), “An approach for rush
order acceptance decisions using simulation and multi-attribute utility theory”, European
Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 613-630.
Belorgey, N., Lecat, R. and Maury, T.P. (2006), “Determinants of productivity per employee: an
empirical estimation using panel data”, Economics Letter, Vol. 91 No. 2, pp. 153-157.
Bhatawdekar, S. (2010), “Work study: method study and Work measurement”, Building Leadership
and Management, USA Licence.
Bourles, R. and Cette, G. (2007), “Trends in ‘structural’ productivity levels in the major industrialized
countries”, Economics Letters, Vol. 95 No. 1, pp. 151-156.
Chinnathai, M.K., Alkan, B. and Harrison, R. (2017), “Convertability evaluation of automated assembly Method
design systems for high variety production”, Procedia, CIRP, Vol. 60, pp. 74-79.
analysis to
Currie, R.M. (1963), Work Study, 2nd ed., British Institute of Management, London.
improve
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2017), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed., Sage, New productivity
York, NY.
ElMaraghy, W., ElMaraghy, H., Tomiyama, T. and Monostori, L. (2012), “Complexity in engineering
design and manufacturing”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 61 No. 2,
pp. 793-814.
Elving, W.J.L. (2005), “The role of communication in organisational change”, Corporate
Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 129-138.
Erken, H., Donselaar, P. and Thurik, R. (2018), “Total factor productivity and the role of
entrepreneurship”, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 1493-1521.
Fathi, M., Alvarez, M.J. and Rodriquez, V. (2016), “A new heuristic-based bi-objective simulated
annealing method for U-shaped assembly line balancing”, European Journal of Industrial
Engineering, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 145-169.
Freivalds, A. and Niebel, B.W. (2014), Niebel’s Methods, Standards and Work Design, 13th ed.,
McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Georgalis, J., Samaratunge, R., Kimberley, N. and Lu (2014), “Change process characteristics and
resistance to organisational change: the role of employee perceptions of justice”, Australian
Journal of Management, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 89-113.
Gouws, D.G. and Shuttleworth, C.C. (2009), “Financial literacy: an interface between financial
information and decision-makers in organisations”, Southern African Business Review, Vol. 13
No. 2, p. 141.
Heizer, J. and Render, B. (2011), Principles of Operations Management, 8th ed., Pearson Higher
Education.
Industrial Engineering (2019), “Quality, work study, new-tech manufacturing”, available at: https://
industrialengineering.fandom.com/wiki/WorkStudy (accessed 20 March 2019).
Institute of Management Development (2017), IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, Lusanne.
Institute of Management Services (2018), “Method study”, available at: www.ims-productivity.com
(accessed 18 March 2019).
Johnson, D. (2017), “These are the most productive countries in the world”, World Economy, TIME
USA, LLC.
Kanawaty, G. (1995), Introduction to Work Study, 4th Revised ed., International Labour Organization,
Geneva.
Kenton, W. (2018), “Productivity”, available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/productivity.
asp (accessed 9 March 2019).
Kulkarni, V. (2014), “Productivity improvement using work study techniques at assembly work
station”, International Journal of Social Science and Management, Vol. 3 No. 2.
Lopetegui, M., Po-Yin, Y., Albert, L., Jeffries, J., Embi, P. and Payne, P. (2014), “Time motion studies in
healthcare: what are we talking about?”, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 49, pp. 292-299.
Majumder, A. (2017), “A simple and robust fuzzy-AHP-based Taguchi approach for multi-objective
optimisation of welding process parameters”, International Journal of Productivity and Quality
Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 116-137.
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (2011), Designing Qualitative Research, 5th ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks,
California, CA.
Moktadir, M.A., Ahmed, S., Fatema-Tuj-Zohra and Sultana, R. (2017), “Productivity improvement by
work study technique: a case on leather products industry of Bangladesh”, Industrial
Engineering and Management, Vol. 6 No. 207, doi: 10.4172/2169-0316.1000207.
IJPPM Moon, I., Sarmah, S.P. and Saha, S. (2018), “The impact of online sales on centralised and decentralised
dual-channel supply chains”, European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 12 No. 1,
pp. 67-92.
Mor, R.S., Singh, S. and Bhardwaj, A. (2016), “Learning on lean production. A review of opinion and
research within environmental constraints”, Journal of Operations and Supply Chain
Management, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 61-72.
O’Donnell, C.J., Fallah-Fini, S. and Triantis, K. (2017), “Measuring and analysing productivity change
in a metafrontier framework”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 47 No. 2, Springer,
pp. 117-128.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015), “Better policies for better life”,
available at: https://www.oecd.org/about (accessed 10 March 2019).
Park, Y.B., Yoon, S.J. and Yoo, J.S. (2018), “Development of a knowledge-based intelligent decision
support system for operational risk management of global supply chains”, European Journal of
Industrial Engineering, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 93-115.
Pryce-Jones, J. (2012), “Ways to be happy and productive at work”, Pridobljeno, Vol. 26 No. 12, p. 2012.
Pycraft, M., Singh, H., Philela, K., Slack, N., Chambers, S. and Johnston, R. (2010), Operations
Management. Global and South African Perspectives, 2nd ed., Pearson Education South
Africa.
Rathod, A.S., Jadhav, R.G. and Babar, A.B. (2016), “An overview of method study and study of
different recording techniques”, International Journal of Science and Research, Vol. 5 No. 8,
pp. 1484-1491.
Riddle, J. (2010), “The manager’s guide to increasing employee productivity”, available online at:
Workawesome.com.
Rudek, R. (2013), “Minimising maximum lateness in a single machine scheduling problem with
processing time-based aging effects”, European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 7 No. 2,
pp. 206-223.
Singh, S. (2018), “Productivity betterment: implementation of clustering with improved tooling in
manufacturing”, International Journal of Productivity Management and Assessment
Technologies, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 1-18.
Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., Johnston, R., Singh, H. and Phihlela, K. (2017), Operations Management.
Global and South African Perspectives, 13th ed., Pearson Education.
Sookdeo, B. (2012), Method Study, 1st ed., InDesign, Unisa, Florida, Unisa Press, CIWSO1E/1/2012.
Sookdeo, B. (2016), “An efficiency reporting system for organisational sustainability, based on
work study techniques”, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 27 No. 4,
pp. 227-236.
Sookdeo, B. (2018), “Measuring organisational performance using work measurement: towards
improving productivity”, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Vol. 1,
doi: 10.1504/IJPQM.2019.10018654, Accepted article.
Soroush, H.M. (2012), “Solving the single machine scheduling problem with general job-dependent
past-sequence-dependent setup times and learning effects”, European Journal of Industrial
Engineering, Vol. 6 No. 5, pp. 596-628.
Stevenson, M. (2013), “The role of services in flexible supply chains: an Exploratory study”,
International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 307-323.
Stevenson, W.J. (2014), Operations Management: Theory and Practice, 12th Edition Global ed.,
McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, NY.
Talikoti, M. (2019), “Online surveys for academic research – how to design them?”, QuestionPro,
available at: https://www.questionpro.com/blog/online-surveys-for-academic-research (accessed
4 March 2019).
Van der Merwe, M.M. and Nienaber, H. (2015), “Factors hindering strategy implementation as Method
perceived by top, middle and frontline managers in a South African electronic organisation”,
Journal of Global Business and Technology, Vol. 11 No. 2, Fall 2015, pp. 45-57. analysis to
improve
productivity
Further reading
Creswell, J.W. (2013), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches,
Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, CA.
Zandin, K.B. (2001), Maynard’s Industrial Engineering Handbook, 5th ed., The McGraw-Hill
Companies.

About the author

Dr Barnes Sookdeo is a Fellow of the World Academy of Productivity Science (WCPS). He is a senior
lecturer at the University of South Africa (Unisa). He obtained his PhD in Operational Research in 2015.
He practiced work study for 16 years in industry before joining academia, where he has worked for 20
years. His research interests include work study, industrial engineering, operations management, and
lean manufacturing. His publications include the South African Journal of Industrial Engineering and
International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. He has presented papers at local and
international conferences and is a reviewer of international journals and conferences. Barnes Sookdeo
can be contacted at: bsookdeo@unisa.ac.za

For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com

View publication stats