Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Synthesis, Characterization,
Mechanism, and Applications
Chandrabhan Verma
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/organic-corrosion-inhibitors-synthesis-characterizatio
n-mechanism-and-applications-chandrabhan-verma/
1.375 in 6 x 9 in
Divided into five sections, the text first covers the basics of corrosion and prevention, experimental
ENO E. EBENSO
and computational testing, and the differences between organic and inorganic corrosion inhibitors.
The next section describes various heterocyclic and non-heterocyclic corrosion inhibitors, followed by
discussion of the corrosion inhibition characteristics of carbohydrates, amino acids, and other organic
green corrosion inhibitors. The final two sections examine the corrosion inhibition properties of car-
bon nanotubes and graphene oxide, and review the application of natural and synthetic polymers as
corrosion inhibitors. Featuring contributions by leading researchers and scientists from academia and
ORGANIC
industry, this authoritative volume:
• Discusses the latest developments and issues in the area of corrosion inhibition, including
manufacturing challenges and new industrial applications
• Explores the development and implementation of environmentally-friendly alternatives to
CORROSION
traditional toxic corrosion inhibitors
• Covers both established and emerging classes of corrosion inhibitors as well as future
research directions
• Describes the anticorrosive mechanisms and effects of acyclic, cyclic, natural, and synthetic
corrosion inhibitors
INHIBITORS
Offering an interdisciplinary approach to the subject, Organic Corrosion Inhibitors: Synthesis,
Characterization, Mechanism, and Applications is essential reading for chemists, chemical engineers,
researchers, industry professionals, and advanced students working in fields such as corrosion inhib-
itors, corrosion engineering, materials science, and applied chemistry.
Chandrabhan Verma, PhD, is Post-Doctoral Fellow, Interdisciplinary Research Center for Advanced
Materials, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia. He is a
member of American Chemical Society (ACS) and is the author of several research and review articles
in peer-reviewed international journals.
SYNTHESIS, CHARACTERIZATION,
Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain, PhD, is Adjunct Professor, Academic Advisor, and Director of
Chemistry and EVSC Laboratories, New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), USA. Dr. Hussain is the
author of numerous papers in peer-reviewed journals as well as of several scientific monographs and
handbooks in his research areas.
MECHANISM, AND APPLICATIONS
Eno E. Ebenso, PhD, is Full Professor, Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College
of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa. Pro-
fessor Ebenso is the author of more than 450 peer-reviewed journal articles in peer-reviewed journals
and is the recipient of several national and international awards for his academic achievements.
www.wiley.com
Organic Corrosion Inhibitors
Organic Corrosion Inhibitors
Synthesis, Characterization,
Mechanism, and Applications
Edited by
Chandrabhan Verma
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Eno E. Ebenso
University of South Africa
Johannesburg, South Africa
This edition first published 2022
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as
permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available
at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Chandrabhan Verma, Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain, and Eno E. Ebenso to be identified as
author(s) of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Office
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
Editorial Office
111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products
visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some content that
appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
v
Contents
Preface xv
About the Editors xvii
List of Contributors xix
1 An Overview of Corrosion 3
Marziya Rizvi
1 Introduction 3
1.1 Basics About Corrosion 3
1.2 Economic and Social Aspect of Corrosion 4
1.3 The Corrosion Mechanism 5
1.3.1 Anodic Reaction 6
1.3.2 Cathodic Reactions 7
1.4 Classification of Corrosion 8
1.4.1 Uniform Corrosion 8
1.4.2 Pitting Corrosion 9
1.4.3 Crevice Corrosion 9
1.4.4 Galvanic Corrosion 9
1.4.5 Intergranular Corrosion 10
1.4.6 Stress-Corrosion Cracking (SCC) 10
1.4.7 Filiform Corrosion 10
1.4.8 Erosion Corrosion 10
1.4.9 Fretting Corrosion 11
1.4.10 Exfoliation 11
1.4.11 Dealloying 11
1.4.12 Corrosion Fatigue 11
1.5 Common Methods of Corrosion Control 11
vi Contents
Index 483
xv
Preface
monographs and handbooks in his research areas published with Elsevier, Royal
Society of Chemistry, John Wiley & sons, CRC, Springer, etc.
List of Contributors
Savaş Kaya
Health Services Vocational School Mohammad Mobin
Department of Pharmacy Corrosion Research Laboratory
Sivas Cumhuriyet University Department of Applied Chemistry
Sivas Faculty of Engineering and
Turkey Technology
Aligarh Muslim University
Hassane Lgaz Aligarh
Department of Architectural Uttar Pradesh
Engineering India
Hanyang University-ERICA
Ansan
Rachid Salghi
Korea
Laboratory of Applied Chemistry
and Environment
Han-Seung Lee
ENSA
Department of Architectural
University Ibn Zohr
Engineering
Agadir
Hanyang University-ERICA
Morocco
Ansan
Korea
xxii List of Contributor
Part I
An Overview of Corrosion
Marziya Rizvi
Corrosion Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey
1 Introduction
Finished
steel
product Action of moisture &
Smelting/ environment
refining
Adding
energy
Giving up Finished
energy steel
product
Ore mining
GNP’s 3.1% [7]. This estimation is solely inclusive of the direct costs pertaining to
maintenance. Other expenditures after production loss, negative environmental
effect, disrupted transports, fatalities, and injuries were computed to be as much
as the direct costs. Similarly, some countries conducted corrosion cost studies.
These countries were Australia, United Kingdom, Japan, Germany, Kuwait,
Finland, India, China, and Sweden. It was inferred that annual corrosion costs
was 1–5% of the national GNPs. The recently published material relates the global
economic losses due to corrosion, summed up by NACE International in 2016 as
$2.5 trillion, which is 3.5% of global GDP [8–10]. The Central Electrochemical
Research Institute calculated the cost of corrosion in India by NBS input/output
economic model for 2011–2012. The direct cost was US$26.1 billion or 2.4%
GDP. The cost avoidable was US$9.3 billion or 35% direct cost of corrosion. The
indirect cost was US$39.8 billion or 3.6% of IGDP [11]. NACE International
according to the latest global studies estimated Indian cost of corrosion to be
GDP’s 4.2% [12]. Beyond the cost of corrosion financially are the indirect costs like
loss of opportunities and natural resources, potential hazards, etc. A project con-
structed using building material unable to withstand its environment for the esti-
mated design life, the l resources are being needlessly consumed at later stages for
maintenance and repair. Wasting the already depleting natural resources is a
direct opposition to the increasing emphasis and demand for sustainable develop-
ment in order to safeguard for future generations. Along with the wastage of natu-
ral resources, weak constructed structures pose threat to lives and well-being.
Huge safety concerns have been established in regards with the accidents that
might happen in case of corroding structures. A single pipeline that fails, a bridge
that collapses, a derailed train compartment due to corroded track, or other acci-
dents is one among numerous that cause enormous indirect losses and huge pub-
lic outcry. According to the market sector considered, the indirect losses might
make up to 5–10 times the direct loss.
Electron flow
Corrosion No corrosion
occurs here Cations (+) from
occurs here
Anode metal
C
A + a
n t
o Ion flow h
d o
–
e d
e
Anions(–) from
Electrolyte Cathodic reactions
Voltage difference
electrons flow. Anions (from cathodic reactions) move toward the anode and cati-
ons (from the anode itself) drift toward the cathode. Resultantly, anode corrodes
and the cathode does not. There also exists a voltage/potential difference amidst
anode and cathode. Numerous discrete micro cells develop on the metal surfaces,
due to the constitutional phase difference, from stress variations, coatings, and
imperfection levels like dislocations, grain boundaries, kink sites, or from ionic
conductivity alterations or compositional changes in the conducting solution. The
corrosion process is chemically spontaneous oxidation of the metal on reaction
with the cathodic reactant. Every similar cell reaction results from a pair of simul-
taneous anodic and cathodic reactions going on at identical rates on the surface
of metal.
R+ + e− → R0 (1.2)
where R+ is the positive ion present in the electrolyte, e− is the metallic electron,
and R0 is the reduced species. Based on the environment, many cathodic reactions
and electron consuming reactions are possible. The main reactions are as follows.
The anaerobic acidic aqueous environment
2 H + + 2e − → H 2 (1.3)
In the anaerobic alkaline aqueous environment
2 H 2O + 2e − → H 2 + 2OH − (1.4)
In the aerobic acidic aqueous environment
2O 2 + 4 e − + 4 H + → 4 H 2 O (1.5)
In the aerobic alkaline aqueous environment
2O2 + 4 e − + 2 H 2O → 4 OH − (1.6)
Some other reactions that are most commonly present in the chemical process
are following.
Metal ion reduction
M3 + + e − → M 2 + (1.7)
Metal ion deposition
M+ + e − → M (1.8)
The products of the anodic and cathodic reactions react to form solid corrosion
products on the surface of the metal. The Fe2+ interacts with OH− ions as:-
Fe 2 + + 2OH − → Fe ( OH )2
(1.9)
Fe(OH)2 is reoxidized to Fe(OH)3, an unstable product, and thus transforms to
hydrated ferric oxide commonly called as red rust (Figure 1.3).
4 Fe ( OH )2 + O2 + 2 H 2O → 4 Fe ( OH )3
(1.10)
2 Fe ( OH )3 → Fe 2O3 ⋅ 3H 2O
(1.11)
Rust
Fe(OH)3 Fe2O3 Fe(OH)3
O2 O2
O2 Water
Fe(OH)2 droplet Fe(OH)2 O2
O2 O2
Fe2+ Fe2+
HOH– O2 + H2O + 2e– O2 + H2O 4OH–
Iron
e– Electron
e– e–
current
e–
Load
More noble Flowing Cyclic Metal or
metal corrodent movement nonmetal
corrosion, which occurs here in a uniform fashion. Corrosion rates are easily
monitored by electrochemical measuring techniques or gravimetric analysis. A
metal suffering from uniform corrosion can be protected using corrosion inhibi-
tors or coatings and also by cathodic protection. Atmospheric corrosion is an
example of uniform corrosion. When exposed to dry atmospheres with very less
humidity, metals spontaneously tend to form an oxide film. This barrier oxide film
acquires a thickness of 2–5 nm [14].
action of it moving against the surface causes metallic loss at an accelerated rate.
Erosion is common occurrence in constriction areas like pump impellers and inlet
ends. Erosion can be tackled by less turbulent fluid movement, low velocity of
flow, using corrosion resistant pipeline materials, inhibitors, etc.
1.4.10 Exfoliation
At the elongated grain boundaries, the corrosion products present cause the
metal to be forced away from the material and form layer-like look, and this is
called exfoliation. Also known as lamellar, layered, and stratified corrosion, it
proceeds along selected subsurfaces. If the grain boundary attack is severe, it is
visible; otherwise a microscope conducts the microstructure examination. Alloys
of aluminum are most susceptible to exfoliation. This can be controlled using
coatings, heat treatment to control precipitate distribution, and exfoliation-
resistant aluminum alloy.
1.4.11 Dealloying
Dealloying is selective corrosion of solid solution of alloy also known as leaching/
selective attack/parting. Dealloying can be manifested in various categories like
decobaltification (selective leaching of cobalt from cobalt-base alloys), decarburi-
zation (selective loss of carbon from the surface layer), dezincification (selective
leaching of zinc from zinc-containing alloys), denickelification (selective leaching
of nickel from nickel-containing alloys), and graphitic corrosion (gray cast iron in
which the metallic constituents are selectively leached). Dealloying might be pre-
vented by selecting more resistant alloys, controlling the selective leaching, sacri-
ficial anode/cathodic protection.
Basically, the idea is to detect the mechanism and causative agents of the degrada-
tion and reduce them or completely prevent them from occurring. Let us have a
look on some of them as given below.
1.5.2 Coatings
Coatings are generally good option to insulate the metals from exterior aggressive
environments. They extend a lengthy protection in wider spectrum of corrosive
conditions, atmospheric to aqueous electrolyte solution. Although they provide
no structural strength, yet they protect the strength and integrity of a structure.
Their function is that of a physical barrier preventing electrolytic attack on metal.
Organic coatings like paints, resins, lacquers, and varnishes are the most popular
protective coatings. Metallic coating (noble or cathodic and sacrificial or anodic)
is also used for corrosion control.
1.0 mm Hg. When kept in the vicinity of the metal to be protected, they sub-
lime and condense in enclosed spaces [31]. For example, phenylthiourea and
cyclohexylamine chromate are used for protecting brass. Dicyclohexylamine
nitrite protects both ferrous and nonferrous metals/alloys.
ii) Inorganic inhibitors
Some metal ions like Pb2+, Mn2+, and Cd2+ deposit on the iron surface in
acidic environment [32]. Even Br− and I− inhibit corrosion in strongly acidic
solutions [33]. As2O3 and Sb2O3are also corrosion inhibitors in acidic media.
These substances form a metal oxide layer and increase the hydrogen over-
voltage to reduce the corrosion rate.
iii) Organic inhibitors
It includes large number of organic substances containing N, S, or O atoms in
the molecule. Organic inhibitors possess a functional group as the reaction
center for the adsorption process. They have heteroatoms like N, S, and O in
their structures. The molecular structures majorly influence the extent of
inhibition of corrosion.
References
1 Van Delinder, L.S. and deS, A. (1984). Brasunas, Corrosion basics: An introduction.
Houston, TX: NACE.
2 ISO 8044:1999 (2000). Corrosion of metals and alloys -Basic terms and definitions.
Brussels: International Organization for Standardization.
3 Veronika, K.B. (2008). Knowledge about metals in the first century. Korroz. Figy.
48: 133–137.
4 Fontana, M.G. (1986). Corrosion Engineering, 3rde. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5 Uhlig, H.H. (1949). The cost of corrosion in United States. Chem. Eng. News. 27:
2764–2767.
6 Bennet, L.H., Kruger, J., Parker, R.I. et al. (1978). Economic effects of metallic
corrosion in the united states. Washington, DC: National bureau of standards
(Special Publication).
7 Koch, G.H., Brongers, M.P.H., Thompson, N.G. et al. (2002). Corrosion costs and
preventive strategies in the united states. Mater. Perform. (Supplement). 42: 3–11.
8 Wei, H., Wang, Y., Guo, J. et al. (2015). Advanced micro/nanocapsules for self-
healing smart anticorrosion coatings. J. Mater. Chem. A. 3: 469–480.
9 Haque, J., Srivastava, V., Verma, C., and Quraishi, M.A. (2016). Experimental and
quantum chemical analysis of 2-amino-3-((4-((S)-2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)-
1H-imidazol-2-yl)thio) propionic acid as new and green corrosion inhibitor for
mild steel in 1 M hydrochloric acid solutions. J. Mol. Liq. 225: 848–855.
10 Engineering 360 powered by Global Spec, 2016, Annual Global Cost of Corrosion:
$2.5 Trillion. http://insights.globalspec.com/article/2340/annual-global-cost-of-
corrosion-2-5 trillion.
11 Bhaskaran, R., Bhalla, L., Rahman, A. et al. (2014). An analysis of the updated
cost of corrosion in India. Mater. Perform. 53: 56–65.
12 International Measures of Prevention, Application, and Economics of Corrosion
Technologies Study (2016). Report No. OAPUS310GKOCH (PP110272)-1 Report
prepared by DNV GL U.S.A., Dublin, Ohio and APQC, Houston, TX.
13 Roberge, P.R. (2008). Corrosion engineering principles and practice. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
14 Leygraf, C., Wallinder, I.O., Tidblad, J., and Graedel, T. (2000). Atmospheric
Corrosion, 2nde. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15 Burstein, G.T., Liu, C., Souto, R.M., and Vines, S.P. (2004). Origin of pitting
corrosion. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 39: 25–30.
16 Deshpande, K.B. (2010). Experimental investigation of galvanic corrosion:
comparison between SVET and immersion techniques. Corros. Sci. 52:
2819–2826.
17 Tada, E., Sugawara, K., and Kaneko, H. (2003). Distribution of pH during
galvanic corrosion of a Zn/steel couple. Electrochim. Acta. 49: 1019–1026.
18 Souto, R.M., Gonzalez-Garcia, Y., Bastos, A.C., and Simoes, A.M. (2007).
Investigating corrosion processes in the micrometric range: a SVET study of the
galvanic corrosion of zinc coupled with iron. Corros. Sci. 49: 4568–4580.
19 Sedriks, J. (1990). Corrosion testing made easy: Stress corrosion cracking test
methods. Houston: NACE.
20 Turnbull, A. (1992). Test methods for environment assisted cracking. Br. Corros.
J. 27: 271–289.
21 Cherepakhova, G.L., Shreider, A.V., and Charikova, G.P. (1970). Use of galvanized
carbon steel tubes in equipment for condensing and cooling. Chem. Pet. Eng. 6:
490–492.
22 Martin, J.H. (2006). Concise encyclopedia of the structure of materials, 1ste. Elsevier.
23 Erbing Falkland, M.L. (2000). Duplex stainless steels. In: Uhlig’s Corrosion
Handbook, 2ee (ed. R. Winston). New York: Wiley.
24 Grubb, J.F., DeBold, T., and Fritz, J.D. (2005). Corrosion of Wrought Stainless
Steels. In: Corrosion: Materials, ASM Handbook, vol. 13B (eds. S.D. Cramer and
B.S. Covino Jr.). Materials Park, OH: ASM International.
25 Bregman, J.I. (1963). Corrosion Inhibitors, 1ste. New York: The MacMillan Co.
26 Eldredge, G.G. and Warner, J.C. (1948). Corrosion inhibitors. In: H.H. Uhlig’s The
Corrosion Handbook (ed. S. Papavinasam), 1021–1032. New York: Wiley.
27 Nathan, C.C. (1973). Corrosion Inhibitors. Houston, Texas: National Association
of Corrosion Engineers (NACE).
28 Putilova, N., Balezin, S.A., and Barannik, V.P. (1966). Metallic Corrosion
Inhibitors. London: Pergamon Press.
29 Brooke, M. (1962). Chemical Inhibitors Checklist. London: Chemical Engineering,
Pergamon Press.
30 Ranney, M.W. (1976). Inhibitors—Manufacture and Technology. New Jersey:
Noyes Data Corporation.
31 Riggs, O.L. (1973). Theoretical aspects of corrosion inhibitors and inhibition. In:
Corrosion Inhibitors (ed. C.C. Nathan). Houston, TX: NACE International.
32 Poling, G.W. (1967). Infrared studies of protective films formed by acetylinic
corrosion inhibitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 114: 1209–1214.
33 Hausler, R.H. (1979). Corrosion Chemistry. ACS Symp. Ser. 89: 263.
34 Bockris, J.O.M. and Khan, S.U.M. (1993). Surface Electrochemistry: A Molecular
Level Approach. New York: Springer US, Plenum Press.
35 Kirk, R.E. and Othmer, D.F. (1979). Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Wiley.
2.1 Introduction
This explains why utmost materials that are in maximum production and help
to build society are metals and hence much susceptible to corrosion [8, 9]. They
make strong structures to constitute a great economy. From the very early time, it
was presumed that the structures made from metals and its alloys are long lasting
for hundreds of years. But they deteriorate as time passes. This takes so much
dead full and dangerous form to those large-scale industrial plants, like chemical
processing, and electrical power plants shut down as a result of corrosion. All
these enhance the problems in economy and lead to losses in many ways.
The percentage of corrosion happened and damage caused by it can be moni-
tored at time before it starts happening by the application of multiple techniques.
The main purpose of monitoring corrosion is done because it helps to know the
working state of equipment or predicting remaining life of materials and to know
locations where defect is occurring, getting good service conditions, specific rem-
edies, and corrosion rates with variables. By knowing all these parameters, we can
easily administer corrosion control schemes [10–12]. The key role for corrosion to
happen or not can be decided by environments. We can understand the term envi-
ronment as the integrated surrounding in contact with the metallic structures.
Some basic points to keep in mind before describing environments are its physical
state (gas, liquid, or solid), chemical composition, constituents, pH, presence of
impurities, ions present, temperature, and velocity [13]. So for corrosion to hap-
pen, we have to study two components like materials and environments. Further
when corrosion is discussed, it is important to think of a combination of a mate-
rial and an environment. On the other hand, the aggressiveness of an environ-
ment cannot be considered without taking metal into consideration. In short, we
can surely say that the corrosion performance of the metallic structure can be
calculated on to which it is subjected, and the aggressiveness of a surrounding/
environment built upon on the material exposed to that environment. Various
agencies are engaged to calculate the cost of corrosion in different countries
including USA, UK, Australia, Japan, Germany, Finland, Kuwait, Sweden, China,
and India. The most common thing among all countries finding is that annually
cost of corrosion aligned in between 1 and 5% of the gross national product of
each country.
Latest report characterizes direct and indirect corrosion cost of metallic struc-
tures in the United States, where total direct (infrastructure – $22.6 billion,
utilities – $47.9 billion, transportation – $29.7 billion, production and manufac-
turing – $17.6 billion, government – $20.1 billion, total – $137.9 billion) and
Thefeatures
boy who likes to play games in which the lead soldier and other
of imitation warfare have a part, can make his own lead
soldiers, and other castings, by the use of a plaster-of-Paris mold. If
he cannot undertake this work alone, the process is interesting for
his older brother, or even for “daddy.” A mold of plaster of Paris, as
shown in the illustration, is used for the casting box. The hollow
impression of the soldier is filled with the molten lead, which is
poured in through the sprue hole at the top. When the lead cools, the
mold is opened, the casting removed, and the process repeated. An
entire army can thus be made with a single mold.
First obtain a small lead soldier, and coat it with shellac. Make a
box somewhat larger than the pattern for the soldier, as shown in the
sketch. Make it about 1¹⁄₂ in. deep, and set bolts near the corners, as
shown, pouring the plaster around them. Fill the box half full of
plaster of Paris. While still soft, press the pattern into the center of
the plaster so that half its thickness is imbedded. Permit the under
mold to dry, and remove the pattern. Shellac the surface of the
plaster and the impression. Wrap a layer of oiled paper around the
bolts. Replace the pattern in the impression and fill the remaining
half of the box with plaster, and permit it to dry.
Also make a small wooden plug, and set it in the center, its point
touching the pattern, and pour the plaster around it. When the mold
is dry remove this plug, thus forming the sprue hole, through which
the molten lead is poured into the mold.
Lead Soldiers, and Many Other Small Castings, can be Made by the Use of
This Plaster-of-Paris Mold
When the second part of the mold is dry, lift it carefully from the
under mold, and remove the pattern. Shellac the surface of the top
mold, cleaning away any small bits of plaster around the edges. Trim
down the box so that the top mold projects over it about ³⁄₈ in.,
making it easy to drop the top mold into place over the bolts. To use
the mold, make certain that it is clean inside and set the top into
place. Fasten down the wing nuts at the washers. Be very careful
that the mold is dry, as hot metal poured on a wet surface may cause
a dangerous splash. Repeat this process, and if care is taken about
300 castings can be made with one mold. The soldiers can be
painted suitably and even sold in sets. The process can be adapted
to many forms of other small castings, using other suitable metals, or
wax, where the casting is to be molded into shape further.
A Trap Nest for the Poultry House
The Trap Nest Automatically Closes as the Hen Enters the Nest Box,
Releasing the Trigger
Poultry raisers find a trap nest useful, and one can be made
quickly by fitting an old packing box with a suitable sliding gate. In
the arrangement shown, the gate is raised slightly as the hen enters
the nest box, releasing the spring and causing the gate to drop. The
gate and spring can be adjusted to various-sized breeds of poultry.
The two grooved uprights can be cut from flooring and the other
wooden parts made from laths or wooden strips. The trigger is made
of wire.—A. J. Call, Hartsville, Mass.
A Simple Wireless Detector
This Neat Wireless Detector was Made of Materials Easily Gathered in the
Boy’s Workshop